Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
66gg3.PNG
 
I think some of the posters on /pol/ were right, they didn't even want Biden to win. They don't want this colored skank either. The side-show with Giuliani is also a diversion. The point is to make Orange Man Bad into a literal Hitler "stealing democracy", and to rile up those who are easy to rile up.
So... Rudy Giuliani is making a fool of himself in public on purpose, to make people hate Trump?
 
Read the rules carefully. The entire point of this is to be able to arbitrarily exclude people for any given reason. The first question breaks pretty much every single rule of tests I've ever seen in including the number as part of the sentence. 7 is made to make you fail 6, same with 22 and 21. The last one can easily be used to exclude you by simply having north mean the actual direction, so even the box won't save you, as the paper doesn't have to be pointing north when you write it.
The test isn’t hard to give correct answers to. It was designed for the marker to find ways to arbitrarily declare a correct answer as wrong.

I guess if you’re black, white trash or voting D in 1960s Louisiana then it’s impossible to pass. If you look at this test now and can’t figure it out you’re braindead.
 
So... Rudy Giuliani is making a fool of himself in public on purpose, to make people hate Trump?
Incorrect. He is himself, Rudy Giuliani, he doesn't need to pretend, LOL.

He is a colorful person to be sure, even sometimes too colorful. It might be to give some people a false sense of security, and the hope that there is some future worth bargaining for.

Inb4 you tell me that I have a problem believing that the POTUS and his advisors hired people who are incompetent and they are running on fumes. Yes, I think it's highly implausible. However, I also think both you and me don't know the real people who pull the strings and create the strategies, because if I was one of these people I would do whatever it takes to avoid public exposure.
 
The test isn’t hard to give correct answers to. It was designed for the marker to find ways to arbitrarily declare a correct answer as wrong.

I guess if you’re black, white trash or voting D in 1960s Louisiana then it’s impossible to pass. If you look at this test now and can’t figure it out you’re braindead.
Congrats you just repeated what I just said. Does Polly want a cracker?

Incorrect. He is himself, Rudy Giuliani, he doesn't need to pretend, LOL.

He is a colorful person to be sure, even sometimes too colorful. It might be to give some people a false sense of security, and the hope that there is some future worth bargaining for.

Inb4 you tell me that I have a problem believing that the POTUS and his advisors hired people who are incompetent and they are running on fumes. Yes, I think it's highly implausible. However, I also think both you and me don't know the real people who pull the strings and create the strategies, because if I was one of these people I would do whatever it takes to avoid public exposure.
Oh, so you're only pretending to be retarded then?
 
However, I also think both you and me don't know the real people who pull the strings and create the strategies, because if I was one of these people I would do whatever it takes to avoid public exposure.
I think you're giving the people "in charge" way too much credit. The same petty backstabbing, stupid mistakes and excesses of vanity and laziness that bedevil smaller organizations also affect our governments. No person or group of people has an iron grip on how society operates.
 
I think you're giving the people "in charge" way too much credit. The same petty backstabbing, stupid mistakes and excesses of vanity and laziness that bedevil smaller organizations also affect our governments. No person or group of people has an iron grip on how society operates.
Finally some retard posted a message, so I can avoid double-posting.

You are right that there is not one person or group that has an iron grip on how society operates. However, it would be really naïve to think that they do not try to manipulate society by any means necessary.

What we are experiencing right now is a high stakes turf war, and they are going probably to go all-in.

One has to be blind, retarded or paid to pretend that these events are not completely unprecedented both in their scale and severity.
 
Finally some retard posted a message, so I can avoid double-posting.
Why don't you just edit your most recent post as opposed to double-posting?
You are right that there is not one person or group that has an iron grip on how society operates. However, it would be really naïve to think that they do not try to manipulate society by any means necessary.
Try, yes, but attributing seemingly every public event to an intentional effort to brainwash people gives the ruling classes too much credit for competency. Even in very tightly controlled societies, there are always plenty of errors, miscalculations and inexplicably muddled decisions. I mean, Russia visibly flubs its attempts to manipulate the public all the time.
 
Last edited:
Looks like we're entering the final period of ultimate mattering. Some analysts think this is a grift, some analysts think that the Trump team is trying to queue up a series of SCOTUS cases by burning through appeals courts as quickly as possible.

In either case, we should know by Friday.
 
  • Late
Reactions: zedkissed60
Voting tests were a thing in the 1960's. These were mostly given to black voters. Here's an example of one from Louisiana.
View attachment 1742165
View attachment 1742170
Have fun passing this.
These are the "competency tests" that people claim are racist and stop blacks from voting? It's simple fucking instructions, sure there's a few modifications that could be done to make things a little more clear; but if you're not a complete illiterate (by 1960's fifth grade reading levels), this shouldn't be a problem.
 
So where are we now? Apparently 32 of the 34 cases that the media was hyped about saying were dismissed weren't even done by Trump's team, so barely anything from Trump's people have gotten to get through a court yet?

We also have those mysterious German server(s) which are their own weirdness with having it turn out US votes are getting counted on a foreign server, plus it getting confiscated by some sort of authorities?

Then we also have stories of poll observers being disallowed from objecting to votes being counted that they can't see, there was a story of one place changing their rules repeatedly throughout the day seemingly to care less and less about poll observers getting to see anything.

I was pretty skeptical that Trump could genuinely win this at this point, but there's been enough insanity documented that it seems like he has some chance at this point (at least with the courts). I'm just wishing it'd actually get some court trials going already so Trump's people could finally lay out some of their real tangible arguments.

Edit: Also it's been fucking weird how upset people get over the idea of proving Biden won. If he's won so decisively and with no fraud whatsoever, then no investigation would turn up anything and Democrats would get to gloat about Trump and his people being divorced from reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back