- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
New defense counsel, he's not helping himself with multiple ad hominems and sounding like he's about to start shouting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FUCK YO COVID LIKE I FUCK YO MUTHA'S DRYER THAN THE SARAH'S CUNT. Would be the reply if I were a triggered RD winger.BUT MUH COVID
#tinfoilcap...I'll take it with a grain of salt.It's almost as if a public skype call allows other people to find your IP address and fuck with your connection.
Oh, is that who is talking right now? I can't tell!New defense counsel, he's not helping himself with multiple ad hominems and sounding like he's about to start shouting
Apparently rigging an election doesn't harm anyone
they're trying to fix a broken mic now fucking kek
EDIT:
They haven't even tried to justify their obvious ballot fraud and instead they tried to argue that THE PLAINTIFF CANNOT PROVE ANY HARM WAS COMMITED. Now they're trying to argue that Equal Protection law doesn't apply.
Some sort of absolutely fucking insane defense. A coup does not actually cause any harm, ergo no one can complain about it. Or somesuch?
Apparently the PA Supremes went full party line 5-2 on it. Just absolute fucking madness, of the "these people should be impeached for this" variety.
Want to know the -ultimate- salt? If they really cracked own on the fake votes and it turns out that the black vote was always way more conservative than it was, and it only looked like it wasn't due to using them as fake votes.The mistake was giving Democrats the right to count the votes unsupervised.
"Oh fuck, why did I have to get THIS case?"It's been 14 minutes and the hearing still hasn't started.
I bet the judge is recovering from a hangover.
Assume ANYTHING in PA that goes to the PASC will be ruled in democrats favor. The PASC is pozzed to fuck.PA SC just ruled the states handling of election observers was legal.
https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1328791284975362048
Apparently blocking international watchdogs is within PA law now
Isn't that the same argument that was rejected in bush v gore and got Bush the win?Defense argues that plaintiff has happened upon different election/ballot handling procedures in different counties that yields different voting results, rather than violations of the Equal Protections clause.
I doubt it is true, though I do suspect that the actual proportion of African support for Republicans may be higher than it appears.
People were sued over screwing over Bernie? Odd.Isn't the defense in the PA case almost literally the same defense they used when they were sued over screwing Bernie Sanders?
Lol that you guys think Rudy's case is going wellCatching up on everything.
It blows my mind that that was their defense for all of this shit. 30-40 years ago, no court would have dismissed anything after hearing something like that.
The PA Courts dismissing this isn't a surprising thing in the slightest. It's just proving the inevitable: That this is going to the SCOTUS, and it always was going to go to the SCOTUS. The biggest problem right now, though, is that the clock is definitely ticking.
This is what I said by the Dems running out the clock.Probably because it hadn't gone all the way to the state's Supreme Court until now.
Hell if I know. This is still a different situation from Bush v. Gore, though.Isn't that the same argument that was rejected in bush v gore and got Bush the win?
It is. Quoting from Wikipedia:Hell if I know. This is still a different situation from Bush v. Gore, though.
Seven justices agreed that there was an Equal Protection Clause violation in using differing standards of determining a valid vote in different counties, causing an "unequal evaluation of ballots in various respects"
They haven't even tried to justify their obvious ballot fraud and instead they tried to argue that THE PLAINTIFF CANNOT PROVE ANY HARM WAS COMMITED. Now they're trying to argue that Equal Protection law doesn't apply.