2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently someone posted this on /pol/ to keep track of the traitors in the party. I am surprised to see Rubio is there but not Mike Lee, Ron Johnson and that one dude from Indiana.

1605806310443m.jpg
 
dont they know that they refusing recounts and legit audits make everything looks more fishy?
Better for it to merely look fishy, without concrete evidence, to the peons who don't side with them.

I mean, what do they care? They have the news media in their pocket, they've cornered the "fact-checking" sub-industry, they have throngs of people willing to see no wrong in them since they manufactured their redemption arc (recall the time when we recognized all politicians were rotten, now you have people accusing the other side of wrongdoings and accusing them of projection, as though theirs is immune to the same rot). With all of this, they have considerable sway among independents, and the GOPe will willingly kowtow to them because most of them are part of the uniparty that most of the Democratic party establishment is a part of. Those who are otherwise moderate will be inclined to try to meet at the middle, unaware that they're completely playing to the tune of the Democratic party rather than genuinely negotiating.

Getting away from your point a bit, the only way to resist this reality is to co-opt the GOP and its cultural appendages in the way the progressives are doing with the Democratic party so they can actually be useful, or render them irrelevant by creating a third party option that can actually stand toe-to-toe with them. In either case, the GOPe would need to be rendered irrelevant. The catch is that even if you succeed, you're still setting the foundation for the next establishment contingent of whichever successful party.

Indeed, the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
 
I think this pretty much makes sure that nothing has been certified yet? Why remove them now if it was already a done, irreversible thing?




View attachment 1737459

"They aren't voting the right way so we need to replace them with someone who will" is certainly the hallmark of a functioning society and not a banana republic coup in progress.
 
the only way to resist this reality is to co-opt the GOP and its cultural appendages in the way the progressives are doing with the Democratic party so they can actually be useful, or render them irrelevant by creating a third party option that can actually stand toe-to-toe with them.
Trump has shown that the former is the better option. Third parties in America are non-starters, and the Herculean work that needs to be done to make one competitive is too much for the handfuls of autists that join them.
 
Better for it to merely look fishy, without concrete evidence, to the peons who don't side with them.

I mean, what do they care? They have the news media in their pocket, they've cornered the "fact-checking" sub-industry, they have throngs of people willing to see no wrong in them since they manufactured their redemption arc (recall the time when we recognized all politicians were rotten, now you have people accusing the other side of wrongdoings and accusing them of projection, as though theirs is immune to the same rot). With all of this, they have considerable sway among independents, and the GOPe will willingly kowtow to them because most of them are part of the uniparty that most of the Democratic party establishment is a part of. Those who are otherwise moderate will be inclined to try to meet at the middle, unaware that they're completely playing to the tune of the Democratic party rather than genuinely negotiating.

Getting away from your point a bit, the only way to resist this reality is to co-opt the GOP and its cultural appendages in the way the progressives are doing with the Democratic party so they can actually be useful, or render them irrelevant by creating a third party option that can actually stand toe-to-toe with them. In either case, the GOPe would need to be rendered irrelevant. The catch is that even if you succeed, you're still setting the foundation for the next establishment contingent of whichever successful party.

Indeed, the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
All these decades and conservatives and lolberts still don't know how the game is played. It literally took a democrat (Trump) to give them a fighting chance at all, not that they deserve one.
 
All these decades and conservatives and lolberts still don't know how the game is played. It literally took a democrat (Trump) to give them a fighting chance at all, not that they deserve one.

I must admit I was shocked when it dawned on me what the Democrats were trying to do.
 
By "a number", you mean "two".

He's had to retract two false claims. Out of over two dozen.

And he's far from the only one who makes these claims-- CNN just wants to use him as the lightning rod for this conversation to make their job of deboonking the idea of the dead rising from the grave to vote for Joe easier.
Oh? "two dozen"? Sounds like massive voter fraud. Who are these two dozen people, hmm? Seems like it shouldn't be hard to name them so that due diligence can be done.

The fact the thedonald.win and other Trump stooges are also making these claims doesn't add credibility, they're even less credible than Tucker.
What are you talking about? Everyone here knows that you need a name, DOB, and in some jurisdictions an SSN in order to retrieve a particular voting record. Sometimes the rolls are open for viewing, like in PA. I speak with the assumption that everyone who comments on this is aware of this, and so when they say "this dead person vooted", it's because they found their record and it indicated such. Which is why I doubt that a woman who didn't verify her identity, is said to also be named the same as the alleged dead voter (instead of just being the only person named such) and whose actual name can be Donald Fauntleroy Duck for all we know in light of the aforementioned, is actually the alleged dead voter. I'm genuinely open to being proven wrong.

That said, even ignoring the dozens, if not hundreds or thousands of other cases of posthumous voting being discovered, they couldn't definitively prove that this woman was the alleged voter or that Tucker was talking about this particular person.
I have no idea what you're rambling about. Just to clarify, when I suggested this woman was a zombie, I was joking. As the articles that document the false claims being made about dead voters document, there were two different women, and Trump stooges like Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson's researchers Tucker Carlson's researchers parroting baseless claims from chan boards and thedonald.win were too stupid to tell the difference.

Which is extremely funny when you consider that Georgia has an online 'Check Your Registration' website that only requires the first initial, last name, county, and date of birth. I mean, I'm just a retard on the internet, but it took me less than two minutes to find the dead lady's date of birth. I would never break Georgia law by misusing the voter check website, but it seems like that's something that one could do in oh, maybe another two minutes, to verify that the dead lady wasn't registered in either the county she died in or the county the completely different lady voted in. There are tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of retarded boomers on thedonald.win, and none of them thought to do it. Amazing.

Now, if I was the Trump campaign, I'd have full voter lists and related correlative information through NationBuilder and other sources to find the exact details of the other voter in minutes. That would be what I'd do if I actually believed there was fraud and wanted to prove it.

Or, I suppose, if I was the Trump campaign and I just wanted to con desperate people into giving me money they really can't afford to spare, I could just follow the approach that Trump's legal team is doing, talk about dead voters and parrot nonsense from GOP shills like Carlson, while filing lawsuits quibbling about whether ballot envelopes that voters used to get the ink flowing on their pen before filling out the ballot should be allowed to be counted (but no lawsuits about actual fraud).

Additionally, that voter registration page doesn't seem to have any captchas and probably doesn't have rate limiting either, so hypothetically a researcher could spend thirty minutes to an hour to set up a script to iterate through dates of birth for a name and county. Literally anyone on the internet could do that, no special knowledge required, no need to write to the government of Georgia to get a voter list, just a little bit of automation. But that would get in the way of the grift.
But with what basis? dont they know that they refusing recounts and legit audits make everything looks more fishy? just look at all the lawsuits, is a titanic battle from the Democrats to not allow the checking of votes they want the fraud to pass and they are making the entire process as painful and annoying as possible even when they are making horrible mistakes in the process not noticing that they are helping Trump
Honest question, is there something congenital where Latin American conservatives in particular are incapable of accepting the results of a free and fair election? I'm noticing this pattern a lot.
 
All these decades and conservatives and lolberts still don't know how the game is played. It literally took a democrat (Trump) to give them a fighting chance at all, not that they deserve one.
They know the rules. They've just consigned themselves to being jobbers over "wedge" issues as to distract from the political class hollowing out the nation for specifically their own benefit.
 
Honest question, is there something congenital where Latin American conservatives in particular are incapable of accepting the results of a free and fair election? I'm noticing this pattern a lot.

I think they'd accept the results of a free and fair election just fine. It's just that this unfair one reminds them of what they've seen in their countries.
 
Giuliani is Columbo'ing hard.


"If we let this happen we become Venezuela"

If he wins I hope Robert Duvall, who is apparently a libertarian or conservative, plays him in the movie. If he loses he'll get gulaged by the new regime.

Sydney Powell is explaining how Smartmatic told the Democrats how many ballots they needed to manufacture. I'm casting Kristy Swanson in the film. Or maybe she should play Jenna Ellis.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back