Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Lily is on twitter again.
and she jump straight to what she always does. Telling people how to write stories and declaring anyone to go against it a childish swear
So you know, there's that.
also as a report. No, Lizzy has not commented. and honestly lets assume their will be no comment, and Lizzy will be all the better
Ok, time to answer those things since i'm writing a novel and i don't have other shit to do this day:
  1. Don't worry about spoilers? A story can't have a plot device or it'll be disappointing. At a minimum, you must generate a foreshadow if you want to reveal something important and make a big impression.
  2. No, that's a dumb advice. Depending on the story, it may be both near the end and in the middle the best part of the story. Lily is giving literally fanfiction info only for mentioning relationships.
  3. Why? Isn't there a possibility with a rival at least? I always said; antagonists aren't purely evil, they're even follow the protagonist's objetives but in a different path that causes conflicts.
  4. Ok, probably she is right in this. Zuko, at least unlike Vegeta, the only bad thing he's done was the invasion of the South Pole and having too pride. Everything after that is being Azula's pawn and that's finally he thinks about that. And later he decides to help the Avatar.
  5. It's just Batman about killers. Lily seems not saw that as a morale decision rather than "enabling" (shit word if you ask). At least for me, depends a lot on the protagonist in question. Like i always said: "killing is killing, regardless of the cause".
  6. wow , she said literally the last sequence of TLOK's S4 ending... and... she's right, again. Give me some minutes to recover from this
  7. Wait a moment, who uses Twitter to reveal content? ... Don't answer for that
  8. Again, depends. I can't stop writing a final antagonist who conspired to provoke a civil war that was already visible at that time just because it's evil and everything, there are reasons involved and those are the ones that should keep the character being written.
  9. That's a opinion and not a advice. Fuck off, Lily. At least Blizzard showing shitty writings nowadays isn't false
  10. What? Worldbuilding can be decisive in many vital points. I can't simply write a story about robots & machines in a fantasy world-based story, at least without proper introduction. That point sounds like Lily don't giving at shit when someone talks about a inconsistency in her shitty webcomics. And that's right
  11. Yeah, that point is hypocresy. How Lily have balls to talk on it?
  12. Same shit as 11, again; looks like she has big balls.
  13. Well... that's surprising. She's right about that.
  14. Yeah, she mentioned indirectly again TLOK's S4 ending. And she's not wrong there. It's a modern media problem actually.
  15. Ok, she's not wrong there... again.
  16. Currently there are stories like this? Seems interesting in these times.
  17. Again, i don't see her comics deeply, but i prefer don't trust either. And no, some stories can work with that situation. It's all about storytelling, Lily.
  18. Well... i've no doubt about minories being misrepresented. But it's too rich coming for her.
  19. Same as 18
  20. Same as 18
  21. Same as 18
  22. Same as 18
  23. Forcing? Writing a bizarre rape-like scene for making empathy at least of the reader isn't worth? (Of course that will be make sense) No.
  24. Wait, that point is too specific. The problem is getting the redemption arc or it's the unilateral group focusing on the kid?
  25. Well, "Bikini Armor" is outdated. Probably she's right in that too.
  26. No, that keeps stupid. If they aren't in the beach and playing shit, it's pointless.
It's amazing how you have more problems trying to giving properly advice than solid arguments to build better a story.
 
Lily is on twitter again.
and she jump straight to what she always does. Telling people how to write stories and declaring anyone to go against it a childish swear
So you know, there's that.
also as a report. No, Lizzy has not commented. and honestly lets assume their will be no comment, and Lizzy will be all the better
Oh boy, Lily dispensing writing "tips". Let's take a look at those, shall we?

Nr. 1: While technically true that most stories in most genres are enjoyable even when you know how they're gonna end/are rereading them, spoiling them for people who don't want to be spoiled is always a dick move. But this mainly shows that Lily has no appreciation for a good mystery in a story, probably because she's too unimaginative to ever come up with one herself.

Nr. 2: Well, as Duine said, people don't just write a "five season show" from the get-go. That aside the reason why the romantic resolution is left for the finale is usually because the actual resolution of the Will They Won't They tension often kills the interest into the ship for a lot of people. They're together now, the exciting part is over. Much like a real relationship, once the honeymoon phase wears off, it takes a lot of work to make it work. The "payoff" is the carthartic moment where the two characters become a couple, not the boring mundanities of the relationship afterwards. Lily herself does it with her comic. The Will They Won't They of CLily and her Gardevoir are the main feature, while CLily's actual, stable relationship is left forgotten by the roadsite 99% of the time because it's a lot less interesting by comparison. It's pretty much all the same reasons why the villain is defeated at the end, rather than halfway through and the rest of the story is just the heroes living mundane, post-victory lives.

If you want to write a story about two characters in a relationship, then that relationship has to be the premise, rather than the reward. The viewers have to be pulled in by the idea of watching those two people deal with being a couple, rather than with becoming a couple.

Nr. 3: Lily, your personal tastes do not equal writing advice.

Nr. 4: So now she tries to retcon Zuko's entire character arc into not being a redemption, just so she can hold on to her idea that all redemption arcs are bad. Does she know she's talking bullshit but doesn't want to admit it? Or is she so deluded about being right that she feels compelled to twist any reality that disagrees with her until it fits?

Nr. 5: Clear dig at Steven Universe. Also, Lily doesn't understand characters with morals or principles, because she herself doesn't have any.

Nr. 6: Clear dig at She-Ra. Also, a hero and a villain fighting each other isn't abuse. They're no power-dynamic, there's no pretending to be anything other than enemies. They're hostile to each other and they act on that hostility, simple as.

Nr. 7: The only one so far that's sorta agreeable. Yes, a work should stand on its own and not require supplements from Twitter to explain important things about itself.

Nr. 8: Oh wow, Lily actually displaying a moral principle...

Nr. 9: ...only to immediately reveal that she actually doesn't and it's all about defending her Waifu.

Nr. 10: Technically, yes, everything in a story is there because the writer wrote it. But I'm sure this is more about her "if you write it in a story you support it in real life" mindset, than people trying to justify genuine bigotry as worldbuilding.

Nr. 11: Technically true, but too unspecific. An 18-year-old is an adult, a 17-year-old is a minor. Pairing them up is not pedophilia. And yes, I've seen morons on tumblr and twitter argue that it is.

Nr. 12: Technically, yes, but this is like the one above, with morons taking it beyond any resemblance of reason. I've seen people villify the very idea of showing teenage girls to have breasts.

Nr. 13: "Fusion". Ah, so it was just a dig at Stevonnie all along. But that clears up that Lily is just being one of the overzealous tumblr morons, since the entirety of Stevonnie being "sexualised" was a the reveal shot of them.

Nr. 14: Lily, as usual, forgets that there's a world beyond the little bubble of LGBT acceptance she exists in. In a lot of places, you flat-out CAN'T openly protray LGBT themes openly. Disguising it in metaphors is simply the response to it.

Nr. 15: Childish insults for the sake of being childish aside, technically yes. Practically, I point to Nr. 14.

Nr. 16: Stupid insults aside, technically also yes. Portraying the single minority character in a work as a negative stereotype is generally not a good thing.

Nr. 17: Probably just another dig at She-Ra, but aside from that same as Nr. 16.

Nr. 18: Definitely a dig at She-Ra, also view Nr. 14.

Nr. 19: Same as Nr. 16

Nr. 20: Same as Nr. 16.

Nr. 21: Same as Nr. 16.

Nr. 22: Same as Nr. 16.

Nr. 23: Clear dig at the New Trilogy and Reylo. In which case I point to Nr. 6. Kylo Ren is not Rey's abuser, because an openly hostile villain attacking the heroe is not abuse.

Nr. 24: Probably another dig at the New Trilogy because I can't think of anything else that fits this specific scenario. This isn't even pretending to be a writing tip, it's just Lily bitching about Kylo Ren.

Nr. 25: Yes, characters don't have sexual agency because they're not real. Which also doesn't make it a crime against those character to put them in bikini armor. And yes, Lily's brand of morons are also arguing that.

Nr. 26: Sex negativity is not a good look in general and especially for someone who spends so much time salivating over lesbians and having people draw porn for her.
 
The fact that she says 'if you're writing a five-season show' is insane. That's not how network production works. They buy by season. You might want to have a five-season show, but the networks only tend to buy one season at a time (although a lot of shows do tend to get greenlit for a second season pretty quickly). There's a reason so many shows wind up never finishing their story arcs, or writing in such a way that season finales are rewarding while also dangling little cliffhangers and hooks-- if the show has to end on that note they want it to be remembered as being reasonably satisfying, but sometimes putting a plot hook can also encourage a network to renew for another season. (I think The 300 actually tried to do this by refusing to answer all of its questions at the end of its last season specifically to force the network to renew it. Didn't work.)
At least part of the reason Korra is such a mess is because of the network. They were first greenlit for one season of 13 episodes. They thought that was all the time they had to tell their story. Then Nick bought a second season, so they had to create a new conflict, because they ended the last season with the leader of the anti-Benders being outed as a bender himself, and dying in a murder-suicide. THEN Nick bought 2 more seasons, so they could finally try to tell a longer form narrative and didn't have to wrap up all their plot threads in the same season. Korra has problems, but it's obvious that they had to make up a large portion of the series as they went along because they never knew how many episodes or seasons they had to tell their story. Maybe their original ideas had nothing to do with the Dark Avatar, or the Red Lotus, or Kuvira and it would've just focused on the Equalists storyline, but fleshed out over a much longer period of time. We'll never know, because they thought they had to tell that story in just a few episodes, not a few seasons.

Lily really doesn't understand how good she has it being an independent YouTube creator/fanfic writer with no higher up interference to deal with, no test audience screenings, no crunch time, no deadlines, so on and so forth. For the network, the entire staff and showrunner is ultimately replaceable. They don't care if you made Steven Universe, they OWN it. You can plant your feet about your on-screen gay scissoring all you like, but if you won't abide to network demands, they'll replace your ass with someone else who will do what they say and you'll lose the right to create content set in that world, forced to watch from the outside as they ruin your baby.

If Lily had to work in the industry, she'd be a John K. 2.0. Impossible to work with, never meets their deadlines solicits minors and ultimately, whatever project they're working on is better off without them, even if it's something that was wholly their idea and vision.
 
Last edited:
Holy shit the art took a nose dive. It's kind of funny that the scene where their two self-inserts get engaged is so passionless and obviously drawn hastily by someone who wasn't very interested. How long til they both realize that irl roleplaying as lesbians isn't as hot as they both thought it would be?
 
these tips are not even helpful, they are just a list of prohibitions based on what she doesn’t like and nothing contructive, all this is just to make stories that specifically please her and her tastes without giving a foundation and without arguments "if you do that then you are a turd"
wow very convincing

and in the spirit of the tips:
https://archive.fo/WRAsP
1605459670396.png

yeah, just have one side of the conflict to be heard and always be right or otherwise you have an abusive fetish.
as if stories do not have the advantage of exploring different perspectives and not everything is black and white

https://archive.fo/oAeTz
1605460044177.png

sexualized clothing is more of an aesthetic than a style of writing and characterization

Bayonetta, Nier, Persona, Soul Calibur, Overwatch, Street Fighter and others have already been criticized for presenting sexualized females, but that was never their only feature and those who complained (exclusively Anita and the others like Lily were just parroting at this point) only spoke of the observable surface and said that it was problematic despite the contradiction that still hasn't hurt anyone except who wants to be offended( who does not want to be reminded that there are attractive people in the world)

and the drawings are not exclusively for the author, but for the audience he wants too,
people like to see attractive people in the media. comics, movies, anime, cartoons the vast majority who like it don't compare themselves to the characters and end up hating themselves because they don't look like them

Lily wants you to believe this is a problem, but she doesn't justify it why is bad and just wants to insult whoever does it.
except that she does that and worse,
incest, bestiality, pedophilia and violent lesbians she can't stand writing without adding one to those things and always has her excuses
there's no reason to put any of this and despite that she put it anyway
 
Lily really doesn't understand how good she has it being an independent YouTube creator/fanfic writer with no higher up interference to deal with, no test audience screenings, no crunch time, no deadlines, so on and so forth. For the network, the entire staff and showrunner is ultimately replaceable. They don't care if you made Steven Universe, they OWN it. You can plant your feet about your on-screen gay scissoring all you like, but if you won't abide to network demands, they'll replace your ass with someone else who will do what they say and you'll lose the right to create content set in that world, forced to watch from the outside as they ruin your baby.

If Lily had to work in the industry, she'd be a John K. 2.0. Impossible to work with, never meets their deadlines solicits minors and ultimately, whatever project they're working on is better off without them, even if it's something that was wholly their idea and vision.
Yeah it's funny she lectures actual professionals about how they should run their show and how they don't know what they're doing, meanwhile her tenure as a youtuber has consisted of her sitting on her ass, getting to make videos where she complains about other peoples work, and complaining when her fans and patrons want results or show interest in her ideas.
She also frequently shows contempt for artists because they refuse to be treated like dirt and give her porn for free.

She is the quintessential internet neckbeard with a trendy coat of paint.
 
She likes Zuko's redemption arc... because in her mind it's not a redemption arc. She's twisted it into Zuko overcoming his abuser rather than redeeming himself, which is... an interesting read on the situation, absolving Zuko of all responsibility there. Obviously folks in the thread are fans of Avatar and know how bullshit this take is
I mean, it's not technically total bullshit in that Zuko's arc is both redeeming himself AND overcoming his abuse. It's just Lilly, like so many in the cartoon community in particular, see abuse as the ultimate absolver for the characters they like . You know, like how people will often act like Harley 'Child Murderer' Quinn doesn't actually need to be redeemed, she just needs to be away from the Joker's abuse, even though many of her terrible actions weren't really stemming from her abuse. Zuko's arc is realizing that what his father put him through wasn't okay and that he's always had the choice to be better, but he doesn't truly believe he has the strength to move away from the influence of his father until he faces his father in person and tells him upfront that he's going to help the avatar. Then the episodes after that are him slowly proving to the people he tormented and fucked over for most of the first two seasons that he wants to help.
 
Not to say that isn't an aspect of Zuko's arc, but Lily is saying that his redemption was entirely overcoming his abuse, which is not the case. The implication is that Zuko didn't get a redemption arc because Zuko didn't need to be redeemed because he was just the victim of abuse, which is the bullshit part. Zuko's choices were his own, and there's no point that exemplifies it more than The Crossroads of Destiny. He had spent all that time in the Earth Kingdom with Iroh and found that it was possible to lead a better life, to forget his vengeance and his quest for 'honor', to run a tea shop or even go on a date. He chooses to abandon that life in order to continue his pursuit of the Avatar. Even in the cavern below the lake, Katara heals him and shows him that there's still a better way.

And when given the chance, he chooses to rejoin his father and sister. He chooses to pursue his birthright and 'reclaim his honor'. He could have chosen to remain with Ozai and Azula and become a great figure in the military; he was given his place of honor next to his father at the war meeting. He could have chosen to stay.

He didn't. The rejection of that was a redemption that we saw was possible from the very first season. We also see the contrast of Azula, who chooses to embrace their father's (and grandfather's) legacy. They were both victims of abuse in different ways, but it's choices that allow them to be redeemed. Azula is ultimately a pathetic victim of circumstance who refused to be better even when given the chance. Meanwhile, when Zuko was given what he thought he wanted, he ultimately rejected it when he recognized the evil it represented. The evil he had been perpetuating, in his own desperate search for approval and love.

Having written that, it might explain why Lily hates redemption arcs, or at least one of the reasons-- they require one to take responsibility for their actions. It's not about having an excuse for them, which is why Zuko works so well: he has an explanation for his behavior, but it's not an excuse, and it's his own actions and choices that both led him down a bad path and, more importantly, led him back out of it.

Given that Lily compared this to 'redeeming' Sylvanas in her next 'tip' and how she goes on and on about Sylvanas is justified and it's not her fault (and therefore doesn't need to be redeemed-- and I'm not addressing bad storytelling decisions in WoW, just Lily's perspective on this-- it clarifies once again her tendency to simply refuse to have characters (and herself) take responsibility for their actions. It's easier to make up excuses and say they're justified in what they do than it is to have a character actually own their choices, recognize their mistakes, and strive to be better, no matter how difficult it is for them.
 
Lily is on twitter again.
and she jump straight to what she always does. Telling people how to write stories and declaring anyone to go against it a childish swear
So you know, there's that.
also as a report. No, Lizzy has not commented. and honestly lets assume their will be no comment, and Lizzy will be all the better
Lily is on twitter again.
and she jump straight to what she always does. Telling people how to write stories and declaring anyone to go against it a childish swear
So you know, there's that.
also as a report. No, Lizzy has not commented. and honestly lets assume their will be no comment, and Lizzy will be all the better

Lily is on twitter again.
and she jump straight to what she always does. Telling people how to write stories and declaring anyone to go against it a childish swear
So you know, there's that.
also as a report. No, Lizzy has not commented. and honestly lets assume their will be no comment, and Lizzy will be all the better
Besides unironic horny-shaming from a child porn writer, I especially hate the “don’t make your characters into stereotypes” rule. The only reason the “angry black man” or “flamboyant gay man” are seen as offensive is because we’ve been told to see those things as negative. A wider VARIETY of character types is good, but to hate stereotypes like these with such a passion is to claim they don’t exist in real life, aren’t based on truth, and that these are shameful behaviors. It’s a form of respectability politics, which Lily claims to hate.
Also, on the subject of "characters have no agency"... that's not really how characters work. In a good story, a character is not just a mindless puppet to slide from point A to point B. A good character feels like they appeared out of nowhere and demanded to be created, and will feel like a fully-realized person. Sometimes they come to you wearing bikini armor, and you just roll with it. Again, to horny-shame these character designs is to deny that some real women exist and like dressing provocatively. I get the "omnipotent male gaze that de facto exists under patriarchy" blah blah blah, but, unlike Lily, I am an actual leftist and I understand that the true framework to view the world through is through class structures, so all the race, gender, etc. stuff are just tools to turn the lower classes against each other. The fact is that attractive characters can sell a work to a target audience. Tying back to the "no sexualizing minors" rule, she's clearly talking about anime, which is largely for preteens and teens (yes, anime is actually kind of a niche interest even in Japan), and they like looking at pretty girls. 'Course, it's weird for her to complain about any of this, because again... so sayeth the child porn writer.
EDIT: Been thinking about this forever, but I have to say it. Steven Universe had very few human LGBT+ characters because it takes place in southern Delaware. As a Delaware resident myself, I can speak from experience that they don’t like gay people here, especially down south near the beaches. The only successful LGBT+ businesses are owned by “straight-passing” gays who “keep it to themselves” which Lily and I would both agree isn’t real acceptance. Hell, my brother’s non-binary pansexual partner moved up from downstate before they went to his school, and has lots of stories of homophobia they had experienced before moving. Being a “blue state” doesn’t tell the whole story.
 
Last edited:
I feel like Lily got another twitter just to annoy me. Now I have to cycle between two sites I hate just to keep track of her dumb ass. Whee.
Anyway, we have a lovely bit of snide fart huffing to enjoy today. Not archiving because it isn't worth archiving.
Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 1.16.38 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 1.16.43 AM.png

Your ordinary joyless turd would just say the show isn't to their taste, but Lily is an advanced joyless turd.
If you can't find a reason to dislike something, just condescend to the people who like it and make them look unreasonable.

The fact that the marvel that is the human brain is being devoted to exchanges like this makes me long for a bullet to the head.
 
Thanks to the Thread Reader, I have copy-pasted all of his "advice" here for an easy read and find whenever necessary.

Simple Writing Tips: A Thread
(1) Don't worry about spoilers. If your story is good, spoilers aren't going to make it any less enjoyable. If spoilers make a story less enjoyable, that just means you were relying on cheap shock value as a shortcut.
(2) The middle point of a story is the best time to get a main couple together. Are you working on a 5 season show? Put your main couple together halfway through Season 3. The finale is the worst time because we don't get any time to enjoy the payoff.
(3) Friends to Lovers > Enemies to Lovers. Every time.
(4) Victims of abuse moving away from the negative impacts of their abuse (ie, Zuko) and becoming healthier are not "redemption arcs."
(5) Heroes refusing to kill villains who have shown to be actively trying to murder people isn't "noble." It's enabling.
(6) Two women kissing in the last episode of a show after 4-5 seasons of trying to murder each other isn't "Revolutionary." It's fetishized abuse and violence.
(7) Twitter is not an appropriate place to reveal story details. The appropriate place is IN THE WORK ITSELF!
(8 ) When a character's body count is over 10,000 innocent lives then that character is no longer redeemable.
(9) Tip 8 does not apply to characters for whom making them the villain was a stupid, idiotic idea (ie, Sylvanas Windrunner). At that point it's just character rerailment.
(10) Everything in a story is there because the creator wished it to be there. Trying to explain away bigoted story decisions using worldbuilding is a fallacy because you put it there to begin with.
(11) Don't pair adults with minors. That's pedophilia.
(12) Don't sexualize teenage characters.
(13) Don't make up weird anime excuses for sexualizing teenage characters ("actually 1,000", "fusion", "Age of consent in X country is..."). See Rule 10.
(14) Making a "metaphor" for gay/trans/ace rep is always inherently inferior to just making a gay/trans/ace character.
(15) If there are humans in your story, restricting gay/trans/ace rep to the non-human characters makes you a huge turd.
(16) If the only gay man in your work is a faupish diva, you're a huge turd.
(17) If the only lesbian in your work is an abusive rageaholic with vague angst issues and a codependant relationship to a protagonist, you're a huge turd.
(18 ) If your only nonbinary character is a non-human shapeshifter, you're a huge turd.
(19) If your only autistic character is an ethically-challenged number fetishist, you're a huge turd.
(20) If your only black character is a volatile, hyper-angry brute, you're a huge turd.
(21) If the only black woman in your cast barely gets any screen time except to be fetishized OR fits rule 20, you're a huge turd.
(22) If the only trans woman in your cast a Drag Queen in all but name, you're a huge turd.
(23) If you force a woman to kiss her abuser, you're a huge turd.
(24) If you sideline every non-white character in your cast to focus on a white boy with anger issues and a tendency toward hostility getting a redemption arc, you're a huge turd.
(25) Justifying horny armor designs or horny clothing designs with "Sexual Agency" makes you a huge turd. Characters don't have sexual agency, you made them that way as a justification. See Rule 10.
(26) Related to the above, if your justification is to just be honest and say you like ogling sexy characters, you're still a huge turd, but slightly less of a turd than the above.

Slightly.
(27) Don't worry about not having everything planned out beforehand. No writer or creator plans everything beforehand, and the oneswho say they do are filthy liars. Writers have at best 1-2 story beats they're determined to include, everything else is by the seat of their pants
(28 ) Don't try and "do what Avatar did." You can't. Even the people who made Avatar can't make another show do what Avatar did.
(29) Low-stakes interpersonal conflict will always be more satisfying in the long run than high-stakes saving the world. "Friends" is more popular than your favorite anime for a reason.
(30) Choose whether you're a comedy or drama at the start and stick to it. Don't make a comedy and turn it into a drama later on, that just annoys people.
(31) Worldbuilding is like salt. A pinch can make it better, 10 cups of it will not.
(32) Characters should always come before anything else.
(33) The protagonist should be a protagonist, not just a vessel for the antagonist to hog the story. If you're going to make a villain protagonist, just open with that.
(34) Perspective shifts are a staple of storytelling. Having only one perspective isn't a "stylistic choice" it's just crap.
(35) If you're making a cartoon, hire writers. Don't just have your storyboarders write the story. That's not what they're there for. Arists draw, writers write, artists cannot just take over for the writers on a whim.
(36) Related to Rule 2: Will They, Won't They isn't a fun story. It's just addiction-peddling. We need to stop pretending Ross/Rachel was good storytelling and learn to appreciate Chander/Monica and Joey/Rachel.
(37) "Romance Trope, but gay" is not an absolute rule to live by. If She Ra taught us anything it's that "Gay Reylo" was not actually an improvement.
(38 ) Someone on this hellsite once made the remark "We need more lesbian noncon because purity is boring." That is a dangerous, violent person. Do not listen to them, they do not have a point, seriously my fucking god what is wrong with you people?!
(39) Women who fetishize abuse (Reylos, Catradoras, KiGos, ect) and present it as something feminist and paint detractors as misogynists are gaslighting you. Don't listen to them.
(40) If abuse fetishists are giving you shit for not caving to their demands, just block them. Don't argue with them, don't debate them, don't treat them with good faith. Just block them and get on with your day.
(41) Rape victims are not villains and should never be written as villains. Don't be like @Blizzard_Ent . It costs $0 to not be a misogynistic pig.
(42) If straight men really hate a certain character, but lesbians love them, there's an 90% chance that is your best character.
(43) If one of your writers believes Simon (Infinity Train) was misunderstood and Grace is a villain, that writer should be fired immediately.
(44) The best solution to a love triangle is polyamory.
(45) If you have a male character who actually shows respect and admiration to a woman, and some of your viewers call that character a "simp" there is a 90% chance you have a good character.
(46) "Mary Sue" is not a real criticism. It's thiny veiled misogyny. Always disregard it.
(47) Emotional vulnerability does not make a female character "antifeminist."
(48 ) Goblins are inherently antisemitic
(49) If your first thought when told about a bigoted trope (Bury your gays, Goblins, ect) is to try and figure out how to "do it well" you are a huge turd who is missing the point. It's not that these tropes aren't "done well", it's that they're done too much.
(50) Writing a relationship based on a "dynamic" or trying to get a particular trope (ie, enemies to lovers) into the story is a bad decision.
(51) Vitriol does not immediately render criticism invalid. If you tone police criticism, you will likely miss something important.
(52) Your fandom will fight and argue. This is how people solve conflicts. It's typically better to let people fight it out than to be complacent and beg people to "just stop fighting."
(53) Related to the above, "every headcanon is valid" should never leave your mouth. Do you want pedophiles and fascists in your fanbase? Because that's how you get pedophiles and fascists in your fanbase.
(54) Speaking out against abuse fetishists, pedophiles, and bigots in your fanbase will always be better in the long run than being quiet or complacent. It might be exhausting to deal with, but it's better for everyone in the long run.
(55) "Fanservice" is a concept you should never think about. Fans who need to be "serviced" are not actually fans. If you have fans, those fans are already having fun and don't need to be pandered to.
(56) The tendency for shipping to dominate discourse is the biggest sign that characters and their relationships are more satisfying than anything else. People didn't petition for a 4th season of Kim Possible to see what happened with Drakken or to see new villains.
(57) Complaints about "too much negativity" is shooting the messenger. If there is an overabundance of negativity, that means there's things to be negative about. People cannot be positive without things to be positive about.
(58 ) If you do something bigoted and get yelled at for it, listen to the people yelling at you. Cancel Culture isn't real, the rage and vitriol will be gone in two weeks, and you'll be a better person for it. Getting yelled at stopped being "the end of the world" at age 10.
(59) The quickest and easiest way to make yelling stop is to own up to the mistake, don't make excuses (or explain why you did the bad thing), fix it, and never repeat it. Progressives are very forgiving if you give them results. Stubbornness is what gets people cancelled.
(60) "Forced Diversity" is a right-wing dogwhistle, not a criticism.
(61) "Reclaimed" slurs are not universal, and as such should NEVER be included in a work.
(62) Oppressed people fighting against their oppressors are not "Villains." No I don't care if you think they "went too far." Not all those who respond with violence are wrong, and not all those who preach nonviolence are right to do so.
(63) Related to the above: A good spin on the "Heroes who never kill" mantra is to highlight how refusing to kill a villain who later goes on to kill more innocent people makes the hero responsible for those deaths. There's a free story theme for ya.
(64) If you're writing fantasy and you have no issue having dragons in your world but suddenly think people of color are "unrealistic" because "something something Medivel Europe" you're a huge turd. And an idiot.
(65) Sexual Tension and Chemistry are not the only indicators of a potential relationship, and in a relationship is the quickest thing to fade.
(66) The best potential romantic partner for a character is her best friend. They're best friends for a reason.
(67) "I don't want X character to be defined by her relationships" is a stupid philosophy to have. EVERYONE is defined by their relationships. That's how human beings work.
(68 ) If you don't want a character to only be remembered for a romantic subplot, don't end the story on that subplot reaching it's conclusion. Give it time to sink in and become the new "normal" for the viewer. The memorable moment will always be the LAST moment.
(69) "Slow Burn" does not mean "Taking forever to get together." It means "Full series long romantic subplot." Getting together is the START of a romantic subplot, not the end.
(70) "Sexual Awakening" is not a real character arc.
(71) The only people who think "Boob Armor" makes sense are people who have never touched a boob.
(72) The Bow and Arrow are strength weapons, not dexterity weapons. Female characters who do archery should naturally be very physically strong. Longbows have a draw weight of 80-150lbs. Rangers are always stronger than Warriors, deal with it.Image
(73) The best way to avoid tokenism is multiple characters.
(74) Want an easy way to become more accustomed to diverse casts? Limit your "Straight, white, cis" characters to one of each. Those can be three characters for each trait, or pack it all into one character, but only one of each.
(75) Don't be afraid of failure and backlash. If someone is screaming at you about how a character you made is racist, that is literally free writing advice that someone is just giving you. Look on the bright side of life for a change.
(76) People of color and LGBTA people are allowed to just exist. Don't feel like you HAVE to cover bigotry just because they're in the story. In fact, people will be happier if you don't because having these characters defined by suffering is itself a tired trope.
(77) "I just want my readers/viewers to have fun" is an excellent attitude to have when it comes to storytelling.
(78 ) As a general rule, Slice of Life has always been a more popular genre than Action/Adventure
(79) "Feature Creep" is a problem in storytelling as well. You don't have to cram every single idea, reference and homage you can think of into a story. You can save ideas for another time.
(80) D&D Alignments are terrible metrics for character design. They're meant as a quick reference for improvisation in a TTRPG environment and shouldn't be taken outside that environment.
(81) When writing LGBTA characters, stay as far away from "Rocky Horror Picture Show" as you possibly can. Some gay people hold it up as a meaningful part of our "culture." It is not. It's a transmisgynistic nightmare made by an actual TERF, not a reference guide for ANYTHING.
(82) The Q-slur as a concept tactily reinforces heteronormativity by casting LGBTA people as inherently "strange." In "No Big Deal" representation, the word should be avoided. Normalizing LGBTA people and the Q-Slur are like oil and water and don't go together.
(83) Rape is an unforgivable crime, more so than killing. Killing can potentially be justified in a story without becoming a villain. Rape cannot.
(84) Sex scenes are never necessary. You want to include one because you're horny, then more power to you. But any attempt to justify it as "important to the story" will only get you laughed at.
(85) "Strong" characters can still cry and need support from others. Vulnerability is not a character flaw.
(86) "Peak TV" is a fancy way of saying "Addiction-fueled misery porn."
(87) Addiction-based storytelling relies on serialization, cliffhangers, "shocking twists", constantly raised stakes, and an obsession with foreshadowing to get people to watch not because they're enjoying themselves but because they're stuck on a tension high.
(87, Pt 2) By the end, the viewer is only watching for closure because they've already invested so much and they need their fix in order to feel like it was worth it. This is the same business model that soap operas use.
(88 ) If the Sunk Cost Fallacy didn't exist, shows like Steven Universe and Game of Thrones would have been cancelled by Season 2.
(89) Hardcore fans will tell you that "Continuity" is the most important thing. They're wrong.
(90) "This is too political" is a complaint only made by conservatives when a story acknowledges that non-white and non-straight people exist. The existence of other kinds of people is not political. Ignore these complaints.
(91) The Little Mermaid and Cinderella are more feminist than Beauty and the Beast.
(92) If you want to know when to change a trans character's pronouns in the narration, doing so at the moment where they realize who they are and admit it to themselves out loud is *chef's kiss*
(93) As long as it isn't harmful or bigoted, you don't have to justify story decisions made on the basis of self-indulgence.
(94) Vampires/Werewolves are not inherently "LGBTA-Coded" and doing so is an example of othering. They work better as metaphors for aristocracy and predators respectively than as the "Underclass."
(95) Some of the best stories ever made were written as an act of spite.
(96) Any system of government (with the exception of Fascism) can exist in a positive or negative context. Monarchies are not always inherently evil (see Hawaii pre-annexation) and Democracies are not always inherently good (See USA). Write accordingly.
(97) "Lesbian still on good terms with ex-boyfriend from before coming out" is a really cute friendship trope. And vice versa.
(98 ) The only real difference between an extremely close platonic relationship and a romantic relationship is what the people involved choose to call it. Best Friends are not something that should ever be prefixed with the word "Just."
(99) Normalize friends saying "I love you" to each other.
(100) If you write a 100-tweet long thread of writing advice, you are a huge loser with way too much free time on your hands. Get back to work and do something productive with your time!
EDIT: (101) "Tips" and "Rules" are two different words.

Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 3.49.14 AM.png
You're welcome.

Also gotta love these hidden replies.
Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 3.51.13 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 3.39.20 AM.pngScreen Shot 2020-11-16 at 3.51.51 AM.pngScreen Shot 2020-11-16 at 3.53.07 AM.pngScreen Shot 2020-11-16 at 3.52.12 AM.png

And lastly, I'm glad he finally realizes what we've been telling him for years now.
Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 4.00.33 AM.png
 
Last edited:
If you write 100 tips worth of advice, their status as “simple tips” is dubious at best. At the very least, it ceases to be “easy”.
All this is assuming the recipient has complete control over their work, which if they’re working for, pssh, idk, Dreamworks or Cartoon Network, just won’t be the case. The way she puts all onus on the individual and forgets that her real enemies are the executives at the top is what bothers me, because if she was such a “death to capitalism” leftist, she wouldn’t do that. She’s a neoliberal, or at best a socdem, who’s high on liberal idpol while shirking the concept of intersectionality because... some communists are white men?
That’s the thing with Lily. She simultaneously thinks that everything needs to be twisted to fit her ideal world... while also thinking we already live in such a world.
 
I feel like Lily got another twitter just to annoy me. Now I have to cycle between two sites I hate just to keep track of her dumb ass. Whee.
Anyway, we have a lovely bit of snide fart huffing to enjoy today. Not archiving because it isn't worth archiving.
View attachment 1731870
View attachment 1731869
Your ordinary joyless turd would just say the show isn't to their taste, but Lily is an advanced joyless turd.
If you can't find a reason to dislike something, just condescend to the people who like it and make them look unreasonable.

The fact that the marvel that is the human brain is being devoted to exchanges like this makes me long for a bullet to the head.
Both BTAS and KP are good shows. Guess what the difference between their protags is? That's the reason Lily likes one more than the other.
 
If you write 100 tips worth of advice, their status as “simple tips” is dubious at best. At the very least, it ceases to be “easy”.
All this is assuming the recipient has complete control over their work, which if they’re working for, pssh, idk, Dreamworks or Cartoon Network, just won’t be the case. The way she puts all onus on the individual and forgets that her real enemies are the executives at the top is what bothers me, because if she was such a “death to capitalism” leftist, she wouldn’t do that. She’s a neoliberal, or at best a socdem, who’s high on liberal idpol while shirking the concept of intersectionality because... some communists are white men?
That’s the thing with Lily. She simultaneously thinks that everything needs to be twisted to fit her ideal world... while also thinking we already live in such a world.
This might answer your question? Not that his word has any consistency.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 8.54.21 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 8.54.21 AM.png
    76.2 KB · Views: 158
This might answer your question? Not that his word has any consistency.
Ok, so she’s a socdem. Instead of any fundamental changes, she just wants to pass more restrictions and laws...as if rich people are all law-abiding citizens and means-testing doesn’t hurt those it’s supposed to help.
By the way, I’ve been looking for a certain post from Lily’s Tumblr but can’t find it, so I was wondering if someone could possibly help me. It’s this thing where she said, in regards to Rebecca Sugar, “I’ll criticize that two-bit fascist moron as much as I damn well please, until she stops being the fucking worst”. I know the post exists, but could someone re-find it? I need it for future reference.
 
I feel like Lily got another twitter just to annoy me. Now I have to cycle between two sites I hate just to keep track of her dumb ass. Whee.
Anyway, we have a lovely bit of snide fart huffing to enjoy today. Not archiving because it isn't worth archiving.
View attachment 1731870
View attachment 1731869
Your ordinary joyless turd would just say the show isn't to their taste, but Lily is an advanced joyless turd.
If you can't find a reason to dislike something, just condescend to the people who like it and make them look unreasonable.

The fact that the marvel that is the human brain is being devoted to exchanges like this makes me long for a bullet to the head.

I haven't seen Batman TAS to be fair, but I'm 100% certain he thinks it's bad because it's "dark" and "gritty" and he absolutely loathes stories like that because reasons

You can't really compare KP to it though. It's like comparing Henry Danger to Captain America Winter Soldier, so he's just doing that to get under people's skin like he usually does

Who cares though, it means he's not gonna touch that series with a 10 foot pole and any criticisms he has of it will amount to useless subjective "I think it's bad" non-arguments


Ok, so she’s a socdem. Instead of any fundamental changes, she just wants to pass more restrictions and laws...as if rich people are all law-abiding citizens and means-testing doesn’t hurt those it’s supposed to help.
By the way, I’ve been looking for a certain post from Lily’s Tumblr but can’t find it, so I was wondering if someone could possibly help me. It’s this thing where she said, in regards to Rebecca Sugar, “I’ll criticize that two-bit fascist moron as much as I damn well please, until she stops being the fucking worst”. I know the post exists, but could someone re-find it? I need it for future reference.
Oh yeah I remember that post. Here you go
1605541947527.png
 
Last edited:
Thanks to the Thread Reader, I have copy-pasted all of his "advice" here for an easy read and find whenever necessary.

Simple Writing Tips: A Thread
(1) Don't worry about spoilers. If your story is good, spoilers aren't going to make it any less enjoyable. If spoilers make a story less enjoyable, that just means you were relying on cheap shock value as a shortcut.
(2) The middle point of a story is the best time to get a main couple together. Are you working on a 5 season show? Put your main couple together halfway through Season 3. The finale is the worst time because we don't get any time to enjoy the payoff.
(3) Friends to Lovers > Enemies to Lovers. Every time.
(4) Victims of abuse moving away from the negative impacts of their abuse (ie, Zuko) and becoming healthier are not "redemption arcs."
(5) Heroes refusing to kill villains who have shown to be actively trying to murder people isn't "noble." It's enabling.
(6) Two women kissing in the last episode of a show after 4-5 seasons of trying to murder each other isn't "Revolutionary." It's fetishized abuse and violence.
(7) Twitter is not an appropriate place to reveal story details. The appropriate place is IN THE WORK ITSELF!
(8) When a character's body count is over 10,000 innocent lives then that character is no longer redeemable.
(9) Tip 8 does not apply to characters for whom making them the villain was a stupid, idiotic idea (ie, Sylvanas Windrunner). At that point it's just character rerailment.
(10) Everything in a story is there because the creator wished it to be there. Trying to explain away bigoted story decisions using worldbuilding is a fallacy because you put it there to begin with.
(11) Don't pair adults with minors. That's pedophilia.
(12) Don't sexualize teenage characters.
(13) Don't make up weird anime excuses for sexualizing teenage characters ("actually 1,000", "fusion", "Age of consent in X country is..."). See Rule 10.
(14) Making a "metaphor" for gay/trans/ace rep is always inherently inferior to just making a gay/trans/ace character.
(15) If there are humans in your story, restricting gay/trans/ace rep to the non-human characters makes you a huge turd.
(16) If the only gay man in your work is a faupish diva, you're a huge turd.
(17) If the only lesbian in your work is an abusive rageaholic with vague angst issues and a codependant relationship to a protagonist, you're a huge turd.
(18) If your only nonbinary character is a non-human shapeshifter, you're a huge turd.
(19) If your only autistic character is an ethically-challenged number fetishist, you're a huge turd.
(20) If your only black character is a volatile, hyper-angry brute, you're a huge turd.
(21) If the only black woman in your cast barely gets any screen time except to be fetishized OR fits rule 20, you're a huge turd.
(22) If the only trans woman in your cast a Drag Queen in all but name, you're a huge turd.
(23) If you force a woman to kiss her abuser, you're a huge turd.
(24) If you sideline every non-white character in your cast to focus on a white boy with anger issues and a tendency toward hostility getting a redemption arc, you're a huge turd.
(25) Justifying horny armor designs or horny clothing designs with "Sexual Agency" makes you a huge turd. Characters don't have sexual agency, you made them that way as a justification. See Rule 10.
(26) Related to the above, if your justification is to just be honest and say you like ogling sexy characters, you're still a huge turd, but slightly less of a turd than the above.

Slightly.
(27) Don't worry about not having everything planned out beforehand. No writer or creator plans everything beforehand, and the oneswho say they do are filthy liars. Writers have at best 1-2 story beats they're determined to include, everything else is by the seat of their pants
(28) Don't try and "do what Avatar did." You can't. Even the people who made Avatar can't make another show do what Avatar did.
(29) Low-stakes interpersonal conflict will always be more satisfying in the long run than high-stakes saving the world. "Friends" is more popular than your favorite anime for a reason.
(30) Choose whether you're a comedy or drama at the start and stick to it. Don't make a comedy and turn it into a drama later on, that just annoys people.
(31) Worldbuilding is like salt. A pinch can make it better, 10 cups of it will not.
(32) Characters should always come before anything else.
(33) The protagonist should be a protagonist, not just a vessel for the antagonist to hog the story. If you're going to make a villain protagonist, just open with that.
(34) Perspective shifts are a staple of storytelling. Having only one perspective isn't a "stylistic choice" it's just crap.
(35) If you're making a cartoon, hire writers. Don't just have your storyboarders write the story. That's not what they're there for. Arists draw, writers write, artists cannot just take over for the writers on a whim.
(36) Related to Rule 2: Will They, Won't They isn't a fun story. It's just addiction-peddling. We need to stop pretending Ross/Rachel was good storytelling and learn to appreciate Chander/Monica and Joey/Rachel.
(37) "Romance Trope, but gay" is not an absolute rule to live by. If She Ra taught us anything it's that "Gay Reylo" was not actually an improvement.
(38) Someone on this hellsite once made the remark "We need more lesbian noncon because purity is boring." That is a dangerous, violent person. Do not listen to them, they do not have a point, seriously my fucking god what is wrong with you people?!
(39) Women who fetishize abuse (Reylos, Catradoras, KiGos, ect) and present it as something feminist and paint detractors as misogynists are gaslighting you. Don't listen to them.
(40) If abuse fetishists are giving you shit for not caving to their demands, just block them. Don't argue with them, don't debate them, don't treat them with good faith. Just block them and get on with your day.
(41) Rape victims are not villains and should never be written as villains. Don't be like @Blizzard_Ent . It costs $0 to not be a misogynistic pig.
(42) If straight men really hate a certain character, but lesbians love them, there's an 90% chance that is your best character.
(43) If one of your writers believes Simon (Infinity Train) was misunderstood and Grace is a villain, that writer should be fired immediately.
(44) The best solution to a love triangle is polyamory.
(45) If you have a male character who actually shows respect and admiration to a woman, and some of your viewers call that character a "simp" there is a 90% chance you have a good character.
(46) "Mary Sue" is not a real criticism. It's thiny veiled misogyny. Always disregard it.
(47) Emotional vulnerability does not make a female character "antifeminist."
(48) Goblins are inherently antisemitic
(49) If your first thought when told about a bigoted trope (Bury your gays, Goblins, ect) is to try and figure out how to "do it well" you are a huge turd who is missing the point. It's not that these tropes aren't "done well", it's that they're done too much.
(50) Writing a relationship based on a "dynamic" or trying to get a particular trope (ie, enemies to lovers) into the story is a bad decision.
(51) Vitriol does not immediately render criticism invalid. If you tone police criticism, you will likely miss something important.
(52) Your fandom will fight and argue. This is how people solve conflicts. It's typically better to let people fight it out than to be complacent and beg people to "just stop fighting."
(53) Related to the above, "every headcanon is valid" should never leave your mouth. Do you want pedophiles and fascists in your fanbase? Because that's how you get pedophiles and fascists in your fanbase.
(54) Speaking out against abuse fetishists, pedophiles, and bigots in your fanbase will always be better in the long run than being quiet or complacent. It might be exhausting to deal with, but it's better for everyone in the long run.
(55) "Fanservice" is a concept you should never think about. Fans who need to be "serviced" are not actually fans. If you have fans, those fans are already having fun and don't need to be pandered to.
(56) The tendency for shipping to dominate discourse is the biggest sign that characters and their relationships are more satisfying than anything else. People didn't petition for a 4th season of Kim Possible to see what happened with Drakken or to see new villains.
(57) Complaints about "too much negativity" is shooting the messenger. If there is an overabundance of negativity, that means there's things to be negative about. People cannot be positive without things to be positive about.
(58) If you do something bigoted and get yelled at for it, listen to the people yelling at you. Cancel Culture isn't real, the rage and vitriol will be gone in two weeks, and you'll be a better person for it. Getting yelled at stopped being "the end of the world" at age 10.
(59) The quickest and easiest way to make yelling stop is to own up to the mistake, don't make excuses (or explain why you did the bad thing), fix it, and never repeat it. Progressives are very forgiving if you give them results. Stubbornness is what gets people cancelled.
(60) "Forced Diversity" is a right-wing dogwhistle, not a criticism.
(61) "Reclaimed" slurs are not universal, and as such should NEVER be included in a work.
(62) Oppressed people fighting against their oppressors are not "Villains." No I don't care if you think they "went too far." Not all those who respond with violence are wrong, and not all those who preach nonviolence are right to do so.
(63) Related to the above: A good spin on the "Heroes who never kill" mantra is to highlight how refusing to kill a villain who later goes on to kill more innocent people makes the hero responsible for those deaths. There's a free story theme for ya.
(64) If you're writing fantasy and you have no issue having dragons in your world but suddenly think people of color are "unrealistic" because "something something Medivel Europe" you're a huge turd. And an idiot.
(65) Sexual Tension and Chemistry are not the only indicators of a potential relationship, and in a relationship is the quickest thing to fade.
(66) The best potential romantic partner for a character is her best friend. They're best friends for a reason.
(67) "I don't want X character to be defined by her relationships" is a stupid philosophy to have. EVERYONE is defined by their relationships. That's how human beings work.
(68) If you don't want a character to only be remembered for a romantic subplot, don't end the story on that subplot reaching it's conclusion. Give it time to sink in and become the new "normal" for the viewer. The memorable moment will always be the LAST moment.
(69) "Slow Burn" does not mean "Taking forever to get together." It means "Full series long romantic subplot." Getting together is the START of a romantic subplot, not the end.
(70) "Sexual Awakening" is not a real character arc.
(71) The only people who think "Boob Armor" makes sense are people who have never touched a boob.
(72) The Bow and Arrow are strength weapons, not dexterity weapons. Female characters who do archery should naturally be very physically strong. Longbows have a draw weight of 80-150lbs. Rangers are always stronger than Warriors, deal with it.Image
(73) The best way to avoid tokenism is multiple characters.
(74) Want an easy way to become more accustomed to diverse casts? Limit your "Straight, white, cis" characters to one of each. Those can be three characters for each trait, or pack it all into one character, but only one of each.
(75) Don't be afraid of failure and backlash. If someone is screaming at you about how a character you made is racist, that is literally free writing advice that someone is just giving you. Look on the bright side of life for a change.
(76) People of color and LGBTA people are allowed to just exist. Don't feel like you HAVE to cover bigotry just because they're in the story. In fact, people will be happier if you don't because having these characters defined by suffering is itself a tired trope.
(77) "I just want my readers/viewers to have fun" is an excellent attitude to have when it comes to storytelling.
(78) As a general rule, Slice of Life has always been a more popular genre than Action/Adventure
(79) "Feature Creep" is a problem in storytelling as well. You don't have to cram every single idea, reference and homage you can think of into a story. You can save ideas for another time.
(80) D&D Alignments are terrible metrics for character design. They're meant as a quick reference for improvisation in a TTRPG environment and shouldn't be taken outside that environment.
(81) When writing LGBTA characters, stay as far away from "Rocky Horror Picture Show" as you possibly can. Some gay people hold it up as a meaningful part of our "culture." It is not. It's a transmisgynistic nightmare made by an actual TERF, not a reference guide for ANYTHING.
(82) The Q-slur as a concept tactily reinforces heteronormativity by casting LGBTA people as inherently "strange." In "No Big Deal" representation, the word should be avoided. Normalizing LGBTA people and the Q-Slur are like oil and water and don't go together.
(83) Rape is an unforgivable crime, more so than killing. Killing can potentially be justified in a story without becoming a villain. Rape cannot.
(84) Sex scenes are never necessary. You want to include one because you're horny, then more power to you. But any attempt to justify it as "important to the story" will only get you laughed at.
(85) "Strong" characters can still cry and need support from others. Vulnerability is not a character flaw.
(86) "Peak TV" is a fancy way of saying "Addiction-fueled misery porn."
(87) Addiction-based storytelling relies on serialization, cliffhangers, "shocking twists", constantly raised stakes, and an obsession with foreshadowing to get people to watch not because they're enjoying themselves but because they're stuck on a tension high.
(87, Pt 2) By the end, the viewer is only watching for closure because they've already invested so much and they need their fix in order to feel like it was worth it. This is the same business model that soap operas use.
(88) If the Sunk Cost Fallacy didn't exist, shows like Steven Universe and Game of Thrones would have been cancelled by Season 2.
(89) Hardcore fans will tell you that "Continuity" is the most important thing. They're wrong.
(90) "This is too political" is a complaint only made by conservatives when a story acknowledges that non-white and non-straight people exist. The existence of other kinds of people is not political. Ignore these complaints.
(91) The Little Mermaid and Cinderella are more feminist than Beauty and the Beast.
(92) If you want to know when to change a trans character's pronouns in the narration, doing so at the moment where they realize who they are and admit it to themselves out loud is *chef's kiss*
(93) As long as it isn't harmful or bigoted, you don't have to justify story decisions made on the basis of self-indulgence.
(94) Vampires/Werewolves are not inherently "LGBTA-Coded" and doing so is an example of othering. They work better as metaphors for aristocracy and predators respectively than as the "Underclass."
(95) Some of the best stories ever made were written as an act of spite.
(96) Any system of government (with the exception of Fascism) can exist in a positive or negative context. Monarchies are not always inherently evil (see Hawaii pre-annexation) and Democracies are not always inherently good (See USA). Write accordingly.
(97) "Lesbian still on good terms with ex-boyfriend from before coming out" is a really cute friendship trope. And vice versa.
(98) The only real difference between an extremely close platonic relationship and a romantic relationship is what the people involved choose to call it. Best Friends are not something that should ever be prefixed with the word "Just."
(99) Normalize friends saying "I love you" to each other.
(100) If you write a 100-tweet long thread of writing advice, you are a huge loser with way too much free time on your hands. Get back to work and do something productive with your time!
View attachment 1731958
You're welcome.

Also gotta love these hidden replies.
View attachment 1731965

View attachment 1731963View attachment 1731966View attachment 1731968View attachment 1731967

And lastly, I'm glad he finally realizes what we've been telling him for years now.
View attachment 1731974

funny that these tips go from writing to politics to behavior to personal taste and finally to venting her frustrations with what she's been bitching for years and still doesn't have a solid argument besides "stop doing what i don't like, good stories are the ones that pander to me ", while saying that those who do contrary to what she says are right-wing and turds

without space for other perspectives and in the format like she was stating facts, which is not due to being a list, this is her style since always: a list of things she demands from others and not being nearly as strict with herself

those who follow these tips are idiots without creativity who need someone to write story ideas for them and will never do anything original, since even Lily does not follow this list and their tastes change depending on whether someone is offended by something she likes

(59) The quickest and easiest way to make yelling stop is to own up to the mistake, don't make excuses (or explain why you did the bad thing), fix it, and never repeat it. Progressives are very forgiving if you give them results. Stubbornness is what gets people canceled.( Indeed)

(83) Rape is an unforgivable crime, more so than killing. Killing can potentially be justified in a story without becoming a villain. Rape cannot.( G is the villan confirmed)

(75) Don't be afraid of failure and backlash. If someone is screaming at you about how a character you made is racist, that is literally free writing advice that someone is just giving you. Look on the bright side of life for a change.( or just hope they go away like Lily)

(34) Perspective shifts are a staple of storytelling. Having only one perspective isn't a "stylistic choice" it's just crap.(Ironic)

(39) Women who fetishize abuse (Reylos, Catradoras, KiGos, ect) and present it as something feminist and paint detractors as misogynists are gaslighting you. Don't listen to them.( but fetishize victims of abuse is ok )

(54) Speaking out against abuse fetishists, pedophiles, and bigots in your fanbase will always be better in the long run than being quiet or complacent. It might be exhausting to deal with, but it's better for everyone in the long run.( but only when you can make yourself look good)

(51) Vitriol does not immediately render criticism invalid. If you tone police criticism, you will likely miss something important.( wish you follow that)

79) "Feature Creep" is a problem in storytelling as well. You don't have to cram every single idea, reference and homage you can think of into a story. You can save ideas for another time.( HAHAHAH)
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen Batman TAS to be fair, but I'm 100% certain he thinks it's bad because it's "dark" and "gritty" and he absolutely loathes stories like that because reasons

You can't really compare KP to it though. It's like comparing Henry Danger to Captain America Winter Soldier, so he's just doing that to get under people's skin like he usually does

Who cares though, it means he's not gonna touch that series with a 10 foot pole and any criticisms he has of it will amount to useless subjective "I think it's bad" non-arguments



Oh yeah I remember that post. Here you go
View attachment 1732271
Lmao SU would be criticized regardless of who it was written by. It's both sincere and flawed which makes it a target for wannabe critics who want to cut their teeth on something that's considered an easy target.
 
Screen Shot 2020-11-16 at 12.17.01 PM.png

I'll give Lily credit for using the NPC meme, not something I expected.
However it doesn't work because the NPC has no reply, but in this instance Lily is never going to let that anon reply.
Because she has full control of what is and isn't posted, and if she doesn't like what they're preaching the conversation ends.

Aside from that, does anyone have an answer to Lily's query? How does the relationship between Rey and Lily's self-insert romanticize abuse? Cause from what I've seen on this thread, they seem to have a god awful dynamic that Lily mirrors in all of her work.
 
View attachment 1732468
I'll give Lily credit for using the NPC meme, not something I expected.
However it doesn't work because the NPC has no reply, but in this instance Lily is never going to let that anon reply.
Because she has full control of what is and isn't posted, and if she doesn't like what they're preaching the conversation ends.

Aside from that, does anyone have an answer to Lily's query? How does the relationship between Rey and Lily's self-insert romanticize abuse? Cause from what I've seen on this thread, they seem to have a god awful dynamic that Lily mirrors in all of her work.

Well for starters, Rey came from nothing. Being abandoned sucks, but she wasn't "escaping an abusive relationship." And no, supposedly correcting her relationship with Kylo Ren doesn't work because that relationship is never established in Jerry's story. Conveniently, Rey is, in fact, escaping INTO an abusive relationship.

Jerry's self-insert basically burns all of Rey's bridges with other people for her, keeps her around basically for sex, recruits her into an evil cult on the basis on "it's actually really cool srsly", and pushes her toxicity of character and personal dramas onto Rey who really doesn't have any sort of stake in those issues outside of banging Jerry's character.

Basically it's all give and no take. Rey is a deer-in-headlights with no active thoughts in regards to her relationship with her sith companion outside of how good it feels. Rey's also much younger which means she can justify everything she chooses to believe through the age of her "lover". What I'm saying is, like everything else, Rey is expected to be a good little lesbian for the bad-bitch who gets to do and fuck whoever she wants and Rey in turn is "rescued" from having to question, infer, or act independently without said relationship as her reward.

Such a wholesome little couple, isn't it?
 
Back