2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did something happen that caused the doomering in here to skyrocket, or is everybody just very anxious about next week's fireworks?

Weekends usually have little to no news and developments, but lots of demoralizing media propaganda. Doomer Weekends are pretty consistent.


Screenshots_2020-11-22-14-09-09.png

Lol, at nonpartisan. Like I give a fuck what they say the Supreme Court will do. The Court already gave PA an order to separate ballots in case they need to make a ruling on them after the fact, a ruling they seemingly ignore to the vocal upset of one of the Justices. But they aren't going to even accept the President's Lawsuit?
 
This was clearly co-ordinated and as for an organised cabal, some of the most powerful people in the world oppose Trump. To them, this is nothing.

We haven't seen the evidence. The best we've gotten so far is hints towards the kinds of evidence Powell will be presenting
Excactly. This right here. We have hints but we don't have the evidence itself that they are going to court with therefore we can't verify the veracity, admissibility and whether Sidney gets fucked by the courts so hard she becomes addicted to anal or the other way around. One thing is certain though, if any of these fuckers is blowharding nobody will forgive em, certainly not the courts or the American People themselves. The avenue they chose to walk they have to win, losing is not acceptable, and i gotta say so far not so good. Clock is ticking.
 
You are missing the best part, their former financier was none other than Bloomberg News

Also I like how SCOTUSBlog ignores the detail of Pennsylvania dismissing an order from the SCOTUS which if unchecked could be bad nationwide depending on how SCOTUS rules in the future.

Lol, at nonpartisan. Like I give a fuck what they say the Supreme Court will do. The Court already gave PA an order to separate ballots in case they need to make a ruling on them after the fact, a ruling they seemingly ignore to the vocal upset of one of the Justices. But they aren't going to even accept the President's Lawsuit?
I brought it up, because the other day I was trying to find a good place to learn/listen to the SCOTUS stuff in preparation for things if/when they hit the supreme court. This website was suggested, but perhaps they aren't as non-partisan as they claim. Following the money, does it ever lie?
 
The behavior of state-level Republicans raises an interesting possibility. Up to now, I assumed the Democrats rigged it unilaterally and Republican state legislators would go ballistic because they'd know they'd be next if this level of rigging was allowed to stand.

However, consider the following. A bunch of high-level Republicans and Democrats have a deal. The high-level Republicans don't like Trump. The Democrats probably know that AntiFa and BLM riots need to be suppressed because even normies know something is wrong if their city gets burned down. We know they fucking hate people like AOC talking about socialism and defunding the police. What they all want is a neoliberal regime. Woke capitalism basically. Sweatshops in China, and with illegal immigrants in the US but a rainbow flag during pride month and bans for anyone dumb enough to not see that there are some things you don't question.

So the elections were not rigged down-ballot because the down-ballot Republicans are in on the deal. The heads of the state legislatures will certify because they're in on it too. What will happen in Georgia? Maybe the Republicans get that in return for giving up the White House? The midterms will produce a carefully balanced house - literally 50:50. So the Republicans have some way to enforce the deal because they get to keep the Senate and the house is split. Republicans would probably know how many Democrat legislators would back things like the Green New Deal or court-packing and they'd know those have no chance of passing. And they've got the Senate in case something terrible happens.

If this were the case I'd expect the new regime to be a carefully bipartisan technocratic one that doesn't really achieve anything. Woke scraps will be thrown to the left but capitalism will continue to shaft normal people. Immigration and free trade will be pushed. Bipartisan groups will work out careful chess moves to play against China - carrier battlegroups will prowl the seas and US allies will be bolstered. In Europe, NATO will announce that the US is back, baby, with more commitment to oppose Russian expansionism. One interesting thing about this is that you'd see the more strident members of each party decommissioned, a bit like the US and USSR decommissioned their intermediate-range nukes towards the end of the cold war. So when AOC said she 'might leave politics' she wasn't kidding. Her next primary will end with her losing to stuffed ballots to some DNC apparatchik and she knows it. Similarly, all the Republicans who cast doubt on the 2020 'election' will get primaried and will lose, with varying degrees of legitimacy. So the reason the entire Republican party seems to be hedging its bets is that they all sense that the fix is in for this election and if you cast any doubt on the legitimacy of the process you're gone next primary or next election. Conversely, if you hedge your bets a bit you might benefit from the new, post-democratic order.

So what you've got is a compromise. It's just it's the Compromise of 2020 arranged pre-election, not a compromise of 2021 arranged before it.

Would it work? I'm not convinced. Suppose the Democrats break the deal and win control of the Senate? At that point, the Republicans know they've been screwed. Or if the Democrats rig the midterms. The regime requires that two parties that absolutely hate each other have a core of people who are willing to work together.

Incidentally, Newsmax has a parade of Republicans saying 'fight it out in court but if you lose move on'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39WrSskl3XE
I disagree with this theory because I don't think the fraud was a highly coordinated effort. It looks to be a few bad actors in certain swing states panicking really hard over Trump's numbers that they sent out mail-in ballots. It doesn't help that if this was planned by a grand level of conspiracy Biden would've been called as President much earlier than when he had actually been called. Furthermore, the fraud wouldn't have been this obvious if it was a calculated play. The next thing that dampers a hole in the theory is that senate Republicans are siding with Trump including McConnell who changed his tune from wanting to help Biden to helping Trump.

While it could be a case of hedging their bets, it would be much more quick to get no one at all to side with Trump and just shrug off his complaining to make Biden look legitimate. The last thing I'd like to point out is the actions of the Biden-Harris team since Harris is also hedging her bets since she could just quit the senate right now if the fix was in and they wouldn't be begging for money for both a transition of power along with fighting Trump's legal efforts.

Though I would disagree with you on AOC's meaning to quit politics as I think that is more of a childish tantrum than anything since AOC is an unhinged maniac given she did make a hitlist of Trump supporters which she deleted after days of backlash.

Basically there are too many factors being weird in this case that really make this look too unorganized to be a super coordinated conspiracy.
 
I brought it up, because the other day I was trying to find a good place to learn/listen to the SCOTUS stuff in preparation for things if/when they hit the supreme court. This website was suggested, but perhaps they aren't as non-partisan as they claim. Following the money, does it ever lie?

His bias is in the other side but warned on his sleeve, but Uncivil Law on YouTube does a very dry coverage of Supreme Court Cases where he listens to the pleadings with minimal commentary.

He interacts with Nick Rekeita, though they don't always agree, but if the association is a poison pill don't bother. I've found him acceptible if I'm interested in the case or procedure as the content is largely from the hearing and not him, but he also adds nothing compelling if I'm not invested in the subject.
 
Excactly. This right here. We have hints but we don't have the evidence itself that they are going to court with therefore we can't verify the veracity, admissibility and whether Sidney gets fucked by the courts so hard she becomes addicted to anal or the other way around. One thing is certain though, if any of these fuckers is blowharding nobody will forgive em, certainly not the courts or the American People themselves. The avenue they chose to walk they have to win, losing is not acceptable.

Ok, suppose my theory posted above is correct. In that case, Powell will crash and burn in court. You'll see Republicans come out and say 'Well it looks like we tried our best and failed. Time to move on'. All the other more credible accusations of ballot stuffing will fail in court. The SCOTUS won't take up the cases. On the upside, the Republicans will win the runoffs in Georgia. So we'll have a Democrat White House, a Republican Senate, and a razor-thin majority in the House. The Democrats will get rid of people like AOC. The Republicans will get rid of anyone who casts doubt on the glorious show of democracy that is the 2020 election.

The only problem is, it's all bullshit. Both parties have done a backroom deal to get rid of the most obnoxious members of their party and to tolerate massive chicanery to do it. You won't see any non neoliberal/neocon politicians under the new regime. No Bernies, no Trumps, No AOC. Just endless technocratic non-entities with zero support who nevertheless seem to win.

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a corporation that makes all its stuff in sweatshops in China having a rainbow logo for Pride month forever.
 
View attachment 1743354

So uh. Why do multiple Wayne County Precincts have the exact same Trump Vote counts? But different Biden votes? Which add up to the wrong Total Votes?

Simple. What happened in Wayne County looked a bit like an election in the sense that people voted but the result had nothing to do with the actual numbers of votes.
 
We haven't seen the evidence. The best we've gotten so far is hints towards the kinds of evidence Powell will be presenting
Exactly, right now we have seen nothing and therefore skepticism is required.

Though let me throw everyone here a bone, and before anyone rates me :optimistic: know that I am crafting this not off of what I necessarily believe, but off of what could be happening.

Before I do though, I need to launch into a bit of a rant as to why I hate the term "4D chess". You see, the vast, vast majority of what people refer to as such is actually really, really simple. It is merely making your opponents react in a way you can expect and having a trap laid out in front of them. In order to do this, you just need three steps.

A: Know how and in what ways your opponent tends to react.
B: Know what kind of actions are likely to illicit a reaction.
C: Understand which actions from B create which reactions from A, set your goal to align.

That is it, and YOU have in fact likely done this at some point. Did you ever ask your parents for a candy bar, request a raise, asked a buddy for a favor, etc? Those are the unconscious application of this. All "4D chess" is, is the conscious application of this on a larger scale. It is literally the most central and basic political tool in a politicians box, and all Trump does better than his opponents is better understanding them than they do him. Which really isn't hard when the democrats are -incredibly- predictable and meanwhile seem to have the most cartoonishly villainous look of Trump himself clouding their ability. He lucked out with really shitty foes and isn't some grand chessmaster, blame this on his +99 luck stat.


So why this winded and overly long rant? Well, if I am to be charitable and assume that there is evidence and Powell just isn't showing it, then the blue ball strategy is EXACTLY the best one they could be doing. Much to our chagrin. Chances are, it'll take months maybe years to dismantle such an organization and get the exact evidence needed to make the case 100% airtight. They don't have that. So instead they get just enough to begin blitzing a counter-media campaign.

Democrats are nervous, the other evidence of fraud is blatant, they are looking down the barrel of a lame duck presidency, and an absolute slaughter come the mid-terms... and Trump has kept he rumor afloat of a possible 2024 run. Meanwhile, state legislatures are increasingly leery of dominion and election reform and the lack of willingness to do another mail in ballot splurge alongside the fact that the only reason a lot of republicans would be willing to look the other way is to nuke Trump means that they can't repeat this twice.

So, lets look at the application of the theory. Reaction wanted? Them to do something stupid, we want them to panic. Action to illicit this? Easy, play up just how much you have, leave them no venues to counter it effectively, make them worry that you do in fact have all of it. Play up their ignorance on the timescale too. The trap then is set, now the end goal. Easy, a panicked person is someone who is likely to make mistakes, mistakes in this case mean either people coming forward to bolster the legal case, or worse yet people trying to hide the evidence which, with a bit of focused attention on only a handful of cities, is very likely to be spotted... in a second wave of recounts.



Now, this much has been bog standard and IS likely the strategy they are going for. Even if their evidence is paper thin, it doesn't have to be any more than existent to begin with to do this. So lets get to the rainbows.

Republican reactions have been nonsensical, saying they will do a total audit then doing barely more than a recount, meeting with Trump only to say nothing happened with Trump, being obtuse then obsequies all in the span of a couple days.

Let me propose... a possibility. Not a probability, again keep your damn rainbows to yourself you wonderfully autistic bastards, but a possibility. Just don't bet on it, use it for Hopium if you -have- to.

The possibility is that this is a grand charade, the Republicans are nominally on Trump's side up to the point that he loses the court case. Beyond that, the knives come out. Still, up to it they are on his side enough they'll go along. They pretend to be absolute drooling morons to play both sides, wrap up their initial recounts, wait a day or two with just enough plausible but unconformable chaos to give the pressure time to build, then announce a second, more in-depth recount. So, Georgia.

What would this fairly simple plan achieve? Well... with one recount done and it 'in the bag', these people might suddenly want, really hard, to bury the evidence. Maybe burn a few ballots. They are in the clear, but by burying it before anyone can look again they ensure its never seen again.

An action brought upon by panic, that fucks them over. Just enough cover to the GOP that they can deny it entirely and don't take unnecessary risks, and all it requires is knowing how to make your predictable as fuck enemy react predictably.
 
What would this fairly simple plan achieve? Well... with one recount done and it 'in the bag', these people might suddenly want, really hard, to bury the evidence. Maybe burn a few ballots. They are in the clear, but by burying it before anyone can look again they ensure its never seen again.

An action brought upon by panic, that fucks them over. Just enough cover to the GOP that they can deny it entirely and don't take unnecessary risks, and all it requires is knowing how to make your predictable as fuck enemy react predictably.

So uh, with Trump replacing the Cybercrime chief... And them publicly talking about Dominion and Server Raids...

What are the odds Trump has a FISA warrant and people are reading those panicked, terrified emails from certain people asking if "the Dominion Project" is secure, or what have you?
 
So uh, with Trump replacing the Cybercrime chief... And them publicly talking about Dominion and Server Raids...

What are the odds Trump has a FISA warrant and people are reading those panicked, terrified emails from certain people asking if "the Dominion Project" is secure, or what have you?
I don't rate it highly, that mental exercise above was me assuming its all true which I remain super skeptical of.

At the same time, my reasons for being skeptical are what would also make it WORK sooooo.
 
Just some more autism from me.

Found a dominion document from 2019.
This is an interesting feature for poll-workers.
1606075369818.png



Reasons Texas rejected Dominion voting system:
Accidental configurations to reject certain type of ballots.
1606077327880.png



another reasons Dominion was rejected by Texas was USB port vulnerability:
1606075986214.png


Another was that it could connect to the internet through ethernet ports:
1606076060498.png


Voting jurisdictions would have to implement procedures to make sure that tamper seals and locks were effective.....
1606076121856.png


Another was the misaligned highlight feature which caused more confusion during testing than not.
1606076414512.png


Scanning options in "democracy suite, imagecast central user guide" v.5.11 (May)
1606077638168.png


They appear to have rejected Dominion earlier in 2019 as well
1606076546943.png


1 character pin code (with key)
1606076683075.png


straight party voting can be turned off
1606076812763.png


Safest election in history !
1606077007615.png
 

Attachments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back