Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Just A Butt]

I think you're lying and you're just saying that to win this debate. Reminds me of Destiny lying to win his debate with Vegan Gainz.

Assume I am telling the truth for the sake of honing your skills. What will you say to rebuff that argument?

Fucking 12 year olds is pedophilia. Full stop. I don't care who did it, founding fathers or John Bulla

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Full physical maturity and ability to become pregnant arent synonymous though

Well in @BoxerShorts47's mind they are and that's why he has to get permission and register every time he moves from one hovel to another.



She's not fully physically mature, as the changes in her body from age 12 to age 14 show.

Answer the question.

at 14 i would argue she is fully mature.
i'll agree with the 12 part tho but borderline enough to fit many high school age women so that's why i said even 18 wouldn't be unreasonable.

Assume I am telling the truth for the sake of honing your skills. What will you say to rebuff that argument?

Fucking 12 year olds is pedophilia. Full stop. I don't care who did it, founding fathers or John Bulla

You're not telling the truth. You never once through the US founding fathers and all people before 1880 were "pedophiles" because they were fine with the age of consent 12 and under. Do you have any proof showing that you actually believed this before 7 minutes ago?

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

you're being deceptive. not all 12 years are at the same level of puberty.

More coping. The fact that you don't understand what's wrong, here, is precisely why you're never getting:
1) employed
2) laid
3) smarter

Keep on seething for that rainbow, though, @Mincer47, I'm sure it'll work out at the end of a rope

 

[Stardust]

Boxy, if we totally ignore the reality of you EVER getting a date/girlfriend/wife, what exactly would you talk about with a 10 year old on a date? Besides the garbage in your manifesto.

 

[Just A Butt]

You're not telling the truth. You never once through the US founding fathers and all people before 1880 were "pedophiles" because they were fine with the age of consent 12 and under. Do you have any proof showing that you actually believed this before 7 minutes ago?

how the fuck are you expecting me to prove what i thought ten minutes ago you absolute fucking mong.

 

[draggs]

age of consent was 10/12 before 1880. So that was the standard age of consent during the America revolution and civil war. Did they have a huge problem with 5 year olds getting pregnant? No. You're making up hypoethical situations which are unlikely, so exception, not the rule, to strawman my arguments.. I'm not going to respond to not serious posts.


So all the US founding fathers were pedophiles because the age of consent was 12 and under at that time? Yes or no.

All the US founding fathers were fucking 10 year olds? You should write a book about it, you'd make bank and be an progressive hero.

Was the age of consent 10, or 12? Which is it?

And you will keep responding because this is the only contact you have with other humans save bureaucrats at the welfare office and your parole officer.

Answer the question. A 14 year old is not 10, 11, or 12 years old. Give us one example of a fully physically mature 10-12 year old. Not that this Kristina Peminova is fully physically mature at 14 anyway. Puberty doesnt stop because a pervert thinks you look good enough.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

Boxy, if we totally ignore the reality of you EVER getting a date/girlfriend/wife, what exactly would you talk about with a 10 year old on a date? Besides the garbage in your manifesto.

Favourite off-brand breakfast cereal, probably. Or how it sucks when his mom doesn't cook his friend chicken the way he likes it.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Boxy, if we totally ignore the reality of you EVER getting a date/girlfriend/wife, what exactly would you talk about with a 10 year old on a date? Besides the garbage in your manifesto.

I've never said I am looking to take 10 years on a date. You're mispresenting my position.

 

[SIGSEGV]

You're not telling the truth. You never once through the US founding fathers and all people before 1880 were "pedophiles" because they were fine with the age of consent 12 and under. Do you have any proof showing that you actually believed this before 7 minutes ago?

You've managed to persuade me that everyone who existed before 1880 was a pedophile.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

All the US founding fathers were fucking 10 year olds? You should write a book about it, you'd make bank and be an progressive hero.

And you will keep responding because this is the only contact you have with other humans save bureaucrats at the welfare office and your parole officer.

Some people were at that time period and they didn't seem to care because they didn't issue a high age of consent.

Again you're not addressing the legimate issues with the current age of consent. You're trying to use strawman arguments to change the subject.

 

[SIGSEGV]

I've never said I am looking to take 10 years on a date. You're mispresenting my position.

I don't think you're interested in dating a ten year old, just that you want to fuck them.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

. . . You're mispresenting my position.

So, you're saying you're not lurking in bushes near schools? Controversial...

 

[Just A Butt]

Some people were at that time period and they didn't seem to care because they didn't issue a high age of consent.

Again you're not addressing the legimate issues with the current age of consent. You're trying to use strawman arguments to change the subject.

Why is it strawman or whatever when we do it, but you can't answer a simple question like "now what?" without completely going off on a tangent?

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

Why is it strawman or whatever when we do it, but you can't answer a simple question like "now what?" without completely going off on a tangent?

Oh! I know the answer to this one, its autism...

 

[SIGSEGV]

Why is it strawman or whatever when we do it, but you can't answer a simple question like "now what?" without completely going off on a tangent?

This may come as a surprise to you, but @BoxerShorts47 is fucking retarded. He is a literal knuckle dragging, drooling, toe sucking, pants shitting, crayon eating mongoloid.

 

[Stardust]

Boxy, you have this idea that the past was better, that we should adhere to the way things were, yet you're using the Internet? Better yet, why are you, a shit-colored spic, talking to a white woman? In the past, that would get non-whites dangled from a tree, so should we bring that back?

 

[Just A Butt]

Yea yea yea, sometimes I forget.

 

[SIGSEGV]

Boxy, you have this idea that the past was better, that we should adhere to the way things were, yet you're using the Internet? Better yet, why are you, a shit-colored spic, talking to a white woman? In the past, that would get non-whites dangled from a tree, so should we bring that back?

The past was objectively better though because @BoxerShorts47 didn't exist.

 

[L. Duse]

I've never said I am looking to take 10 years on a date. You're mispresenting my position.

But you wanted the age of consent to have sex to be lowered to 10! You said that you are willing to impregnate a 12 year old girl (who is sexually mature since she can be impregnated) that you are married to with parental consent. You want me to post this screenshot again?

And I'd imagine that you'd want to date the person first before having sex with them!

I am not misrepresenting you. I am quoting you. It is not a strawman when we are discussing the implications of you holding this position. Maybe these implications are why the reasons why age of consent was raised or to be more precise, introduced?

You seem to think that you needn't date 10 year olds before having sex with them.

You seem to think that you can breed with 12 year olds without worrying if the 12 year old mother can go through or survive childbirth.

And of course, when I ask you to address the question of whether you even want an age of consent in the first place since you said age is just a number or whether you want to impregnate 10 year olds since you want the age of consent to have sex to be lowered to 10, you say "concern trolling", "I won't be answering your questions anymore".

You call this winning an argument or convincing people to come to your position? If anything, you lost because you ran away and refuse to answer questions using "concern trolling" as an excuse.

 

[Stardust]

So, you're saying you're not lurking in bushes near schools? Controversial...

Boxy hates bushes. Especially on his school girls.