Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's from barely a month ago.
View attachment 1725452

Not pasting every graph but here's the conclusion:
View attachment 1725461
Link

Yeah, PJ Media, a right-wing news blog is just such a reliable source there, chief. I mean, right-wingers would never ever be biased against masks because Dear Leader says not to wear them, right?
 
It was about the data of china keeps steal from people using Tick toc & trump forcing them sell or give it to us or non-china company protect americans data . Which now it just seems to be just stock manuplaion short run now. :reality:
Trump wanted to ban tiktok because it's chink sspyware they made fun of him on it which cost him the zoomer and ethot vote and thus the election.
I thought this already didn't go as expected and TikTok was here to stay. Figured it was something new.
 
"Self admitted pedophile"? Where did Biden admit to being a pedophile? I know you are known for being a retard on these forums, but do you not know the definition of "self admitted"?

Also lol at your coping that your cult leader lost. Oh right, you totally don't support Trump, even though you're coping hard. I also think you don't know the definition of cope. Why would I be coping when my guy won?
You'd think after i called you out very clearly about what you are doing you wouldn't do the exact thing i called you out for. God you aren't very bright.
He is a self admitted pedophile, that video i posted despite the dramatic oblivion edit he really did say those words. Now are we gonna play semantics for what self admitted is ? Pathetic
Yeah, PJ Media, a right-wing news blog is just such a reliable source there, chief. I mean, right-wingers would never ever be biased against masks because Dear Leader says not to wear them, right?
Is this coming from the guy that considers HuffPo and CNN a credible news source ? Fucking lol
 
"Self admitted pedophile"? Where did Biden admit to being a pedophile? I know you are known for being a retard on these forums, but do you not know the definition of "self admitted"?

Also lol at your coping that your cult leader lost. Oh right, you totally don't support Trump, even though you're coping hard. I also think you don't know the definition of cope. Why would I be coping when my guy won?
Go eat the soylent green given to you by your Chinese rulers as your social security safety net is taken away by Joe Biden.
 
Yeah, PJ Media, a right-wing news blog is just such a reliable source there, chief. I mean, right-wingers would never ever be biased against masks because Dear Leader says not to wear them, right?
Notice I provided the data sources, which in turn aggregate government websites. Go look for yourself. I doubt you will, though.

I don't mind people encouraging and opting to wear masks in the same way I don't mind people encouraging and opting to wear hijabs. I absolutely loathe governments that mandate such things; and yes, I would cry foul if "Dear Leader" tried to implement a national mask mandate.
 
Fascist = Anyone who doesn't bend over and grab their ankles for communists.

If you review the record of so-called 'antifa' in Spain and Italy (extortion, blackmail, mass executions, torture, political assassinations) then 'antifa' is an 'idea' wholly at odds with liberal society, moreso than fascism, because at least the fascists didn't pretend to be anything other than what they were.
 
You'd think after i called you out very clearly about what you are doing you wouldn't do the exact thing i called you out for. God you aren't very bright.
He is a self admitted pedophile, that video i posted despite the dramatic oblivion edit he really did say those words. Now are we gonna play semantics for what self admitted is ? Pathetic

Is this coming from the guy that considers HuffPo and CNN a credible news source ? Fucking lol
You are seriously retarded and don't even know what "self-admitted" means. You also don't know what "cope" means. Pick up a dictionary and then come back and talk to me.

And yes, CNN is a lot more credible than a shitty blog. Just because your daddy says that CNN is bad, doesn't mean it's true. Keep coping and accusing the anti-Trump folks of coping though, because it's fucking hysterical to anyone with a basic grasp on the English language

Notice I provided the data sources, which in turn aggregate government websites. Go look for yourself. I doubt you will, though.

I don't mind people encouraging and opting to wear masks in the same way I don't mind people encouraging and opting to wear hijabs. I absolutely loathe governments that mandate such things; and yes, I would cry foul if "Dear Leader" tried to implement a national mask mandate.
Yeah, the issue is that he is extrapolating data and making huge assumptions. Just because there's mask mandates doesn't mean they are enforced and that people wear them. Especially at indoor parties, which is currently thought to be the main cause of the spread. It also doesn't take into account that people could get them at places that don't have them and then come back and spread them by not wearing them. Let the scientists with experience in this stuff do the data analysis, not some shitty blog writer who couldn't cut it at a normal news source.
 
If you review the record of so-called 'antifa' in Spain and Italy (extortion, blackmail, mass executions, torture, political assassinations) then 'antifa' is an 'idea' wholly at odds with liberal society
College kids protesting in the United States didn't fight in the Spanish Civil War, dude. They're just average people who want to stand up and push back against the injustices they see, and I can't think of anything more important to a liberal society than that.
 
Notice I provided the data sources, which in turn aggregate government websites. Go look for yourself. I doubt you will, though.
I don't think whether or not there's evidence of election fraud can be disputed at this point. I think he's just being obstinate because he knows he's wrong.

My question to you, based on your understanding of the data, is:

1) Do you think enough election fraud occurred to tip the scale? (e.g. Detroit throws away all Trump Ballots but they were only 10% of the vote anyway, so he still wasn't going to win)

2) How confident are you that enough fraudulent ballots will be identified to flip the election in Trump's favor?
 
I don't think whether or not there's evidence of election fraud can be disputed at this point.
Literally every news story about this calls the allegations "baseless" and "meritless", even right-wing news. There was no election fraud, your boy just lost. Even the majority of Republicans agree there was no voter fraud, because they're not insane conspiracy theorists.
 
Look all you niggers, white or otherwise, need to shut up with your faggotry cope, your worthless seething, your hopeless tardation. For we all know the absolute, the undeniable, the God King by divine providence. The real 2020 President

Giant Meteor 2020.jpg

The Supreme Court can't stop him now. Be ready for him.
 
You are seriously retarded and don't even know what "self-admitted" means. You also don't know what "cope" means. Pick up a dictionary and then come back and talk to me.

And yes, CNN is a lot more credible than a shitty blog. Just because your daddy says that CNN is bad, doesn't mean it's true. Keep coping and accusing the anti-Trump folks of coping though, because it's fucking hysterical to anyone with a basic grasp on the English language


Yeah, the issue is that he is extrapolating data and making huge assumptions. Just because there's mask mandates doesn't mean they are enforced and that people wear them. Especially at indoor parties, which is currently thought to be the main cause of the spread. It also doesn't take into account that people could get them at places that don't have them and then come back and spread them by not wearing them. Let the scientists with experience in this stuff do the data analysis, not some shitty blog writer who couldn't cut it at a normal news source.
Look at you not being able to refute any of my points, and yes i do know what cope means, i am looking at it right now. Look at yourself trying to play semantics on what "self-admitted" is like what i called you out pal. You are so predictable i even know your next moves. It's over, go take your HRT and go to bed after your dillation. I declare you the loser and i declare myself the King of this thread, now BOW TO ME. YOU WILL BOW TO ME.
 
Look at you not being able to refute any of my points, and yes i do know what cope means, i am looking at it right now. Look at yourself trying to play semantics on what "self-admitted" is like what i called you out pal. You are so predictable i even know your next moves. It's over, go take your HRT and go to bed after your dillation. I declare you the loser and i declare myself the King of this thread, now BOW TO ME. YOU WILL BOW TO ME.
"Self-admitted" means that you admit that you, yourself, are guilty of something. Biden never admitted that he was a pedophile.

You are seriously mentally retarded or something. Or trolling. I am starting to think "trolling" because it might be impossible to be as cringy and retarded as you are
 
Literally every news story about this calls the allegations "baseless" and "meritless", even right-wing news. There was no election fraud, your boy just lost. Even the majority of Republicans agree there was no voter fraud, because they're not insane conspiracy theorists.
I don't care what the news media says. That's an appeal to authority. I'm assuming you've watched all the videos and seen all the statistical improbabilities yourself.

Were all the suspicious videos staged? How is the obvious understanding of the data incorrect?
 
I don't care what the news media says. That's an appeal to authority. I'm assuming you've watched all the videos and seen all the statistical improbabilities yourself.

Were all the suspicious videos staged? How is the obvious understanding of the data incorrect?
if there really is fraud, do you honestly think only one side is guilty of committing it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back