- Joined
- Mar 27, 2019
Defense asserts that allegedly cured or otherwise illegitimate ballots don't cause particular harm to either plaintiff or voters because the ballots are for all races-- federal, state, and local.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“It wasn’t Trump, it was just the people who run his campaign”And there it is.
Those gorillion lolsuits weren't even his.
This is not an adept defense on any level so far. It's basically we violated the law but this is the wrong venue for it and also it didn't harm anyone because violating the law doesn't harm anyone in this contextDefense asserts that allegedly cured or otherwise illegitimate ballots don't cause particular harm to either plaintiff or voters because the ballots are for all races-- federal, state, and local.
Defense argues that plaintiff has failed to argue particular harm-- specifically, the idea of "vote dilution" via illegitimate ballots does not pose particular harm to either plaintiff or the voters-- and thus their argument does not rest on the Equal Protections clause.
Nobody said anything about said lawsuits coming from his campaign. Can you stand to figure out what you're talking about before you waste everyone's time?“It wasn’t Trump, it was just the people who run his campaign”
Something that stands out: defense argues, in the case of Philadelphia for example, that ballot curing was offered, but there's no indication that those offers were taken or that those ballots were counted.
Turns out having a diversity hire as a lawyer is a bad idea, who would have thoughtThis is not an adept defense on any level so far. It's basically we violated the law but this is the wrong venue for it and also it didn't harm anyone because violating the law doesn't harm anyone in this context
So much for the whole line of succession thing. Yet another institution of Our Democracy™ destroyed. Kamala is such a puppet. She might as well be the transition candidate and not Joe.Joe Biden is probably not going to be in charge. The democrats are now an oligarchy with Nancy having more power than cucks Schumer and Kamala and Biden. Nancy said that she will investigate Trump after election.
They're so lucky voter fraud is hard to prove. When the guy who is the president-select does some bullshit once he gets into office, I might feel just a wee bit violated. But it's not as if Joe's talking a fat whiff of me.This is not an adept defense on any level so far. It's basically we violated the law but this is the wrong venue for it and also it didn't harm anyone because violating the law doesn't harm anyone in this context
Hey! Don't talk that way about Stacey Abrams!I think it's more inappropriate to refuse to concede an election you obviously lost.
You mean the conference call? Yeah, it cut out a few minutes ago.Aaaaaaaand it’s thrown out.
He's in the courtroomYou mean the conference call? Yeah, it cut out a few minutes ago.
So, in your opinion, what are the chances?You mean the conference call? Yeah, it cut out a few minutes ago.
It's fucking weird, the defense makes this laughably bad argument, he finishes, someone says let me interrupt and the line goes dead. Sus afYou mean the conference call? Yeah, it cut out a few minutes ago.
Aaaaaaaand it’s thrown out.