2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Looks like our unbiased, reputable newspapers have been paid millions of dollars from China for the last 4 years to shit on the US and Trump while promoting their country and distancing themselves from the Wuflu. Weren't these "journalists" supposed to learn how to code? Such trash.

Beijing-Controlled News Outlet Paid US Newspapers Millions To Publish Propaganda This Year​


An English-language newspaper controlled by the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda department paid U.S. media companies nearly $2 million for printing and advertising expenses over the past six months, even amid heightened scrutiny over Beijing’s disinformation efforts in the West.

China Daily paid The Wall Street Journal more than $85,000 and the Los Angeles Times $340,000 for advertising campaigns between May and October 2020, according to a disclosure that the propaganda mill filed this week with the Justice Department under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

China Daily also paid Foreign Policy magazine $100,000, The Financial Times, a U.K.-based newspaper, $223,710, and $132,046 to the Canadian outlet Globe & Mail for advertising campaigns, according to the filing.

The Beijing-based outlet paid several newspaper companies a total of $1,154,666 for printing costs, including $110,000 to the Los Angeles Times, $92,000 to The Houston Chronicle and $76,000 to The Boston Globe. (RELATED: China Watch: LA Times Publishes Paid Chinese Propaganda)


Overall, China Daily spent more than $4.4 million on printing, distribution, advertising and administration expenses over the past six months, according to the FARA filing.

China Daily, which is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party’s State Council Information Office, its propaganda agency, has for years paid newspapers and magazines in the U.S. and other Western countries to publish advertorials designed to look like legitimate news articles.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian at the daily media briefing in Beijing on April 8, 2020. (GREG BAKER/AFP via Getty Images)
China Daily paid The Washington Post more than $4.6 million from late 2016 through October 2019, according to a FARA disclosure China Daily filed in June.

The Journal received $6 million for advertorials from 2016 through April 2020, according to the disclosure.

So far in 2020, The Journal has received $461,489 in advertising revenue from China Daily.

China Daily’s inserts, which are entitled “China Watch,” have typically offered a pro-Beijing spin regarding the Chinese economy, Chinese culture or China’s geopolitical views.

The Journal, which maintains a website of its sponsored China Daily content, includes numerous articles first published by China Daily touting Beijing’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic, which originated in Wuhan last year.

Apple CEO: China Getting Outbreak Under Control” is the title of one article on the Journal’s site.

Several articles are critical of U.S. officials who have accused the Chinese government of misleading the West about the pandemic, and allowing the virus to spread globally.

Trump’s China Remark Rebuked” and “US Spin On Virus’ Name Condemned” are the headlines of two articles on the Journal’s site.

The Journal has not published any articles on its sponsored page since July. China Daily’s FARA filing does not list any payments to the newspaper since the month ending June 30, 2020.

Some American newspapers have cut ties with China Daily in response to the criticism of the pay-for-print arrangements. The Washington Free Beacon reported in August that The New York Times quietly scrubbed its website of advertorials it had published as part of a deal it had with China Daily.

In February, the State Department designated China Daily and four other Beijing-controlled news outlets to be “foreign missions,” which treats them the same as foreign embassies because of their close ties to the Chinese government.

The Wall Street Journal did not respond to a request for comment about its relationship with China Daily. The Los Angeles Times also did not respond to a request for comment.

This is one of the many articles(?) bashing Trump from The Journal's website of sponsors China Daily content

A prestigious medical journal has refuted claims made by US President Donald Trump in a letter that criticized the World Health Organization’s response to the coronavirus pandemic and threatened permanent funding cuts.

Trump wrote Monday to the international health body that it had ignored “credible reports of the virus spreading in Wuhan in early December 2019 or even earlier, including reports from the Lancet medical journal.”

He also criticized the organization’s relationship with China and gave it 30 days to “commit to major substantive improvements” or he would permanently withdraw US funding and membership.

In response to the letter, the British journal Lancet issued a statement on Tuesday calling Trump’s mention of the reports as “factually incorrect.”

“The Lancet published no report in December 2019, referring to a virus or outbreak in Wuhan or anywhere else in China,” the journal said in its statement. The first two such reports published by the Lancet were on January 24, and both studies were led by scientists and physicians from China, according to the journal.

“The allegations leveled against WHO in President Trump’s letter are serious and damaging to efforts to strengthen international cooperation to control this pandemic,” said the Lancet. “It is essential that any review of the global response is based on a factually accurate account of what took place in December and January.”

Trump is “trying to create drama and hate towards China to deflect his own incompetence and inability to deal with the pandemic,” Julie Tang, a civil rights advocate and retired Superior Court judge in San Francisco, told China Daily. “He should stop his provocation with China and start cooperative and peaceful engagements with China to address this crisis.”

Despite the call for collaboration with China from US and international scientists, Trump and his Republican allies have been aggressively blaming China for the pandemic, such as calling the disease the “Chinese virus” and saying Chinese Americans are mostly angry with China.

“We are proud of what China did to stop the virus and tried to prevent its spreading. We wish our president can do half as good a job as China has done. If he had, we wouldn’t be still sheltering,” said Tang.

While Trump threatened the WHO, China pledged to the international organization on Monday that it will provide $2 billion over two years to help other countries respond to the impact of the pandemic and produce a vaccine for the global public good.

The pledges demonstrate “China is doubling-down on commitment to WHO and the multilateral system. The US really risks not only being left behind by China but by the rest of the world,” Alexandra Phelan, assistant professor in the department of microbiology and immunology at Georgetown University, wrote on Twitter.

In contrast to China’s pledges, Trump’s accusations against the WHO could damage “America’s reputation and global standing over COVID-19,” warned Tom Fowdy, a British political and international relations analyst. “Its [China’s] pledges of support for others and international cooperation still paints a massive contrast to the absolute disaster in the United States,” he said.

Evan Feigenbaum, vice-president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, suggested that there’s more to Trump’s threat to the WHO.

“If you really think that letter to Tedros (WHO director) had anything to do with a deep desire to ‘reform global institutions’ then you haven’t been paying sufficient attention for the last three years,” Feigenbaum said on Twitter.

He said Trump is a “grievance politician” and has shown “no interest in multilateral institutions.”

“Existential debates about ‘global governance’ aren’t his thing,” he said.
 
Is it looking unlikely we'll win or do we still have hope?
The situation now is that Barnes is essentially leading the attack in the right dirction by being in the legal team and focusing on proper angles.

Powell is doing her own thing now. Its another avenue at best and a good show at worst.

The one explanation for Tuck, and I almost lament to have to say this because it's fucking stupid, but he might very well be working to tank Fox's ratings on purpose. It's so balls to the walls retarded, but his sudden shift in direction is also a completely retarded mystery.
To be fair, Tuck lost all of his Hunter evidence in the fucking mail. I am still convinced that was an excuse to not report it because he immediately started the "Dont attack him, he isn't the president" take seen on Twitter after.

Tucker is only allowed to attack people allowed in his crosshairs. Don't get that mixed up.
 
Last edited:
DR.COOMER COOMED ON THE DOMINION PATENTS THAT WERE GIVEN TO CHINA

I REPEAT, THERE IS COOM ON THE PATENTS

View attachment 1744134

No matter who wins the election, this e-detective saga is quite fun.

This is gonna end with the meme of Guliani presenting Hunter Biden's dick pic as evidence to SCOTUS becoming real.
 
She's batshit insane and all-in on conspiracy theories. She even went out and bought a gun because she's terrified of BLM and Antifa. She thinks Soros and Bill Gates are out to destroy America. Thinks that everyone who is successful sold their soul to Satan. I give her somewhat of a pass for her insanity because she was sexually abused as a child, but instead of going to therapy and all that stuff, she's doing "self healing", which apparently is listening to her conman fiancee who, I suspect, is what turned her to these conspiracy theories.
Well to be fair, Soros and Bill Gates ARE out to destroy America. BLM and antifa should be met with bullets also.
 
I know a QAnon believing boomer, who legit screencaps posts from /pol/ and posts them on Facebook as "breaking news". Like, she posted that Biden was arrested like a dozen times after he was the nominee because some troll on 4chan posted it. You'd think after the first few times she would learn, but nope.
No you don't. You read someone else's fanfic about their friend's cousin's brother's friend who knows a guy.

I know this dude who thought Jussie Smollett was telling the truth about being jumped at 2 am in chicago. And who believes russia hacked an election with memes. And who believes in an international conspiracy between an eastern european strongman and an american president who sent weapons to his enemies to kill his soldiers with.

He also thinks Russia is paying taliban troops to kill americans. Because, I assume, of the well known love affair between the taliban and Russia.
 
No you don't. You read someone else's fanfic about their friend's cousin's brother's friend who knows a guy.

I know this dude who thought Jussie Smollett was telling the truth about being jumped at 2 am in chicago. And who believes russia hacked an election with memes. And who believes in an international conspiracy between an eastern european strongman and an american president who sent weapons to his enemies to kill his soldiers with.

He also thinks Russia is paying taliban troops to kill americans. Because, I assume, of the well known love affair between the taliban and Russia.
Lol settle down there.

She goes to my gym and I am Facebook friends with her.
 
Sidney's case will take months and she'll only get those months if Trump gets a second term. The Giuliani/Ellis cases on voter fraud have the opportunity of making it the SCOTUS to have some effect on the Republican State Legislature elector decisions before December 14th. Sidney's case does not.

And that's really the long and the short of it. They don't need a perfect case that destroys the entire Democratic Party Vote Rigging Network, because that'll take months if not years. They need something short and to the point that will prove beyond enough of a doubt that this election was fucked in such a way that the SCOTUS or the RNC state legislatures can be confident enough to defy the results of the "election" and not get lynched for it. That's constitutional arguments and provable instances of minor to medium scale vote fuckery in the short term. That's "they didn't segregate the votes" and "they didn't check signatures" and "they were curing votes for Democrats but not Republicans."
 

I would really recommend you guys watch the stream Barnes did with Viva Frei today it's really fascinating and Barnes has a really good perspective on things. Update on Barnes himself at the moment he's back home in Nevada after the time he spent in Atlanta and he said he'll likely be back on the road soon, so I imagine he's nowhere near done working with the trump case.

To put it bluntly Sidney Powell shit the bed. Barnes thinks that while there are problems with Dominion in general, the stuff Powell was pushing was coming from a disinfo campaign and it pretty much derailed trump's legal team. Barnes laid out the fact that's pretty much three competing factions in the Trump legal team.

The first faction is the establishment republicans who ideally Trump to push for a few counts then eventually concede and fade quietly into the night, on the opposite end of the spectrum is the QAnnon true believers pushing the dominion stuff, and in the middle are people like Barnes from both the left and right focusing on the constitutional and statistic arguments who beyond just wanting to fight for trump also want to have a legitimate conversation about electoral reform. Barnes said that this middle faction of which he is part off isn't as effective as it could be because it's effectively being crushed by the two other factions, the republican establishment who wants trump to fade away and in someways are trying to sabotage his legal efforts and the True Believer side who Is pushing these arguments which if true are just too hard to prove in court.

Barnes was extremely critical of Powell and blames her for the current situation in Georgia, saying that prior to Powell starting up her circus about Dominion the SoS in Georgia was getting flak for not doing a proper audit and canvas but then Powell drew attention away from that situation. Once the circus was started Barnes said that Powell effectively took over Trump's legal team to a point where at one point over the weekend there was no a single election lawyer working in the inner circle which was a very bad sign. (Side Note: Speaking of Georgia, Barnes said that pretty much everyone on Trump's team outside of Powell's circle thinks Lin Wood is fucking crazy)

So based off what Barnes was saying it does sound worth dooming over as Powell did ineffectively derail Trump's team for most of last week but Barnes did offer up some information that gives me a bit of hope.

For starters, Trump has apparently made it very clear he does not want this to become a right wing russia gate nor does he want to go the way of al gore,He wants focus on figuring out what wrong in this election in the best case scenario rectify what wrong as trump has legitimate reason to believe he would have won in a fair vote and worse case scenario at least keep his legacy intact by fighting for his base to best set up for a potential run in 2024. Due to this Barnes said that based off what Trump wants and what was happening last week, he and a lot of others saw Powell being dismissed coming and that it was only a matter of time.

With Powell gone, Barnes thinks that despite Powell's actions hurting Trump's case in someways it does improve his chances. It's still a Hail Mary as he says, but it's now become an above average hail mary as opposed to last week where it was really starting to go nowhere because of Powell. Another note that is Barnes did mention Trump isn't hostile to Powell and actually sympathizes with her possibly due to Flynn, so I think that sympathy explain while Elis was retweeted Powell's statement earlier.

Something that gave me hope is that Barnes claims he was able to get Trump's team to zero in on the mail in ballot signatures in the PA case which he says was completely ignored by the Judge when he threw the case out. Barnes thinks that is a really good avenue of attack for Trump's team and mentioned talking to people in Georgia said that signatures have never been properly audited in Georgia and if it were to happen this election about 10% of the ballots would be affected , so he thinks it's a good thing that Kemp seems to be pressuring for that to happen, and believes it would be a game changer in pretty much ever disputed state.

So overall it's a bit demoralizing to hear how badly Powell fucked things up, Barnes does still believe Trump has a chance which is good to hear because I do take Barnes very seriously if he were to say Trump has no chance that would be pretty shattering but he still thinks Trump can go somewhere with his case. Yes Powell fucked things up a bit but at least she's gone now rather than later or not at all, I think it's best she got removed today especially as we head into the new week. I think the beginning of last week was a pretty optimistic time for us because Rudy and Ellis did seem to have solid arguments in the PA court case and that was before Powell went wild with the dominion stuff. And now that she's been removed and considering what Trump wants from the case, I do think it'll move back towards the stuff Rudy and Ellis were arguing about which is much more in line with Barnes' faction in the trump legal team. And I think it's very good to hear that Trump's team does seem to be moving towards pushing to audit the signatures.

So at the end of the day I think we're just gonna have to say how things play out this week and what we hear from Trump's team. Considering what past weeks have been like I'm expecting a decently optimistic start to week, so let's hope we get some good signs soon.

That's about all..........Peace out
So.... Tucker Carlson was completely right about Powell and you all immediately threw him under the bus, lmao.

Anyway, anyone who still thinks Trump will win needs to give it up before they hurt themselves from coping too hard; The actual lawyers were threatened and quit a week or so ago, now the only people left working on this are grifting lolwyers who are taking you all along for a ride that goes nowhere like the hunter biden emails.
 
Last edited:
Do you know the good news about Powell? Now she's been disavowed she can be omitted from the movie.

So that means Kristy Swanson can play Jenna.

Rudy Giuliani: Robert Duvall
Jenna Ellis: Kristy Swanson
Donald Trump: Jon Voight.

Directed and financed by Mel Gibson from all the cash he made from The Passion of The Christ. Vince Vaughn could play some obnoxious Democrat reporter and antagonist.

The ending scene of the movie would be some allusion to Powell's claims finally getting to court.

Title suggestions welcome. No, you can't have "The Passion of The Trump". You know why.
 
I did read that, yes. What I'm saying is that people need to putting a fucking lid on it right this moment, and that includes Powell and Wood. Stop it with the lolsuits and do things professionally if you even want to get a hint of a chance.
Or what?

No, seriously, what's the downside? Powell's attached to trump and flynn forever, her reputation is already completely on the line.

Same deal with Lin Wood and Guiliani.

Saying crazy shit keeps it in people's minds, even normies are talking about powell's crazy accusations. This means they're aware of them, which the MSM didn't want (this is why many didn't cover the press conference)

The media and the public don't have any say in this case. You and I and cnn and fox can all say whatever we want, it's irrelevant to the legal case.

I don't know what the fuck is going on, I'm not even saying "trust the plan", just that anyone tied to trump has their reputation tied up with him either way, crazy accusations or not.

If they win, they get to say I told you so. If they lose, they're laughingstocks forever.
 
Or what?

No, seriously, what's the downside? Powell's attached to trump and flynn forever, her reputation is already completely on the line.

Same deal with Lin Wood and Guiliani.

Saying crazy shit keeps it in people's minds, even normies are talking about powell's crazy accusations. This means they're aware of them, which the MSM didn't want (this is why many didn't cover the press conference)

The media and the public don't have any say in this case. You and I and cnn and fox can all say whatever we want, it's irrelevant to the legal case.

I don't know what the fuck is going on, I'm not even saying "trust the plan", just that anyone tied to trump has their reputation tied up with him either way, crazy accusations or not.

If they win, they get to say I told you so. If they lose, they're laughingstocks forever.
To be fair, people already know Powell is batshit insane. I mean, she is a QAnon believer. It's not like she's got much to lose at this point
 
hunterbiden: Hey nat. My dick so powerful it destroyed the republic.

If Hunter Biden's dick ends up winning this for Trump, I give up. The simulation can win.

At least if this happens we'll be able to say definitively that Giuliani wasn't bluffing about releasing the kraken.

This is horrifying because you made me imagine Hunter Biden texting some stripper about his kraken, and that's not an image I was ready for.
 
TBF hospitals try to stay full around the clock. Empty beds aren't making cash and hospitals have massive operating bills.

That's why all of those scare mongering "The ICUs are nearly full!" articles are pointless. I can walk into our CVICU any day and find it 90+ percent full from just normal patients. Outside of an ICU, you can go in any "step down" room and the COVID+ people there are just hanging out like they have a flu, if that. AKA the actual number of people suffering from COVID in an ICU is a small fraction of the "hospitalized" statistic. Probably people who showed up for something else and were found to be positive from mandatory testing and then shoved into a room.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back