US Instances of Voter Fraud (Megathread?) - Probably a good idea to have a thread on this given how often it's discussed and will continue to be discussed even after November.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Is mail in voting autistic?

  • Total voters
    92
  • Poll closed .
Sidney Powell laying out a ton of evidence for fraud, calling what is happening an American revolution.
My prediction, when this is all done China and the DNC implicated in massive fraud through Dominion software. CIA implicated through hammer and scorecard. Trump winning the election will be the least interesting thing going on in a few weeks.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: The Notorious RGB, Polystyrene Glioblastoma, Dynamite Ninja and 9 others
DeadFish said:
Well in other news some guy where I live lost everything.
Job. Wife. Bussiness. The works.

This bad turn of events happened as a result of some tax dispute with the local council.

Instead of going all postal he decided to pick up a hobby. Started an ant farm.

Got to be known for it too. Did school tours. Helped at the local zoo. Stuff like that. Said he forgave what the city did to him

Turned out he was dropping termites and carpenter ants in abandoned buildings. The critters would embed themselves in their new home then spread to the neighbors. This jack ass ended up ruining entire neighborhoods.

Now the entire city is facing an epidemic of these pests. Not everyone has the money to hire pest control. Especially the city. Its been having budget issues since corona hit. So now the town is being slowly destroyed.

Guess the Fucker figured out how to get revenge after all.
Click to expand...
"Beware the wrath of a patient man."

I don't know this guy's name, But he's going on my very short list titled "People I absolutely do not mess with, Ever".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Polystyrene Glioblastoma, Angry New Ager, madethistocomment and 2 others
  • Agree
Reactions: ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛, Hollywood Hulk Hogan and Blubbles
RandomTwitterGuy said:
I dont belive it.

Germany allowing foreign military operation on an German company, is not likely. Now if it comes out that the American government asked the German government to size the servers, then it is possible as this kind of thing happens, but not US soldiers raiding a German company.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's a load of BS.

There may have been raid, but the U.S. Army wouldn't have been involved. The closest it may feasibly be is Germans conducting a raid and handing off materials at a US base.

There aren't any credible sources to back up the claim. Just a couple sites known to make shit up (like gateway pundit).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hollywood Hulk Hogan
introvertedobserver said:
There may have been raid, but the U.S. Army wouldn't have been involved. The closest it may feasibly be is Germans conducting a raid and handing off materials at a US base.
Click to expand...
The only plausible thing I could imagine is if Germany has something like an ex parte writ of search and seizure which you generally can only get if someone is known for defying court orders. Then in the U.S., marshals would accompany the lawyers and whatever team they brought to execute the seizure. I can't see doing something like that in a foreign country without cooperation at the highest levels, or without it becoming really widely known really quickly. This sounds like Qtard bullshit like random public statements of officials being secret messages that thousands of pedos are being secretly arrested right now.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Kane Lives, Jimmy J. Weems and 1 other person
I dunno guis, my list of unbiased sources (Trump's legal team shills and theDonald.win) are all projecting it's in the bag already. I was told to have my salt bucket at the ready for next week's upcoming bombshells and revelations.

Oy vey, I know I'm on team Trump, but that's mostly out of hatred for what the left has become and not out of any love for the orange jew cum guzzler. Thanks media/Trump machine for making American politics a poorly written soap opera.

Tune in next week to see if any of the blatant corruption sticks! Will dominion turn out to be a thing or will we drop it after hyping it up for a solid week? Stay hyped regardless!!! 😫

edit: this weeks code words are HAMMER & SCORECARD! Use them in a regular conversation and you will instantly be transformed into a shunned conspiratard right before your former friends' eyes!
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Polystyrene Glioblastoma, ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛, Sperghetti and 8 others
introvertedobserver said:
Yeah, it's a load of BS.

There may have been raid, but the U.S. Army wouldn't have been involved. The closest it may feasibly be is Germans conducting a raid and handing off materials at a US base.

There aren't any credible sources to back up the claim. Just a couple sites known to make shit up (like gateway pundit).
Click to expand...
Very probably BS, but the more detailed stories say it wasn't an "Army raid," the Army just provided some kind of support. That could be intelligence sharing, could be a couple CID agents tagging along with the Germans to keep eyes on the evidence. Support could mean anything.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Polystyrene Glioblastoma
I'm getting kind of blackpilled on the probability of Trump pulling this off.

But if there's really nothing to this, then why is Trump so confident? Why Pompeo? Why the firings? SOMETHING has to be going on, and people with actual clearance are singing a very different tune than the media.

Is he saying something with merit or not? Is he just trying to drag the legal shit out until Dec 14 for a House victory?

I want Trump as President. I'm disgusted with the left. Honestly even if it was a legitimate coup I'd support it anyways because the other choice will destroy this country and the few remaining morals we have.
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Polystyrene Glioblastoma, ConSlut#5000, FriedPickles and 7 others
Aidan said:
To be clear and maybe I'm late, but they did not confirm any actual algorithm. They identified a correlation that takes places in 3/4 of the most populated counties in Michigan. Due to the nature of the correlation and how consistent it is in those 3 counties, it implies that a single algorithm can describe all 3 counties' votes which is suspect.

This is a really fun video that at least shows you data and explains things so you can come up with your own explanation. They only present the data and acknowledge it's suspicious.
Reposting the video for convenience.

To summarize the chart real quick and explain the trend for those who don't want to watch 30 minutes of some random engineer pajeet....
x axis - % of the precinct that's republican
y axis - % of voters who voted Trump relative to what's expected

Basically, you'd expect most people who vote Trump to vote straight Republican for the most part. People who vote only Trump but not Republican would put the precinct above the red line and people don't vote Trump but presumably voted Republican overall would put it below the line. Technically it's based on the estimated Republican % of each precinct which I'm not sure how they figured, though I don't argue it since it's probably not that far off to matter and could be based off of exit polls or just historical data.

Anyway, look at the pic (check video or post I'm replying to), you can see that essentially, the more Republican a precinct is estimated to be, the more likely it was NOT to vote for Trump. When the expectation is, it should be a generally flat line and hovering around the 0% mark. That would mean most Republicans voted Trump as well as for other Republicans.

It definitely raises questions and it'd be nice if we could get a single source (eg 1 organization's polling data) and then plot the precincts for other controversial areas and some "stable" areas to compare the results. If this show keeps on running into December and I remember when I get time I'll do it, but who knows what can happen between now and then...


Quick rundown of this video.
Benford's law is not necessarily applicable to election data and is actually quite contentious but using data to check if what should be random is in fact, not random, may be able to help. He shows how even that can be misleading at times and basically finishes saying that the numbers may seem unusual when looked at one way, but that should only mean further evaluation before jumping to fraud. Buy his book at the link below.

Numberphile, Dr James Grime (singingbanana), and a couple others have Benford Law explanation videos from years ago that are good.
Click to expand...
Continuing on the Shiva video, Stand-up Maths aka Matt Parker, has done a video response to this and he brings up good points as to why this isn't indicative of fraud. To his credit he went ahead and did the same for Biden and I doubt he fudged the numbers to make a point but I'm too lazy right now to verify either claim.

I want stats wars now.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: 💗Bitchstopher Columbitch💗, Hollywood Hulk Hogan, A_throwaway_name62919 and 1 other person
BanyaHat said:
I'm getting kind of blackpilled on the probability of Trump pulling this off.

But if there's really nothing to this, then why is Trump so confident? Why Pompeo? Why the firings? SOMETHING has to be going on, and people with actual clearance are singing a very different tune than the media.

Is he saying something with merit or not? Is he just trying to drag the legal shit out until Dec 14 for a House victory?

I want Trump as President. I'm disgusted with the left. Honestly even if it was a legitimate coup I'd support it anyways because the other choice will destroy this country and the few remaining morals we have.
Click to expand...
Pompeo is a neocon so its surprising that he made that statement.

Could be Trump make the backroom deals for state legislatures to appoint electors that will vote for him on December 14th if SCOTUS cucks. That is probably the only reason he is so calm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back