Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[All becomes gunt]

Can you imagine if this investigation uncovers that both were cheating, just one was cheating more and people don't really care to go vote anymore except a minority of em ? That would be funny but i doubt they'd let it go that deep.

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

I haven't followed GA specifically, I'm making an inference based on what happened after they "found" ballots that were 100% for Biden in other states, most famously the 200k Michigan dump ("that" graph). It also occurred in Wisconsin. So, that type of fraud also occurring in GA does not seem like a stretch to me.

Fact-checked: DEBUNKED!

Actchullually, the totally TRUE and HONEST ballots were only 99.98% for Biden. Stop spreading conspiracy theories!

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

I don’t think anyone alleged Russia changed vote totals in any state, except maybe from TDS sufferers on social media.

The interference that was laid out in the Mueller report had to do with Russian intelligence sending Podesta/DNC emails to Wikileaks and using bots and paid ads to spread pro-Trump on social media.

Whether Russian FB ads influenced anyone’s vote, I’m skeptical. I think Hillary was just deeply unpopular and the electorate didn’t want a Washington insider.

But what Trump is alleging is a bit different.

Ah, I see. I wasn't paying much attention during the 2016 elections. Regardless, fraud is a possibility.

Can the voting process be hacked? | 2020-09-17 | Security Magazine

archived 13 Nov 2020 09:47:44 UTC

archive.is

Florida voting machines ripe for Russian hackers, experts say

archived 20 Oct 2020 05:30:42 UTC

archive.is

2020 Elections: Voting Machines Expose Hacking Risks - Bloomberg

archived 11 Nov 2020 16:57:09 UTC

archive.is

https://archive.md/O89Fw

Four Stolen Elections: The Vulnerabilities of Absentee and Mail-In Ba…

archived 13 Nov 2020 09:55:56 UTC

archive.is

 

[Nom Carver]

The red and blue thing behind, not the biden, the creepy icecream eating biden can be ignored.

It's just what it looks like: It's a graph depicting the obviously legitimate votes the Democrats got suddenly to edge over the Republican votes.

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

It's just what it looks like: It's a graph depicting the obviously legitimate votes the Democrats got suddenly to edge over the Republican votes.

Which are totally legit. Get back in your pod, prole!

 

[TheSimpShow]

It's just what it looks like: It's a graph depicting the obviously legitimate votes the Democrats got suddenly to edge over the Republican votes.

So it was the meme, and not a real logo. Got it. I just found it suspicious that it was popping up everywhere in relation to biden and I had a mild inkling that someone in his marketing team was taking the mickey.

 

[AMERICA]

The red and blue thing behind, not the biden, the creepy icecream eating biden can be ignored.

I posted the Wisconsin graph above, but the line from the Biden image comes from the Michigan one. If you zoom in on the graph to see what happened at 4 AM when the Biden ballots were "found", it looks like those infamous red and bue lines.


And here's what happened after

 

[Bosmadden]

I haven't followed GA specifically, I'm making an inference based on what happened after they "found" ballots that were 100% for Biden in other states, most famously the 200k Michigan dump ("that" graph). It also occurred in Wisconsin. So, that type of fraud also occurring in GA does not seem like a stretch to me.

Also the count-pausing, which is used as a marker of fraud. That happened in GA. Also, at one location they claimed a water pipe had burst, but so far they have not been able to produce an invoice. Something is fucked in GA for sure.

Edit: And also, if you read that infamous Data Scientist twitter thread, it discusses the mechanism by which this type of fraud occurs in depth. It's not Georgia specific, but it discusses how the mail is collected and mixed, and why changes in the overall data trend is improbable. The outliers do not prove fraud themselves, but alongside all the weird circumstantial evidence..

Politifact are on the case

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/04/tweets/no-biden-did-not-receive-thousands-mysteriously-su/

It was all down to a data error in Michigan that showed Biden getting 138K votes and Trump zero. When people started sending WTF tweets it was 'corrected'. Politifact claims it was down to an election worker copying and pasting from a spreadsheet, except that isn't how votes are tallied for the media. Stuff like this happen all the time in elections apparently, one candidate being mistakenly awarded tens of thousands of votes. The fact it never happened with Trump's totals is besides the point and any claims otherwise shows worrying traits of being a conspiratard.

Also in Wisconsin the claim that Biden got 99% of a randomized postal voting batch is also false, it was only 96%. So suck on that Trumpers.

I rate Politifacts claims to be mostly gay.

 

[Collections Agent]

Sorry for Double post.
New Glitch found
Voting Machine software is case sensive & some one (Susan -sex ed major ) forgot to profread the code.
View attachment 1726423

View attachment 1726424

This.

This is why we shouldn't have encouraged those Buzzfeed journalists to learn to code.

 

[fam]

Statistical analysis of the Michigan vote, including the exact algorithmic trigger when the vote count was manipulated.

Edit: TLDR

Biden won in Michigan because heavily Republican districts voted for Biden and the down ticket GOP but did NOT vote for Trump.

That the more Republican the precinct the more this happened.

That this happened in a straight linear fashion and was replicated in Republican districts across Michigan.

That this did NOT happen in majority Democrat precincts where Trump outperformed the GOP ticket.

Finally that this cannot be explained by 'never Trumpers' because the linear curve of Trump's vote in GOP districts can only be explained by algorithmic manipulation.

Why doesn't Dr. Pajeet do the same analysis on straight Dem and Biden votes? Or on data from past elections? It's almost as if they would exhibit the same downward slope "patterns" which are inherent to how the data was plotted (by literally subtracting X from Y.)

 

[Bosmadden]

I don’t think anyone alleged Russia changed vote totals in any state, except maybe from TDS sufferers on social media.

The interference that was laid out in the Mueller report had to do with Russian intelligence sending Podesta/DNC emails to Wikileaks and using bots and paid ads to spread pro-Trump on social media.

Whether Russian FB ads influenced anyone’s vote, I’m skeptical. I think Hillary was just deeply unpopular and the electorate didn’t want a Washington insider.

But what Trump is alleging is a bit different.

Russia hacked the 2016 election, CNN never ever said that. No sir.

Why doesn't Dr. Pajeet do the same analysis on straight Dem and Biden votes? Or on data from past elections? It's almost as if they would exhibit the same downward slope "patterns" which are inherent to how the data was plotted (by literally subtracting X from Y.)

If you bothered to watch the video you'll see that they dealt with that. They showed heavy Dem precincts over weighted for Trump but voting for the Dems down ticket. They then compare that to what they saw in Republican precincts.

The issue isn't that it's impossible that GOP voters could have voted for Biden and the GOP down ticket it's that it should have been far more randomized across precincts. i.e. some would have voted for Biden more and some less, giving us a straight randomized curve. Instead we see a linear curve which can only be explained by someone plugging in an algo.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

I don’t think anyone alleged Russia changed vote totals in any state, except maybe from TDS sufferers on social media.

The interference that was laid out in the Mueller report had to do with Russian intelligence sending Podesta/DNC emails to Wikileaks and using bots and paid ads to spread pro-Trump on social media.

Whether Russian FB ads influenced anyone’s vote, I’m skeptical. I think Hillary was just deeply unpopular and the electorate didn’t want a Washington insider.

But what Trump is alleging is a bit different.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/12/politics/russia-hack-us-election/index.html

Election 2016: Have Russian hackers already handed Vladimir Putin a v…

archived 13 Nov 2020 10:46:44 UTC

archive.is

But allegations have surfaced of Russian hackers attempting to access US voter records, of trying to sabotage the physical ballot and of unleashing its troll army -- Internet bloggers paid by the Kremlin to spread false information online -- in support of Republican nominee Donald Trump.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/russian-hacking-mueller-report/index.html

Mueller discovered new ways Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016…

archived 16 Jun 2019 00:02:50 UTC

archive.is

The report contains the first ever public US government claim that Russian hackers compromised a county's network in the leadup to the 2016 election, with an attack on an unnamed Florida county.
According to the report, "the FBI believes that this operation enabled the GRU to gain access to the network of at least one Florida county government."

Looks like CNN alleged that Russians tried to mess with digital election systems, voter records and physical ballots.

 

[Bosmadden]

https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/12/politics/russia-hack-us-election/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/russian-hacking-mueller-report/index.html

Looks like CNN alleged that Russians tried to mess with digital election systems, voter records and physical ballots.

Fake news, didn't happen.

Genuine question, when Dem voters receive their programming updates does it wipe their memories completely or is it filed in an encrypted cache?

 

[Aidan]

If the use of the word "software" was correct, then no, you are thinking of hardware components. Software would imply coding and programming that ended up in the end product.

Oh yeah I screwed up and misread like a tard. Sad.

 

[fam]

If you bothered to watch the video you'll see that they dealt with that. They showed heavy Dem precincts over weighted for Trump but voting for the Dems down ticket. They then compare that to what they saw in Republican precincts.

I assume you're referring to the Detroit graph, which still has straight R % (= A) on the X axis and split Trump % - straight R % (= B - A) on the Y axis. There will always be a downwards slope unless the split and straight % is always the same, which seems unlikely.

But scrutinizing the math is unnecessary. All you have to do is take a look at Dem/Biden variables instead to see how quickly his theory falls apart.

 

[Aidan]

I assume you're referring to the Detroit graph, which still has straight R % (= A) on the X axis and split Trump % - straight R % (= B - A) on the Y axis. There will always be a downwards slope unless the split and straight % is always the same, which seems unlikely.

But scrutinizing the math is unnecessary. All you have to do is take a look at Dem/Biden variables instead to see how quickly his theory falls apart.

View attachment 1726531

Where did you get this chart? I just wanna know of the sources for hopefully later compilation as time goes on.

 

[Bosmadden]

I assume you're referring to the Detroit graph, which still has straight R % (= A) on the X axis and split Trump % - straight R % (= B - A) on the Y axis. There will always be a downwards slope unless the split and straight % is always the same, which seems unlikely.

But scrutinizing the math is unnecessary. All you have to do is take a look at Dem/Biden variables instead to see how quickly his theory falls apart.

View attachment 1726531

Now weight your graph by percentage of Dem voters per precinct (you can use the 2016 election data) so we're not comparing apples to bananas. That's assuming the variance is statistically meaningful.

I'll wait.

 

[fam]

Where did you get this chart? I just wanna know of the sources for hopefully later compilation as time goes on.

It was buried deep in the Inventor of Email™'s Twitter replies, and probably a repost. I'll admit it's not really trustworthy.

However, other people have done the same analysis:

https://twitter.com/jbakcoleman/status/1327148379785322497

Another person ran simulations that show the same pattern:

https://kabir-naim.medium.com/dr-shiva-ayyadurai-the-danger-of-data-charlatans-4f675ffe793c

 

[Gorilla Tessellator]

Trump needs 99% of the remaining vote to to take AZ

Timestamp	In The Lead	Vote Margin	Votes Remaining (est.)	Change	Batch Breakdown	Batch Trend	Hurdle
Arizona (EV: 11) Biden leads with 1,668,684 votes (49.4%), Trump trails with 1,657,250 votes (49.1%).
2 hours ago	Biden	11,434	11,645	3,978	Biden 55.0% / 45.0% Trump	Trump is averaging 52.7%	Trump needs 99.9%

Vote counts don't matter at this point. From what I gather the game is about making certification impossible. It can be achieved by demanding recount, reporting fraud etc.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Vote counts don't matter at this point. From what I gather the game is about making certification impossible. It can be achieved by demanding recount, reporting fraud etc.

This is how Kanye can still win.