2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
View attachment 1735229

From the way this guy is talking about it really sounds like they want the audit first before they certify and that the media's reporting on them being certified before the audit is disinfo.
If this is actually true then it is clear CNN is prepping a "DRUMPF STOLE DEMOCRACY" narrative if this happens

If this is not true, more shit for Trump's legal team given two of the certifiers were essentially doing it with the threat of a gun to their lives.
 
Somewhere Robert Barnes is laughing.
In his last Viva podcast Barnes is in Georgia, helping out in some way he wouldn't say.

Was disappointing to hear him go full doomer and admit that it's for "future elections" he's fighting, not this one.
Dr. Fauci.
Dr. Fauci is becoming a 21st century Henry Kissinger. Doesn't matter who you vote for, the fucker is still there in power..
 
It sucks that the workers are getting doxxed by these antifa clowns. So much for this "return to normalcy."
It would help if they hadn't spent the last year promoting "the new normal." Kinda think that was the point of the COVID. "All this shitty stuff that happened? Yeah, it's the new normal, we're just bringing back corporatists."
 
Do you think absent fathers have no effect on male and female children?
Who even has fathers anymore? You sound like a fascist.

To think there was a time when I wanted to study and live in the US.. I'll stay in Europe and America can turn into...I really don't know. Worse than anything I've ever seen for sure.
My dreams were once to live in Canada or England. How horrifying both of my expatriate plans seem now. there is scant chance to escape the poz in the anglosphere.
 
On a final note, there are still many that blame Trump for the deaths caused by the China Virus and blame him for all the deaths. Could this be a sign of how traditional religion has completely died out. Like life happens and there are things out of a person's control like a virus and yet the people who want more lockdowns and masks. I personally realize to some extent of how religion was used as a way for people to believe in the afterlife and somethings you have to endure and move on. But these urban bugmen and bugwomen have a childish belief that like mommy and daddy would molly coddle them, that molly coddling will somehow save people from this virus. This is possibly a post abrahamic religious society in action.
That part makes sense (the rest of it does too, but I just want to focus on this). It's why it's usually those that are extremely religiously lax or otherwise irreligious (although this by no means is a universal characterization. Just a general trend) that tend to be liberal: because to them their devotion isn't to God, but to the liberal mindset and the various high priests of the catherdral of the Church of Reason. I think it's because we've just taken the moral fabric of Western society and take for granted the fact that it's rooted in both Greek philosophy and Christian morality. It's why I think we have so many problems today: we're in the middle of a societal identity crisis and we have allowed our societies to crumble in terms of its history and what it stands for in return for passing materialistic goods.

If this is actually true then it is clear CNN is prepping a "DRUMPF STOLE DEMOCRACY" narrative if this happens

If this is not true, more shit for Trump's legal team given two of the certifiers were essentially doing it with the threat of a gun to their lives.
In the latter case, it literally gives Trump's legal team ample evidence that the certification process had been tampered with and can't be outright trusted. That's a dumb fucking move since you made a brazen powermove like that thinking it won't affect how the courts think of it. At least how SCOTUS thinks of it.
 
In the latter case, it literally gives Trump's legal team ample evidence that the certification process had been tampered with and can't be outright trusted. That's a dumb fucking move since you made a brazen powermove like that thinking it won't affect how the courts think of it. At least how SCOTUS thinks of it.
To be fair, they gotten away with it so far. There's no sign so far that there will any sort of repercussions for such shitty behaviour.
 
Don't underestimate the two Obama apointees. They seem to be the type of justices the "pack the court" critics warn about.
There's only two of them, though.
or ends up not giving either candidate the needed 270
Then it goes to a contingent election and Trump wins
But yeah, the clock is ticking, and there's a good chance that since SCOTUS is very selective
SCOTUS will hear this case because it's an emergency
 
In the latter case, it literally gives Trump's legal team ample evidence that the certification process had been tampered with and can't be outright trusted. That's a dumb fucking move since you made a brazen powermove like that thinking it won't affect how the courts think of it. At least how SCOTUS thinks of it.
Would a court even accept that as evidence?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cristobal’s Colon
It sucks that the workers are getting doxxed by these antifa clowns. So much for this "return to normalcy."
The problem isn't antifa. The problem is that lowlifes like that Aiyash cunt are using the same tactics. And these people are running for public office (some are already likely in). The pool is already infested with vermin.
 
Yes and no. Nothing ideal ever exists in the realm of economics, but something that's more or less viable and not prone to rapid self-degradation is. Capitalism that's slightly regulated to prevent the consumer from being sold bad goods and worker from being abused would inevitably find some set of problems that it would not be able to solve easily, but those problems are less significant than those posed by forms of capitalism where you don't have some mediating force break up monopolies/oligopolies or other forms where the government is so involved as to actively aid monopolies and oligopolies. Point being, it is impossible because all systems have their problems, but at the same time, the problems the better systems face aren't reflections of failure of the systems (like it is with corporatism), but just due to things just naturally being imperfect.
While the answer is interesting, and thank you for it, I was more making the point that ideal capitalism is more possible than ideal socialism. Aka, capitalism is the best because it is the least worst.
 
While the answer is interesting, and thank you for it, I was more making the point that ideal capitalism is more possible than ideal socialism. Aka, capitalism is the best because it is the least worst.
I agree 100%. I don't think ideal capitalism is 100% possible just due to the nature of human systems, but it still is more likely to happen than ideal socialism, which basic human nature prevents from happening. We got close to it in the early 1900s, but that was before big business had a hold on politics to the degree that it does now.
 
While the answer is interesting, and thank you for it, I was more making the point that ideal capitalism is more possible than ideal socialism. Aka, capitalism is the best because it is the least worst.
Such is the nature of everything in human interaction. Feudalism arose because it was the least terrible option in a time when a bad decision made quickly was less likely to result in national death than taking the time to figure out the right answer. The American Republic was created to be the least terrible distribution of power, by diffusing it as far as could be managed while still having a coherent government (see the Articles of Confederation for an example of going too far in castrating the government).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back