2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Dr J]

No. Charles S. Dutton would be perfect casting.

Should be Andre Braugher

 

[Techpriest]

the mechanisms that allow curing are illegal. for example, cant open ballots before election day. thats illegal. natalie price was informed on dec 1 she had to cure her ballot. means they opened her ballot before election day.

1 case of election fraud. pa cant certify end of story.

Are you actually mentally deficient?

You can get the option to cure your ballot if it was submitted in the wrong envelope, or if the envelope was damaged beforehand. Also December 1st hasn’t fucking happened yet, how the hell is she getting mail from the future?

Oh. Well I gotta go take a cold shower then. Got a bit excited. Thanks for the warning anyway.

Essentially the appeal here is to try to get them to amend because they claim they have standing they just couldn’t prove it. Again, as stated before, they didn’t prove it and their desired compensation was ludicrously out of proportion to damages. The opinion for dismissal doesn’t deny that the two plaintiffs who had their ballots thrown out without a chance to cure them weren’t injured by this - he explicitly states they were, but who they’re suing had nothing to do with that and instead they should be suing their own counties about it.

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

Essentially the appeal here is to try to get them to amend because they claim they have standing they just couldn’t prove it. Again, as stated before, they didn’t prove it and their desired compensation was ludicrously out of proportion to damages. The opinion for dismissal doesn’t deny that the two plaintiffs who had their ballots thrown out without a chance to cure them weren’t injured by this - he explicitly states they were, but who they’re suing had nothing to do with that and instead they should be suing their own counties about it.

Don't double post just edit your prior comment. Also you're wrong. Judge was fairly obviously pozzed, we all saw the livestream, it was hilarious, and we all knew he'd reject it anyway. This is just one more step to SCOTUS, we've been saying that from day 1, everything else was never anything other than filler.

 

[omega_faggot]

Is Powell going to try and submit her Qboomer schizo case to a court even though Trump has cut her from his team or are we going to be denied the spectacle of watching a Qboomer's career go down in flames?

 

[Techpriest]

Don't double post just edit your prior comment. Also you're wrong. Judge was fairly obviously pozzed, we all saw the livestream, it was hilarious, and we all knew he'd reject it anyway. This is just one more step to SCOTUS, we've been saying that from day 1, everything else was never anything other than filler.

And as I said again, it isn’t going to reach SCOTUS because of the dismissal with prejudice. If the appeals court finds it correctly was dismissed with prejudice, it can’t be appealed further. With prejudice means it cannot be brought back to the court.

EDIT: More from the legal opinion here. Brann is a member of the federalist society. He was approved unanimously by the senate.

Individual Plaintiffs’ claims fail because it is perfectly rational for a state to provide counties discretion to notify voters that they may cure procedurally defective mail-in ballots. Though states may not discriminatorily sanction procedures that are likely to burden some persons’ right to vote more than others, they need not expand the right to vote in perfect uniformity. All Plaintiffs have alleged is that Secretary Boockvar allowed counties to choose whether or not they wished to use the notice-and-cure procedure. No county was forced to adopt notice-and-cure; each county made a choice to do so, or not. Because it is not irrational or arbitrary for a state to allow counties to expand the right to vote if they so choose, Individual Plaintiffs fail to state an equal-protection claim.
Moreover, even if they could state a valid claim, the Court could not grant Plaintiffs the relief they seek. Crucially, Plaintiffs fail to understand the relationship between right and remedy. Though every injury must have its proper redress, a court may not prescribe a remedy unhinged from the underlying right being asserted. By seeking injunctive relief preventing certification of the Pennsylvania election results, Plaintiffs ask this Court to do exactly that.

 

[LurkTrawl]

And as I said again, it isn’t going to reach SCOTUS

You can keep saying it, it's still going to SCOTUS eventually. All you're doing is wishful thinking.

 

[Techpriest]

You can keep saying it, it's still going to SCOTUS eventually. All you're doing is wishful thinking.

I see you’re firmly at the “TRUMP CAN STILL WIN WITH THE SUPREME COURT” stage of the denial list.

 

[CrippleThreat]

I see you’re firmly at the “TRUMP CAN STILL WIN WITH THE SUPREME COURT” stage of the denial list.

So, if Trump gets BTFO'd at this step of the game, which is already over at this point, then laugh and collect cope while we get on with our lives.

Is the doomsday thread that bad that you all can't wait for Trump to fall on his face trying to win a lost game, repeatedly? Sad.

 

[Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth]

Can you please explain that image? I don't get it. I mean he's failing miserably at cutting that cake I guess (fork? while cutting a cake? that tall? what?) And is that coke and sauce? Again what? But other than that...



They better have the brief ready 'cause 4 pm sure is a short time and if they Ty this I'mma rage. But also holy fuck HYPE.

It's a hat not a cake, ask @Techpriest about it.

 

[iRON-mAn]

Though states may not discriminatorily sanction procedures that are likely to burden some persons’ right to vote more than others,

Except this is exactly what the GOP suit is about.

 

[Techpriest]

Except this is exactly what the GOP suit is about.

View attachment 1744744
View attachment 1744751

No, that’s their allegations, not the truth. That’s what they submitted to the court in their plea. The court has found that their argument is without standing and dismissed it with prejudice.

Edit: Seriously just read the legal opinion it’s got citations and everything. It also explains things like “standing” which you seem to have trouble comprehending.

 

[ChikN10der]

Why wouldn’t they? Expedited review doesn’t mean anything but it getting moved up. Enjoy losing at an accelerated pace.

Is your whole gimmick acting completely confident, being hilariously wrong, then refusing to acknowledge you're wrong as you move onto a new subject to be hilariously wrong about?

Eat the hat means you're utterly discredited and your opinions aren't worth the time to slap a dumb rating on.

 

[MrJokerRager]

I wonder with Joe Biden filling up with cabinet with war hungry neocons and rich billionaires.

Is this a sign that he is asking for Trump to cross the rubicon combined with the right wing to just lose their shit.

Liberal boomer hippies voted in Bush 4.0 it looks like at this rate. And the so called antiwar progressives as well, who will keep on being the new niggers of the DNC plantation.

 

[Techpriest]

Is your whole gimmick acting completely confident, being hilariously wrong, then refusing to acknowledge you're wrong as you move onto a new subject to be hilariously wrong about?

Eat the hat means you're utterly discredited and your opinions aren't worth the time to slap a dumb rating on.

No? I’ve acknowledged I’ve been wrong before. I’m not wrong about what I said in your quote.

 

[AMHOLIO]

How's that backseat working out for you while you attempt to mod from it by the way, champ?

Terrible, no one's called me a fag yet and null won't answer my calls

 

[ChikN10der]

No, that’s their allegations, not the truth. That’s what they submitted to the court in their plea. The court has found that their argument is without standing and dismissed it with prejudice.

Edit: Seriously just read the legal opinion it’s got citations and everything. It also explains things like “standing” which you seem to have trouble comprehending.

One judge's opinion will always match every other judge's opinions, this is why the supreme court has 1 judge on it. 9 would be redundant.

This is why there is no such thing as an appeal.

So when you're wrong will you finally eat the hat? Or will you say " I never meant they wouldn't go before the supreme court per se..."

How about this: if the sc agrees to hear the case you fuck off from this thread and any related threads (anything political, basically) forever?

 

[big ups liquid richard]

No? I’ve acknowledged I’ve been wrong before. I’m not wrong about what I said in your quote.

ChikN10der is a troll who is trying to rack up as many thread bans as he can, it seems. I wouldn't take him too seriously.

 

[Techpriest]

One judge's opinion will always match every other judge's opinions, this is why the supreme court has 1 judge on it. 9 would be redundant.

This is why there is no such thing as an appeal.

So when you're wrong will you finally eat the hat? Or will you say " I never meant they wouldn't go before the supreme court per se..."

How about this: if the sc agrees to hear the case you fuck off from this thread and any related threads (anything political, basically) forever?

How about you eat a hat? I’ll teach you how to cook it.

 

[Puerto Pollo]

I wonder with Joe Biden filling up with cabinet with war hungry neocons and rich billionaires.

Is this a sign that he is asking for Trump to cross the rubicon combined with the right wing to just lose their shit.

Liberal boomer hippies voted in Bush 4.0 it looks like at this rate. And the so called antiwar progressives as well, who will keep on being the new niggers of the DNC plantation.

Just the DNC revealing its true colors. It's ok wheh we do it.

And if you think Biden is somewhat sentient and able, you're going to be sorely disappointed.

 

[GuntPunt]

How about you eat a hat? I’ll teach you how to cook it.

Panther didn't cuck out of his obligation. He is taking it in full.

Eat the hat.