Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

[Pointless Pedant]

This lineup is insane. The Hodge twins, Posobeic, Mike Cernovich and Scott fucking Presler? So we've got the groyper crew standing shoulder to shoulder with "Whip it out" Cernovich, boomer bolstered Posobeic, token gay Scott Pressler, and some grifty YouTube brothers. I'm sure they'll all love sharing the street with Jaden McNeil doing a T pose and Baked ironically shouting "blood and soil".

The biggest concentration of autism in one place since the last brony convention.

 

[Fools Idol]

Why do fags like Nick think that all you have to say is "I disavow!" or "I don't co-sign everything!" when your friends act like complete and utter fucking degenerate retard criminals and everything will be kosher? You mightn't be responsible for your friends actions, but if they keep on acting like a pack of wild niggers and keep on taking a big fat shit on everything that you supposedly value, then "I don't co-sign everything!" isn't going to cut Nick. Either actually disavow and tell them to fuck off or you have to accept the fact they speak volumes to your character. You can't have your cake and eat Nick.

They would have a fucking field day with this little twink at Nuremberg and if Biden's Twitter cult has anything to say about it, they just might.

 

[Henry Wyatt]

Nick on his stream explicitly said to not do shit that will make the movement look bad if caught on camera. Also to point out, film, and loudly disavow anyone who does. I guess we'll see if Nick can bring himself to disavow this.

nick should just disavow himself then

Why do fags like Nick think that all you have to say is "I disavow!" or "I don't co-sign everything!" when your friends act like complete and utter fucking degenerate retard criminals and everything will be kosher? You mightn't be responsible for your friends actions, but if they keep on acting like a pack of wild niggers and keep on taking a big fat shit on everything that you supposedly value, then "I don't co-sign everything!" isn't going to cut Nick. Either actually disavow and tell them to fuck off or you have to accept the fact they speak volumes to your character. You can't have your cake and eat Nick.

They would have a fucking field day with this little twink at Nuremberg and if Biden's Twitter cult has anything to say about it, they just might.

Im not sure if its supposed to be an actual disavow, it is the equivalent of saying "parody" after saying X should die or saying "Off the record"

 

[The Pink Panther]

nick should just disavow himself then

Does that involve shooting himself?

 

[Get_your_kicks_with_30-06]

Maybe I am just an out of touch boomer, but I don't get the appeal of Fuentes at all. The right taking any advise or getting behind a 20 year old Mexican that still lives with mommy and daddy, doesn't have an actual job (Hear he actually makes a not bad living on lemons and his grifts for a 20 something with no real bills.) and has presumably never a) been in a relationship or b) even gotten his dick tugged behind the bleachers.

His appeal IS that he's a 20 year old, who lives with mom and dad and doesn't have a job, along with the zoomer humor. A lot of conservative/right wing zoomers and guys in there 20s relate with him on these things. Also, the fact that there is not a lot of popular, young right wing talking heads, especially none that talk about some of the stuff Nick talks about. They are all either old men who have been doing it for 20-40 years or just young people who espouse word for word talking points from the Republican Party.

Nick being the somewhat "figure head" of the young nationalist right should show how desperate and dire the need for strong leadership is in this sphere. They'll latch onto a podcaster/live streamer who acts more like a comedian than a political figure, who hangs out with catboys and druggies and constantly delegitimizes the "movement" with jokes. Anytime he does something good, like getting people to ask Charlie Kirk and the Con Inc. tough questions that they don't have an answer for, he immediately does something retarded to negate any kind of actual influence it might have had.

 

[KiwiJoe]

Nick disavowed Catboy Kami on tonight's stream. Was it because he shoved dildos in his mouth? Or because he went on a literal date with him? What about wearing girly clothes and thongs while in blackface? Or maybe that Kami is a degenerate with mental illness? Is it possibly any of these concerns that make Nick's AmNat cluster look like absolute fucking losers?

Nope. It's because he did that Hitler rant tier speech at the protest and is whining about WigNats and optics again.

You have a clip or YT link of him diasavowing Kami? I'm surprised it took this long and its because of that. I wonder how Kami is coping with that these days. Is he being attacked by Groypers or something?

 

[High Tea]

You have a clip or YT link of him diasavowing Kami? I'm surprised it took this long and its because of that. I wonder how Kami is coping with that these days. Is he being attacked by Groypers or something?

This was on YT. I assume this is the disavowal

 

[KiwiJoe]

This was on YT. I assume this is the disavowal

Makes me wonder if its a genuine disavowal and he's completely ditching Kami in all aspects, or this is just a front and secretly they're still friends?

 

[Yellow Letter]

Makes me wonder if its a genuine disavowal and he's completely ditching Kami in all aspects, or this is just a front and secretly they're still friends?

Nick doesn't strike me as the kind of guy to have true friends. I think he uses people like Kami and Baked in order to bring in their viewers to his show and pay piggy him. In other words, I think Nick simply uses people for financial gain, similar to how he uses the paleocon and nationalist movement and talking points as ways to make money. And I can assure you, it's definitely paying off.

 

[Illiterate Wanderer]

it's definitely paying off.

According to my google math he's made approximately 139,337$ over his 20 months on dlive which puts him at about 7 grand a month, and that is only counting his dlive crypto, so he could easily be making more if you include streamlabs or whatever he's using these days plus merch like t shirt, flags and hoodies.

Spoiler

plus whatever the glow in the darks may or may not be paying him

 

[Kenobi]

His appeal IS that he's a 20 year old, who lives with mom and dad and doesn't have a job, along with the zoomer humor. A lot of conservative/right wing zoomers and guys in there 20s relate with him on these things. Also, the fact that there is not a lot of popular, young right wing talking heads, especially none that talk about some of the stuff Nick talks about. They are all either old men who have been doing it for 20-40 years or just young people who espouse word for word talking points from the Republican Party.

Nick being the somewhat "figure head" of the young nationalist right should show how desperate and dire the need for strong leadership is in this sphere. They'll latch onto a podcaster/live streamer who acts more like a comedian than a political figure, who hangs out with catboys and druggies and constantly delegitimizes the "movement" with jokes. Anytime he does something good, like getting people to ask Charlie Kirk and the Con Inc. tough questions that they don't have an answer for, he immediately does something retarded to negate any kind of actual influence it might have had.

https://twitter.com/JiuJitsuGroyper/status/1326596141488742401

Not trying to be mean or anything. But whenever the guy speaks or moves he just gives of these massive homosexual vibes. Just look at this. All of the other times he has been out in public he has dressed like a gay man would too.

Nick doesn't strike me as the kind of guy to have true friends. I think he uses people like Kami and Baked in order to bring in their viewers to his show and pay piggy him. In other words, I think Nick simply uses people for financial gain, similar to how he uses the paleocon and nationalist movement and talking points as ways to make money. And I can assure you, it's definitely paying off.

Idk man he kept Baked and Kami when they were nobodies with nothing for him to gain and everything for him too lose.
He was on top of his game coming off the tpusa trolling. Yet he kept them around they had no fans and no clout and made him seem like a total degenerate.
The only way i can see it is if Nick has some misguided friendship with these freaks.

 

[AltisticRight]

Optics-cucking strikes again, although not really. You would think with that reason he'd disavow him long ago. Doesn't Nick make constant references to Mussolini though? Why would he have an issue with Hitler?

Fascist Italy didn't go after Da Jooz, Mussolini was very reluctant to do so even when Hitler pressured his regime. Of course, the regime did help transport Jews to the various camps. However, within, they never overtly purged the Jewry until Mussolini was overthrown. Nazism and fascism aren't the same thing. The Nazis were fascists, but not all fascists are Nazis. It's just like "Maoism is communism, but not all communists are Maoists". I would go further to argue that Nazism is an outlier of fascism. Notable fascists such as Julius Evola even criticised the regime for their dah jooz autism and fixation of Aryan labels.

Yes from my understanding Mussolini read Julius Evola and Evola talked about there being a spiritual aspect of Race that one could access, Mussolini believed something along the lines of E. Michael Jones that large scale race/ethnic mixing had already occurred so no one in 1930s or 1940s Europe could claim to be physically a Pure German or Roman or anything like that.

Both the Nazis and Italian Fascists were extreme civic nationalists. Race was a secondary component that's given out like a fucking sticker at primary school under Nazism. If you're Jewish and you agreed with Hitler's vision, you're an honourary Aryan. It's that lame. Here's 4 I can pull out of my head:
Werner Goldberg
Erhard Milch
Hans-Geert Falkenberg
Friedemann Lichtwitz
While some joined oblivious to the atrocities or before the SS started the Shoah of their people, they were all considered equals in the army.
I'm pretty sure Hitler was autistic too.

 

[Me262PrinceOfTurboJet]

If being a zoomer unemployed moron who willingly lives with Mommy and Daddy despite having the money to move out is a feature, and not a flaw. The Groypers should just Jonestown themselves.

 

[No. 7 cat]

I vaguely remember seeing some of those videos at the time and thinking his support of fuentes bordered on full fledged homosexuality. He must have been disappointed to find out some months later that nick prefers catboys to the brokeback mountain type.

Catboys before cowboys

 

[Rekkington]

Fascist Italy didn't go after Da Jooz, Mussolini was very reluctant to do so even when Hitler pressured his regime. Of course, the regime did help transport Jews to the various camps. However, within, they never overtly purged the Jewry until Mussolini was overthrown. Nazism and fascism aren't the same thing. The Nazis were fascists, but not all fascists are Nazis. It's just like "Maoism is communism, but not all communists are Maoists". I would go further to argue that Nazism is an outlier of fascism. Notable fascists such as Julius Evola even criticised the regime for their dah jooz autism and fixation of Aryan labels.

That's because the Jewish Question was not about fascist doctrine or any widely applicable ideology, but rather a political issue unique to Germany. That's why I don't even buy Nazism as a valid term, they were fascists in their ideology but they had a wide range of political avenues, 2 big examples being border disputes (a massive political/diplomatic project was re-annexing land they lost in the Versailles treaty) and their banking/trade relationships with the rest of Europe (namely Britain and France.) Some of the biggest stories about what Germany did had very little to do with Fascism which is why it pairs so well with nationalism. Marxism by its nature is universalizing, Fascism is tailor made to adhere to specific peoples with specific histories. A lot of Hitler's distrust of Slavs wasn't coded into Fascism either, it's not like it demands constant expansion and world domination, he just hated Slavs for personal reasons and I think people struggle to separate a lot of these things.

 

[Doctor Placebo]

THE GROPYER ECELEB GRIFTER RALLY:
note baked will be there but he isnt mentioned
View attachment 1724181

Nick Fuentes and john doyle speeches:
https://twitter.com/cool_cheese_guy/status/1326608167065694210?s=20

more speeches:
https://twitter.com/cool_cheese_guy/status/1326605792880029698?s=20

I'm actually pretty surprised that Doyle is getting so buddy buddy with Fuentes. I haven't watched much of his stuff, but if he's who I'm thinking of he seemed like a pretty milquetoast, entry level Republican talking points guy. He even made a video or two about how Nazis are leftist because they're socialist. His show is called "Heck off, commie" because "fuck" is too dirty. I figured he'd be more at home in a lineup with Ben Shapiro than the Groypers. Maybe Trump's electile dysfunction has gotten to him.

nick should just disavow himself then

Im not sure if its supposed to be an actual disavow, it is the equivalent of saying "parody" after saying X should die or saying "Off the record"

"In Minecraft."

 

[Hotel in Minsk]

Oh boy.

 

[Yellow Letter]

He even made a video or two about how Nazis are leftist because they're socialist.

I've seen this as a common thread with Republican talk show hosts. They think "Hmmm, well, socialism is leftist, therefore, Nazis are leftists! Libtards btfo!" Even though the socialism that they think of is Marxist 90 percent of the time. It's the same thing with the phrase "democrats are the real racists/fascists/nazis etc." They want to separate themselves so badly from any assocation with far-right politics that they'll flip it onto the other side. Ironically enough, that's exactly what the left does that they complain about.

 

[Anne Hyroe]

Trump’s going to talk about gamergate, mace the press and do the Roman salute, all while TTS blares in the background.

 

[Doctor Placebo]

I've seen this as a common thread with Republican talk show hosts. They think "Hmmm, well, socialism is leftist, therefore, Nazis are leftists! Libtards btfo!" Even though the socialism that they think of is Marxist 90 percent of the time. It's the same thing with the phrase "democrats are the real racists/fascists/nazis etc." They want to separate themselves so badly from any assocation with far-right politics that they'll flip it onto the other side. Ironically enough, that's exactly what the left does that they complain about.

Even if you disagree with it, it makes sense from a political standpoint. Hollywood has brainwashed the vast majority of the public to see Nazis as so evil that nothing else comes remotely close. This isn't to say that there aren't valid reasons to hate the Nazis, but genocidal. oppressive regimes are a dime a dozen. It's a purely emotional response ingrained in people from a young age by entertainment. Since the right doesn't have anything approaching the media apparatus of the left (by the design of leftists who have been taking over the entertainment industry and locking right wingers out at an intensifying rate since the 1920's) it's a lot easier to just say the Supreme Evil is leftist than to try and argue that maybe it wasn't the Supreme Evil to which all others must be compared, and maybe things can be just as evil as the Nazis while not occupying the same political quadrant.

Although calling the Nazis "far right" is a bit of a misnomer too, since things like absolute monarchy and Hindu fundamentalist caste system would actually be further on the auth-right scale. Nazis actually did want more economic and social equality, but only within a very narrow category of people defined along racial lines.