US Instances of Voter Fraud (Megathread?) - Probably a good idea to have a thread on this given how often it's discussed and will continue to be discussed even after November.

[Ebonic Tutor]

some Indian named doctore PH.D from MIT basically discovered what an algorithm does in Michigan.

basically, the more a precint votes red, the more votes it takes from Trump and gives to Biden.

he found a linear relationship that is absolutely not found under any natural circustance.

easy to digest video, rate me late if I am so.

Apparently an algorithm gives a fraction of the numbers around from individual voters as it gets heavier with straight ticket republican voters to Biden.

 

[Quioui]

I've come across an interesting video from a mathematician regarding Biden's vote in Chicago and Benford's law. As Chicago precincts are made to each be about the same small size and with Dem getting most of the vote you get a normal distribution (ie not a good data set to apply Benford's law to, it needs numbers with varying orders of magnitude, meaning numbers with differents length)

You can jump at 6:30 to skip explanation about Benford's law

 

[MrJokerRager]

Having read these links, I'm going to (rhetorically) ask again:
To the leftists and Biden simps, and to the Antifatards and burn loot murders: Either you love the pedophile or you don't. Doesn't make a difference really. Why do so many of these people think/believe/whatever that Biden is on their side and will carry out "The will of the American People??"
He won't.
And if it EVER in wet dreams or fantasyland turned out that the democratic party INDEED DID steal this election...why don't you want to know? Are you afraid it's because the mask will fly off and you'll all be rounded up to happy friendship and tolerance camp? SPOILER: You will anyway. Read over in Articles and News right now. Pedophile and Brown Dicksmoker are through with all useful idiots...just like you were warned.
Over
And Over
And Over
Ad Nauseum.

Same thing to Trump simps and republitards: Same message. Why would ANYONE NOT WANT to know whether their president won fair and square and whether their party of choice is willing to throw you ALL under the bus the minute it suits them?
Instead of everyone TARDING out "HURR DURR TWUMP LOSS--get ovarr it HURR DURR" Everyone should wake the goddamn fuck up and turn your anger/frustration/whatever right where it needs to be.

Since when does the media call the president? I'm middle aged, and this has to be the first presidential zoo I've seen where CNN and Huffington Paint decides to crown who they deem the lord and savior while flinging shit because--what--the incumbent president asks for a recount (as is his legal right--Annnnd has been done by many others without this much shit flinging and character assassination??)

Antifa and Burn Loot Murder better straighten the hell up. Sleepy Joe and Copmala ain't their friends. They just might find theirselves screeching for mercy and assistance from the rest of us.

Sit and spin. This is your new world order.

If you read the election thread in deep thoughts, we Trump simps are on the warpath with regards to the voter fraud allegations as Cocaine Mitch has ordered the GOP establishment to aid Trump.

As for the Biden support among far leftists, I believe it was a hatred of Trump more than love of Biden. If Biden wins the legal battles assuming Trump does not activate the nuclear option, then they will be forgotten just as liberals went to sleep during the Obama era. There is a high chance Biden and Kamala will crack down harder so there is an illusion of stability.

 

[fam]

"It Defies Logic": Scientist Finds Telltale Signs Of Election Fraud After Analyzing Mail-In Ballot Data​

The data they are using here provides four relevant columns: the timestamp, the total number of votes, and the cumulative D and R vote shares.

How do you get the vote shares of each "batch"? Multiply the total votes by the shares to get D and R votes, and take the difference from the previous row.

The problem is that the cumulative vote shares in the data set are only accurate to a tenth of a percent. For a majority of the batches, where the difference is too small to affect the cumulative shares, the batch share is basically impossible to determine, and it ends up defaulting to the cumulative share.

The "anomalies" are all just shifts in the cumulative share.

 

[Blubbles]

I found a User Manuel for the Dominion Voting System

Link

Since this is a government website and publication it shouldn't legally be taken down.

THe Company Name is Dominion Systems. There are allegations of links to prominent democrats (pelosi) but even if these are substantiated I don't believe that anyone who owned these would dare risk thier investment over someone else's political ambitions. If Pelosi had gone and manipulated the Machines and got caught she would go to jail and loose all her money. That being said there is an interesting disclaimer that these machines should not be hooked up to the internet. Now there is an allegation that they were hooked up to the internet in Michigan but this is wholly unconfirmed, if they are then that would mean that the machines are compromised and a hand recount is needed (I belive there should be a hand recount in Michigan anyway because of the mistake of both the council member loosing then winning and the 5k votes for Trump that got switched to Biden.)

Now there is also some interesting built in features such as weighted races and such. I don't mean this as conspiratorial because I think you would have to be incredibly stupid to change those settings but I dont know. Just out of curiosity, does anyone have any idea why you would want weighted races? Are dominion machines used in other things as well?

 

[Aidan]

Apparently an algorithm gives a fraction of the numbers around from individual voters as it gets heavier with straight ticket republican voters to Biden.

View attachment 1722112

To be clear and maybe I'm late, but they did not confirm any actual algorithm. They identified a correlation that takes places in 3/4 of the most populated counties in Michigan. Due to the nature of the correlation and how consistent it is in those 3 counties, it implies that a single algorithm can describe all 3 counties' votes which is suspect.

This is a really fun video that at least shows you data and explains things so you can come up with your own explanation. They only present the data and acknowledge it's suspicious.
Reposting the video for convenience.

To summarize the chart real quick and explain the trend for those who don't want to watch 30 minutes of some random engineer pajeet....
x axis - % of the precinct that's republican
y axis - % of voters who voted Trump relative to what's expected

Basically, you'd expect most people who vote Trump to vote straight Republican for the most part. People who vote only Trump but not Republican would put the precinct above the red line and people don't vote Trump but presumably voted Republican overall would put it below the line. Technically it's based on the estimated Republican % of each precinct which I'm not sure how they figured, though I don't argue it since it's probably not that far off to matter and could be based off of exit polls or just historical data.

Anyway, look at the pic (check video or post I'm replying to), you can see that essentially, the more Republican a precinct is estimated to be, the more likely it was NOT to vote for Trump. When the expectation is, it should be a generally flat line and hovering around the 0% mark. That would mean most Republicans voted Trump as well as for other Republicans.

It definitely raises questions and it'd be nice if we could get a single source (eg 1 organization's polling data) and then plot the precincts for other controversial areas and some "stable" areas to compare the results. If this show keeps on running into December and I remember when I get time I'll do it, but who knows what can happen between now and then...

I've come across an interesting video from a mathematician regarding Biden's vote in Chicago and Benford's law. As Chicago precincts are made to each be about the same small size and with Dem getting most of the vote you get a normal distribution (ie not a good data set to apply Benford's law to, it needs numbers with varying orders of magnitude, meaning numbers with differents length)

You can jump at 6:30 to skip explanation about Benford's law

Quick rundown of this video.
Benford's law is not necessarily applicable to election data and is actually quite contentious but using data to check if what should be random is in fact, not random, may be able to help. He shows how even that can be misleading at times and basically finishes saying that the numbers may seem unusual when looked at one way, but that should only mean further evaluation before jumping to fraud. Buy his book at the link below.

Numberphile, Dr James Grime (singingbanana), and a couple others have Benford Law explanation videos from years ago that are good.

 

[Affluent Reptilian]

Thread this is from, which includes a link to the data source: https://twitter.com/DataRepublican/status/1326328001705865216

I find this stuff more convincing than a lot of the witness testimony - it gives you a higher-level look and is less subject to the flaws of human perception.

 

[Palpatine]

So besides the affidavits that are being thrown around on twitter, are there any actual open cases or investigations?

Looks like no federal agency can be trusted to do the investigation now. All the investigation will likely come from discovery in the ongoing court cases.

 

[AnOminous]

THe Company Name is Dominion Systems. There are allegations of links to prominent democrats (pelosi) but even if these are substantiated I don't believe that anyone who owned these would dare risk thier investment over someone else's political ambitions.

Literally every voting machine company is shady as fuck.

 

[knobslobbin]

some chan sperging about how the dominion glitch works

 

[Palpatine]

some chan sperging about how the dominion glitch works
View attachment 1722698

You don't need 4chan sperges for this. Dominion manual literally tells you to manually clear testing data before switching to production environment. In other words, you can conjure up some ballots in testing environment and "forget" to clear them before switching back to production.

 

[Ctrl+Alt+Rt]

I found a User Manuel for the Dominion Voting System

Link

Now there is also some interesting built in features such as weighted races and such. I don't mean this as conspiratorial because I think you would have to be incredibly stupid to change those settings but I dont know. Just out of curiosity, does anyone have any idea why you would want weighted races? Are dominion machines used in other things as well?

What page is that on?

View attachment 1722301

Thread this is from, which includes a link to the data source: https://twitter.com/DataRepublican/status/1326328001705865216

I find this stuff more convincing than a lot of the witness testimony - it gives you a higher-level look and is less subject to the flaws of human perception.

Unless, of course, you want to concede that Republicans committed fraud too on that basis:

For example:

 

[Evilronald]

Just an FYI for anyone who might not know this: never talk to the police. Ever. Especially not without a lawyer. Got to do a “come on man” when he doesn’t see through this obvious glow-in-the-dark postal inspector. He worked in airforce intelligence, he’s part of the deep state.

 

[Noideawhattopick]

So defcon in 2019 looked into several voting machines including dominion on page 18
Document link:

https://media.defcon.org/DEF%20CON%2027/voting-village-report-defcon27.pdf

Flash drive containing a simple .xml drive with option to change votes

Guess what happened?

https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2020/11/06/milwaukee-election-flash-drive/

 

[Free Dick Pills]

{...}

jesus what an absolute retard.

Yesterday I'd given him the benefit of the doubt and not assumed that O'Keefe sensationalized another nothing burger... but god damnit.
Anything that COULD have come out of the story is now in jeopardy since this galaxy brain
a) didn't lawyer up - even after being made aware of his right to do so
b) signed the form preemptively, that waives any claims of coercion
c) actually fucking goes on to recant his original affidavit [1:17:48]
d) states clearly that all of this is voluntary

I just can't anymore.
fuck Project Veritas

edit:
To any halfway sane person (putting partisanship aside) reviewing this, the raw tapes are actually quite the self-own and not the great win that O'Keefe would've imagined. Sad.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Evidence suggests several state Senate candidates were plants funded by dark money​

Evidence suggests several state Senate candidates were plants funded …

archived 11 Nov 2020 22:49:45 UTC

archive.is

MIAMI – Why would candidates for Florida Senate seats do no campaigning, no fundraising, have no issue platforms, nor make any effort to get votes?

Local 10 News has found evidence to suggest three such candidates in three Florida Senate district races, two of them in Miami Dade County, were shill candidates whose presence in the races were meant to syphon votes from Democratic candidates.

Comparisons of the no-party candidates' public campaign records show similarities and connections that suggest they are all linked by funding from the same dark money donors, and part of an elaborate scheme to upset voting patterns.

In one of those races, District 37, a recount is underway because the spread between the Democratic and Republican candidates is only 31 votes. The third party candidate received more than 6300 votes.

That third party candidate is Alexis Rodriguez, who has the same last name as the Democratic incumbent senator Jose Javier Rodriguez. The Republican challenger is Ileana Garcia.


Alexis Rodriguez falsified his address on his campaign filing form last June. The couple who now live at the Palmetto Bay address say they have been repeatedly harassed since then by people looking for Rodriguez, who hadn’t lived there in five years.

Local 10 visited Rodriguez’s place of business Tuesday, where Rodriguez lied about his identity. Pretending to be a business partner, Rodriguez shed little light on his sudden candidacy in the District 37 race and lack of fundraising or campaigning.

Local 10 began investigating Rodriguez’s candidacy because of a hunch by Executive Producer Natalie Morera de Varona last month. She was collecting candidates' headshots for election broadcast graphics and was curious why a candidate was nowhere to be found, not returning phone calls.

A search of campaign documents filed by Rodriguez led to a money trail and campaign finance connections with other no-party third candidates in Florida Senate District 9 in Central Florida, and District 39 in Miami-Dade.


The District 39 candidate is 81-year-old Celso Alfonso, a retiree who named the woman he calls his wife as campaign treasurer. She owns a day spa, and the home where we found Alfonso Tuesday afternoon.

He, too, lied about his identity at first, and finally admitted to being the candidate.

Alfonso claimed he had a lifelong dream to be in public service. He said he filed on his own, that no one assisted him.

A comparison of candidates Alfonso and Rodriguez show unusual similarities.

Both filed as No Party Affiliated candidates, yet both had recently been registered Republicans.

Both qualified as candidate on the same day, June 12, 2020, by paying a qualifying fee.

Both listed Gmail addresses with identical patterns: first initial, last name and district number and 2020.

Both list one single contribution to their campaign; both contributions are $2000 self-loans, presumably to pay the filing fee.

Both candidates' support appears to come from the same Political Action Committee, “Our Florida” - that have no previous political contributions or expenditures listed. It is the PAC that paid for campaign fliers for the candidates, all done by the same Clermont, Florida mail house, Advance Impressions.


Celso Alfonso gave conflicting answers about campaign fliers, first claiming there were none, then claiming his own campaign paid for them, though that expenditure is not listed in his campaign finance report. An unlisted campaign expenditure could be a campaign finance violation.

That $370,000 PAC expenditure to the printing house on Oct. 5 is the sole expenditure of “Our Florida”. And the PAC’s only contributor is an entity called Proclivity, whose $370,000 contribution is listed two days earlier.

Proclivity lists an address that traces back to a mailbox in a UPS Store in Atlanta.

Florida law allows the group to keep people behind its money private.

Local 10 News could not locate any businesses registered in Florida or Georgia under the name Proclivity.

The end of the money trail leaves no information on who is ultimately funding at least three candidates for Florida Senate who did no campaigning and no fundraising, whose presence in the race might have recalculated the number of voters who cast votes for the Democrats in the race.


Alex Rodriguez received 3% of the D37 vote, more than 6300 votes. The race, currently in recount, has a margin of .02 between the Democrat incumbent and Republican challenger.

The race for D39 was decided by 12.3 percent, a large enough margin to make Celso Alfonso’s 1.5 percent of the vote moot.

Copyright 2020 by WPLG Local10.com - All rights reserved.

@Hollywood Hulk Hogan rejoice, now your side can complain about fraudulent shenanigans too!

 

[teriyakiburns]

signed the form preemptively, that waives any claims of coerci

A form signed under duress can't be held as valid.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

 

[Palpatine]

View attachment 1723276

Nah, Dr.Shiva is a known lolcow. He's too hung up on the whole "inventor of email" bullshit.

 

[assdick42069]

View attachment 1723276

He's right wing Brianna Wu except an even worse liar. I'm surprised he doesn't have a thread here, but it's a blessing in disguise since he'd file a lolsuit if he did