Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
So far we have...
  • He "watched" a woman "get raped" on a beach and somehow knew she entered a relationship (which don't exist) with her rapist.
  • He thinks there are cases where bestiality is necessary.
  • Women literally behave like wild animals when asked for a relationship.
  • Consent doesn't exist.
  • He's fucked 6 women recently due to "hunts."
  • His penis is a weapon.
  • He can sense pregnancy after 2 weeks.
Yeah, sounds plausible to me.
 
I think I've stumped him because he hasn't answered my last two posts, but keeps up the insults with everyone else. Does that mean I win? What's the grand prize?
 
I think I've stumped him because he hasn't answered my last two posts, but keeps up the insults with everyone else. Does that mean I win? What's the grand prize?
Congratulations! You win the Internet!
maxresdefault.jpg
 
So far we have...
  • He "watched" a woman "get raped" on a beach and somehow knew she entered a relationship (which don't exist) with her rapist.
  • He thinks there are cases where bestiality is necessary.
  • Women literally behave like wild animals when asked for a relationship.
  • Consent doesn't exist.
  • He's fucked 6 women recently due to "hunts."
  • His penis is a weapon.
  • He can sense pregnancy after 2 weeks.
Yeah, sounds plausible to me.
Also add:
  • Asked mom for sex "out of desperation" at LEAST 3 times. (says he wouldn't have done it)
  • Says men cannot/will not say "No" to a girl offering sex. It's impossible.
  • That being said... Holden would have had to have sex with him mom had she said yes.
 
I think I've stumped him because he hasn't answered my last two posts, but keeps up the insults with everyone else. Does that mean I win? What's the grand prize?

Probably a one-way ticket to his blocked list.
 
Congratulations! You win the Internet!
maxresdefault.jpg


Thank you, thank you! First, I just want to say that none of this would be possible without the Kiwi Farms. I love you guys! Next I want to thank Santa, for giving me a reason to be a good boy every year. I would also like to give a shout out to the man who showed me the way here, because this has given me a lot of laughs. Thank you again Kiwi Farms, and goodnight!
 
Also add:
  • Asked mom for sex "out of desperation" at LEAST 3 times. (says he wouldn't have done it)
  • Says men cannot/will not say "No" to a girl offering sex. It's impossible.
  • That being said... Holden would have had to have sex with him mom had she said yes.

I've always wondered if he had no intention of having sex with his mom, what was he desperate about? He was desperate to simply ask someone for sex or .... ?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Keerakh
And that would be..... Bad? I'm not convinced it would be.

It's actually about the same as not being blocked. It isn't like his responses make sense or have any deep meaning.

That someone is an idiot. I probably didn't see his post because they were dumb enough to get themselves blocked.

Notice how he implies that it was my doing I was blocked, it's never his fault for anything, always the fault of others.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
Reactions: cromit
It's actually about the same as not being blocked. It isn't like his responses make sense or have any deep meaning.

I suppose that is true, but then I don't get the same satisfaction I would seeing him try to muddle through a counter-argument that makes little to no sense.
 
I suppose that is true, but then I don't get the same satisfaction I would seeing him try to muddle through a counter-argument that makes little to no sense.

Yeah, that's where it isn't the same. But since we have posters here like you and the others, it's still entertaining as hell to watch him squirm.
 
Believe me, your wife is Chad meat.

Oh look, he's back to talking to me. Still didn't address any of the arguments I made against him, but hey, at least he notices me. I'm so happy! Wait.... Shit. That means I don't get my prize now. You did this just to screw it up didn't you @Holden?

Now for what you actually said: The hell does it mean? You have never seen my wife. What you don't seem to realize is that I at least have a wife and you have nothing.
 
Believe me, your wife is Chad meat.

@Saint That's the same thing he said to me when I brought up the same point.

All I can figure he has no retort so he invokes his conspiracy theory about how our wives are secretly screwing other men behind our backs and since we are "manginas" we are fine with it.
 
@Saint That's the same thing he said to me when I brought up the same point.

All I can figure he has no retort so he invokes his conspiracy theory about how our wives are secretly screwing other men behind our backs and since we are "manginas" we are fine with it.

Secretly? Wow, no she wouldn't secretly screw other men. We're swingers, so she does it right in front of me, usually while I bang the other guy's wife. Of course, that is when we aren't tag-teaming another woman since she is bi.

Oh! @Holden what is your conspiracy theory for women being bisexual? Is that part of the big feminist movement, or some sort of brainwashing or mutation in the brain?
 
Very interesting, but just seems to confirm Fisherian runaway idea. It doesn't explain why it would be in any way useful to overall good of birds like peacocks (by good I don't mean mating but escaping predators etc).

It seems this principle is at hand in today's modern world, but only because seducers are usually men also get government benefits so they have time and resources to chase women.

Somebody like myself has this time and resources artificially, refusing to work, but I can't become an omega by merely being partially in their situation. I still lack seduction skills.

This is the key difference between myself and an omega -I don't want to work, omega doesn't know how to work.

I just don't see how would this principle be useful to humanity in any way. You need to have jewels and cars to prove you can be mated with? I don't think it's like that, I think you need to show seduction in the form of immorality and that is the ornament here, but if it were so what good would it be that you need to have luxury cars and jewels just to have a wife? This again would seem to create losers in terms of mating out of most men.
Couldn't modern morality be an example of the handicap principle. Men show that they can afford to have limitations put upon themselves by not engaging in rape
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back