Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
learning to worship the preamble to the dec. of indep. in k-12 is the same thing as learning to worship the Bible in sunday school
yes or no. do you acknowledge that there are biological differences between races? That we are not the same. That we are not equal?
There are biological differences between all human beings. Ergo, we are all individually different but race cannot be used as an excuse or a means to sort humans into arbitrary biological groups. Race is in the eye and cause of the beholder; it is personal and community prerogative that exercises what is racist and not racist. It is clear that I am dealing with someone who cannot distinguish fact from fiction.

Oh, and thank you for giving me another clue to your insufferable stupidity - I'm not even American. What relevance the Declaration of Independence to any of these arguments?
 
Don't they tell you in schools that Wikipedia is not a credible source? Besides that, even your own citation shows that at minimum, the both parties need to at least be well into puberty. I don't know if you know this but 10-12 year olds aren't well into puberty.
depends on the person, and race. not everyone hits puberty or finishes puberty at the same time. and this age will also change over time as people races evolve. it might go up or might go down.

There are biological differences between all human beings. Ergo, we are all different but race cannot be used as an excuse. Race is in the eye and cause of the beholder; it is personal and community prerogative that exercises what is racist and not racist. It is clear that I am dealing with someone who cannot distinguish fact from fiction.
except it's not, your own link showed that race can be clustered by MATH.
We can even measure the differences, e.g. the fastest runners are africans or black women give birth on avg 39wks not 40wks like whites or certain drugs work better on certain races.
There is an overwhelming amount of data to support the idea of races and an entire theory "natural selection."
You're just a science denier.

Oh, and thank you for giving me another clue to your insufferable stupidity - I'm not even American. What relevance the Declaration of Independence to any of these arguments?
Because "all men are created equal" is from the dec. of indep. that's the source of "human equality." Equality is a lie.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
depends on the person, and race. not everyone hits puberty or finishes puberty at the same time. and this age will also change over time as people races evolve. it might go up or might go down.

We've determined that it CAN go up and down. Can you explain why it SHOULD? I'm pouring through pages of nonsense just to get a bead on your core argument here.

Sure it's not a God-given imperative, or some universal constant- but why does it need to be different? Is your point just that it's not set it stone and that it's a changeable social construct?
 
We've determined that it CAN go up and down. Can you explain why it SHOULD? I'm pouring through pages of nonsense just to get a bead on your core argument here.

Sure it's not a God-given imperative, or some universal constant- but why does it need to be different? Is your point just that it's not set it stone and that it's a changeable social construct?
natural selection.
maybe over the long run people who hit puberty faster will reproduce more and become the new foundation
or maybe vice-versa.

many of these laws that were enacted over the last 100-200 years are non-sense and they will not be eternal.
To build the next-generation society, we need to destroy the current society and that means changing the existing laws.
 
natural selection.
maybe over the long run people who hit puberty faster will reproduce more and become the new foundation
or maybe vice-versa.

many of these laws that were enacted over the last 100-200 years are non-sense and they will not be eternal.
To build the next-generation society, we need to destroy the current society and that means changing the existing laws.

Eternal Laws- next-generation society- new foundation-

Sounds like you need to be talking to the illuminati... not Kiwi Farms.
 
except it's not, your own link showed that race can be clustered by MATH.
We can even measure the differences, e.g. the fastest runners are africans or black women give birth on avg 39wks not 40wks like whites or certain drugs work better on certain races.
There is an overwhelming amount of data to support the idea of races and an entire theory "natural selection."
You're just a science denier.
CITE ONE. And pray that it matches the calibre of my own sources, lest I offload more upon you, since it is clear you do not understand the rules of debate.

Your constant use of "maybe" belies speculations - speculation we know to be utterly unfounded.
 
Eternal Laws- next-generation society- new foundation-

Sounds like you need to be talking to the illuminati... not Kiwi Farms.
the left has their great reset nwo world order. we need a counter vision.

CITE ONE. And pray that it matches the calibre of my own sources, lest I offload more upon you, since it is clear you do not understand the rules of debate.

Your constant use of "maybe" belies speculations - speculation we know to be utterly unfounded.
top 10 faster 100m sprinters are all black.
is that because of black supremacy?
do we need more white and Asian runners?
How will we close this gap?
 
top 10 faster 100m sprinters are all black.
is that because of black supremacy?
do we need more white and Asian runners?
How will we close this gap?
You are arguing from statistics and public perception. You are trying to use a baseless supposition to support an indefensible position in rigorous debate. What does the performance of a runner have to do with the usefulness of an arbitrary racial grouping? So Kenyans run faster than everyone else, so what? Ironically you are preaching the very same enforced diversity spiel you so claim to loathe.
 
You are arguing from statistics and public perception. You are trying to use a baseless supposition to support an indefensible position in rigorous debate. What does the performance of a runner have to do with the usefulness of an arbitrary racial grouping? So Kenyans run faster than everyone else, so what? Ironically you are preaching the very same enforced diversity spiel you so claim to loathe.
blacks have dna that make them faster at running. just like how greyhounds have dna that make them faster at running. very simple. but you're a science denier so you cannot admit DNA is real.

you want more, okay. UC system is dropping SAT and ACT tests

Why? Because the gap is genetic. Race and ethnicity have become stronger predictors of SAT scores than family income and parental education levels.

So we have all the data showing DNA is real. Genetic differences between races is real. Natural selection is real. Race realism is settled science and you're just a science denier.
 
blacks have dna that make them faster at running. just like how greyhounds have dna that make them faster at running. very simple. but you're a science denier so you cannot admit DNA is real.

you want more, okay. UC system is dropping SAT and ACT tests

Why? Because the gap is genetic. Race and ethnicity have become stronger predictors of SAT scores than family income and parental education levels.

So we have all the data showing DNA is real. Genetic differences between races is real. Natural selection is real. Race realism is settled science and you're just a science denier.

Somehow it would be better at this point if you just said race was a social construct. At least you could just own it and say it was a social construct that you wanted to keep around. Ironically that's the same argument you had for AOC- It's a social construct, so you can change it or keep it.

Why not racial groups too?
 
blacks have dna that make them faster at running. just like how greyhounds have dna that make them faster at running. very simple. but you're a science denier so you cannot admit DNA is real.

you want more, okay. UC system is dropping SAT and ACT tests

Why? Because the gap is genetic. Race and ethnicity have become stronger predictors of SAT scores than family income and parental education levels.

So we have all the data showing DNA is real. Genetic differences between races is real. Natural selection is real. Race realism is settled science and you're just a science denier.
Holy shit, nigger, who cares about physical differences between races?

Just because niggas can run faster, and gooks can do math better, doesn't mean that they should be segregated from the huwhites. All races should be given equal opportunities to improve their social standing; that's the whole point of equality, you dumb fuck.
 
How does this explain your own mixed DNA?
same as every other americamutt.

Boxershorts how do you feel about covid?
not dangerous enough to warrant a lockdown.
I think social distancing + masks is reasonable enough.

Somehow it would be better at this point if you just said race was a social construct. At least you could just own it and say it was a social construct that you wanted to keep around. Ironically that's the same argument you had for AOC- It's a social construct, so you can change it or keep it.

Why not racial groups too?
race is a social construct. 100% true. DNA is a spectrum. but race emerges when you cluster people. Same as dogs.

ethnicities = dog breeds (golden, lab., etc.)
races = dog types (spitz, retreiver, etc.)

Holy shit, nigger, who cares about physical differences between races?

Just because niggas can run faster, and gooks can do math better, doesn't mean that they should be segregated from the huwhites. All races should be given equal opportunities to improve their social standing; that's the whole point of equality, you dumb fuck.
You are fucking retarded.
If the differences are genetic that means they can NEVER achieve equality.
And differences extend beyond just speed.
I don't want to race mix away into a brown blob you liberal freak.
 
Don't they tell you in schools that Wikipedia is not a credible source? Besides that, even your own citation shows that at minimum, the both parties need to at least be well into puberty. I don't know if you know this but 10-12 year olds aren't well into puberty.
AOC laws were way lower or even non-existent at one point. I am happy with them being the age they are now, but this whole "don't cite wikipedia cus school said no" take is fucking retarded. Wikipedia has its sources listed, the reason academic institutions say don't cite it isnt cus its a bad source for basic info and history, but because its not authoritative and just an aggregation of sources anyway. In a fucking internet debate you can just double check the source wikipedia lists.
 
Back