I participate much more in the economy because there's lots of restaurants and a grocery store near my home, but my office was in the sticks. But maybe the great reset will move me out into a food desert so other, more deserving people can take my place here.
I mean, with UBI that sort of shit is to be expected. If you don't have to work a shitty low-pay retail/admin job to pay the bills, most people aren't going to. Some will for the extra money, but I guarantee that most would rather wait and apply to positions in fields that they're passionate about.
I would go the opposite direction. You'd probably end up getting more anime, video games, and other forms of art/entertainment at the cost of shitty fast food.
Going into the creative and intrinsic part of the whole problem of this, as said in Fahrenheit 451, "Flowers do not come from flowers, fireworks cannot come from fireworks. Flowers come from the dirt, fireworks are made with metals and the earth."
The UBI aspect of it may be needed at some point due to the cost of having meaningless jobs, there's further costs that many companies are importing millions of Africans and Indians to fill these voids as consumers and low-skill workers.
There's a whole reason why they think this, and it's a pretty old one that goes back over a century. Basically, these people believe all mental illness can be solved by science (usually by pumping people full of pills and sending them to a psychiatrist) and that there is no such thing as spirituality or anything but the material world. It's science worship at it's worst, an unholy version of high modernism repackaged for modern society. It's the sort of "human nature and society as we know it is in the way, let's reshape it so we can have our utopia."
I've long argued that the 20th and, it would seem, the 21st Century have just been the world paying for the absolute mind-numbing stupidity that the 19th Century produced. To borrow from Chesterton, we progressed in technology and thought so far our souls have yet to catch up. We can't grasp the consequences of any of these things any more, because by the time we start to really wrestle with the implications, we're on to the hot new thing.
I keep forgetting the late 1990s was about 30 some years ago. I'll keep the sperging short, but when the whole importation and flood of video games and anime from Japan happened in the late 1990s, this happened when animation and comic books were at a precarious position out west, namely when the censors held major grasp over animation and comics and their production for the near last 50 years at that point, and only reinforced the social stigma that sequential art is only to be garbage to hold children's minds to babysit them. So when video games and anime hit, this prompted major sway over to their side because they could provide story and visual content not restricted only for children and "family friendly" images.
Looks like a deep fake.
I couldn't find any obvious tells so I just decided to share it anyway. It'd be funny if Trudeau actually did say something that ridiculous though.
www.justice.gov
Only idiots think LSD is an effective brainwashing drug. How can you control somebody through something as unpredictable as a hallucinogenic? If elites really believe that would work, they are tards.
I argued with neoliberals about this for years. Literally years. Since 2012ish, even. I argued that automation would come for our jobs, that we would be competing with AI and Big Data, that people would use Amazon's Mechanical Turk and unwittingly train machines to perform all these little tasks that humans get paid a pittance to do.
They always went "Oh, Lump of Labor fallacy". They always assumed there would be more jobs. That has been the assumption for a long time, hasn't it? That growth can continue unabated? That employment will not be disrupted excessively by new technology? Oh, if only that were true.
Now, @MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This is going to sound really, really schizo, so bear with me. All of this is hypothetical. I have no definitive proof of any of it, so take it with a grain of salt.
Earlier this year, when people started complaining about 5G cell radiation and how it might cause tissue damage, or how COVID-19 might actually be caused by wireless radiation injury, I viewed all that stuff with a very skeptical eye. However, I gave the idea some thought. I mulled it over a little bit, trying to figure out what might actually be going on here.
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
News, analysis and comment from the Financial Times, the worldʼs leading global business publicationwww.ft.com
Scientists in Switzerland are very concerned about 5G radiation and are stonewalling the tech. Gee, I wonder why?
Huawei are the guys behind much of the push for 5G, and the US has been trying to sanction Huawei for quite a while.
I started digging a bit, connecting the dots.
5G uses small-cell tech, with a very large number of small base stations everywhere. Lampposts, telephone poles, buildings, everywhere. These antennas are capable of beamforming. They can guide the wireless radiation directly towards a receiver, greatly increasing their range and efficiency for a given wattage.
Klaus Schwab’s book repeatedly mentions melding human biology with machinery, and the Internet of Things, and so on and so forth. Basically, transhumanism, turning people into cyborgs, etc.
I’ve been fascinated with transhumanism and cyberpunk stuff for quite a long damn time, but I’m also aware of the potential for rather extreme abuse of the tech.
Think back towards the beginning of the year. Professor Charles Lieber from Harvard, an expert in nanotechnology, was arrested due to undisclosed links to the Wuhan University of Technology and China’s scientist-scalping Thousand Talents program:
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.
More recently, there was a huge and very suspicious fire at Huawei’s 5G antenna lab in Dongguan:
But back to Charles Lieber. The reason why he’s such an interesting figure is because of the technology he was working on. He was trying to develop silicon transistor nanowire probes that could penetrate into human cells and have two-way, read-write functions in them, altering their behavior, and so on. The problem with this idea is that penetrating cell membranes has a tendency to kill cells. So, they coated the things in lipids to make them look like a part of a cell membrane and encourage fusion between the nanowire and the cell without killing the cell. It worked. It worked very, very well.
These nanowires are the width of a virus. They’re extremely tiny.
Virus-Sized Transistors
Chemist Charles Lieber and his colleagues have developed a nanoscale transistor so small it can enter, probe, and communicate with cells without harming them.www.harvardmagazine.com
Ostensibly, Charles Lieber was hired to work on battery tech for the Chinese. This was a cover. He was doing nothing of the sort. He never worked on batteries.
I started thinking about the applications of the nanowire. At first, they planned on using them to record the events inside cells, detecting how organelles in those cells behaved. However, eventually, they planned on doing two-way communication with cells, including altering the behavior of organelles.
Imagine if one of these nanowire probes could instruct a cell to secrete any substance its proteins could manufacture? Imagine if it could give ribosomes blueprints to follow, forcing them to build proteins?
You could force a cell to manufacture a virus or a deadly prion from nothing. You could force a cell to release neurotransmitters or hormones to manipulate behavior. You could blow up someone’s heart with adrenaline, or soothe them with dopamine and serotonin. Anything you wanted. You could do literally fucking anything to someone. You could assassinate a dissenter, or turn a criminal into a blissfully dazed vegetable.
Here’s how it could work.
Think of how a Wacom pen works. There is no battery in the pen. When you move the pen over the tablet, the antennas inside the tablet actually energize the pen using an induction coil. Just like a Wacom pen, such a device would require no batteries, no internal power source at all. It could be powered externally, with wireless radiation. As in, 5G beam-forming antennas beaming deep-penetrating EMF into someone’s tissues. The person with the smart dust in their body becomes an internet-of-things “object”, recognized by the network.
- Imagine a piece of smart dust that consists of an induction coil, a small voltage regulation and control circuit, and a multitude of these nanowire probes, much like a little artificial virus.
- Someone gets millions of these things injected into their body, along with a larger chip that acts as a transponder to tell the grid where they are and if they have the smart dust or not.
- When they step into a 5G grid, the system recognizes them and locks onto them with a beam-forming antenna, directing electromagnetic radiation into their body.
- The tiny, tiny nanotech induction coils inside the smart dust absorb this energy and turn it into electricity. The smart dusts’s nanowires have penetrate into and fused with the surrounding cells.
- The EMF is pulsed such that it modulates the signal from the transistor to the cell, giving the cell instructions and reading back from it.
- The coils of the smart dust act as a phased-array antenna, weakly beaming the readings back, either to their phone or the nearest base station.
- The dust also commands the subject’s cells to do basically anything.
Take this device, for example:
It has many of the same components that I’m describing, here. An induction coil and a control circuit with a capacitor and diode and a TFT. All you really need to do is replace the TFT with nanowires and make the whole thing very, very, very small. Insanely small.
What if this is the true plan behind the “Great Reset?”
I find it fascinating that they’re proposing an mRNA vaccine for COVID-19, something that has never been tried before.
- Use an emergency, such as a deadly pandemic, as an excuse for mass immunization programs, controlling people’s movements.
- Use property seizure to force people out of the country and into the cities, where the grid is located.
- Inject them with nanomachines that cyberize their bodies and link them to the grid, under the pretense of vaccination.
- Boom. Everyone, everywhere, utterly enslaved with no possibility of escape or rebellion.
Most vaccines consist of weakened or killed whole virus, injected into the body to produce an antibody response and “train” the immune system to recognize and defeat the live virus, making someone immune. This is a perfectly fine idea that has saved millions of lives Since the discovery of vaccination.
mRNA vaccines are different. These vaccines consist of a bit of genetic code that actually orders your cells to construct chunks of virus (in SARS-CoV-2‘s case, this would be the Spike protein, the part that the virus uses to latch onto cells and the part that your antibodies need to neutralize). When someone is injected with an mRNA vaccine, they quite literally become a genetically modified organism. There are all sorts of possible issues, like autoantibodies forming against healthy tissues, multiple sclerosis and other demyelination disorders, et cetera.
You want to know something really funny? A nanowire probe that manipulates cells the same way as mRNA, telling ribosomes to build proteins, like bits of viral proteins, is basically indistinguishable from an actual mRNA vaccine. You would see exactly the same effects. The ribosomes would transit the endoplasmic reticulum and construct parts of the virus from amino acids, producing antigens that the immune system would successfully make antibodies against. This would all be detectable and verifiable as such. It would blend right in.
There would be no way to tell that anything was wrong with the vaccine. In truth, your biology would be completely controlled by whoever or whatever is controlling the grid that controls the induction-powered nanomachines.
If the nanowires worked as intended, then the cells could, in theory, be forced to construct proteins that don’t even exist in nature.
What if Wuhan was a trial run? Wuhan had just rolled out a huge 5G network. What if they injected people with these nanomachines, and then the nanomachines constructed the virus in-situ, infecting them and spreading it around the world, causing a mass panic and ruining our economies? What if the reason why there are so few infections in China now is not because they’re lying, but because they’ve already flicked on the signal to the nanomachines to manufacture the vaccine inside everyone’s bodies, but just in China?
This is not just some hypothetical shit. Published, peer-reviewed papers and prototypes of the necessary technology are known to exist. The lead scientist behind much of the research was known to have contact with the CCP, and was arrested and charged for it. Yes, the tech exists, it’s only a matter of integrating it together into a single, working device, testing a prototype, and then mass-producing it. China has a huge semiconductor industry. It would be trivial for them.
Why does China have so many people in concentration camps? Human experimentation. What if the Uighurs are test subjects? They’ve probably injected them with all sorts of shit just to see if it works or not.
We’re in a fucking Black Mirror episode, boyos. We full-on Deus Ex, now. Fuck me running.
View attachment 1732183
Again, none of this is conclusively proven to exist. It’s just speculation. However, the weird links between Charles Lieber and Wuhan, and the nature of his research, are far too disturbing to ignore. If it does exist, then indeed, it is so outlandish-sounding that nobody would believe it.
I can, of course, see why Xi Jinping would love such a thing. It completely fucking eliminates any possibility of dissent. If someone says something you don’t like, you can force their body to basically self-destruct, remotely, through the cell network. Totally deniable. It looks like a natural death.
Remember, Klaus Schwab predicted a fusion of biology and technology. His book openly talks about melding life and machinery, and using smart dust. I shit you not. It’s all in there. It’s a quote from his book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. “The future may see curious mixes of digital-and-analog life that will redefine our very natures.”
The 4th Industrial Revolution – Enabling the Smart Factory - FINAT
In his book “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”, Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum describes the ...www.finat.com
If this tech worked as intended, it wouldn’t just be usable for political assassination and turning our world into an Orwellian nightmare beyond our forebears’ worst nightmares. It could also extend people’s lifespans, replace many drugs, et cetera. Imagine if you could command a diabetic’s cells to make insulin, or force the cells to make cancer-killing compounds.
So much potential, and yet, utterly unethical. This would rob everyone of their freedoms, permanently.
You know, it’s uncanny. The virus scare seems so irrational and overblown, and all this talk about “resetting” the economy and confiscating everyone’s property and forcing them to move into the cities seems utterly bizarre. And yet, in this particular context (smart-gridding people with nanotech, which basically requires forcing people to move from rural to urban areas), it makes perfect sense.
Too much sense. Holy shit.
I don't doubt that such a thing could be possible, but I do doubt that the Chinese have the expertise to pull it off. Beijing punishes people for reporting problems, for example. Everyone involved in such a process has every reason to want to try and fuck it up before launching it, too.I argued with neoliberals about this for years. Literally years. Since 2012ish, even. I argued that automation would come for our jobs, that we would be competing with AI and Big Data, that people would use Amazon's Mechanical Turk and unwittingly train machines to perform all these little tasks that humans get paid a pittance to do.
They always went "Oh, Lump of Labor fallacy". They always assumed there would be more jobs. That has been the assumption for a long time, hasn't it? That growth can continue unabated? That employment will not be disrupted excessively by new technology? Oh, if only that were true.
Now, @MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This is going to sound really, really schizo, so bear with me. All of this is hypothetical. I have no definitive proof of any of it, so take it with a grain of salt.
Earlier this year, when people started complaining about 5G cell radiation and how it might cause tissue damage, or how COVID-19 might actually be caused by wireless radiation injury, I viewed all that stuff with a very skeptical eye. However, I gave the idea some thought. I mulled it over a little bit, trying to figure out what might actually be going on here.
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
News, analysis and comment from the Financial Times, the worldʼs leading global business publication
Scientists in Switzerland are very concerned about 5G radiation and are stonewalling the tech. Gee, I wonder why?
Huawei are the guys behind much of the push for 5G, and the US has been trying to sanction Huawei for quite a while.
I started digging a bit, connecting the dots.
5G uses small-cell tech, with a very large number of small base stations everywhere. Lampposts, telephone poles, buildings, everywhere. These antennas are capable of beamforming. They can guide the wireless radiation directly towards a receiver, greatly increasing their range and efficiency for a given wattage.
Klaus Schwab’s book repeatedly mentions melding human biology with machinery, and the Internet of Things, and so on and so forth. Basically, transhumanism, turning people into cyborgs, etc.
I’ve been fascinated with transhumanism and cyberpunk stuff for quite a long damn time, but I’m also aware of the potential for rather extreme abuse of the tech.
Think back towards the beginning of the year. Professor Charles Lieber from Harvard, an expert in nanotechnology, was arrested due to undisclosed links to the Wuhan University of Technology and China’s scientist-scalping Thousand Talents program:
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.
More recently, there was a huge and very suspicious fire at Huawei’s 5G antenna lab in Dongguan:
But back to Charles Lieber. The reason why he’s such an interesting figure is because of the technology he was working on. He was trying to develop silicon transistor nanowire probes that could penetrate into human cells and have two-way, read-write functions in them, altering their behavior, and so on. The problem with this idea is that penetrating cell membranes has a tendency to kill cells. So, they coated the things in lipids to make them look like a part of a cell membrane and encourage fusion between the nanowire and the cell without killing the cell. It worked. It worked very, very well.
These nanowires are the width of a virus. They’re extremely tiny.
Virus-Sized Transistors
Chemist Charles Lieber and his colleagues have developed a nanoscale transistor so small it can enter, probe, and communicate with cells without harming them.
Ostensibly, Charles Lieber was hired to work on battery tech for the Chinese. This was a cover. He was doing nothing of the sort. He never worked on batteries.
I started thinking about the applications of the nanowire. At first, they planned on using them to record the events inside cells, detecting how organelles in those cells behaved. However, eventually, they planned on doing two-way communication with cells, including altering the behavior of organelles.
Imagine if one of these nanowire probes could instruct a cell to secrete any substance its proteins could manufacture? Imagine if it could give ribosomes blueprints to follow, forcing them to build proteins?
You could force a cell to manufacture a virus or a deadly prion from nothing. You could force a cell to release neurotransmitters or hormones to manipulate behavior. You could blow up someone’s heart with adrenaline, or soothe them with dopamine and serotonin. Anything you wanted. You could do literally fucking anything to someone. You could assassinate a dissenter, or turn a criminal into a blissfully dazed vegetable.
Here’s how it could work.
Think of how a Wacom pen works. There is no battery in the pen. When you move the pen over the tablet, the antennas inside the tablet actually energize the pen using an induction coil. Just like a Wacom pen, such a device would require no batteries, no internal power source at all. It could be powered externally, with wireless radiation. As in, 5G beam-forming antennas beaming deep-penetrating EMF into someone’s tissues. The person with the smart dust in their body becomes an internet-of-things “object”, recognized by the network.
- Imagine a piece of smart dust that consists of an induction coil, a small voltage regulation and control circuit, and a multitude of these nanowire probes, much like a little artificial virus.
- Someone gets millions of these things injected into their body, along with a larger chip that acts as a transponder to tell the grid where they are and if they have the smart dust or not.
- When they step into a 5G grid, the system recognizes them and locks onto them with a beam-forming antenna, directing electromagnetic radiation into their body.
- The tiny, tiny nanotech induction coils inside the smart dust absorb this energy and turn it into electricity. The smart dusts’s nanowires have penetrate into and fused with the surrounding cells.
- The EMF is pulsed such that it modulates the signal from the transistor to the cell, giving the cell instructions and reading back from it.
- The coils of the smart dust act as a phased-array antenna, weakly beaming the readings back, either to their phone or the nearest base station.
- The dust also commands the subject’s cells to do basically anything.
Take this device, for example:
It has many of the same components that I’m describing, here. An induction coil and a control circuit with a capacitor and diode and a TFT. All you really need to do is replace the TFT with nanowires and make the whole thing very, very, very small. Insanely small.
What if this is the true plan behind the “Great Reset?”
I find it fascinating that they’re proposing an mRNA vaccine for COVID-19, something that has never been tried before.
- Use an emergency, such as a deadly pandemic, as an excuse for mass immunization programs, controlling people’s movements.
- Use property seizure to force people out of the country and into the cities, where the grid is located.
- Inject them with nanomachines that cyberize their bodies and link them to the grid, under the pretense of vaccination.
- Boom. Everyone, everywhere, utterly enslaved with no possibility of escape or rebellion.
Most vaccines consist of weakened or killed whole virus, injected into the body to produce an antibody response and “train” the immune system to recognize and defeat the live virus, making someone immune. This is a perfectly fine idea that has saved millions of lives Since the discovery of vaccination.
mRNA vaccines are different. These vaccines consist of a bit of genetic code that actually orders your cells to construct chunks of virus (in SARS-CoV-2‘s case, this would be the Spike protein, the part that the virus uses to latch onto cells and the part that your antibodies need to neutralize). When someone is injected with an mRNA vaccine, they quite literally become a genetically modified organism. There are all sorts of possible issues, like autoantibodies forming against healthy tissues, multiple sclerosis and other demyelination disorders, et cetera.
You want to know something really funny? A nanowire probe that manipulates cells the same way as mRNA, telling ribosomes to build proteins, like bits of viral proteins, is basically indistinguishable from an actual mRNA vaccine. You would see exactly the same effects. The ribosomes would transit the endoplasmic reticulum and construct parts of the virus from amino acids, producing antigens that the immune system would successfully make antibodies against. This would all be detectable and verifiable as such. It would blend right in.
There would be no way to tell that anything was wrong with the vaccine. In truth, your biology would be completely controlled by whoever or whatever is controlling the grid that controls the induction-powered nanomachines.
If the nanowires worked as intended, then the cells could, in theory, be forced to construct proteins that don’t even exist in nature.
What if Wuhan was a trial run? Wuhan had just rolled out a huge 5G network. What if they injected people with these nanomachines, and then the nanomachines constructed the virus in-situ, infecting them and spreading it around the world, causing a mass panic and ruining our economies? What if the reason why there are so few infections in China now is not because they’re lying, but because they’ve already flicked on the signal to the nanomachines to manufacture the vaccine inside everyone’s bodies, but just in China?
This is not just some hypothetical shit. Published, peer-reviewed papers and prototypes of the necessary technology are known to exist. The lead scientist behind much of the research was known to have contact with the CCP, and was arrested and charged for it. Yes, the tech exists, it’s only a matter of integrating it together into a single, working device, testing a prototype, and then mass-producing it. China has a huge semiconductor industry. It would be trivial for them.
Why does China have so many people in concentration camps? Human experimentation. What if the Uighurs are test subjects? They’ve probably injected them with all sorts of shit just to see if it works or not.
We’re in a fucking Black Mirror episode, boyos. We full-on Deus Ex, now. Fuck me running.
View attachment 1732183
Again, none of this is conclusively proven to exist. It’s just speculation. However, the weird links between Charles Lieber and Wuhan, and the nature of his research, are far too disturbing to ignore. If it does exist, then indeed, it is so outlandish-sounding that nobody would believe it.
I can, of course, see why Xi Jinping would love such a thing. It completely fucking eliminates any possibility of dissent. If someone says something you don’t like, you can force their body to basically self-destruct, remotely, through the cell network. Totally deniable. It looks like a natural death.
Remember, Klaus Schwab predicted a fusion of biology and technology. His book openly talks about melding life and machinery, and using smart dust. I shit you not. It’s all in there. It’s a quote from his book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. “The future may see curious mixes of digital-and-analog life that will redefine our very natures.”
The 4th Industrial Revolution – Enabling the Smart Factory - FINAT
In his book “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”, Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum describes the ...www.finat.com
If this tech worked as intended, it wouldn’t just be usable for political assassination and turning our world into an Orwellian nightmare beyond our forebears’ worst nightmares. It could also extend people’s lifespans, replace many drugs, et cetera. Imagine if you could command a diabetic’s cells to make insulin, or force the cells to make cancer-killing compounds.
So much potential, and yet, utterly unethical. This would rob everyone of their freedoms, permanently.
You know, it’s uncanny. The virus scare seems so irrational and overblown, and all this talk about “resetting” the economy and confiscating everyone’s property and forcing them to move into the cities seems utterly bizarre. And yet, in this particular context (smart-gridding people with nanotech, which basically requires forcing people to move from rural to urban areas), it makes perfect sense.
Too much sense. Holy shit.
"We're going to increase fuel prices and add new taxes to discourage driving so we can save our planet."
