2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume this is true (since I don't exactly disagree in the long term), but for purely selfish reasons, I'd rather Trump delay the inevitable if it means there can at least be 4 more years of my life where a global superpower isn't completely lost to corruption. Can't say I'm optimistic about how 2024 will turn out even if Trump wins this election, but if he actually carries out significant election reform, slows down immigration rates and is followed by another populist candidate, then maybe the same shit won't end up happening. Considering that it's dependent on four ifs though, I won't be surprised if you're proven right- 250 years is about what you'd expect anyway before the decline becomes really obvious.
Trump is insignificant in the grand scheme of things. He is a babbling baboon at best and a traitor at worst. He cant remedy jack shit, either of these clowns being up doesnt change anything. Back in 2016 voting for Trump meant something, he was the outsider, he was the one who was meant to change things in the eyes of the people, now he is just another politician. He didnt do jack squat up on his term that mattered in the end and the whole wealth transfer shitshow kept running with his blessing. The bubbles grew bigger and the stranglehold of the tech industry got more and more restrictive. The fed bailed out most of big tech like 7 times and they inflated their stock with corporate buybacks so much that just in May the best one was 26 times over their yearly projections.

Most people dont really know how bad things really are with the dollar right now. It will meet a hyperinflationary end. The reason its not yet is because most of the energy is being stored. The psychology of money in uncertain times is people sell and keep storing cash so prices go down. The stimulus packages keep adding to that energy thats being stored. Suddenly you will see a small spike in prices once that uncertainty is lifted with an air of faux positivity because each household will reach a certain amount of dosh, different for each and they will start spending again. It will look for a bit like the economy is recovering but dont be fooled, after a little while the dollar will become a hot potato and all this energy will be released into the market causing a hyperinflation.

Fun fact is this doesnt even need to happen which it will anyway but, as we speak China has America by the balls and 40% of their fucking debt. If they want to crash the American economy they can just dump that back into the American market and make Weimar look like a good time.
 
Last edited:
Worried. The SCOTUS can only look at evidence that was presented, right? If they prevent them from presenting the evidence, they can't look at it.
Not sure if it was that one but I recall chatter about at least one of the Trump cases putting in a legal thingy to allow extra evidence.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume this is true (since I don't exactly disagree in the long term), but for purely selfish reasons, I'd rather Trump delay the inevitable if it means there can at least be 4 more years of my life where a global superpower isn't completely lost to corruption. Can't say I'm optimistic about how 2024 will turn out even if Trump wins this election, but if he actually carries out significant election reform, slows down immigration rates and is followed by another populist candidate, then maybe the same shit won't end up happening. Considering that it's dependent on four ifs though, I won't be surprised if you're proven right- 250 years is about what you'd expect anyway before the decline becomes really obvious.
I'm not sure what you saw during Trump's presidency. He promised to be tough -- within his first few months of the job, he flew to Saudi Arabia, bent over, spread his cheeks and let every member of the Saudi royal family have their way with him.
 
I'm not sure why people in here are now thinking that SCOTUS is going to turn on Trump based on only the Obamacare decision. In very recent memory, Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito, and Kavanaugh all wanted to take up the Pennsylvania ballots case a few weeks ago before the election (likely to deem it unconstitutional), and Barrett recused herself because it was a pending case, and she was new. These five justices–Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and now Barrett–have all had experience with the Democrats trying to mess them over (dating back to Thomas's experiences with Biden and the false rape accusations leveled at the former). They are all likely aware Biden wants to pack the court. I also think they don't want to essentially give up their constitutional power on SCOTUS by helping a guy who wants to pack the Supreme Court win.
 
I'm not sure why people in here are now thinking that SCOTUS is going to turn on Trump based on only the Obamacare decision. In very recent memory, Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito, and Kavanaugh all wanted to take up the Pennsylvania ballots case a few weeks ago before the election (likely to deem it unconstitutional), and Barrett recused herself because it was a pending case, and she was new. These five justices–Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and now Barrett–have all had experience with the Democrats trying to mess them over (dating back to Thomas's experiences with Biden and the false rape accusations leveled at the former). They are all likely aware Biden wants to pack the court. I also think they don't want to essentially give up their constitutional power on SCOTUS by helping a guy who wants to pack the Supreme Court win.
I don't see Biden packing the court. Kamala might if she were to ever become President, but not Biden.
 
The balls on this mofo. GEOTUS is still strong in the face of all this evil and treachery lol. May he please do the "right thing".


Screenshot 2020-11-21 184222.png


Edit: Ninjaed since I am like 4 pages behind.
 
Last edited:
Assuming that i understood the ruling, the judge says the proper thing for PA voters is to sue the counties to get their ballots cured.

PA has to certify the results by monday.

Shouldn't GOP officials talk to the state legislatures about not certifying until voters get the chance to cure their ballots? that's what the judge said was proper.
 
If you think this is an accident on Rudys part, can you tell me if Trump has always been orange? If not, when did he develop the penchant for having a tan?
The Daily Mail has no less than FIVE articles related to Rudys press conference and hair fail. How many would they have had if he didn't sweat like a pig with makeup on?

If you want the news to report your stuff, you need to give them something good. Politics is boring, so to get your politics in the Clown World News, you need to add a Clown.
Are you saying it was no accident Giuliani had copious amounts of hair dye dripping down his face during a news conference making his case for challenging the results of the Presidential election? Because it wouldn't have been covered by the MSM otherwise? In other words, he looked ridiculous on purpose?

If so, that is some crazy rationalization. Keep in mind he's actually lawyering, and in the big leagues, not in some criminal court before a judge he golfs with on Fridays with whom he can laugh off the occasional gaffe. No one has won a case before SCOTUS by making an ass out of him/herself on national television.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back