Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

Laws are literally social constructs, you drooling fucking chimp. They are constructed to maintain societal cohesion and to stop, for example some uppity potato-chewing slavturd from raping any children they feel like with impunity.
So you're in favour of removing the rule of law, then @BrokenSperm47? You would like to see what a lawless country looks like? I promise you; you really wouldn't.
so laws aren't real and they can be changed.
age of consent 16/18 was enacted by feminists post 1880, it's 100% historically abnormal and it isn't proven to work long-term.
You're just a coward defending the status quo.
 
The boomer went through every post in this thread and negged me. He single handedly raised my rating from -12k to -14k. Too bad he hasn't even put 1% of this effort into deport the non-whites and preventing white genocide.
Report him, he's a faggot. Shit, I negrate you a lot but I actually read the shit first. Just do it and see what happens.
 
awww. he's sad that no one else read his trash but me.

Report him, he's a faggot. Shit, I negrate you a lot but I actually read the shit first. Just do it and see what happens.

Since @BoxerShorts47 doesn't know how to write a manifesto and I have to comb through his posts before negrating him to -16000, I guess I have to go through this thread then negrate his posts then come up with his manifesto.

It should be easier than what he claims in the personal messages. He is just running away and making excuses. Furthermore, his arguments are repetitive as hell.
 
so laws aren't real and they can be changed.
age of consent 16/18 was enacted by feminists post 1880, it's 100% historically abnormal and it isn't proven to work long-term.
You're just a coward defending the status quo.
That's really fucking rich; you calling anyone a coward is the height of irony. Dox yourself, then, big lad. Put your balls on the table, hand out hammers and dare us to swing.
You and others like you being too inept to score with women is no reason to start changing AoC laws. Work on being less of a bitter, unfuckable retard and you might even get a girlfriend, albeit one that's over 18. As long as she never sees this thread, obviously.
 
Since @BoxerShorts47 doesn't know how to write a manifesto and I have to comb through his posts before negrating him to -16000, I guess I have to go through this thread then negrate his posts then come up with his manifesto.

It should be easier than what he claims in the personal messages. He is just running away and making excuses. Furthermore, his arguments are repetitive as hell.
Good luck brother Duse, may the flying spaghetti monster be with you.
 
I'm the one that should be mad. I have to somehow redesign this Mexican puppet into a slav.
1606148837528.png
 
Since @BoxerShorts47 doesn't know how to write a manifesto and I have to comb through his posts before negrating him to -16000, I guess I have to go through this thread then negrate his posts then come up with his manifesto.
I just want to see what happens. If someone is just spamrating some dude, why doesn't he get to report it?
 
The US Founding Fathers would think you're insane for thinking a 15 year old women wasn't marriage material.
You're totally insane and no different from the cuckservatives who protect diversity.
You invoke the Founding Fathers when you aren't an American and don't have any stake in my nation. Do you think I would take that seriously?
Of course not. You're a third world troglodyte arguing in favor of pedophilia. You want to mold a teenage girl into a woman that won't leave you because adult women avoid a wretch like you.

I don't much care for the woke culture of the 21st century but I do hate child predators with a passion. It could some tradfash retard like you or some dangerhair landwhale, doesn't matter. You're both scum for wanting to impose your sexual desires onto children and adolescents.
 
You invoke the Founding Fathers when you aren't an American and don't have any stake in my nation. Do you think I would take that seriously?
Of course not. You're a third world troglodyte arguing in favor of pedophilia. You want to mold a teenage girl into a woman that won't leave you because adult women avoid a wretch like you.

I don't much care for the woke culture of the 21st century but I do hate child predators with a passion. It could some tradfash retard like you or some dangerhair landwhale, doesn't matter. You're both scum for wanting to impose your sexual desires onto children and adolescents.
Yes or no, Did you founding fathers live in a society where age of consent was 12 (or lower) and no one thought there was anything wrong or "pedo?"
 
I just want to see what happens. If someone is just spamrating some dude, why doesn't he get to report it?
He wasn't really spamming from what I can tell, @Balanced Boomer was actually reading the thread from what he has said earlier on in this thread. He rated some of my posts from the 300~ page area too. Boxy is just butthurt that people don't like his posts.
 
Didn't we establish just upthread that the magic number back then was 15?

so the answer is "no"
No. it's 15 right now in Arizona assuming a women lies about her age.
It was 12 in roman empire for women.
10-12 (except Deleware) prior to 1880.
Using your own modern historical revisionism, many of your ancestors were pedophiles because they got together between 10-18.
 
Yes or no, Did you founding fathers live in a society where age of consent was 12 (or lower) and no one thought there was anything wrong or "pedo?"
Yes, they did. But it was seen as uncouth by the 19th century. Eventually, Americans came to realize that marrying off teenager girls wasn't good for their development and health, thus we stopped doing it.

My nation's Founding Fathers also lived in a world where chattel slavery was the norm and even practiced it. It took 87 years but after much strife and the bloodiest war in my nation's history we eradicated the institution of slavery. You wouldn't want to ask for the return of American chattel slavery today.
 
Back