Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

He's got a DNA profile, or at least he pretends to have one.

I will accept nothing less than a copy of it to prove his case.


Even if he did present his DNA profile, and everything else was disproven, there's one glaring issue. He's Jewish. The extreme white nationalists he wants to represent are not going to accept that.
 
you're being deceptive. not all 12 years are at the same level of puberty.

Then if you think that for a girl to give consent *to have sex*, they must hit puberty first, then why even have an age of consent in the first place?

Some girls hit puberty at 12, some don't. But you say that all 12 year olds can have sex when you say that the age of consent ought to be lowered. That includes those who can't be impregnated. You want to have sex with those 12 year old girls who have yet to hit puberty? That is an implication if you want a blanket lowering of age of consent to 12.

So if you are following this "it depends on the girl" argument, best not to have an age of consent so that you won't run into the problem as described as above. Maybe change the requirements say girls who have their period can have sex.

This is not "concern trolling". I am telling you the problems I have with your argument and its implications. I believe you are running away and are losing your argument when you come up with excuses like "concern trolling".
 
Last edited:
Then if you think that for a girl to give consent *to sex*, they must hit puberty first, then why even have an age of consent in the first place?

Some girls hit puberty at 12, some don't. But you say that all 12 year olds can have sex when you say that the age of consent ought to be lowered. That includes those who can't be impregnated. You want to have sex who those 12 year girls who have yet to hit puberty? That is an implication if you want a blanket lowering of age of consent to 12.

So if you are following this "it depends on the girl" argument, best not to have an age of consent so that you won't run into the problem as described as above. Maybe change the requirements say girls who have their period can have sex.

This is not "concern trolling". I am telling you the problems I have with your argument and its implications. I believe you are running away and are losing your argument when you come up with excuses like "concern trolling".
Running away and losing are the only things @BoxerShorts47 is able to accomplish. He is such Neander Nigger he can only redo the same futile patterns over and over again. Fitting then that his genetics will die with him in his damp basement. Probably when he chokes to death on a tendie.
 
What kind of beta faggot admits he got his feelings hurt by a literal faceless stranger in the internet? @BoxerShorts47 you are a cowardly shit skin, who should be insulted daily to remind you that the only thing you will ever do that is met with acclaim is when you finally grow a pair and end your worthless life.
 
I haven't really insulted you either but I still get the neg ratings anyway.


Unless you give Boxy the Informative rating sticker, you are insulting him. He CRAVES the Informative sticker like BBC, DREAMS of it like BBC, OBSESSES over it like BBC.

This 145 IQ midwit negrates you because, in his autistic mind, your Reaction Score is dropping. To Boxy, Reaction Scores are like Power Levels from DragonBall/Z/GT/Super, and you are becoming weaker. But that aside, his mass negrating is stupid as we are not A&H, so stickers don't matter to us here. Ol' Boxy believes negrating makes him the Napoleon Bonaparte of the Internet. Vive la Autism!
 
because right now very little (or no girls) finish puberty at age 7.

Would you then dispute the observation that the better nourished the child is, the earlier he or she hits puberty?


Around the 1900s, in the US the average menarche –when a girl gets her first period- was about 14. After the World War 2 the age of puberty was typically at 11-12 years. Especially since the 1980s has the age of puberty fallen and for increasing number of girls is now gradually declined to 7-8. Ever since the turn of the century many environmental, societal and dietary changes are occurring and by the age of 7 girls are starting to develop breasts and the onset of menstruation.

If you don't dispute this, never mind that people in the 19th century were having sex with girls who have yet to hit puberty, would you call for a lowering of age of consent to 7 or 8 since girls hit puberty at that age since the 1980s?
 
Unless you give Boxy the Informative rating sticker, you are insulting him. He CRAVES the Informative sticker like BBC, DREAMS of it like BBC, OBSESSES over it like BBC.

This 145 IQ midwit negrates you because, in his autistic mind, your Reaction Score is dropping. To Boxy, Reaction Scores are like Power Levels from DragonBall/Z/GT/Super, and you are becoming weaker. But that aside, his mass negrating is stupid as we are not A&H, so stickers don't matter to us here. Ol' Boxy believes negrating makes him the Napoleon Bonaparte of the Internet. Vive la Autism!
i think he just wants dick
 
*chimp noises*

Why is this sea monkey lecturing anyone about America? I mean sure, I'd love for everyone in THE GREATEST NATION EVER CONCEIVED UNDER GOD'S WILL to be able to screech nigger at each other all day IRL and not try to get each other fired for it like a bunch of faggots, but that doesn't concern you, Boxy. Trump Biden Moloch isn't your president. Go take up your age of consent issues with daddy Duterte and see how that goes, you vile subhuman, you absolute repressed niglet.

Plz have mom post ur thumb dox after Rodrigo pump and dumps your corpse.
 
. . . Probably when he chokes to death on a fat black dick.
FTFY

Also, @Books Are Hard47, why do you consider 900 pages to be too long? You even grumbled at 60, ffs. Are you that ADD-afflicted that you can't even read 900 pages? Do you only read the "See Spot Run" books you leave around as bait for children, or something? It's not like you're doing anything else, you jobless quadroon, read the fucking book.
 
Why is this sea monkey lecturing anyone about America? I mean sure, I'd love for everyone in THE GREATEST NATION EVER CONCEIVED UNDER GOD'S WILL to be able to screech nigger at each other all day IRL and not try to get each other fired for it like a bunch of faggots, but that doesn't concern you, Boxy. Trump Biden Moloch isn't your president. Go take up your age of consent issues with daddy Duterte and see how that goes, you vile subhuman, you absolute repressed niglet.

Plz have mom post ur thumb dox after Rodrigo pump and dumps your corpse.
So how many pages have you read up to now?
 
251. I was ready to say fuck it and bail out, but then I reached a point where some thread about MAPs got merged with this one and other future child rapists entered the fray and now I'm like well shit guess I gotta keep going.
You need to get to the Clorox arc around the 300 area. It is one of the crowning moments in Boxy's posting career.
 
Unless you give Boxy the Informative rating sticker, you are insulting him. He CRAVES the Informative sticker like BBC, DREAMS of it like BBC, OBSESSES over it like BBC.

I gave him "Winner" stickers but he isn't appreciative. Well, he says that he is winning every argument so I gave him that sticker to encourage him.

However, when I merely quoted him verbatim and told him what the implications of his arguments are, he ran away, used the "concern trolling" excuse and refused to address them and started neg-rating. This isn't winning. This is retreating and losing.

I am going to keep this screenshot as my trophy depicting Boxershorts's defeat.

Screenshot_20201119-142951_Samsung Internet.jpg


@BoxerShorts47, how about you tell us what you mean by "concern trolling"?
 
Last edited:
I gave him "Winner" stickers but he isn't appreciative. Well, he says that he is winning every argument so I gave him that sticker to encourage him.


Boxy is indifferent to the Winner sticker, for the reason you mention. He believes, always and by default, he is winning or - after the manifesto, after he owns the libtards on the Internet, etc - he will win. What Boxy needs is the Informative sticker, as in his autistic mind, this reinforces his points and is similiar to a Seal of Approval. Boxy, according to himself, already has the victory. What he needs, though, is the "proof" for spectating eyes to behold.

Remember, this is the faggot who tried to ransom us with 'rate me Informative or no answers for you'. He's not done this with any other sticker rating, as of typing this response. So, take that for what you will.
 
Back