Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

So, I decided to check out the start of the thread to refresh myself with the previous lawsuits.

A couple notes: The case is being overseen by the same judge as Mel's last few attempts.

Melinda had a freakout about being called a loser the last time she sued Null. I assume that's why she's screaming so much about him being a loser now. This also means Null's been living rent free inside her head for at least an entire year now, if not longer.
 
What Melinda thinks will happen: Judge gifts her a million dollars from Null's pocket, teleported from where he is, no strings attached, while forcing him to provide any and all documentation she requests, while hordes of kiwi lives are ruined for their involvement. This sparks a series of default judgements where she just rakes in the cash.

What will actually happen: The default decision gets reversed by null claiming he was never properly served.

If this somehow fails, he'll never pay her, and she'll never get her discovery request.

Melinda gets nothing but continues to cry victory for months as her children starve on the no money generated from her book sales.
 
What Melinda thinks will happen: Judge gifts her a million dollars from Null's pocket, teleported from where he is, no strings attached, while forcing him to provide any and all documentation she requests, while hordes of kiwi lives are ruined for their involvement. This sparks a series of default judgements where she just rakes in the cash.

What will actually happen: The default decision gets reversed by null claiming he was never properly served.

If this somehow fails, he'll never pay her, and she'll never get her discovery request.

Melinda gets nothing but continues to cry victory for months as her children starve on the no money generated from her book sales.
I still don't get how she thinks she's getting discovery. If she wins the default judgment she's not getting discovery, and if she doesn't win it she's not getting discovery either because she didn't serve Null.
 
I still don't get how she thinks she's getting discovery. If she wins the default judgment she's not getting discovery, and if she doesn't win it she's not getting discovery either because she didn't serve Null.
She's not shown any evidence of good thought processes yet. Why start now?
She's got dollar signs in her eyes, and has counted them way before they hatch. She's probably scouting out "homesteads" as we speak and imagining how she'll exploit her crotch fruit to run it for her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
You're a bunch of sore losers who can't accept defeat

He was served. Judge said so in his Order.

When you post a legal servicing address up on your website, it's valid if it makes it to the mailbox.

View attachment 1738716
Hey, you figured out how to attach a video! Good for you. I'm proud of you.

However, regardless of whether or not the servicing was proper, your chosen method of getting damages is sure to fail, and that's what warms the cold crevices of my heart.

Say hi to the sprog for me.
 
You're a bunch of sore losers who can't accept defeat

He was served. Judge said so in his Order.

When you post a legal servicing address up on your website, it's valid if it makes it to the mailbox.

View attachment 1738716
I thought being a sore loser would require losing something first? Or at the absolute least, have some kind of stake in loss. Hmm. I guess I will be pretty disappointed when the suit ends, but that’s just because I’ll have less lolsuits to laugh at and not about the outcome. Even Mel winning the suit at this point would be hilarious.

By the way Melli, still waiting for those sources about panties and circulation assuming you weren’t trying to wear the wrong size. I need to shove it in the face of all those people who are against the nudist lifestyle.
 
This judge has overseen all of her suits against Null. 6 suits, 6 times he was the judge.

More than just the suits against Null, I think, but yes. In any case, this is still not likely to go her way.

You're a bunch of sore losers who can't accept defeat

How have we been defeated? We are not Null's minions, and even him you've "won" against only on a technicality.

He was served. Judge said so in his Order.

Well, no, Judge said he accepted the affidavit of service, rather than saying Null was served. Semantics, but you revel in those so why not?

When you post a legal servicing address up on your website, it's valid if it makes it to the mailbox.

View attachment 1738716
[/quote]

Two things:
Firstly, a screenshot would have served your purposes far better. Also maybe mute the mic next time you record unless audio is vital so we don't hear you ignoring your child to try and prove a meaningless point?
Secondly, you really ought to pay better attention to your daughter.

Hey, you figured out how to attach a video! Good for you. I'm proud of you.

However, regardless of whether or not the servicing was proper, your chosen method of getting damages is sure to fail, and that's what warms the cold crevices of my heart.

Say hi to the sprog for me.

I almost wonder if the Judge is accepting default to close the case quicker. "Yep, guy defaulted. However there is literally nothing you can claim damages for, I award you zero dollars, the case is closed, you cannot add more defendants, matter closed, you have to find something new and different to sue for next time"

I thought being a sore loser would require losing something first? Or at the absolute least, have some kind of stake in loss. Hmm. I guess I will be pretty disappointed when the suit ends, but that’s just because I’ll have less lolsuits to laugh at and not about the outcome. Even Mel winning the suit at this point would be hilarious.

By the way Melli, still waiting for those sources about panties and circulation assuming you weren’t trying to wear the wrong size. I need to shove it in the face of all those people who are against the nudist lifestyle.

There's so many claims Mel has made about the natural world that are oodles more interesting than her silly vendetta against Null or the Goys and yet she never wants to discuss them. A shame, really. Her explanations would give us hours of uproarious laughter.
 
You're a bunch of sore losers who can't accept defeat
What have any of us lost? I certainly haven't lost anything. Unless you count two of my best droogs getting banned, which had jack shit to do with Melinda or her unwinnable lolsuit.
"Just a minute, sweetheart"
Story of that poor kid's life. Damn.
 
He was served.
He was not. Serving a mailbox that sends it to a third party that ransoms the mail back to Null is not proper serving.
Judge said so in his Order.
Please cite. Because he did not say what you think he said.
When you post a legal servicing address up on your website, it's valid if it makes it to the mailbox.
No. Just no. Proper service is mandatory unless the court makes an exception. If you need a citacion, § 8.01-296 (VA) and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070 as well as this article should inform you of the basics of service.

But, please feel free to prove me wrong.
You're a bunch of sore losers
What have we lost? Almost none of us got sued, and you did not yet secure a win against those that have.

P.S. I really recommend looking at Hughes v Benjamin. Hughes tried serving him in like 4 different ways, all of which failed, and she had to beg Sargon to waive service. There is a lot to learn there for you.

Here's how to beg for waive of service in VA. Could be useful. Other relavant stuff in here
 
Last edited:
It's kinda like watching a rat grab an egg that the chicken has tossed out of the nest, because they didn't want it, and the rat congratulating itself for being so good at stealing eggs. Meanwhile the only egg they have ever gotten is the one the chicken didn't even want.
Good job rat, good job.
 
Firstly, a screenshot would have served your purposes far better. Also maybe mute the mic next time you record unless audio is vital so we don't hear you ignoring your child to try and prove a meaningless point?
Secondly, you really ought to pay better attention to your daughter

You have severe mommy issues if you think 36 seconds is "ignoring" someone

You're sore losers who can't accept defeat.

Keep whining LOSERS

Judge already decided service was effective.

Instant replay...


Screenshot_20201117-165945_Drive.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Keep whining LOSERS
You keep saying this without clarifying what we've lost.
Since in your mind, you've finally been vindicated, after years of fighting the evil farms, why are you still here?
I also am led to wonder why you posted that video. It doesn't exactly show anything that we haven't seen.
Including you putting your own children on a back burner to hang out here. I certainly hope you don't do this all the time, but I find it telling that you couldn't have just put up screenshots, turned off audio, or recorded your screen at some other time. So I can only conclude that you WANTED people here to witness you shrugging of your child to make a nonsensical point on the internet.
At the rate you are going, Marshall can use your online behavior to argue for custody. He's probably going to get sick of you using your children to manipulate him sooner rather than later, and come back here to do some passive aggressive posting if his own.
I'm not speaking solely for myself when I say, we'd love to hear his side of the story.

PS. Did you eat a brain tumor for breakfast, or did you actually think that someone would pay you enough money to buy your child labor farm for letting them out of your dead buffalo of a lawsuit? If you actually get your precious default ( doubtful) you get nothing in regards to all other claims.
I know you think that having a degree within your demographic makes you clever, but it's not exactly hard to outline on that particular tooth lacking bell curve.
 
IIRC, Melinda's kids are not all biologically Marshall's, and I highly doubt he gives a fuck about any of them. Definitely not enough to argue for custody.
Apparently 2 of them are, and supposedly he adopted the rest. But if you believe that, you probably believe they were ever married.
You likely also underestimate the griftyness of both parents. They represent a paycheck, nothing more. Especially the retarded one.
 
You're a bunch of sore losers who can't accept defeat

He was served. Judge said so in his Order.

When you post a legal servicing address up on your website, it's valid if it makes it to the mailbox.

View attachment 1738716

Lol, is this the level of 'evidence' that you're going to present to the court? Blurry videos from a potato phone of a computer screen? Yeah, the judge is going to definitely award you 500 grand and an automatic first down. Plus Josh will be exiled to Monster Island and all Kiwi Farms users will be frozen in carbonite.

Apparently 2 of them are, and supposedly he adopted the rest. But if you believe that, you probably believe they were ever married.
You likely also underestimate the griftyness of both parents. They represent a paycheck, nothing more. Especially the retarded one.

TBF I have no idea if they were legally married, not having the slightest desire to dig up marriage records. It's almost a sure thing that the four children (or five, I forget) who aren't biologically related to Marshall haven't been legally adopted. Adoption costs money, court costs at the very least, and I don't really see Marshall laying out that cheddar. I might be wrong, he may have legally adopted the children. He was never actually a father to any of them, that's for sure. That would have taken away from his zoning out on his phone time.

If I were ever served for real in this lawsuit (never happen), I'd retain a court researcher to dig up all of these records in Virginia. I'd dig up every piece of paper in every one of her lawsuits and court actions, and everything not sealed by order of the court would be posted here for all to see.

It's actually a really good thing for Melinda that I'm laughing at her lawsuit instead of taking it even the slightest bit seriously.
 
Melinda, you fail to realize your own insignificance in our daily lives.

You keep harping over the posters here being sore losers, whiners, etc. But here's the thing - you're acting like we're a baseball team, or the fans of a particular team. OR you see us all as a group concentrated on you. But our lives do not revolve around you.

For me in particular you are entertainment at best. A wreck on the side of the road. An episode of Jerry Springer. One of many wrecks, all generally the same level of entertainment. To assume I've lost would be incorrect - my entertainment has not stopped. The show continues. Has Null lost on some miniscule level? Sure, I'll give you that.

But you're incorrect in assuming I'm a fan of Null. I appreciate his site as it provides me entertainment, but we are not friends. If I were to suffer injury, I would not cry out for him, nor him for me. I am just as anonymous to him as I am to you.

Pointless to say all that to you, I know. But I feel the point needs made regardless.
 
Judge already decided service
Titled "Clerk's entry of Default" and signed by the clerk

giphy.gif

I suppose asking for reading is a bit much, huh?
service was effective.
Literally not what the doc says.
It says that the you provided an affidavid "showing proper service". That is not in itself a show of proper service. This is done all the time. The clerk sees an affidavit and that is enough. If Null says it's wrong, only then will they look further. For example, see Hughes v Benjamin where this exact thing happened.
You're sore losers who can't accept defeat.

Keep whining LOSERS8
It's been 3 days, and you still can't tell us what we lost.

Also, weird how you didn't respond to anything else. Almost as if you cannot defeat our arguments.
Actually for the sake of argument, let's assume the judge did say it was proper. What do you think appeals and this are for? And, again, look at Hughes v Benjamin. Everything was going for Hughes just like for you, Sargon was defaulted, bla bla bla, and Sargon still won $38,911.89
 
Last edited:
giphy.gif

I suppose asking for reading is a bit much, huh?

Literally not what the doc says.
It says that the you provided an affidavid "showing proper service". That is not in itself a show of proper service. This is done all the time. The clerk sees an affidavit and that is enough. If Null says it's wrong, only then will they look further. For example, see Hughes v Benjamin where this exact thing happened.

It's been 3 days, and you still can't tell us what we lost.

Also, weird how you didn't respond to anything else. Almost as if you cannot defeat our arguments.
It's been 3 whole days since Melinda's epic win! (By default.) Yet here we all still are, so obviously she didn't get her desired results of this site being shut down. Null still has the servers, he hasn't needed to liquidate his assets to pay for the damn diapers yet. No one's information has been given up.
Literally the only outcome of this amazing flawless victory was Melinda posting an embarrassing video.
 
Back