2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[CrystalHead]

Where's he stream? Google and DuckDuckGo are both being unhelpful in different ways.

He streams on his YouTube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/c/PeoplesPunditDaily

I don't know if he actually will be streaming tonight though.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

PA destroyed all their ballot envelopes. All the evidence of fraud is gone.

Giuliani is going to try to get those ballots thrown out because they can't be certified because the evidence to certify them has gone and there were no Republican observers present to see it 'and in some cases no Democrat observers either'.

If the poll workers were opening the security envelopes and discarding them then the votes are not legal.

It'll be like I said, Mail-in ballots would normally have a 20-30% rejection rate. The Democrats panicky fuckery on election night is going to push that way up.

 

[Puff]

Aren't those envelopes supposed to be kept for a period of two years? If they destroyed them, that will result in a pretty big challenge to the legitimacy of the ballots counted.

And they allegedly destroyed all spoiled ballots in Philly too. Which are intended to be kept for the same reasons.

 

[Irritable Bowel Syndrome]

The opposite. They just disobeyed a direct order from the supreme court and then publicly destroyed any chance of their being able to walk back that disobedience. PA is completely and utterly fucked when the supreme court takes the case. The state legislature will likely pick the electors now.

Lol implying the Supreme Court of rapists will ever bother doing their jobs.

 

[Swerf'n'Terf]

A critique of the employment of Benford's law with election data:

The first piece of text that appears on screen is taken from Wikipedia.
The post-election edited version. Including the non-word 'problematical'.

Haven't finished watching yet but that immediately strains his credibility.

 

[Gehenna]

Lol what? 270 isn't a magic number, it's whoever has the most electors. It's if the College and the Senate fail to figure out who has the most votes that it goes to the house delegation.

It is, in fact, the magic number. We base our elections on a MAJORITY not a PLURALITY.

Legally, if no one gets 270, it goes to congress.

Look up the 1824 election, it's happened.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

One could argue that there is now no chain of custody. For the entire vote.

What does this mean? That they can't prosecute now?

 

[Tomboy Respecter]

So it's over?

It basically means Trump already won his case in Pensylvannia. Look up spoileration.

 

[Gehenna]

What does this mean? That they can't prosecute now?

Chain of custody is required for a vote to be considered valid. If the chain is broken, those votes are invalid.


They fucked themselves harder.

 

[There'll be another time]

If they actually did that it's an absolutely fucking retarded play.

 

[Pocket Dragoon]

I know that sounds glowie, but you can't stage a coup with just journalists and a load of soyboys/troons/dangerhairs. I don't know exactly what to expect, but I would be amazed if there wasn't people with guns who would be willing to enforce the democratic/msm/globalist coup.

Edit: I suppose you could leave the guns behind if you would are confident that the judiciary will rule in your favour.

When Trump won in 2016, everyone started digging & burning up their stashes, it was cathartic at first; but I always tried to remind people that it wasn't a good idea use up their strategic reserves during the first four years. Because Murphy is a fucking dick.

People got far too complacent, too quickly; along with some serious short-term memory loss.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

Chain of custody is required for a vote to be considered valid. If the chain is broken, those votes are invalid.


They fucked themselves harder.

In that case, then thank god these dumb bastards burned them.
I'm both loving and hating the emotional whiplash all this has given me.

 

[Tomboy Respecter]

PA destroyed all their ballot envelopes. All the evidence of fraud is gone.

1) That's pants-on head retarded on PA's end.
2) Source?

 

[Puff]

If they actually did that it's an absolutely fucking retarded play.

Or a big dick move. "I dare you to throw out 20% of the ballots"

 

[Gehenna]

In that case, then thank god these dumb bastards burned them.
I'm both loving and hating the emotional whiplash all this has given me.

This is why they are required to maintain the envelopes for 2 years, in case any investigation occurs into the votes it ensures chain of custody was maintained. This was -monumentally- stupid.

Or a big dick move. "I dare you to throw out 20% of the ballots"

Not even ROBERTS can defend this.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Lol what? 270 isn't a magic number, it's whoever has the most electors. It's if the College and the Senate fail to figure out who has the most votes that it goes to the house delegation.

270 is the magic number because it's not who has the most, it's who has over 50%, where 50% is 269. If both candidates have below 270, even if one has more than the other, it goes to a contingent election.

Giuliani is going to try to get those ballots thrown out because they can't be certified because the evidence to certify them has gone and there were no Republican observers present to see it 'and in some cases no Democrat observers either'.

If the poll workers were opening the security envelopes and discarding them then the votes are not legal.

It'll be like I said, Mail-in ballots would normally have a 20-30% rejection rate. The Democrats panicky fuckery on election night is going to push that way up.

Destruction of evidence is not handled lightly when it comes to any other crime and should not be treated like a "oh, the evidence is destroyed, oh well" here either.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

The ancient Romans thought of actors as the lowest tier of society (below prostitutes) only because they never met a journalist

For a prostitute to be as low of scum as a journo, the prostitute would have to constantly self-promote themselves as a caste upholding freedom, while refusing to put out for clients who specifically pay for sex.
Even then hookers still come out as more honorable because there simply can't be the level of gaslighting and brain-washing that journos inflict.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

McEnany gives an efficient sound bit on a case about ballot curing. Even where ballot curing is legal it is not illegal to treat Republican and Democrat ballots differently because it violates the Equal Protection clause. It's also not legal to open the ballots before election day. There's an affidavit saying the poll workers did ballot curing in areas that tended Democrat but not ones that tended Republican and may have open the ballots before election day.

I'll upload the stream Fairbanks did that recorded GA election officials instructing to only seek out Democrats for ballot curing if someone can tell me how to upload a 210MB MP4.

PA destroyed all their ballot envelopes. All the evidence of fraud is gone.

I still need a news source on that one, and the original allegation (or, the one I'm aware of) was re: Philadelphia.

The first piece of text that appears on screen is taken from Wikipedia.
The post-election edited version. Including the non-word 'problematical'.

Haven't finished watching yet but that immediately strains his credibility.

Actually, he's referring to the paper proper-- from his comment in the comment section:

 

[Meat Target]

Chain of custody is required for a vote to be considered valid. If the chain is broken, those votes are invalid.


They fucked themselves harder.

But how will they know which ballots to invalidate?

For a prostitute to be as low of scum as a journo, the prostitute would have to constantly self-promote themselves as a caste upholding freedom, while not only refusing to put out for clients who specifically pay for sex.
Even then hookers still come out as more honorable because there simply can't be the level of gaslighting and brain-washing that journos inflict.

Hell, pimps and drug dealers have more honor than journoswine.

 

[Corn Flakes]

A critique of the employment of Benford's law with election data:

Nothing against the guy's analysis but I'm pretty sure we're past Benford's law already.

Particularly when it comes to that subject, I think people really should keep in mind the difference between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. Benford's law is at most cirucmstantial evidence. It's an indirect indication that something may have happened. If someone walks into a building with a wet umbrella and wet shoes, you could postulate that it's raining outside and be reasonably certain of it, but until you look outside or the person tells you that it's raining outside (which would be direct evidence), all you have is circumstantial evidence.

Benford's law is a statistical thing. It can be used to justify an investigation, but if the investigation finds no evidence of wrongdoing then the statistical anomaly was just that: an anomaly. It's like saying "90% of buildings are built according to code". That's a perfectly fine assessment. But you can only know for certain whether an individual building was built up to code if you sent an inspector to check it.