2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Potholes and gasoline spills, the truly fearsome wrath of muh armed militia
Im making a prediction how such backlash will manifest. Im saying low grade sabotage will be the route counter government forces will pursue. If you were expecting a massive vote from the roof top movent then you are going to be disappointed. Nor did I say such forces would have a major impact via such tactics.
 
I mean new pot holes forming due to saboteurs.

Not natural causes. If people are going fight back then they will target stuff which is low risk and cost.

Its less risky to "accidentally" spill a Jerry filled with gasoline on a remote asphalt road while you pretend to refill your gas tank vs throwing fireworks towards a federal court house.

Infrastructure in remote, unguarded and unsupervised places will be the first to get wrecked by counter government forces of either side for obvious reasons.
That implies right-wingers are capable of acting with nuance and intelligence. A single intelligent lone wolf could easily cripple large parts of society's infrastructure if they really wanted to, since so much of it is trust-based, but that just wouldn't satisfy the right-winger's infantile need for immediate gratification and gung-ho machoism. Also it kind of requires having some idea of how society works.
 
Jesus Christ you know give me top hats all you want but possibly the one thing that warms my heart about a Marxist revolution is that after it is complete, all these journalists will be among the first lined up against the wall and shot by the new overlords re: Bezmenov.
"Pathetic" for what, ending the foreign wars? Cutting taxes? Being the first President since the 60s to stand strong against the chicoms?
Leftists have no foundational beliefs whatsoever and can't think beyond what media and their professors spoon feed them.

fuckofflefty.jpgfuckoffagainlefty.jpg

 
Oh, I was mostly implying that it waa such an often occurence for us that they could do it and we'd be so used to it we'd think it'd be an every day thing. "Huh, this stupid state has more holes. Damn draining." Like how in areas where drugs are common a shooting that wasn't drug related would be classified as such.
Pretty much. Going 556 on a courthouse doesnt have the same deniability as sabotage.


Plus such low grade sabotage can be done multiple times and multiple locations by a single individual. It might take a while for them to get caught. The 556 option going get any wanna be Rambo killed immediately and that incident will be used as justification to disarm the public further.
 
Last edited:
That implies right-wingers are capable of acting with nuance and intelligence. A single intelligent lone wolf could easily cripple large parts of society's infrastructure if they really wanted to, since so much of it is trust-based, but that just wouldn't satisfy the right-winger's infantile need for immediate gratification and gung-ho machoism. Also it kind of requires having some idea of how society works.
Didnt say right wingers. I said counter government forces. This includes antifa and blm revolting if trump wins.

Over the summer they targeted wooden electricity poles, used arson to burn down the p n w. They blocked roads to cause chaos. There was talk about dumping boxes of nails on major hi ways. So there is already precedent of dissents targeting infrastructure for political reasons.
 
Last edited:
It’s only because the number of sketchy ballots are piling up to be examined on tables because observers are questioning a lot of ballots and examining them
Enough to the point where the recount is going very slowly, way behind schedule and the Biden people are complaining that the Republican watchers are doing their job.
Jesus Christ you know give me top hats all you want but possibly the one thing that warms my heart about a Marxist revolution is that after it is complete, all these journalists will be among the first lined up against the wall and shot by the new overlords re: Bezmenov.
"Pathetic" for what, ending the foreign wars? Cutting taxes? Being the first President since the 60s to stand strong against the chicoms?
Leftists have no foundational beliefs whatsoever and can't think beyond what media and their professors spoon feed them.

View attachment 1746731View attachment 1746732

It's bullshit shaming tactics. "Are you challenging our fraud? You're pathetic!"
...do you think the left-aligned would become meaningfully adversarial to the PRC if the GOP stopped using the "communist China" moniker and instead pointed out that they more resemble actual fascism?
No.
 
Illegal Use of Absentee Ballots happened almost in a literal way, since state GAs and Governors changed electoral laws without the authority to do so, disrespecting the courts and their own legislatures, this is discounting the obvious use of Mail-In ballots for fraud, using false adresses in government buildings, fabrication of ballots and so on.

Oposition Observers were ejected from counting precints, there are hundreds of reports of such happening, video, photos, and even lawsuits asking for the observers to be in a distance close enough to actually observe anything, you hadreached the point of having pricints that obstructed their windows so they could not be observed.

North Korean style turnout also check, since there were counties where the turnout exceeded 99% in the states allegued of fraud, some might have exceeded 100% having more votes counted than the registered population in voting age, you also see massive spikes in turnout that far exceed 40% shifts in areas that show no history of doing so.

Mobile Ballot fraud, is almost laughtable, since Biden got batches after election day of nearly 100% ratio in votes in Mail-In ballots, that swept in a instant a two digit lead Trump had accumulated during the whole day, these present an almost miraculous distribution that is in no way consistent to the known data of registered and returned Mail-In ballots for both parties in these states, the text about Ukraine talks about huge increases in the use of such ballots, in this election they were increased in some precints by more than 1000%.

Computer Data Altered absolutely checks, and in every swap of vote, every shift, they were all in Bidens benefit, many machines were reported to "mulfunction" this election, shifting thousands of votes between candidates that were only found after maual recount of the ballots.

Reports of fraud are pilling in with hundreds of sworn affidavits, Mail workers, Observers, people alleging to be forced to backdate ballots, people withnessing the preserce of perfect printed ballots with perfect circle marks, there are hundreds of whithnesses to the schemes that happened in local precints.

literally all of those things caracterize a fraudulent election that happened in a third world coup, these are only the similarities to Ukraine, we didn't even talk about the suspicious pauses in counting that happened in elections like the ones in Venezuela and Bolivia.
1. They weren't illegal at the time of the election. You'd have to do a total re-vote at this point if you really wanted to not count those. Besides, the state SC said it was okay given the circumstances

2. No, they weren't. Trump's campaign even admitted this was the case when questioned under oath. The people rejected were random retards wanting to watch

3. Not true at all. Those "registered voter" totals were from several years ago.

4. Again, not true at all. Look at how votes are counted in batches.

5. Again, not true at all.

6. No one has come forward with those claims. Just random QAnon tards on Twitter.

Stop believing Tweets from QAnon believing boomers. All of your claims were thoroughly debunked over and over again.
 
Last edited:
Also, you know, there's no reason other than pessimism to think that the SCOTUS won't just say: "Yeah look, this shit is uncertifiable, we're sending this back to the state legislatures" or even just blatantly play kingmaker. This is a hilariously unprecedented situation, and nobody can say with any certainly how the Supreme Court will rule one way or another. Also, the only way Biden/Harris(assuming the worst for a moment and the dems get away with all this fraud) can make any of their nutty gun control policies stick is if they pack the Supreme Court with leftists, which they need control of the senate to do and that is not guaranteed. Furthermore, said threat of court stacking may well motivate the conservatives on the SCOTUS to just hand the election to Trump.

People need to stop being so pessimistic about this shit, nothing is decided for real until mid-december.
THAT'S EXACTLY I'VE BEEN TRYING TO SAY! It's starting to get on my nerves It's like peoppe want it to end that way so they can doompost forever. Chill the fuck out. It ain't like dems like biden to begin with.
 
The thing is, Republicans are in pretty good position as is considering they now have the power to gerrymander the fuck out of everything and are in a good position to win in 2022 and 2024.

Harris is a mercenary and fake as fuck though. She'll do what the DNC wants which is to enact the will of their corporate donors. I really doubt the likes of Amazon and Goldman Sachs are going to want a political party pushing lists, trials, and asset seizing which I am sure would go to every court in the country and absolutely result in massive electoral backlash.

Most likely she'll be terrible, sell us out to China/corporations, and is unlikely to get reelected without a massively blatant amount of fraud that no one other than the most diehard left-wingers could deny. She did terribly in the primaries (and it was pretty apparent she was the DNC's top choice), has zero charisma, is generally disliked as is, and would really need to turn around for swing voters to like her.
Yeah the dems don't see how making that trump accountablity hitlist is gonna backfire on them badly.
 
Last edited:
1. They weren't illegal at the time of the election. You'd have to do a total re-vote at this point if you really wanted to not count those. Besides, the state SC said it was okay given the circumstances

2. No, they weren't. Trump's campaign even admitted this was the case when questioned under oath. The people rejected were random retards wanting to watch

3. Not true at all. Those "registered voter" totals were from several years ago.

4. Again, not true at all. Look at how votes are counted in batches.

5. Again, not true at all.

6. No one has come forward with those claims. Just random QAnon tards on Twitter.

Stop believing Tweets from QAnon believing boomers. All of your claims were thoroughly debunked over and over again.
Like clockwork, evidence isn't evidence. Red is not red. Blue is not blue. If you get dropped too many times as a toddler, this could be you too.
 
Yeah the dems don't see how making that trumo accountablity hitlist is gonna backfire on them badly.
Because they expected them to just rollover in fear and/or get them afraid enough to join their side. Everyone other then RINO's or already compromised assets siding with Trump wasn't part of the plan.
 
Best I can do. I remember reading that they tore the ballots in such a way that, while voter intent was clear, the counters could say 'oop, this ballot is spoiled. Better not count it'. That's what they do in third world shitholes (which France is rapidly becoming, by the way) and it's sort of what they did in Arizona if the sharpie thing is to be believed

Literally nobody knew who the guy was. They knew nothing about him except that he was 'Not Le Pen'
That's not particularly good, I'll admit, but it appears to be a relatively isolated incident that doesn't really explain the massive disparity in votes. It's also entirely plausible given the nature of French politics that the moderates would bandwagon around an establishment candidate (which Macron was). For reference, Chirac won 82% in 2002 against Jean Marie Le Pen.

Can you point me the part of my post where I said Yellow Vests predated the 2017 election?
When you said " I also remember the yellow vests movement, which directly contradicts the "67%" statement too." That implies that he wasn't the less palatable enough candidate to receive 67% of the vote, especially when you tie it in with the fraction of the populace argument. You can't go after the number, so you rely on attacking the statement. Sad.

He really wasn't. His approval ratings dropped almost immediately.
The fact that his approval rating DROPPED is sufficient proof that he was at some point popular, especially at the very beginning.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cristobal’s Colon
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back