2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Pompano Mike]

You can have as many people in the world be against the woke cult as you want and it won't matter because the type of people who are against the woke cult have neither the will nor the intelligence to actually do anything about it. This might be a hard concept for you to grasp because your primitive western brains are incapable of thinking outside the framework of democracy, but generally when it comes to playing the game, quality > quantity. Better to have a few people on your side in the right places than it is to have a million peasants whose lives are completely irrelevant, though you should still let those peasants think their lives are meaningful.

Haha okay dummy, guess we should just pretend popular support is irrelevant to social power instead of being its foundation throughout all of human history. Galaxy brained take there.

 

[Meat Target]

Foreign policy-wise I'd expect to see that Trump's idea that Asian powers should develop nukes to counter China independent of America will happen. Of course, the neocon foreign policy establishment that Biden seems to favor will do everything they can to make it seem like the US is still a global hegemon that can stand up to China and Russia.

I wouldn't be opposed to shoring up more hard and soft influence in the Pacific to box in China. We're already tight with, say, Japan, South Korea, and Australia. Maybe we should also start offering some sweetheart deals to the Pajeets?

That said, another Vietnam should be avoided....

Haha okay dummy, guess we should just pretend popular support is irrelevant to social power instead of being its foundation throughout all of human history. Galaxy brained take there.

No, he's right. As Edmund Burke said, "all it takes for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing."

The "just wanna grill" mentality, which most anti-wokeists really are when it comes down to it, is nothing new. It's textbook Bystander Effect. The Woke Cult are nothing if not ambitious and lustful for power.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

You can have as many people in the world be against the woke cult as you want and it won't matter because the type of people who are against the woke cult have neither the will nor the intelligence to actually do anything about it.

I see what you mean but consider. In a Blue area, you need to follow the woke rules because they're backed by criminal and civil sanctions. In a Red area, the civil sanctions don't exist because everyone knows they're bullshit. And I suspect the criminal sanctions won't be enforced because law enforcement officers are actually more skeptical of them than the rest of the population.

The secret is to not live in a Blue area.

This might be a hard concept for you to grasp because your primitive western brains are incapable of thinking outside the framework of democracy, but generally when it comes to playing the game, quality > quantity.

In China, there used to be a saying 'Heaven is high and the Emperor far away'. I.e. the laws the Emperor made didn't really have any effect on the provinces. I suspect Democrat Uniparty rule would look a lot more like China under the Imperial system than some 20th Century totalitarian nightmare like Mao's China. Neither was a democracy of course but in Imperial China, a region skeptical of the current Emperor or his eunuchs could just go on doing things the way it always had and subverting Imperial edicts in a variety of passive-aggressive ways. Imperial China was corrupt as shit of course because no rule of law means epic levels of local corruption. However, it was not totalitarian.

If you lived in the palace you'd best call a deer a horse but that didn't apply out in the provinces.

Another interesting phenomenon is the way ideology tends to drain out of corrupt but non-totalitarian autocracies and anocracies. The people in power are very keen on staying in power but they don't want to try to implement anything non-technocratic or risky outside of that. So in this model, the Uniparty regime will try to do all sorts of things to make it hard to remove electorally in the areas in controls. It won't really try to do anything to mess with the areas it doesn't control, except maybe grouse about them. All the woke shit will be confined to the areas it does.

 

[Irritable Bowel Syndrome]

Haha okay dummy, guess we should just pretend popular support is irrelevant to social power instead of being its foundation throughout all of human history. Galaxy brained take there.

Revolutions have been successfully executed with only a small percentage of the population in support. Likewise, corrupt governments can remain in power for an extremely long time even if they're hated by the peasants.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Haha okay dummy, guess we should just pretend popular support is irrelevant to social power instead of being its foundation throughout all of human history. Galaxy brained take there.

Revolutions have been successfully executed with only a small percentage of the population in support. Likewise, corrupt governments can remain in power for an extremely long time even if they're hated by the peasants.

Support and connections are important, but the most important is the idea of legitimacy. Nobody can hold or maintain power if not enough people think you legitimately hold that power.

 

[It's HK-47]

The thing that really kind of throws me off with what Powell was saying, is if she's suggesting that Hillary Clinton used Dominion to cheat Bernie out of his primary, why didn't she use it to cheat Trump out of the general election? They were clearly making use of it, if that's the case, and if Trump supposedly won this one in as much of a landslide as the last one, it wouldn't be a matter of having to sprint to close the gap. They would have just kept fabricating votes, wouldn't they?

They controlled virtually everything at the time; Trump had no appointees, the government was full of all the dipshits we've learned about since then who have been shoved into an early retirement, so what the fuck was stopping them from just doing the same, damn thing instead of having Hillary immediately concede the race? What was in the way preventing that from happening, if they held every space on the board at the time? What was different?

The whole thing has to hinge on that massive dump of mail-in ballots being sent out to everyone and their mothers and their maiden names, because there was nothing else that was different about the 2016 election, even if you want to make the argument that "they weren't ready for it" because Sidney's insinuating that they were already using Dominion to cheat it, and have been for a long time.



When Barack Obama ran for Senate in 1994, the only reason that he won in the first place is because he challenged the veracity of his opponents' votes by demanding that the signatures be matched. The lowest number of invalid signatures was 48%. Signature matching is an absolutely vital part of the counting process, and it's swung the entire political spectrum one way or the other in the past. If Obama hadn't done this, he probably would have never become President in the first place.

With such a massive influx of mail-in voting this cycle, it should be more imperative than ever that all of these ballots are matched.

The fact that they're so adamant to avoid it and the fact that it's the only way to make sense of what Sidney is saying leads me to believe that's probably what's at the core of this. Granted, it's easier at this point to just say that Trump lost and Sidney's a crazy person, but that's not as fun as taking guesses. That's the only rationale I can see as to what the differences were between 2016 and 2020, because otherwise what Sidney is suggesting doesn't really make any sense, and that could be why they're bunkering down so hard to try and prevent anyone from signature matching.

 

[axfaxf]

That said, another Vietnam should be avoided....

lol, industrial military machine go brrrrrrrr

 

[All becomes gunt]

lol, industrial military machine go brrrrrrrr

They should go enlist the strong and independent womyn and trannies they keep advocating for. HRT thongs and dildoes lose vs bullets and missiles.

 

[HumanHive]

The thing that really kind of throws me off with what Powell was saying, is if she's suggesting that Hillary Clinton used Dominion to cheat Bernie out of his primary, why didn't she use it to cheat Trump out of the general election? They were clearly making use of it, if that's the case, and if Trump supposedly won this one in as much of a landslide as the last one, it wouldn't be a matter of having to sprint to close the gap. They would have just kept fabricating votes, wouldn't they?

I think the answer to this was they trusted their polling in 2016 and thought Hillary would win by a landslide. So cheating would have been a little too obvious. Maybe in 2020 they just said “fuck it” and went all out.

But Dominion is still a tinfoil bridge too far.

 

[Meat Target]

They should go enlist the strong and independent womyn and trannies they keep advocating for. HRT thongs and dildoes lose vs bullets and missiles.

The ones that survived would double down on their obnoxiousness, demanding to be thanked for their cervix.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Revolutions have been successfully executed with only a small percentage of the population in support. Likewise, corrupt governments can remain in power for an extremely long time even if they're hated by the peasants.

Which is why Trump and any "smart" people left in the GOP and the right wing in general need to realize that either Trump crosses the Rubicon or forever be crying about muh stolen elections while the Democrats and RINOs will be busy planning to rig the 2022 midterms and 2024 general elections. Any conservative or Republican believing that you can win like a boy scout in a banana republic are idiots who have lived too much of a sheltered existance.

Imran Khan kept whining like a bitch about Nawaz Sharif stealing the election but it was all noise till a combination of the Panama Papers, the Pakistani military and Supreme Court growing big balls in such a corrupt hellhole made it possible for the incumbent to be removed. And that is probably the only successful attempt excluding military coups, which Pakistan has had like three or four.

 

[The Wicked Mitch]

The thing that really kind of throws me off with what Powell was saying, is if she's suggesting that Hillary Clinton used Dominion to cheat Bernie out of his primary, why didn't she use it to cheat Trump out of the general election? They were clearly making use of it, if that's the case, and if Trump supposedly won this one in as much of a landslide as the last one, it wouldn't be a matter of having to sprint to close the gap. They would have just kept fabricating votes, wouldn't they?

They controlled virtually everything at the time; Trump had no appointees, the government was full of all the dipshits we've learned about since then who have been shoved into an early retirement, so what the fuck was stopping them from just doing the same, damn thing instead of having Hillary immediately concede the race? What was in the way preventing that from happening, if they held every space on the board at the time? What was different?

The whole thing has to hinge on that massive dump of mail-in ballots being sent out to everyone and their mothers and their maiden names, because there was nothing else that was different about the 2016 election, even if you want to make the argument that "they weren't ready for it" because Sidney's insinuating that they were already using Dominion to cheat it, and have been for a long time.

View attachment 1743082

When Barack Obama ran for Senate in 1994, the only reason that he won in the first place is because he challenged the veracity of his opponents' votes by demanding that the signatures be matched. The lowest number of invalid signatures was 48%. Signature matching is an absolutely vital part of the counting process, and it's swung the entire political spectrum one way or the other in the past. If Obama hadn't done this, he probably would have never become President in the first place.

With such a massive influx of mail-in voting this cycle, it should be more imperative than ever that all of these ballots are matched.

The fact that they're so adamant to avoid it and the fact that it's the only way to make sense of what Sidney is saying leads me to believe that's probably what's at the core of this. Granted, it's easier at this point to just say that Trump lost and Sidney's a crazy person, but that's not as fun as taking guesses. That's the only rationale I can see as to what the differences were between 2016 and 2020, because otherwise what Sidney is suggesting doesn't really make any sense, and that could be why they're bunkering down so hard to try and prevent anyone from signature matching.

They probably believed the polling data and didn't think they would need it, plus they didn't have the cover of Flu Panic to flood fake mail in ballots once Trump overpowered the Dominion algo back in 2016

 

[Polyboros2]

The thing that really kind of throws me off with what Powell was saying, is if she's suggesting that Hillary Clinton used Dominion to cheat Bernie out of his primary, why didn't she use it to cheat Trump out of the general election? They were clearly making use of it, if that's the case, and if Trump supposedly won this one in as much of a landslide as the last one, it wouldn't be a matter of having to sprint to close the gap. They would have just kept fabricating votes, wouldn't they?

They controlled virtually everything at the time; Trump had no appointees, the government was full of all the dipshits we've learned about since then who have been shoved into an early retirement, so what the fuck was stopping them from just doing the same, damn thing instead of having Hillary immediately concede the race? What was in the way preventing that from happening, if they held every space on the board at the time? What was different?

The whole thing has to hinge on that massive dump of mail-in ballots being sent out to everyone and their mothers and their maiden names, because there was nothing else that was different about the 2016 election, even if you want to make the argument that "they weren't ready for it" because Sidney's insinuating that they were already using Dominion to cheat it, and have been for a long time.

View attachment 1743082

When Barack Obama ran for Senate in 1994, the only reason that he won in the first place is because he challenged the veracity of his opponents' votes by demanding that the signatures be matched. The lowest number of invalid signatures was 48%. Signature matching is an absolutely vital part of the counting process, and it's swung the entire political spectrum one way or the other in the past. If Obama hadn't done this, he probably would have never become President in the first place.

With such a massive influx of mail-in voting this cycle, it should be more imperative than ever that all of these ballots are matched.

The fact that they're so adamant to avoid it and the fact that it's the only way to make sense of what Sidney is saying leads me to believe that's probably what's at the core of this. Granted, it's easier at this point to just say that Trump lost and Sidney's a crazy person, but that's not as fun as taking guesses. That's the only rationale I can see as to what the differences were between 2016 and 2020, because otherwise what Sidney is suggesting doesn't really make any sense, and that could be why they're bunkering down so hard to try and prevent anyone from signature matching.

I've speculated this myself in entertaining the idea that Powell isn't channeling Alex Jones.

In this speculation I guess that she did cheat, we just have no idea how big Trump actually won in 2016. And that this year they had the mail in scheme and even then he vastly out performed, to the point that Michigan and Wisconsin dumped over 100k votes to one side in the middle of the night, and other states seeing how bad that looked instead spent a week counting the last few percents of votes to mix them in more subtly.

 

[There'll be another time]

The thing that really kind of throws me off with what Powell was saying, is if she's suggesting that Hillary Clinton used Dominion to cheat Bernie out of his primary, why didn't she use it to cheat Trump out of the general election? They were clearly making use of it, if that's the case, and if Trump supposedly won this one in as much of a landslide as the last one, it wouldn't be a matter of having to sprint to close the gap. They would have just kept fabricating votes, wouldn't they?

They controlled virtually everything at the time; Trump had no appointees, the government was full of all the dipshits we've learned about since then who have been shoved into an early retirement, so what the fuck was stopping them from just doing the same, damn thing instead of having Hillary immediately concede the race? What was in the way preventing that from happening, if they held every space on the board at the time? What was different?

The whole thing has to hinge on that massive dump of mail-in ballots being sent out to everyone and their mothers and their maiden names, because there was nothing else that was different about the 2016 election, even if you want to make the argument that "they weren't ready for it" because Sidney's insinuating that they were already using Dominion to cheat it, and have been for a long time.

View attachment 1743082

When Barack Obama ran for Senate in 1994, the only reason that he won in the first place is because he challenged the veracity of his opponents' votes by demanding that the signatures be matched. The lowest number of invalid signatures was 48%. Signature matching is an absolutely vital part of the counting process, and it's swung the entire political spectrum one way or the other in the past. If Obama hadn't done this, he probably would have never become President in the first place.

With such a massive influx of mail-in voting this cycle, it should be more imperative than ever that all of these ballots are matched.

The fact that they're so adamant to avoid it and the fact that it's the only way to make sense of what Sidney is saying leads me to believe that's probably what's at the core of this. Granted, it's easier at this point to just say that Trump lost and Sidney's a crazy person, but that's not as fun as taking guesses. That's the only rationale I can see as to what the differences were between 2016 and 2020, because otherwise what Sidney is suggesting doesn't really make any sense, and that could be why they're bunkering down so hard to try and prevent anyone from signature matching.

Perhaps it was hubris that they would surely win, and they wanted to be more legit so that if Trump challenged that ("It's not rigged, you're just losing") comes to mind. And potentially just because winning it legit sounded so narratively perfect to them, after all, Trump was everything they had engineered popular culture to hate. Doing it legit would be the icing on the cake. Then of course it didn't work lol.

Though at this point I feel Powell might just talking out her ass so who knows.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

I think the answer to this was they trusted their polling in 2016 and thought Hillary would win by a landslide. So cheating would have been a little too obvious. Maybe in 2020 they just said “fuck it” and went all out.

I think they had a level of fraud planned in 2020 which was consistent with the polls saying it was either close or they were ahead. Then the first few states came in and it looked like Trump was going to win and they panicked, stop the counts, stuffed ballots, and told the media to cover it up.

Some of it was pre-planned - the rules on mail-ins and keeping the observers out and the way the media started saying how it was their role to 'call' the election and to be wary of misinformation. The 4:30 am ballot stuff seems to have been a panic reaction. I think the level of coordination wasn't all that high - basically a few frantic WhatsApp messages and calls late at night. That's why it was so obvious something was seriously wrong to anyone who knows about rigged elections in Venezuela or Iran.

If it had have been preplanned we'd have seen Trump start off ahead but then Biden close the gap and come out ahead with no pause in counting and no obvious signs of irregularities. Also, the media wouldn't have been so obviously panicking.

 

[1Tonka_Truck]

When Barack Obama ran for Senate in 1994, the only reason that he won in the first place is because he challenged the veracity of his opponents' votes by demanding that the signatures be matched. The lowest number of invalid signatures was 48%. Signature matching is an absolutely vital part of the counting process, and it's swung the entire political spectrum one way or the other in the past. If Obama hadn't done this, he probably would have never become President in the first place.

Uh, I don't think that's is even about voting. It reads like they were petition signatures for being on the primary ballot. If I am understanding this correctly Obama ran an unopposed primary for state senate, because everyone else's petitions were invalidated.

wikipedia, but w/e

On December 26, the Obama campaign filed objections to the legitimacy of the nominating petitions of Obama's competitors.[15][16] On January 17, 1996, Palmer withdrew her bid for re-election after almost two-thirds of the 1,580 signatures on her nominating petitions were found to be invalid, leaving her 200 signatures short of the 757 needed to earn a place on the ballot.[16][17] The Chicago Board of Election Commissioners had previously sustained an objection to the nominating petitions of Lynch and subsequently also sustained objections to the nominating petitions of Askia and Ewell, citing insufficient valid signatures in all three cases.[16][17]

As a result, Obama won the Democratic nomination unopposed.[18] On November 5, Obama won the race for the 13th Senate district, with 82 percent of the vote; Harold Washington Party candidate David Whitehead (13%) and first-time Republican Party candidate Rosette Caldwell Peyton (5%) also ran.[19]

If anything, this is just further proof that Obama, being a creation of the Chicago political machine, has always been a rigger.

 

[GuntPunt]

The thing that really kind of throws me off with what Powell was saying, is if she's suggesting that Hillary Clinton used Dominion to cheat Bernie out of his primary, why didn't she use it to cheat Trump out of the general election? They were clearly making use of it, if that's the case, and if Trump supposedly won this one in as much of a landslide as the last one, it wouldn't be a matter of having to sprint to close the gap. They would have just kept fabricating votes, wouldn't they?

They controlled virtually everything at the time; Trump had no appointees, the government was full of all the dipshits we've learned about since then who have been shoved into an early retirement, so what the fuck was stopping them from just doing the same, damn thing instead of having Hillary immediately concede the race? What was in the way preventing that from happening, if they held every space on the board at the time? What was different?

The whole thing has to hinge on that massive dump of mail-in ballots being sent out to everyone and their mothers and their maiden names, because there was nothing else that was different about the 2016 election, even if you want to make the argument that "they weren't ready for it" because Sidney's insinuating that they were already using Dominion to cheat it, and have been for a long time.

View attachment 1743082

When Barack Obama ran for Senate in 1994, the only reason that he won in the first place is because he challenged the veracity of his opponents' votes by demanding that the signatures be matched. The lowest number of invalid signatures was 48%. Signature matching is an absolutely vital part of the counting process, and it's swung the entire political spectrum one way or the other in the past. If Obama hadn't done this, he probably would have never become President in the first place.

With such a massive influx of mail-in voting this cycle, it should be more imperative than ever that all of these ballots are matched.

The fact that they're so adamant to avoid it and the fact that it's the only way to make sense of what Sidney is saying leads me to believe that's probably what's at the core of this. Granted, it's easier at this point to just say that Trump lost and Sidney's a crazy person, but that's not as fun as taking guesses. That's the only rationale I can see as to what the differences were between 2016 and 2020, because otherwise what Sidney is suggesting doesn't really make any sense, and that could be why they're bunkering down so hard to try and prevent anyone from signature matching.

I am starting to believe that Powell is starting to posture a bit too much. I wonder if the superdelegates was not enough to stop Bernie in the 2016 primary that they used Dominion to rig it. It would follow the MO of DNC bullshit that was going on behind the scenes in 2016. Its farfetched in my view, but Powell is a lawyer and knows the ramifications of saying that type of shit without evidence. She could lose her job, house, and be jailed for it. I give her the benefit of the doubt for now on how high the stakes are for her and how much shit she is talking. Also, with Georgia deciding to check signatures out of the blue, it feels like Kemp is feeling something coming for the guy that let the vote count halt occur with a smile. Adds some smoke.

If she pulls a rabbit out of her hat by some miracle, you are going to see some serious shit. Its going to rupture the social contract and make anyone question if decades of voting were worth anything. Let's see on Wendesday.

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

Trump had a Republican congressional majority for two years. He could have focused on national voter ID and election integrity but he spent that time exclusively on massive tax cuts for corporations and huge foreign aid packages to Israel. Ironically Jews and corporations would pay him back for his generosity by calling him a Nazi and backstabbing him for four years.

It's almost like Trump is a fucking retard or something.

Everyone who bitches about corporations getting tax cuts are legitimately retarded and economically illiterate. This includes the screeching socialists on the left and national socialists on the right.

Link to tweet with article.

Here is the conclusion made:

So in 2017, when the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law, companies saw their tax rate fall from 35 percent to 21 percent. Just that fast, businesses suddenly had more capital to spend to grow their business, improve productivity, and hire more workers—and few things attract workers more than higher wages.

Unironically shut up about topics you have no understanding of.

 

[All becomes gunt]

I think they had a level of fraud planned in 2020 which was consistent with the polls saying it was either close or they were ahead. Then the first few states came in and it looked like Trump was going to win and they panicked, stop the counts, stuffed ballots, and told the media to cover it up.

Some of it was pre-planned - the rules on mail-ins and keeping the observers out and the way the media started saying how it was their role to 'call' the election and to be wary of misinformation. The 4:30 am ballot stuff seems to have been a panic reaction. I think the level of coordination wasn't all that high - basically a few frantic WhatsApp messages and calls late at night. That's why it was so obvious something was seriously wrong to anyone who knows about rigged elections in Venezuela or Iran.

If it had have been preplanned we'd have seen Trump start off ahead but then Biden close the gap and come out ahead with no pause in counting and no obvious signs of irregularities. Also, the media wouldn't have been so obviously panicking.

Imho the 4:30 am ballot stuff seems like the SHTF scenario for them. However none of this really matters you know as bad as it looks because if they get away with it they can just keep doing it again and again and again. Americans probably aren't going to do anything about it anyway because they are still too comfortable, the tensions might rise however when they lose that comfort soon enough.

 

[The Pink Panther]

The Dominion voter machines have no problems with them. They work as intended. The problem with right-wingers is that they always have to make shitty theories as to why they dont have bigger influence on people as an explanation for their losses.

Drumpf is a nazi and a racist who hasn't kept his promises and is a traitor to the American people who only works to promote Russian propaganda to the masses. The fact that you guys have kept this shtick up for a man that doesn't deserve it is a testament to how stupid the right really is.