Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

About testoterone and women ...Buck Angel (the porno Ftm person) did a wee story about that.

"However, things kept getting worse. After about 15 years on testosterone, I felt a fever coming on one day after my workout, like I was getting the flu, and the next thing I knew I was passed out on the floor. My then-partner rushed me to the emergency room with a 101-degree fever and rising. (We were living in Mexico at the time.) Luckily, the doctors admitted me immediately and began treating me without question. They also got to the bottom of my ongoing problems, which were much worse than what my previous gynos thought.

As it turned out, the testosterone had atrophied my reproductive system—a condition that could have been prevented by the use of estrogen cream (I fucking doubt that Bucky 😁). The atrophy fused my uterus and my cervix together, along with my ovaries and everything else, creating an infection that burst and became septic."
Sauce
On his list of how to avoid this he says be honest with your Doctor. I mean we all know that's the crux of the issue. He lied and hid it and nearly died.
 
A quick question for this thread, so as it stands right now, transgenderism surgery through HRT and gender reassignment is posing a multitude of health complications to the point of being a total hazard for some people. Would it morally incorrect to have the process illegalized and/or banned completely until the safety and complications are addressed? Should we do more research into reassignment and see if there's a more safer and more concrete procedure to provide to people who make this choice?
 
He hasn't been active in weeks... do ya think he did the deed? Waste of fucking money getting them fake tits, hormones and penis mutilation if he did neck himself.

He's so bipolar it's not even funny. "I hate myself." "Feeling better now!" "I wanna die." "Don't use me as an example of mentally ill trans!"

He'll either be back on that account or back with another.

Attention suck's like that don't just go away.
 
A quick question for this thread, so as it stands right now, transgenderism surgery through HRT and gender reassignment is posing a multitude of health complications to the point of being a total hazard for some people. Would it morally incorrect to have the process illegalized and/or banned completely until the safety and complications are addressed? Should we do more research into reassignment and see if there's a more safer and more concrete procedure to provide to people who make this choice?
Do you mean like a ban until they can pinpoint why some people react badly to any of the treatments? It would be useful, but with the social climate it wouldn't happen.

Some people react badly to having a tooth removed though... so like...
 
A quick question for this thread, so as it stands right now, transgenderism surgery through HRT and gender reassignment is posing a multitude of health complications to the point of being a total hazard for some people. Would it morally incorrect to have the process illegalized and/or banned completely until the safety and complications are addressed? Should we do more research into reassignment and see if there's a more safer and more concrete procedure to provide to people who make this choice?

Gender dysphoria is a real condition,

and should be treated with therapy and time.

The alternative is having people tell you you need to love your body, only AFTER you went and permanently altered it. Pics related.
christ.png


jess.png
 
A quick question for this thread, so as it stands right now, transgenderism surgery through HRT and gender reassignment is posing a multitude of health complications to the point of being a total hazard for some people. Would it morally incorrect to have the process illegalized and/or banned completely until the safety and complications are addressed? Should we do more research into reassignment and see if there's a more safer and more concrete procedure to provide to people who make this choice?
Are you asking for people's opinions or what medical ethics would say?


As I understand medical ethics, "First Do No Harm" is a key principle.


We don't let anorexics starve themselves to death, we do not let those with a predisposition to the older methods of self injury like compulsive self harm carry on. We section people showing these behaviours and treat them, often putting them under compulsory treatment orders.

If these rules were applied fairly, we would do the same to people who are fat and refuse to reign in their eating and troons, but we don't apply them equally. Additionally, Peter Tatchell (pedo in chief of Stonewall UK) and the current generation of trannytards have invested considerable time and effort perpetuating the belief that to try and dissuade someone from going trip-trip-tripping down the tranny path, is akin to corrective rape and agressive conversion therapy and making gay men get married.


In short, yes we bloody well should, the suicide rate is going to creep ever higher, because the current generation of young people being groomed by the troonypedoes are peddlinng the lie that it's reversible, and it's not, can you imagine how world crushing it will be for people to realise? It'll be necks away at a far higher rate than the low 40% in a few years. But we won't because the cabal of troons knocking about will move heaven and earth to make sure that doesn't happen.
 
I don't know how testosterone affects the vagina, though.
In a very amusing manner. Testosterone can induce the vaginal epithelium to turn into prostate-type glands.

Nothing out of the ordinary for troon Reddit. But as I skimmed through his posting history I discovered that he has BEATEN UP HIS MOTHER. MULTIPLE TIMES:
2.png
Now this is a case where castration might be useful.

A quick question for this thread, so as it stands right now, transgenderism surgery through HRT and gender reassignment is posing a multitude of health complications to the point of being a total hazard for some people. Would it morally incorrect to have the process illegalized and/or banned completely until the safety and complications are addressed? Should we do more research into reassignment and see if there's a more safer and more concrete procedure to provide to people who make this choice?
The problem is that researchers cannot do such research today without activist groups, or even individual nut cases, threatening their jobs.
 
Do you mean like a ban until they can pinpoint why some people react badly to any of the treatments? It would be useful, but with the social climate it wouldn't happen.

Some people react badly to having a tooth removed though... so like...
Yes, that's what I meant.
Are you asking for people's opinions or what medical ethics would say?


As I understand medical ethics, "First Do No Harm" is a key principle.


We don't let anorexics starve themselves to death, we do not let those with a predisposition to the older methods of self injury like compulsive self harm carry on. We section people showing these behaviours and treat them, often putting them under compulsory treatment orders.

If these rules were applied fairly, we would do the same to people who are fat and refuse to reign in their eating and troons, but we don't apply them equally. Additionally, Peter Tatchell (pedo in chief of Stonewall UK) and the current generation of trannytards have invested considerable time and effort perpetuating the belief that to try and dissuade someone from going trip-trip-tripping down the tranny path, is akin to corrective rape and agressive conversion therapy and making gay men get married.


In short, yes we bloody well should, the suicide rate is going to creep ever higher, because the current generation of young people being groomed by the troonypedoes are peddlinng the lie that it's reversible, and it's not, can you imagine how world crushing it will be for people to realise? It'll be necks away at a far higher rate than the low 40% in a few years. But we won't because the cabal of troons knocking about will move heaven and earth to make sure that doesn't happen.
I was asking for the thread's opinion. My personal opinion is yes and no because there's a distinct possibility that someone going through a dysphoric episode is probably also going through a phase and the reassignment surgery currently is irreversible which is probably why suicide rates are so 50/50 right now because of regret. So yes in the sense that it's irreversible and there's a trend that shows that transgenderism might either be a phase or a complete mental disorder. However, no, in the sense that is it fair to restrict what someone should do with their body? If someone wants and is making the choice to transition, should they have the freedom to do so without the government interfering? Is it possible to perform more complex procedures to change someone's gender into something more accurate? That remains a mystery and, according to science, it's impossible to change a chromosomal makeup which is the key behind gender development. So I guess I'm conflicted right now.
 
Yes, that's what I meant.

I was asking for the thread's opinion. My personal opinion is yes and no because there's a distinct possibility that someone going through a dysphoric episode is probably also going through a phase and the reassignment surgery currently is irreversible which is probably why suicide rates are so 50/50 right now because of regret. So yes in the sense that it's irreversible and there's a trend that shows that transgenderism might either be a phase or a complete mental disorder. However, no, in the sense that is it fair to restrict what someone should do with their body? If someone wants and is making the choice to transition, should they have the freedom to do so without the government interfering? Is it possible to perform more complex procedures to change someone's gender into something more accurate? That remains a mystery and, according to science, it's impossible to change a chromosomal makeup which is the key behind gender development. So I guess I'm conflicted right now.


I do think you're right, though on that note, would you feel okay with a person starving or cutting themselves to death? I'm not asking to be contrary, I'm just nosey, I suppose. I draw the line at it involving children. I find it appalling we are allowing women - and sorrynotsorry, it is invariably the Mothers driving it, look at Desmond and Jazz and countless others - cramming a trans identity on their children, Children should not be put on puberty blockers, seeing as how we now know more about the long term effects and harm and they are not mentally capable of making that decision, and it sure a hell should not be the choice of a parent. It's not medically necessary, being trans is a mental disorder and it should be treated with aggressive therapy and if needed, removing the child from the parent pushing the trans identity on them.


And you cannot change gender. You can surgically mutilate your body to have secondary sex characteristics and take drugs to interfere with your endicrine system and replacement hormones for the ones you suppress. But you cannot "change gender". A troon is still chromosomally XX or XY (intersex people are incredibly rare, most are spontaneously aborted in utero because even nature knows that shit needs fetus deleetused).


If grown adults afforded the rights of other adults, and with the mental capacity to function in society want to do that to themselves, then whatever, their funeral. But we need to stop pretending we're helping them. We're helping them by surgically altering their bodies to treat a mental disorder, and as we saw with lobotomies, ultimately we caused far more harm than good with that, as was proven in the longer term. I'd even argue, lettting people troon out is a form of lobotomy. it keeps them quiet and docile and pliant for a few years while the doctor shop and take hormones and chase the lie that the surgery offers, but after a few years, the grave harm and damage becomes obvious, they realise they cannot come back from it and that's why 41%. We can carry on doing it, but ultimately we're saving up harm for the future because we lack the spine to say "no" in the short term.


Edited for typos and stuff.
 
Last edited:
I do think you're right, though on that note, would you feel okay with a person starving or cutting themselves to death? I'm not asking to be contrary, I'm just nosey, I suppose. I draw the line at it involving children. I find it appalling we are allowing women - and sorrynotsorry, it is invariably the Mothers driving it, look at Desmond and Jazz and countless others - cramming a trans identity on their children, Children should not be put on puberty blockers, seeing as how we now know more about the long term effects and harm and they are not mentally capable of making that decision, and it sure a hell should not be the choice of a parent. It's not medically necessary, being trans is a mental disorder and it should be treated with aggressive therapy and if needed, removing the child from the parent pushing the trans identity on them.


And you cannot change gender. You can surgically mutilate your body to have secondary sex characteristics and take drugs to interfere with your endicrine system and replacement hormones for the ones you suppress. But you cannot "change gender". A troon is still chromosomally XX or XY (intersex people are incredibly rare, most are spontaneously aborted in urtero because even nature knows that shit needs fetus deleetused).


If grown adults afforded the rights of other adults, and with the mental capacity to function in society want to do that to themselves, then whatever, their funeral. But we need to stop pretending we're helping them. We're helping them by surgically altering their bodies to treat a mental disorder, and as we say with lobotomies, ultimately we caused far more harm than good with that, as was proven in the longer term. I'd even argue, lettting people troon out is a form of lobotomy. it keeps them quiet and docile and pliant for a few years while the doctor shop and take hormones and chase the lie that the surgery offers, but after a few years, the grave harm and damage becomes obvious, they realise they cannot come back from it and that's why 41%. We can carry on doing it, but ultimately we're saving up harm for the future because we lack the spine to say no in the short term.
I definitely draw the line at children as well and as for the starving part, no, but it comes down to “what can you realistically do?” If it’s someone you don’t know. Maybe I’m a sociopath for thinking that way, but if it was someone I did know I would most definitely intervene.

But what’s your opinion on people who are satisfied with the transition and are happier afterwards? Do you believe there’s more going on behind their head then what’s being lead on? There are some people who have transitioned and are happy with the results and do go on to live relatively decent albeit flawed lives with caveats. What are your thoughts on them?
 
I definitely draw the line at children as well and as for the starving part, no, but it comes down to “what can you realistically do?” If it’s someone you don’t know. Maybe I’m a sociopath for thinking that way, but if it was someone I did know I would most definitely intervene.

But what’s your opinion on people who are satisfied with the transition and are happier afterwards? Do you believe there’s more going on behind their head then what’s being lead on? There are some people who have transitioned and are happy with the results and do go on to live relatively decent albeit flawed lives with caveats. What are your thoughts on them?
I don't want to carry on clogging up the thread too much, but the trans people I know who have had the surgery and are happier for it (or indeed, happy they did it) are people who didn't see it as a magical cure-all for their problems, and who went ahead with it after a lot of careful thought. And who could begrudge another person happiness? I just think we need to be more realistic about it and the surgery, make sure people truly understand what they are doing and the consequences, and that they're not just doing it on a whim/because of a fetish. In doing that, we'd also be ensuring the people who have it are the ones most likely to benefit the most from the procedures and treatments and that's always a consideration with other medically necessary procedures - does the benefit outweigh the harm? (and medical procecures are, invariably, harmful to various degrees).

Feel free to DM me about this if you want to talk more about it, I just don't wanna clog things up or go too OT here, so apologies if that's what I've done.
 
A quick question for this thread, so as it stands right now, transgenderism surgery through HRT and gender reassignment is posing a multitude of health complications to the point of being a total hazard for some people. Would it morally incorrect to have the process illegalized and/or banned completely until the safety and complications are addressed? Should we do more research into reassignment and see if there's a more safer and more concrete procedure to provide to people who make this choice?

Possibly, I mean some of the issues are just starting to come out at the moment, the Tavistock centre is facing the music, detrans people are getting more attention (and blowing the whistle on some of it) and so on and so forth.
 
So, @pogmilf, the NB girl who accuses Mia @cuntrifle/@dlckhaver/@libfucker of sexual assault is currently busy defending Mia. Because the evil TERFs who are misgendering him are worse than rapists...

View attachment 1729648
View attachment 1729649
View attachment 1729650
Interestingly, you could argue both arguments are about self-preservation for her. Number one should obviously be protecting yourself and others from a sexual assaulter, but you could say she is desperately protecting her own “nonbinary identity” by defending dickhaver. Mental illness is a hell of a drug.

Also, I enjoy calling him dickhaver. It sounds like an insult but it was the username this brave transwomyn chose himself.

"My cunt producing more liquid than a fucking tap" :cryblood:
This is the first time I hear of a woman getting horny from crossdressing.
A lot of FTMs get more sexually aggressive due to testosterone, it's just that no one pays any attention to it since they can't really hit their intended target (gay men).
Periods. This biological woman was talking about their periods. In a really fucking weird way, but still.

My personal opinion is yes and no because there's a distinct possibility that someone going through a dysphoric episode is probably also going through a phase and the reassignment surgery currently is irreversible which is probably why suicide rates are so 50/50 right now because of regret. So yes in the sense that it's irreversible and there's a trend that shows that transgenderism might either be a phase or a complete mental disorder. However, no, in the sense that is it fair to restrict what someone should do with their body? If someone wants and is making the choice to transition, should they have the freedom to do so without the government interfering? Is it possible to perform more complex procedures to change someone's gender into something more accurate? That remains a mystery and, according to science, it's impossible to change a chromosomal makeup which is the key behind gender development. So I guess I'm conflicted right now.
We don't let people with body integrity disorder amputate healthy body parts, why do we allow transgender people to do that? When we see people cause harm to their body because of mental issues, we intervene and don't let them continue suffering mentally or causing themselves additional physical ailments. Whether we include dysphoria among mental illnesses or not, I have not seen a transgender person who doesn’t suffer from other mental illnesses both before and after transition. Also, we don't let minors change their body permanently, such as getting tattoos, because they can't consent, why are trans kids different? These doctors are breaking their oaths in so many ways.

C48407F5-B128-4298-84E4-D4D3544D1D99.jpeg
 
As opposed to what Blanchard says, horny women who do it for the fetish exist. - and this is an explanation for most of Tumblr content pre porn ban.

Indeed, I've known quite a few female fetishists. The thing about them is that unlike male fetishists, they're not overly exhibitionist about it - there's no aggressive drive to involve other people. It all mostly stays fantasy and largely takes the form of writing erotica/fanfic. Whether it's fe/male socialization differences or innate, women are largely shy about revealing their perversions.
Well, at least they were until troonism gave all of them a socially accepted outlet.
 
Just found some bullshit on my lunch break, this is currently the top post in r/actuallesbians: GIRLDICK YOU GUYSE

full of 'lesbians' either seeking validation that someone could love their ugly troon selves or assuring that girldick 'tastes great' teehee totally lesbian thing to say!

Also I had a good hearty chuckle at these results of a demographic survey the sub did a while ago


Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 12.15.01.png
 
Back