2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh no, potholes. Truly this will collapse the uniparty regime.
I think that if the perception of governance transitions towards occupation, then governance will require a physical loyalist presence. Any little bit of gum to stick up that mechanism gives the resistance more breathing space and room to maneuver.

Of course, American perception hasn't gotten there, but I think a prolonged economic depression + a Virginia on overdrive (cultural threat) would be the start to popular conservative resistance. It won't happen right away, and others are correct to point out that it'll be more a series of events that lead to that point. Furthermore, I don't think it'll be lone wolves or independent organizations (too easy to pick off via the FBI), but counties and states that organize this resistance.
 
View attachment 1746624

Michigan AG warns on election fraud claims: A false claim of criminal activity is a crime​


"If you have a problem with how the mafia does business, I urge you to take that up with the bosses. *rolls up sleeves and begins cracking knuckles*"

Twitter archive. https://archive.vn/wip/OmsTL

I seriously need to make a copypasta of all the stuff Whitmer, Nessel, and Benson have gotten up to.
 
It's so nice to be able to have a few hours at work and not have to study through 5-10 pages of bait posters and the times as many people taking the bait just to see if there was any news. Thank you @It's HK-47

Something I've been thinking about in my Glooming, when is the cut off date for the census work? Will everything be finalized by end of year and out of the executive's hands or will Biden have the opportunity to fuck it over and undo subtracting illegals from State populations?
 
Jesus Christ you know give me top hats all you want but possibly the one thing that warms my heart about a Marxist revolution is that after it is complete, all these journalists will be among the first lined up against the wall and shot by the new overlords re: Bezmenov.
"Pathetic" for what, ending the foreign wars? Cutting taxes? Being the first President since the 60s to stand strong against the chicoms?
Leftists have no foundational beliefs whatsoever and can't think beyond what media and their professors spoon feed them.

View attachment 1746731View attachment 1746732


They'll probably be out of a job before they're lined up against the wall and shot given the state the media is right now and will be in the next few year unless of course the corporate overlords of many of these "journalist" get a bail=out.
 
The scary part is that this would have gone completely unnoticed if those guys were competent.
That's the worst part, in my opinion. If they win, they did this in such a lazy obvious way, but still scammed their way in. At least if it was done smart, we'd just think "Oh American citizens were dumb enough to vote this guy in lol", but now a large part of America thinks they stole the election in illegal ways.
 
You can tell how harmless he is by the fact that he isn't threadbanned yet. He's baiting others to be exceptional so the mods can weed them out whether intentional or not on his end, a weird version of fedposting.

You're giving HHH way too much credit. Have you been to A&H? Specifically the Pastadome? or really any Trump related thread. His TDS is too severe for him to think, let alone post, like a somewhat reasonable person.
 
It’s hysterical to think that every braindead liberal over the last 3 weeks has said endless stupid shit about how Trump is a fascist dictator trying to undermine democracy when in reality he just wanted to wait for all the states to correctly count up their votes even if that meant waiting for a few recounts.
 
I think that if the perception of governance transitions towards occupation, then governance will require a physical loyalist presence. Any little bit of gum to stick up that mechanism gives the resistance more breathing space and room to maneuver.
.
Correct. Any counter government forces long term goal is do what they can to gain more and more operational freedom.
 
Last edited:
Social contracts, the law, elections... These are all ways of avoiding the use of force.

Voting exists because if you settle things with force, you get hurt.

If one party believes the other will not or cannot defend themselves with force, they see no reason to abide by such social contracts.
 
1. They weren't illegal at the time of the election. You'd have to do a total re-vote at this point if you really wanted to not count those. Besides, the state SC said it was okay given the circumstances

The States SC said it was okay in violation of the legislature. People keep pointing out that SCOTUS doesn't make the law, merely interpret it. The same thing happened here and the contention is the same, that the ruling by the State SC overstepped because it allowed ballots to be used in a way that contradicted the previous law.

2. No, they weren't. Trump's campaign even admitted this was the case when questioned under oath. The people rejected were random retards wanting to watch

Is this the same Lawyer that I quoted to you in context and you immediately ignored?
 
Social contracts, the law, elections... These are all ways of avoiding the use of force.

Voting exists because if you settle things with force, you get hurt.

If one party believes the other will not or cannot defend themselves with force, they see no reason to abide by such social contracts.
Like wise the non violent party going have no choice but use force if the other parties break such things.

An armistice doesnt hold if one side keeps shooting.
 
I blame the pussy for the right not getting a backbone. I am telling you that most of these RINOs have too many daughters that force them to backstab the right wing. Anyone here, pull of family pictures of RINOs and you will see what I mean.
It's more than that, but it is a part of it. Women will naturally go left, because when the choices are a party that encourages finding a decent guy to marry and have children with and supporting a community versus a party that lets you do and say anything, worships you, destroys anyone who dares speaks against you, gives you all the abortions you could want, gives you money for existing, and then tells you "you rock queen", they will obviously go left. Men will simp for them, both do to modern values and a lot of men being too cowed to actually speak out, and women tend to just go for whatever system is in place.
 
You do know that evidence has to be real, right? Random hearsay and conjecture aren't evidence
Hahaha, yeah, you tell 'em, brother! I wish these drumperino's learnt just a little from how the Democrat's handled the "2016 Russian Hacking Reality" and actually presented viable, REAL evidence of interplanetary voter fraud.
But guess what? They can't, and whatever insignificant hearsay they have has been debunked by independent fact checkers and science. As Neal De-Grasse Tyson once said: "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it."
These guys are gonna be on the wrong side of history because they are not as compassionate as people like us!
 
Then I stress again, patience. The death camps have not been rolled out yet, nor going door-to-door after the guns. I don't deny that these things may be on the horizon, but it's going to take more than the possibility to get the people behind you, it will take these things actually happening, just like it did in 1775. If you're planning on actually winning whatever you start, instead of going LEROY JENKINS onto the waiting spears of the enemy, you are going to have to wait until everyone else is on the same page as you.
They will never put you in a position where it is a choice between lose everything or risk everything. They will use "Salami Tactics". What we call today "boil the frog". It will always be lose a little bit or risk everything. And the human brain being what it is, most people will keep choosing to lose a little bit.

 
Social contracts, the law, elections... These are all ways of avoiding the use of force.

Voting exists because if you settle things with force, you get hurt.

If one party believes the other will not or cannot defend themselves with force, they see no reason to abide by such social contracts.

It's not exactly a revolutionary opinion or anything, but I think conflict avoidance is a good thing.
 
The Pennsylvania and Michigan certification was expected, yeah? That means nothing's changed, so it isn't over yet. We still have SCOTUS.
Their legal avenues are narrowing as the EC convention draws near and their actual cases are shrunken by precedent before prejudiced dismissal, which narrows their victory paths should the lawsuits even reach the SCOTUS (never mind the question of what raises a constitutional question). At first blush, the GOP in the contested states are moving to rectify matters or at least achieve clarification, but then you realize that the will of these people wavers if it's even there. If the will exists, then they have to fight off sabotage by whose who fell victim to the Q disinfo campaign or want to just go out in a blaze of glory. According to Barnes, they may actually include election lawyers in their inner circle with the ousting of Powell... because Powell wanted to mastermind the show and ended up pushing out most of the people that would have been actually useful.

Outside of the courts, pressure is slowly building to do signature audits, but the SoS of these states are very reluctant to do so-- regardless of their party allegiance.

Yes, it's not over (because the EC convention is still in mid-December), and yes, the SCOTUS exists. But much did change, and it leaves the Trump efforts overall with less maneuvering space-- to speak nothing about the hopes of election reform.

Men will simp for them, both do to modern values
Simping is as old as humanity itself. Though some of them may have been misguided or with an expiry date, our cultural norms were meant to curb the destructive potential of our instincts.

After all, man fell because Adam ate a fruit he damn well knew was cursed but was given to him by his woman.
 
Youtube and Google is going full 84.
EnkLor_WMAA46HF.jpeg
They are pushing a song that doesn't even fucking exist. And that noone would listen to if it did.
 
Simping is as old as humanity itself. Though some of them may have been misguided or with an expiry date, our cultural norms were meant to curb the destructive potential of our instincts.

After all, man fell because Adam ate a fruit he damn well knew was cursed but was given to him by his woman.
That's what I meant by modern values. In the past, men would say half the stuff women do and say now was stupid and disgusting openly and most would agree. But now? Even on here, where telling transexuals to kill themselves is a common joke, if you say anything against women, you have a chance of everyone acting like you just said you wanted them enslaved. I even saw @MrJokerRager unironically say he thought it was misogynistic to say what he said about RINO's daughters.
 
Last edited:
You're giving HHH way too much credit. Have you been to A&H? Specifically the Pastadome? or really any Trump related thread. His TDS is too severe for him to think, let alone post, like a somewhat reasonable person.
Most folks here are probably trolling with the TDS thing. However, if the Trump lolcow thread is still kicking with only his Twitter posts 4 months from now, then it's really real thing here, and just sad.

Power has a way of doing strange things to people, especially the prospect of losing said power. A Trump willing to Cross the Rubicon is a Trump worth reminding that he is not above the law.
Lol, okay Kamala. Ironic that she says that to Trump and Barr.

But stepping out of power while aware that most of the people in the Swamp want to gut you when you go, will make you reach for the absolute. He's not only fighting for his life (Biden doesn't want to go after Trump, but his Cabinet and most of the Washington aristocrats do), and that of his cabinet (People really want to go after Pompeo lol), and close associates (Imagine everyone with positives contacts to Trump getting the Flynn and/or Stone treatment). I don't even want to think about the impact on his family and business...

He better Cross the Rubicon, but... he likes to be a nice guy.

Personally, if the lolsuits flop and Trump just shrugs and faux concedes (not even a elbow bump with Joe), his presidency is chilling in C-Tier with the cusp of a B at most.
 
They will never put you in a position where it is a choice between lose everything or risk everything. They will use "Salami Tactics". What we call today "boil the frog". It will always be lose a little bit or risk everything. And the human brain being what it is, most people will keep choosing to lose a little bit.

Then put your balls where your mouth is and make them take one step too far. The British didn't go hunting guns randomly, they did it because there was a group of armed and organized men standing ready to oppose them. If you want to do your part to get things rolling, then get armed, get organized, get ready to get Waco'd, and make them do something stupid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back