2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Psychic Espeon]

Trump just tweeted.
(and he already got labeled)

 

[awoo]

He tweeted. That's something.

his Twitter hasn't been active since 2010?

 

[Psychic Espeon]

his Twitter hasn't been active since 2010?

This is his official account:

https://twitter.com/scotusalito

 

[Bartleby]

Unless a case has some physical weight to it, Personal Vendettas are not a good excuse to send it to SCOTUS.

I don't think that's the point of bringing up their vendettas, rather that it gives some reason to believe that they won't just ignore the case even if it is strong for the sake of optics, if the optics have been against them anyway in the past. It's definitely true that it isn't enough when it comes to their actual verdict if they accept the case, compared to the leftist justices who will definitely choose their ideals over the law (at least 2 of them are guaranteed, but will most likely be 4 including Roberts).

 

[Psychic Espeon]

I don't think that's the point of bringing up their vendettas, rather that it gives some reason to believe that they won't just ignore the issue for the sake of optics, if the optics have been against them anyway in the past. It's definitely true that it isn't enough when it comes to their actual verdict if they accept the case, compared to the leftist justices who will definitely choose their ideals over the law (at least 2 of them are guaranteed, but will most likely be 4 including Roberts).

I wouldn't rule out Gorsuch as well. Kavanaugh is also another Wild Card considering that he and Roberts have signaled their willingness to keep Obamacare alive.

 

[Bartleby]

I wouldn't rule out Gorsuch as well. Kavanaugh is also another Wild Card considering that he and Roberts have signaled their willingness to keep Obamacare alive.

Definitely not ruling them out, just going with the 4 justices that are likely to rule against Trump. I don't really know what Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett (ironic that it's the Trump appointees that are questionable here) will decide, but from what I've heard (mainly from @Gehenna), they can be expected to rule for Trump's case, though unfortunately it seems to be much closer to a 50% chance than 100%.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

do we have any public statements?

Dude gave a speech about a week ago and before that his orders were ignored at least once. Fella is anything but happy.

 

[Dafuqisdis?]

LOL at those of you hoping for the Supreme Court to swoop in and save Trump. He can't even get his low level appointees that have heard cases to give him the thumbs up. I would be surprised if the SC took up any substantive election fraud case from here on out. A case has to be pretty weighty in order for them to even consider it, otherwise they will do what they usually do and let it die in Appelate Court.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

So hello first of all, i want to first greet all the fellow jebheads with my arrival in thia thread. Second of all what in the fuck is going on with this election? Is it over yet after soylord fucked em out of court or what ? Can someone please give me a small account on whats going.

Welcome. Old chum.

 

[Psychic Espeon]

For those interested, here's Samuel Alito giving a speech at the Federalist Society. -

P.S. - He begins speaking at 15:39.

 

[Cristobal’s Colon]

So has the shitlord who tagged the doomposters been perma-threadbanned yet?

 

[Random Internet Person]

Seems like a bunch of PA voters have come forward with a pretty good document describing a variety of heinously illegal things that happened in the PA election

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.200.0.pdf
https://archive.vn/wip/6X3h2

View attachment 1741781

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.201.0.pdf

PA is just the BIGGEST series of clusterfucks.

One word: Ouch.
View attachment 1741807

I think PA is almost a Shrodinger's case when it comes to how I should feel about things.

They're stalling.

https://twitter.com/MythinformedMKE/status/1330286372104638470

View attachment 1741814

They're trying to cheat again. It looks to match the MO. They're getting brazen again. They're doubling down. And now I'm worried.

From everything here with the PA hearing and how bad the defense was on top of lawyer harassment, this ruling doesn't seem surprising, only in how blatant they're protecting the state's total disregard for election law. Just a way for the judge to feed the Sunday Morning talkshows with more Drumpf is finished BS. And it makes it easier for the Supremes to slap it down.

That Alito was earlier chomping at the bit for this to come to the Supreme Court with his buffet line shows he knew it was coming too.

We're skipping the election and going full speed to extermination

View attachment 1741893

Tell movie bob his opinions have finally hit mainstream.

What do you think will be the first statue or memorial to be hit. WHat do you think will be the first pet project to be pursued? My money's on voting rights for illegals.

Election cases are like kryptonite for the SCOTUS because they're always guaranteed to piss off one party or the other.
I think they'll be looking for excuses not to take any cases. Prove me wrong, simulation!

The Federalist Society (in which 6 of its members are justices are on the court) made a little video explaining how a case could (or may not) make it. -

Unless a case has some physical weight to it, Personal Vendettas are not a good excuse to send it to SCOTUS.

Everything I hear about SCOTUS makes me feel like this has the potential to blow up in Trump's face.

And Kamala will go on to win the next one. And not because of the bullshit behind "demographics are destiny" or woke white liberals or niggers. It's because they will rig the elections and will keep on doing it and frankly I don't blame them looking at the state of the GOP and how many cuckservatives want to believe that they can all go back to being boy scouts.

How long do you think it'll be before the first camp for Trump supporters will be open? And you know people are going to be chomping at broadcasting the trials for Donald Trump for all the crimes he committed and the Trust and Reconciliation Comission hearings? They're coming once Kamala is sworn in. Hell, maybe Kamala can use her position as head of the senate to get things started before the midterms.

I wouldn't rule out Gorsuch as well. Kavanaugh is also another Wild Card considering that he and Roberts have signaled their willingness to keep Obamacare alive.

Definitely not ruling them out, just going with the 4 justices that are likely to rule against Trump. I don't really know what Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett (ironic that it's the Trump appointees that are questionable here) will decide, but from what I've heard (mainly from @Gehenna), they can be expected to rule for Trump's case, though unfortunately it seems to be much closer to a 50% chance than 100%.

The fact that the Democrats know all the ways to give good optics for those who just want to get through the day, and the fact that nobody in Washington has Trump's mettle to tell the media and every other Democrat to go fuck themselves....makes me feel like things are going to get a lot worse before things get any better.

 

[Tree]

We're skipping the election and going full speed to extermination

View attachment 1741893

Tell movie bob his opinions have finally hit mainstream.

Funny that, I don't think human rights extend to people who see eye to eye with Jerry Saltz.

 

[Colonel Collateral]

 

[Puerto Pollo]

SCOTUS members aren't machines, they're actual human beings. Twitter libtards are making clear they want rehabilitation camps (or worse), for Republicans. This can't leave them indifferent. I mean, if we automatically counted RBG as a a permanent upvote for anything crapped by a Democrat President, why shouldn't we assume the same the other way around?

 

[737 MAX Stan Account]

 

[HTTP Error 404]

View attachment 1742004

Worried. The SCOTUS can only look at evidence that was presented, right? If they prevent them from presenting the evidence, they can't look at it.

 

[Psychic Espeon]

View attachment 1742004

Let's see if he gets his wish.

 

[murdered meat bag]

SCOTUS members aren't machines, they're actual human beings. Twitter libtards are making clear they want rehabilitation camps (or worse), for Republicans. This can't leave them indifferent. I mean, if we automatically counted RBG as a a permanent upvote for anything crapped by a Democrat President, why shouldn't we assume the same the other way around?

look at the snide comments from judges who ruled against trump.

but who knows how it will go? scotus will have to make large rulings against a lot of stuff in PA (if trump's team makes good arguments). it really will set the rules for future elections.

there's also a hard deadline to boot.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

SCOTUS members aren't machines, they're actual human beings. Twitter libtards are making clear they want rehabilitation camps (or worse), for Republicans. This can't leave them indifferent. I mean, if we automatically counted RBG as a a permanent upvote for anything crapped by a Democrat President, why shouldn't we assume the same the other way around?

People are worried about the conservative justices because they tend to switch much more often than the progressive ones. Roberts siding with the progressive justices is something of a meme, and people see the Obamacare rulings as indicative of how this can go.

look at the snide comments from judges who ruled against trump.

but who knows how it will go? scotus will have to make large rulings against a lot of stuff in PA (if trump's team makes good arguments). it really will set the rules for future elections.

there's also a hard deadline to boot.

The Trump team's best shot in SCOTUS for PA is attacking the unconstitutionality of what the courts and SoS did, along with disregarding Alito's orders.