Some of those, yes. But the ones that affect other people, no. Poor hygiene and armchair activism both involve inflicting yourself on other people. Armchair activism, in particular, is not a right or even just the domain of the mentally ill. It typically doesn't refer to people who are activists online but specifically those who talk a really big game, usually advocating mass violence and action, while avoiding any of that pesky labour they want other people to do for them. That also comes into play with things like living with your parents as well, where doing so isn't inherently shameful - but doing so while bitching about them constantly and also refusing to get a job to try and move out is.
So while cows like Jake Alley and Lou Gagliardi clearly are mentally ill, it's not support to then stop pointing out they're scamming people out of money for 'living with transphobic family' while never even trying to get a job to get themselves out of that living situation. It's enabling their delusions and making them worse. But then, I'm betting this person thinks supporting mentally ill people involves also accepting their delusions of being the opposite gender.
"Here's how this system that benefits only men also somehow hurts men!"
I've seen a few times SJWs argue that 'the patriarchy hurts men as well'. Which would work better if they could ever have that conversation, instead of always then attacking anyone who brings up the ways in which men are being hurt.
I remember reading a discussion about a study showing how men get sexually assaulted and raped by women at much higher rates than previously thought, for reasons including that men weren't being believed that they didn't want sex, and that men usually wouldn't describe things as sexual assault or rape, but if you described situations that constituted either of them then a lot of men would say that it had happened to them. And you could see the SJW part of the discussion developing their cognitive dissonance in real time. Because the source was reputable and scientific, and it was countering their belief that men are always the sexual aggressor, and they couldn't handle anything saying that men were victims of sexual assault at a rate much, much closer to parity with women, and perpetrated
by women, than their worldview could handle. You could watch their brains forcing that new information to be men's fault. The problem is they can't ever seem to acknowledge that there's a single benefit to women under 'the patriarchy', let alone allow anything beyond lip service to the idea that men suffer as well.
Incidentally, it's one of the things that annoys me so much about gendertrenders - you can't complain about 'the patriarchy' so much when you've literally changed your gender because you don't feel like you match the expectations you think it places on you. Anyone who complains about how they don't feel like a woman so they aren't one is doing more to reinforce 'the patriarchy' and its effect on women than one thousand straight white men.
