2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Doctor of Autism]

ChikN10der is a troll who is trying to rack up as many thread bans as he can, it seems. I wouldn't take him too seriously.

No he’s just some Right wing dicksucker who gets mad there is no right wing safe space for him that takes politics seriously.

 

[Imperial Citizen]

I wonder with Joe Biden filling up with cabinet with war hungry neocons and rich billionaires.

Is this a sign that he is asking for Trump to cross the rubicon combined with the right wing to just lose their shit.

Liberal boomer hippies voted in Bush 4.0 it looks like at this rate. And the so called antiwar progressives as well, who will keep on being the new niggers of the DNC plantation.

I'm hesitant to say that they will wage a war, or at least one with American boots on the ground. China and Russia have been pushing soft power influence while Iran is surrounded by its enemies that are developing relations with each other.

With Jake Sullivan as Biden's National Security Advisor and Antony Blinken as Secretary of State, it looks like he wants to push the multilateral approach. As a reminder, both of these people were involved in Obama Iranian policy, so expect trying to reach out to international opponents and try to develop trust with them.

 

[There'll be another time]

Just the DNC revealing its true colors. It's ok wheh we do it.

And if you think Biden is somewhat sentient and able, you're going to be sorely disappointed.

"You see this nice man Joe? You'll be wanting him in your cabinet, yes?"
"...yea"
"Good man, now here's another ice cream"
"...yaaaay"

 

[Polyboros2]

I see you’re firmly at the “TRUMP CAN STILL WIN WITH THE SUPREME COURT” stage of the denial list.

Him winning in PA I'd say it's more likely than not. Besides his and the State GOP cases, there is also a case from before the Election on the extended mail in ballot dates that's pretty cut and dry.

Where they hope/cope/doom is (I consider myself a gloomer, it's not out of the realm of possibility, but I think odds are in the area of the larger half of DnD dice) in the two more states needed to flip/refuse to certify.

Peak 2020 would be Wisconsin and Nevada also go to Trump and Biden still winning with exactly 270(if I'm recalling all the numbers correctly)

 

[iRON-mAn]

No, that’s their allegations, not the truth. That’s what they submitted to the court in their plea. The court has found that their argument is without standing and dismissed it with prejudice.

Edit: Seriously just read the legal opinion it’s got citations and everything. It also explains things like “standing” which you seem to have trouble comprehending.

Okay, then show me the proof that they didn't discriminate and cured the ballots at the same rate and the email is fake/GOP is talking out of their ass?

 

[CrippleThreat]

One judge's opinion will always match every other judge's opinions, this is why the supreme court has 1 judge on it. 9 would be redundant.

This is why there is no such thing as an appeal.

So when you're wrong will you finally eat the hat? Or will you say " I never meant they wouldn't go before the supreme court per se..."

How about this: if the sc agrees to hear the case you fuck off from this thread and any related threads (anything political, basically) forever?

Lol calm down.

Just the DNC revealing its true colors. It's ok wheh we do it.

And if you think Biden is somewhat sentient and able, you're going to be sorely disappointed.

And that's the thing. They have to pretend to like him. They wanted him in because "not Drumpf?" Let's see what happens.

Elections have consequences.

 

[ChikN10der]

ChikN10der is a troll who is trying to rack up as many thread bans as he can, it seems. I wouldn't take him too seriously.

So says big ups liquid richard, well known effort poster.
You guys pulled double duty as 0 effort trolls and hall monitors huh? Weird combo, but then the left does love authoritarian anarchy, even if it makes no sense.

No he’s just some Right wing dicksucker who gets mad there is no right wing safe space for him that takes politics seriously.

At least I have eaten all articles of clothing I promised to. Unlike you, oathbreaker.

 

[All becomes gunt]

I am not going to get ahead of myself but this actually kind of seems promising, it's quite interesting. Now either Trump and legal co. are going to get humiliated either we will get to harvest the other side of the spectrum for salt as well. I wouldn't count my chickens before they roost if i were you Bidenbros. It's why i look for the conclusion before i can give my final verdict and comment along the way.

 

[Garm]

I wonder with Joe Biden filling up with cabinet with war hungry neocons and rich billionaires.

Is this a sign that he is asking for Trump to cross the rubicon combined with the right wing to just lose their shit.

Liberal boomer hippies voted in Bush 4.0 it looks like at this rate. And the so called antiwar progressives as well, who will keep on being the new niggers of the DNC plantation.

That's what I've been saying. Progressives voted in everything they hate. They kept saying "we can pull him to the left!" It will be cold comfort when the reality of what they have done comes crashing down.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Raising the constitutionality of an action, issue or result is why SCOTUS exists. No amount of "This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE" by a state court is going to negate a constitutional issue or result in instant rejection at the Federal court level. You can also thank liberal activist judges for the expansion of the Equal Protection Clause.

Discussing the merits is fine but claiming a case will be outright rejected because of what some nobody state court judge or magistrate wrote will get you laughed out of every law school in the USA (with prejudice lol)

Eat the hat.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

The Trump team has submitted NO evidence of voter fraud beyond affidavits that fell apart under cross examination.

There's been no news coverage about cross examinations, and I haven't seen anything about cross examinations, either.

ADD: There actually was. Never mind me.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Raising the constitutionality of an action, issue or result is why SCOTUS exists. No amount of "This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE" by a state court is going to negate a constitutional issue or result in instant rejection at the Federal court level. You can also thank liberal activist judges for the expansion of the Equal Protection Clause.

Discussing the merits is fine but claiming a case will be outright rejected because of what some nobody state court judge or magistrate wrote will get you laughed out of every law school in the USA (with prejudice lol)

Eat the hat.

You have my word that if all this reverses i will personally drag em all kicking and screaming through the harvester.

 

[ChikN10der]

Raising the constitutionality of an action, issue or result is why SCOTUS exists. No amount of "This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE" by a state court is going to negate a constitutional issue or result in instant rejection at the Federal court level. You can also thank liberal activist judges for the expansion of the Equal Protection Clause.

Discussing the merits is fine but claiming a case will be outright rejected because of what some nobody state court judge or magistrate wrote will get you laughed out of every law school in the USA (with prejudice lol)

Eat the hat.

Wait you're telling me that every single case that appeared before the supreme court wasn't just because the judge was too stupid to do the special "and I declare no takesy bakesy on my ruling!"?

Next you'll tell me that undercover cops don't actually have to inform criminals they're police officers when asked.

 

[murdered meat bag]

Are you actually mentally deficient?

You can get the option to cure your ballot if it was submitted in the wrong envelope, or if the envelope was damaged beforehand. Also December 1st hasn’t fucking happened yet, how the hell is she getting mail from the future?


Essentially the appeal here is to try to get them to amend because they claim they have standing they just couldn’t prove it. Again, as stated before, they didn’t prove it and their desired compensation was ludicrously out of proportion to damages. The opinion for dismissal doesn’t deny that the two plaintiffs who had their ballots thrown out without a chance to cure them weren’t injured by this - he explicitly states they were, but who they’re suing had nothing to do with that and instead they should be suing their own counties about it.

did you even read price's affidavit?

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Wait you're telling me that every single case that appeared before the supreme court wasn't just because the judge was too stupid to do the special "and I declare no takesy bakesy on my ruling!"?

Next you'll tell me that undercover cops don't actually have to inform criminals they're police officers when asked.

You should see what the requirements for state and local judges/magistrates are in some places. In upstate NY a magistrate doesn't even have to be a lawyer, law school graduate or even a HS graduate but they can throw you into the slammer indefinitely nonetheless.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Lol calm down.


And that's the thing. They have to pretend to like him. They wanted him in because "not Drumpf?" Let's see what happens.

Elections have consequences.

How does a rigged election have consequences?

Don Jr is trying to get people to vote in the Georgia runoffs. What is the point of voting in to be fair, corrupt retarded GOP senators if they are about to throw Trump under the bus to go back to the good old uniparty days.

Loeffler and Purdue are corrupt fucktards that make Trump look like a lamb of God. It's one thing to hold your nose, it's another if Georgia GOP wants to destroy Trump in order to cuck to that big black Sheboon with the tooth gap.

Absolutely Pathetic. I should tell my California GOP to fucking take over the party since they are the biggest GOPe fighters behind Trump.

 

[Techpriest]

Raising the constitutionality of an action, issue or result is why SCOTUS exists. No amount of "This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE" by a state court is going to negate a constitutional issue or result in instant rejection at the Federal court level. You can also thank liberal activist judges for the expansion of the Equal Protection Clause.

Discussing the merits is fine but claiming a case will be outright rejected because of what some nobody state court judge or magistrate wrote will get you laughed out of every law school in the USA (with prejudice lol)

Eat the hat.

He’s not state, he’s federal. Big difference motherfucker. Eat the hat.

There's been no news coverage about cross examinations, and I haven't seen anything about cross examinations, either.

You weren’t paying attention to the cases in Arizona. The “Sharpiegate” case entirely ran on affidavits and witness testimony.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Here's the Michigan State Board of Canvassers stream.

How does a rigged election have consequences?

Don Jr is trying to get people to vote in the Georgia runoffs. What is the point of voting in to be fair, corrupt retarded GOP senators if they are about to throw Trump under the bus to go back to the good old uniparty days.

Loeffler and Purdue are corrupt fucktards that make Trump look like a lamb of God. It's one thing to hold your nose, it's another if Georgia GOP wants to destroy Trump in order to cuck to that big black Sheboon with the tooth gap.

Absolutely Pathetic. I should tell my California GOP to fucking take over the party since they are the biggest GOPe fighters behind Trump.

California GOP knows the score from experience, unfortunately.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

He’s not state, he’s federal.

Regardless of the venue, stamping "Dismissed with prejudice" does not preclude having an appeal accepted by appellate courts and/or SCOTUS. Nor does it immediately doom an appeal to the rejection pile.

Edit: Apologies for the endless corrections to my bad spelling as I'm currently chasing my kitty around trying to get him to take his medicine.

 

[Techpriest]

Regardless of the venue, stamping "Dismissed wirth prejudice" does not preclude having an appeal accepted by appellate courts and/or SCOTUS.

It does. If a case is dismissed with prejudice you cannot appeal that case. You can appeal the ruling of with prejudice which is what’s happening now.