- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
Just cause they are a cow don't mean they are ignorant. See Terry Davis.
US Instances of Voter Fraud (Megathread?) - Probably a good idea to have a thread on this given how often it's discussed and will continue to be discussed even after November.
- Thread starter muh_moobs
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Just cause they are a cow don't mean they are ignorant. See Terry Davis.
Blubbles
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
Twitch Video
Found this on Parler. Allegedly its an interview with a formoer Dominion Employee who specalizes in Cyber Security. There is a person who goes by thie womans name living in the Southeast Michigan Area but I didn't bother to find out anything more about it. She also
Here is another story about Philly. I think its been posted but I just thought I'd remind everyone.
Link
Archive
Also here is an interview I found that was posted on Twitch from yesterday that interviews an alleged former Dominion Employee. She claims to specialize in Cyber Security (Which would mean she is both smart and hot, a bad combination). I looked her up and there is a lady going by her name who lives in the Detroit area (She is specifically talking about stuff going on in Detroit)
Interview
I have a downloaded copy but wont upload it unless this one gets banned or something.
Found this on Parler. Allegedly its an interview with a formoer Dominion Employee who specalizes in Cyber Security. There is a person who goes by thie womans name living in the Southeast Michigan Area but I didn't bother to find out anything more about it. She also
Here is another story about Philly. I think its been posted but I just thought I'd remind everyone.
Link
Archive
Also here is an interview I found that was posted on Twitch from yesterday that interviews an alleged former Dominion Employee. She claims to specialize in Cyber Security (Which would mean she is both smart and hot, a bad combination). I looked her up and there is a lady going by her name who lives in the Detroit area (She is specifically talking about stuff going on in Detroit)
Interview
I have a downloaded copy but wont upload it unless this one gets banned or something.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2020
How naive of you to assume it WON'T get deleted. Upload it anyway.
One of the golden rules in this place is ARCHIVE EVERYTHING! Between Twitter and YouTube, shit related to the election and voting fraud gets hidden/deleted left and right, what makes you think Twitch doesn't have the same agenda?
WhimsicalTrolli
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
Yeah...the interview was a nothing burger since he said "he assumed" he heard something.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
Thanks for Obvious Coprorate & Backroom Cabal should of just fired him instead of being fag . Being openly retrubution from not following the narrative.
Last edited by a moderator:
WhimsicalTrolli
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
View attachment 1723567
Thanks for Obvious Coprorate & Backroom Cabal should of just fired him instead of being fag . Being openly retrubution from not following the narrative.
The fact Richard talked without having a lawyer
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
True & Look here another person about to be black bagged & DeBankedThe fact Richard talked without having a lawyer
Edit : sorry not providomg the link.
Attorney seeking Trump votes asks for unlawful video of Arizona poll worker be part of case
Attorney seeking Trump votes asks for unlawful video of Arizona poll worker be part of case
By Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services Nov 11, 2020 Updated 8 hrs ago
By Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services
PHOENIX — The question of whether the Trump campaign gets a chance to try to prove the president actually got more votes than have been tallied — and ultimately whether he gets Arizona’s 11 electoral votes — could depend on a video taken illegally in a polling center.
Attorney Kory Langhofer told Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Kiley on Tuesday he has a video of a poll worker “doing it wrong.” And that, he said, backs up the contention of Trump and the state and national Republican committees that there are votes that were not properly recorded, some of which they believe would benefit GOP candidates.
Langhofer, who represents the Trump reelection committee and the state and national Republican parties, was careful to say that neither he nor his clients authorized the video.
“I wouldn’t have signed off on it,” he said.
“But now that it exists and it shows the poll worker pressing the green button, that’s relevant evidence,” Langhofer said. “And I don’t see why it’s not admissible.”
But Assistant Maricopa County Attorney Tom Liddy noted it’s a crime to take videos or photos inside a polling place. That, he told Kiley, makes its use by Langhofer in the case illegal.
All this comes amid efforts by the president’s campaign committee and the GOP to find more votes for Trump.
The most recent figures have the president trailing Democrat Joe Biden, but by fewer than 13,000 votes. With fewer than 47,000 left to be tabulated, Trump would need to pick up close to two out of every three remaining to take the lead.
He has done that well in some rural counties. But most of the uncounted votes are in Maricopa and Pima counties. And while day-of voting even there has tended to favor the president, the margins have not matched what the he needs to overtake Biden.
In fact the update from Pima County on Tuesday afternoon, the first since last week, gave Trump just 50.6% of the 7,142 votes tallied, against 46.9% for Biden.
And the most recent Maricopa County addition of 5,291 votes late Tuesday swung 56.4% for Trump and 41.8% for Biden.
Those kinds of results could make the outcome of this litigation — and whether some ballots go through a hand count to look for unrecorded votes — crucial to who wins Arizona.
Langhofer says that “up to thousands” of Maricopa County voters had their ballots rejected by automatic tabulation devices as polling centers. This can occur due to everything from stray marks on the ballot to “over voting,” meaning filling in too many ovals in any particular race.
He said these voters should have been given a choice of either submitting a new ballot or putting the one they filled out into a special tray where it would be further examined by hand to determine what was the true intent of the voter. Instead, he alleges, poll workers induced voters to “press the green button” on the tabulator, meaning the ballot would be submitted without manual review — and any races affected by an overvote or other defect would not be counted.
And that’s where the video could prove relevant, showing Kiley how the problem occurred.
Liddy, however, pointed out it is a misdemeanor to take photos or videos not just inside of polling places but within the 75-foot perimeter around each one.
“Some folks have gone in and violated the law by filming voters inside the polling place,” he told the judge. “There is no way the Maricopa County attorney can agree to allow the fruits of that illegal activity to be used as a weapon in a civil case when it violates criminal law.”
There was no disclosure at Tuesday’s hearing who shot the video and where it was taken.
Kiley put off a decision on its admissibility until Thursday’s trial. But if he agrees to allow it in, that creates a whole new problem for whoever shot it.
Rules of evidence generally prohibit the introduction of documents, photos or videos unless someone first testifies about their authenticity. That means saying they are the ones who produced it and when and how that was done.
That means if Langhofer tries to use the video at trial it would require the person who shot it to take the stand — and essentially confess to committing a crime.
And there’s another issue: Who gets to see it.
“I’m uncomfortable with the idea of having a video that shows people’s faces, voted ballots or visible who they voted for,” Langhofer said. “So it seems to me like sealing it is appropriate.”
That’s not acceptable to Liddy.
“The people have a right to know that their election is honest and fair and accurate,” he told the judge.
“And the last thing we need is green fleshy food for the beast of the conspiracy theorists that there was this secret evidence and a secret court hearing and that’s how we resolve this issue and the people never get to know,” Liddy continued. “Whatever evidence there is needs to be shared with the people.”
By Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services Nov 11, 2020 Updated 8 hrs ago
By Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services
PHOENIX — The question of whether the Trump campaign gets a chance to try to prove the president actually got more votes than have been tallied — and ultimately whether he gets Arizona’s 11 electoral votes — could depend on a video taken illegally in a polling center.
Attorney Kory Langhofer told Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Kiley on Tuesday he has a video of a poll worker “doing it wrong.” And that, he said, backs up the contention of Trump and the state and national Republican committees that there are votes that were not properly recorded, some of which they believe would benefit GOP candidates.
Langhofer, who represents the Trump reelection committee and the state and national Republican parties, was careful to say that neither he nor his clients authorized the video.
“I wouldn’t have signed off on it,” he said.
“But now that it exists and it shows the poll worker pressing the green button, that’s relevant evidence,” Langhofer said. “And I don’t see why it’s not admissible.”
But Assistant Maricopa County Attorney Tom Liddy noted it’s a crime to take videos or photos inside a polling place. That, he told Kiley, makes its use by Langhofer in the case illegal.
All this comes amid efforts by the president’s campaign committee and the GOP to find more votes for Trump.
The most recent figures have the president trailing Democrat Joe Biden, but by fewer than 13,000 votes. With fewer than 47,000 left to be tabulated, Trump would need to pick up close to two out of every three remaining to take the lead.
He has done that well in some rural counties. But most of the uncounted votes are in Maricopa and Pima counties. And while day-of voting even there has tended to favor the president, the margins have not matched what the he needs to overtake Biden.
In fact the update from Pima County on Tuesday afternoon, the first since last week, gave Trump just 50.6% of the 7,142 votes tallied, against 46.9% for Biden.
And the most recent Maricopa County addition of 5,291 votes late Tuesday swung 56.4% for Trump and 41.8% for Biden.
Those kinds of results could make the outcome of this litigation — and whether some ballots go through a hand count to look for unrecorded votes — crucial to who wins Arizona.
Langhofer says that “up to thousands” of Maricopa County voters had their ballots rejected by automatic tabulation devices as polling centers. This can occur due to everything from stray marks on the ballot to “over voting,” meaning filling in too many ovals in any particular race.
He said these voters should have been given a choice of either submitting a new ballot or putting the one they filled out into a special tray where it would be further examined by hand to determine what was the true intent of the voter. Instead, he alleges, poll workers induced voters to “press the green button” on the tabulator, meaning the ballot would be submitted without manual review — and any races affected by an overvote or other defect would not be counted.
And that’s where the video could prove relevant, showing Kiley how the problem occurred.
Liddy, however, pointed out it is a misdemeanor to take photos or videos not just inside of polling places but within the 75-foot perimeter around each one.
“Some folks have gone in and violated the law by filming voters inside the polling place,” he told the judge. “There is no way the Maricopa County attorney can agree to allow the fruits of that illegal activity to be used as a weapon in a civil case when it violates criminal law.”
There was no disclosure at Tuesday’s hearing who shot the video and where it was taken.
Kiley put off a decision on its admissibility until Thursday’s trial. But if he agrees to allow it in, that creates a whole new problem for whoever shot it.
Rules of evidence generally prohibit the introduction of documents, photos or videos unless someone first testifies about their authenticity. That means saying they are the ones who produced it and when and how that was done.
That means if Langhofer tries to use the video at trial it would require the person who shot it to take the stand — and essentially confess to committing a crime.
And there’s another issue: Who gets to see it.
“I’m uncomfortable with the idea of having a video that shows people’s faces, voted ballots or visible who they voted for,” Langhofer said. “So it seems to me like sealing it is appropriate.”
That’s not acceptable to Liddy.
“The people have a right to know that their election is honest and fair and accurate,” he told the judge.
“And the last thing we need is green fleshy food for the beast of the conspiracy theorists that there was this secret evidence and a secret court hearing and that’s how we resolve this issue and the people never get to know,” Liddy continued. “Whatever evidence there is needs to be shared with the people.”
Last edited:
WhimsicalTrolli
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
Sauce for video?
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
WhimsicalTrolli
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
Sadly that wont hold up in court.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
Yeah, of course. It's just funny.
- Joined
- May 12, 2020
Affluent Reptilian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2018
No, that is not suspicious in the same way as the other ward and precinct, because that lines up with past election data - in 2016, that precinct had 73 votes for Donald Trump and 52 for Hillary Clinton.
It's not merely the mismatch between the census and the votes. It's the census plus (and probably more importantly) the votes from past elections.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2018
Right. But it does not line up with past election data. Again, for Wd 26 Pct 20...
Dem: 60 -> 93. That's a 55% increase.
Repub: 67 -> 153. That's a 128% increase.
Just to remind you, the tweet you posted stated this:
To help drive home the comparison I'm making, I'll rephrase that original tweet with this data:
This ward is curious. Trump got 153 votes there, compared to 67 in 2016. Biden went up too from Hillary, but nowhere near as much. 60 > 93. 128% increase compared to 55% increase. The adult census data v total votes speaks for itself.
So, you either need to concede that the Republicans also committed election fraud on that basis, or, you have to concede that this is a poor basis upon which to make claims of fraud - which is exactly what the guy who actually made the map tool said. I showed you that in the last post.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
That's DOCTOR Based Random Engineer Pajeet, to you, bub.
https://killstream.live/2020/03/05/ep534-warren-drops-dsp-no-shows-coronaworld-va-shiva-live/
Affluent Reptilian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2018
Right. But it does not line up with past election data. Again, for Wd 26 Pct 20...
A very small amount of precincts have a # of ballots cast for Trump anywhere near the population census - in fact, only two, including the one you've highlighted (the other one involves a precinct where the census says the population was two, making me wonder what the hell's going on there). The map is riddled with precincts showing Democrat votes near the census - 22 of them, in fact. Yes yes censuses are imperfect, bla bla. But that many voting beyond the census, with an 11:1 disproportion in favour of Democrat over-voting precincts, and many of the over-voting precincts being in close proximity? HMMM. And those are just where the Biden votes alone exceed the census.
Conceding that the Republicans committed election fraud in this particular precinct doesn't amount to much - if it happened - and of course weird aberrations happen without fraud. And yes, I did highlight a specific precinct which is one example, but it isn't an aberration.
A very small amount of precincts have a # of ballots cast for Trump anywhere near the population census - in fact, only two, including the one you've highlighted (the other one involves a precinct where the census says the population was two, making me wonder what the hell's going on there). The map is riddled with precincts showing Democrat votes near the census - 22 of them, in fact. Yes yes censuses are imperfect, bla bla. But that many voting beyond the census, with an 11:1 disproportion in favour of Democrat over-voting precincts, and many of the over-voting precincts being in close proximity? HMMM. And those are just where the Biden votes alone exceed the census.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2018
Wait so you're going with, 'repubs may have committed fraud, but dems did more!' Oh dear.
The fact is, we're looking at a map of Philadelphia county, which is a Dem stronghold. Even though in 2016 PA went to Trump, Philly was 82%+ Dem. In 2012, it was 85%+ Dem. In 2008, it was 83%+ Dem. 2004, 80%+ Dem. 2000, 80%+. My point is that regardless of which way the presidency goes or who wins the state, Philadelphia always leans heavily Dem. It's hardly a surprise to find the map "riddled with precincts showing Democrat votes near the census" estimates, as you said.
I'm frankly shocked that we could even find 3 precincts where Trump won and had numbers exceeding the census estimates in such a Dem stronghold, considering there were only ~128k votes for him in total. If we instead looked at a county that leaned heavily the other way, you'd see the same pattern in reverse, with far more precincts exceeding census estimates for Trump, simply because they'll be more votes for him in total. Just for a quick sanity check, I looked at Mobile Alabama, where Trump won a modest 55.3% of the vote and 100,605 votes, Biden won 78,754
What's going on here is confirmation bias. You're only looking at (Dem) areas to confirm your foregone conclusion and not looking at (Repub) areas that could disprove it. You cannot base your view that this pattern proves Dems committed voter fraud while dismissing counterpoints of the exact same pattern as Repubs only committing negligible amounts or as simply aberrations based on looking only at an area that consistently overwhelmingly votes Dem. Quite clearly, when you have far more votes in total, it's more likely that, when distributed amongst the precincts, it'll exceed census population estimates. As the guy who created the map admitted, trying to extrapolate census data back to wards and precincts is guesswork estimates - it's not factual information, and not a good indicator of fraud.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
I haven't been around since before the election, been dealing with too many irl gayops right now, but I made it a point to log in and post here:
I am a victim of election fraud in my county. I voted a month ago, in person at the county seat. They never "received" my ballot, despite it never leaving the election clerk's office. Waiting to hear back from the lawyers, they won't give me hard numbers, but it's a lot of people in the same boat. I won't hear anything until after the weekend at the earliest, I'm not optimistic though. I am acquaintances with the judge through an old business, he's not "up to speed" on things in my opinion. I'd be more mad if I wasn't able to say "I told you so."
I am a victim of election fraud in my county. I voted a month ago, in person at the county seat. They never "received" my ballot, despite it never leaving the election clerk's office. Waiting to hear back from the lawyers, they won't give me hard numbers, but it's a lot of people in the same boat. I won't hear anything until after the weekend at the earliest, I'm not optimistic though. I am acquaintances with the judge through an old business, he's not "up to speed" on things in my opinion. I'd be more mad if I wasn't able to say "I told you so."
Noideawhattopick
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2019
Puerto Pollo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2020
Spread the word. Plant the seed of doubt, one bluepilled normie at a time.