Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

[Rin]

Read what I just told Macie. Things like consent or attraction are non-factors for men like me today. We know what chimps are.

Okay, then, so why are you wasting your time posting here when you could be out getting your rape on? Honestly, all that enlightenment you've got doesn't seem to be doing much for you.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Okay, then, so why are you wasting your time posting here when you could be out getting your rape on? Honestly, all that enlightenment you've got doesn't seem to be doing much for you.

Nara, it's not like I haven't taken entire weeks off posting.

Here's the deal, though - you're fine with niggers and all other chosen groups killing people. That's the point. You are hypocritical.

 

[Rin]

Nara, it's not like I haven't taken entire weeks off posting.

Here's the deal, though - you're fine with niggers and all other chosen groups killing people. That's the point. You are hypocritical.

I'm not. There's just not much I can do about anyone killing people from my computer.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

I'm not. There's just not much I can do about anyone killing people from my computer.

Not my point. My point is that liberals support their holy groups doing whatever the fuck they want and the groups they hate being policed for looking at you the way you don't like.

A white guy looking at you for 5 seconds in a train is a threat, a black man who cuts off your head with a machete is good.

 

[supdup]

A white guy looking at you for 5 seconds in a train is a threat, a black man who cuts off your head with a machete is good.

Says the guy who admits he's never seen or talked to a black person in real life.

Macie, for the 254363565th time - YOU DON'T ASK A WOMAN FOR CONSENT TO DO ANYTHING. IT'S JUST NOT HOW THEY WORK.

You are applying outdated, obsolete norms that no longer matter in a modern world.

Big red text makes everything truer.

 

[ON 190]

Macie, for the 254363565th time - YOU DON'T ASK A WOMAN FOR CONSENT TO DO ANYTHING. IT'S JUST NOT HOW THEY WORK.

You are applying outdated, obsolete norms that no longer matter in a modern world.

I AM HAVING A TANTRUM WITH BIG, RED TEXT!!!!!

 

[supdup]

I AM HAVING A TANTRUM WITH BIG, RED TEXT!!!!!

It's funny. Being blocked by fuckbot really isn't that much different than not being blocked. No response is the same as a response .... utterly meaningless.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

I think the important think to note is that paying taxes from any job is better than paying no taxes and being on welfare

So it is better to pay so that no decent men can ever be in a relationship because women and men they find attractive no longer know the concept and that seduction, and, now more and more rape, are becoming the primary ways of reproduction than not to pay for this?

You're just sick.

Shouldn't they also lead to the source you stole them from?

Not if the source they were stolen from is no longer online, a foregone conclusion due to how old they are. And this is why morons here are so pathetic - the youngest pic they have is from fucking 2010, and they obsessively try to get something out of this. The amount of hysteria is just sad.

 

[ON 190]

So it is better to pay so that no decent men can ever be in a relationship because women and men they find attractive no longer know the concept and that seduction, and, now more and more rape, are becoming the primary ways of reproduction than not to pay for this?

That run-on sentence was just sick.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handicap_principle

Very interesting, but just seems to confirm Fisherian runaway idea. It doesn't explain why it would be in any way useful to overall good of birds like peacocks (by good I don't mean mating but escaping predators etc).

It seems this principle is at hand in today's modern world, but only because seducers are usually men also get government benefits so they have time and resources to chase women.

Somebody like myself has this time and resources artificially, refusing to work, but I can't become an omega by merely being partially in their situation. I still lack seduction skills.

This is the key difference between myself and an omega -I don't want to work, omega doesn't know how to work.

I just don't see how would this principle be useful to humanity in any way. You need to have jewels and cars to prove you can be mated with? I don't think it's like that, I think you need to show seduction in the form of immorality and that is the ornament here, but if it were so what good would it be that you need to have luxury cars and jewels just to have a wife? This again would seem to create losers in terms of mating out of most men.

Roughly 2/3 of the world (according to the countries you list) are modern westernized societies. This means 2/3 of the women population are "modern westernized slut feminists". You would put 2/3 of the women of the world into sex slavery (forced prostition). That means that less than 1/3 of the male population could ever get married. That's more than 2/3 of the populace would be incels.


Your perfect world scenario would create more incels than there have ever been in modernized society today. You're a monster.

Anyway, macie, I mentioned a very easy solution to this problem given by mr. cornfed

http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=101367&Page=2


Even if evil Western ZOGs were overthrown and the few million traitors most responsible for their atrocities were executed, there would still be the issue of what to do about Western women. Since women do whatever the men in charge tell them they would instantly start being wives and mothers again when ordered to, and in any case they would have no choice but to come crawling back without the ZOG funding and supporting their dysfunctional lifestyles. However, they would still be horrible monsters and worthless sluts unable to perform their female role adequately. How would the new regime go about addressing this problem?

I can think of a couple of potential solutions. One would be to perform a kind of triage on the female population. Those of breeding age deemed to have good genetics would be ensconced in body fitting cages and kept permanently pregnant via artificial inseminationl like other breeding sows. Those not used for this purpose but who were physically attractive would be sent to state brothels where worthy men could use them for sexual release, and they might also be farmed out to cook and clean for men. The remainder of the Western female population would be shot. Once the generation of post-feminist females being cranked out by the breeders came on stream, they would be apportioned to men as wives and the remaining feminized females would be shot.

Another solution would be for Western women to be declared wild animals and dealt with in a similar manner to how certain animals are under the wild animal control statutes of various countries. Hence the owners of women would be required to brand, tether or tag them, or they would be considered "wild", in which case men would be free to claim them or hunt them or whatever. There would be a limit to how many women a man could own at any given time (excluding daughters), and husbands and fathers would have first claim. Women allowed to roam around unsupervised and cause trouble by irresponsible owners would be impounded and destroyed.

Any better ideas?

 

[Rin]

I think you need to show seduction in the form of morality

So that's your definition of seduction. Behaving in a moral manner. Honestly, I think this says everything about you. You'll never be a good person, because you think the only reason to be moral is to get women. And that's why you'll die alone and no one will ever love you.

Also you want women to be treated like animals wtf. No wonder you don't have a problem with bestiality.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

It was a mere lapsus calami, you dumb bitch. Which you'd have figured out yourself if you actually read my posts before. I fixed my post, fix yours and don't embarrass yourself.

Also, I do have a problem with bestiality. I just said in what situations it is absolutely necessary.

 

[ON 190]

Also, I do have a problem with bestiality.

Oh, okay, that's pret--

I just said in what situations it is absolutely necessary.

WHAT THE FUCK

 

[Rin]

It was a mere lapsus calami, you dumb bitch. Which you'd have figured out yourself if you actually read my posts before. I fixed my post, fix yours and don't embarrass yourself.

Yeah, no. I think it was a Freudian slip, wherein you expressed your true feelings. After all, you constantly talk about how modern morality is immoral (I am paraphrasing what you said, because I'm smart enough to understand how that works)

Also, I do have a problem with bestiality. I just said in what situations it is absolutely necessary.

You constantly treat women as if they are no more intelligent than animals. If they are mentally equivalent to animals, how is having sex with a woman different than having sex with an animal?

 

[Keerakh]

Also, I do have a problem with bestiality. I just said in what situations it is absolutely necessary.

If you have a problem with beastiality, how in the living fuck can you consider it to be necessary in any circumstance?
Are you fucking deranged?
No wait. Don't answer that. We already know.
AND THEN THERE'S THIS

Spoiler

Anyway, macie, I mentioned a very easy solution to this problem given by mr. cornfed

http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=101367&Page=2


Even if evil Western ZOGs were overthrown and the few million traitors most responsible for their atrocities were executed, there would still be the issue of what to do about Western women. Since women do whatever the men in charge tell them they would instantly start being wives and mothers again when ordered to, and in any case they would have no choice but to come crawling back without the ZOG funding and supporting their dysfunctional lifestyles. However, they would still be horrible monsters and worthless sluts unable to perform their female role adequately. How would the new regime go about addressing this problem?

I can think of a couple of potential solutions. One would be to perform a kind of triage on the female population. Those of breeding age deemed to have good genetics would be ensconced in body fitting cages and kept permanently pregnant via artificial inseminationl like other breeding sows. Those not used for this purpose but who were physically attractive would be sent to state brothels where worthy men could use them for sexual release, and they might also be farmed out to cook and clean for men. The remainder of the Western female population would be shot. Once the generation of post-feminist females being cranked out by the breeders came on stream, they would be apportioned to men as wives and the remaining feminized females would be shot.

Another solution would be for Western women to be declared wild animals and dealt with in a similar manner to how certain animals are under the wild animal control statutes of various countries. Hence the owners of women would be required to brand, tether or tag them, or they would be considered "wild", in which case men would be free to claim them or hunt them or whatever. There would be a limit to how many women a man could own at any given time (excluding daughters), and husbands and fathers would have first claim. Women allowed to roam around unsupervised and cause trouble by irresponsible owners would be impounded and destroyed.

Any better ideas?

WHAT IN THE NAME OF THE NON-EXISTENT CHRIST IS WRONG WITH YOU
YOU FUCKING NEO NAZI

As a matter of fact I do have a better idea. It does not bode well for you.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

I have no problem with being civil. But if someone is an ass towards me, then I return it in kind. I was just expressing my views. I can continue to be civil, but please don't assume that means I agree with you because I truly don't.

To start, I do seem to know more about this field than you. I enjoy learning more about nature and have done some studies on it and watched quite a few documentaries on animal mating and survival. You claim that you don't know something about the subject because you are not a biologist or anthropologist, but also say that that doesn't make them right either. While there is disagreement in a lot of fields of science, most do agree about animal mating rituals and how their kinds of seduction do work. You are wanting to refute proven facts by saying that just because someone is an expert doesn't make them right? Well, just from their field of study, they would certainly be a better source than you and the source you quote has been shown to be outdated and wrong.

Brightly colored animals are more noticeable to the predators that hunt them. Unless they are intelligent and strong enough to survive, they will not live long enough to mate. That is why displaying their colors is attractive. They are proclaiming "I have all this, and I am of superior stock that allows me to survive with this." Also, most women react well to flashy men in general, be them animal or human.

That is, IF they do survive. Peacocks are slow and pretty helpless.

Flashy men who display all coats and gold don't seem really smart or really wealthy. They seem to want to deceive. In chimp societies, closer to ours, omega chimps who use seduction are regularly beaten up by alpha and beta male chimps.


Regarding the provider thing, you claim women will more likely choose men who work over those who don't. You haven't really backed this up with any relevant evidence, but I doubt it is even possible. My claim is that they like certain traits and put this above whether a man works or not. In an ideal scenario, where two men have exactly same traits, and one is employed while the other isn't, I'd be inclined to agree with you. But that's not how you can compare it.

Why do you think terms like nerds are connected to being unsuccessful with women today? Nerds are usually in high paying jobs. On the other hand, not many prisoners lack gfs.

 

[supdup]

Oh lordy. I'm convinced someone installed a reality filter in Fuckbot's brain. What goes into it comes out completely distorted.

"Not many prisoners lack gf's"? WTF? I thought Gfs didn't exist?

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Yeah, no. I think it was a Freudian slip, wherein you expressed your true feelings.

So, all the years of me saying seduction is immoral is just me hiding my true feelings and thinking it's actually very moral? Especially when, as you yourself say....

After all, you constantly talk about how modern morality is immoral (I am paraphrasing what you said, because I'm smart enough to understand how that works)

If you were smart enough (and you did paraphrase it well) you'd know that it is hardly a Freudian slip but a pure mistake due to writing in haste.

You constantly treat women as if they are no more intelligent than animals. If they are mentally equivalent to animals, how is having sex with a woman different than having sex with an animal?

Because that's not the same as wanting to fuck dogs and horses.

 

[ON 190]

What goes into it comes out completely distorted.

Man, you have it all wrong... there's no filter. Nothing goes in and complete madness comes out.

 

[Rin]

So, all the years of me saying seduction is immoral is just me hiding my true feelings and thinking it's actually very moral?

I'm not saying that you think seduction is moral; I'm saying that you think modern morality, aka what we call actual morals, are just a form of seduction. You think men are only kind to women and treat them well because they want to get laid. The truth is that you're projecting. You have no morals, so you call your fucked-up sex fantasies of tying women to rape racks and branding them "moral" as a way to justify your world view. You can't picture other people being generally kind and caring because you have no capacity for it yourself.

Luckily, you're an incompetent dumbass, so all you do about it is cry into your pillow because not even your mother loves you.