Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

I mean sure but it's not like you just waltz into the gyno and get naked the second you're in the door. Heck, a lot of them are by appointment only and those appointments are for actual procedures- you don't usually call up your gyno and go there because you feel like it. Adding in the expense associated with American health care, too. Most doctors have a front desk as well so there's even more distance between a troon and a actually forcing one to do anything, especially so if the front desk immediately clocks them. Even if by some miracle the troon managed to get in and see the doctor there's two options when they drop their pants 1. sorry but you need a urologist because I don't deal with penis, or 2. the gyno making some vague attempt at dealing with a fetid hole before advising them to seek out a surgeon or other better suited doctor.

The troon is a loser in all situations that could possibly arise from this.

Imo. I think 75% of the comments about gyno's are fake. That they're making internet commentary that takes them on a one way trip to boner town thinking of invading that female only doctor vs actually going to appointments. Even with the progressive stack as it is, I don't see too many gynos being at all happy by having appointment time wasted when they could be preforming a life saving test or health improving or fertility improving diagnosis to a real woman. Nor would one of them be at all pleased at a man wanting them to examine their limp dick.

My guess is they are going to a gyno urgent care. My doctor has one for acute issues like UTI, pain, or any kind of issue that needs immediate attention l.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: bloomingcactus

I saw this article from stating that 51 studies have reported that transitioning improves mental well-being of transgender people. I haven't looked into the methodologies of these studies. But it seems to be quite contradictory to my experiences with Western trannies, even the proclaimed "transmed" ones I've met.

Many of them state that, yes, they're happier about gender. So maybe the study is correct. But most of them seem to still have mental issues and lack of self awareness in one way or another - like there's an underlying issues transitioning doesnt fix. Or the older, quieter one, there's a version feeling that they accepted more that transitioning wasn't magic and they simply learned to accept themselves as they are, mutilated or not.

Sometimes they seem to talk about how they're medicated and creating stories about how it was a hard decision to them but eventually they're glad they transitioned. But they just sound like addicts to be honest. - that's something I feel with many who says they have depression and "drugs saved their lives". That they seem to not be able to look deep why they feel the thing they did. Just keep living in some sort of zombified bliss state.

I feel like there's an idea of sunk cost fallacy too. I wonder what do you think about the "reported happiness" Vs actual state of troon derangement?

It's very possible that people respond to surveys in very strange ways that serve to undermine their accuracy. Hesitancy to report poor functioning or outcomes so as to contribute to the perception that transition is harmful or undesirable seems to be an obvious possible issue. Consider, for example, the tendency for people on reddit who have regrets to add an essay worth of caveats to their posts so that people don't get "the wrong idea."

The real issue though is just that most if not all the individual studies are poor. The general design is basically just to survey patients at a gender clinic or butcher's shop then wait say 6 or 12 months and then just ask them again. Bucketize them, add some rudimentary controls if you feel the need and then publish. It would be more interesting if this sort of thing didn't result in positive gains in psychological functioning since you are almost certainly going to get either some degree of regression to the mean (especially for gender clinics) and/or a temporary 'high' due to wish fulfillment (I'd guess this would be more common with surgery). Moreover, for HRT, you're generally not likely to be getting them in isolation in most cases as you'd also be receiving psychotherapy and so forth so the specific effect of hormones isn't going to be isolatable.

A very cursory look at some of "positive" papers bare this out. For example, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440516/ which measures the benefits of getting your cock chopped off finds that tranny health is poor before surgery then spikes at 1 year post op before declining back to baseline and ultimately finding that the entire exercise is possibly just a wash though the year 1 spike means this study counts as one of the 51.
1606201046833.png

For reasons of PC or w/e (authors don't justify this decision 🙂), they also take women in the gen. pop as the control group which seems to be just retarded Additionally, aside being purely observational (a problem the authors acknowledge in the conclusion), the results are just going to be meaningless crap anyways because retention rates are just trash:
1606201174110.png


If you were serious about trying to figure out if hormones/surgery had significant benefits then you'd need to do a study with an actual control (i.e. therapy alone) over multiple years as opposed to this single arm observational shit that I everyone knows is just going to produce weak but meaningless positive results no matter what. Wouldn't hold my breath on this happening though especially since doling out the hormones ASAP has become de rigueur which to be fair is probably unavoidable, like imagine a clinician telling some Robert-cum-Lucy that you think it might be best to "focus on the underlying psychological issues behind [his] distress before considering more radical and permanent interventions," in any medical system where anyone has any choice that's a fucking highway to zero patient retention.

Also this is a choice quote from a random paper:
1606200241353.png

As though every mental disorder isn't caused by an interplay of "biologic, environmental, psychosocial and cultural factors."
 
Without even getting to the individual methodologies, one thing a reviewer of the studies must keep in mind is the Hawthorne Effect. The subjects perform better (in this case, appear to be more happy) simply because they are aware of being observed. It is a phenomenon very hard to control in troon studies (the only conceivable way to get around it is to do double-blind trials with placebos, which is obviously impossible in troon cases). So I'm more inclined to believe in population-based (rather than case-based) studies, in which the subjects are not being monitored. The population-based studies I have in mind are suicide statistics, utilizations of psychiatric care service, etc. And such studies have indeed shown trooning out has little effect, no effect, or even adverse effect in psychiatric outcome.

Cornell U doesn't even mention the reviewer's name(s). Their review process simply consists of someone reading out the papers and sorting them out in respective bins: "beneficial", "mixed or null", and "harmful". This is not college material; a twelve-year old kid can do it.
Relevant study that was published in the AJP a year ago: https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010080
A relevant article about the relevant study: https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2020/09/71296/

TL;DR of both links:
Years since initiating hormone treatment was not significantly related to likelihood of mental health treatment (adjusted odds ratio=1.01, 95% CI=0.98, 1.03). However, increased time since last gender-affirming surgery was associated with reduced mental health treatment (adjusted odds ratio=0.92, 95% CI=0.87, 0.98).
And that's in a study that was, according to four MD's, constructed to prove that both of the above are beneficial.
 
Relevant study that was published in the AJP a year ago: https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010080
A relevant article about the relevant study: https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2020/09/71296/

TL;DR of both links:

And that's in a study that was, according to four MD's, constructed to prove that both of the above are beneficial.
The Swedish Population study of Bränström and Pachankis was wildly hailed as what vindicated transition -- by people who don't read it. Even you take the study's findings at face value, you need to chop off 49 dicks to prevent one case of psychiatric consultation. It is extremely telling that it took the AJP one year to issue a correction to a deeply flawed paper.
 
I find it funny the the length of the surgery rapsheet does not correlate with passing at all. For example, while reading a prominent member of Susan's place "Depth" article I noticed her TRapsheet:
HRT 5-28-2013
FT 11-13-2015
FFS 9-16-2016 -Spiegel
GCS 11-15-2016 - McGinn
Hair Grafts 3-20-2017 - Cooley
Voice therapy start 3-2017 - Reene Blaker
Labiaplasty 5-15-2017 - McGinn
BA 7-12-2017 - McGinn
Hair grafts 9-25-2017 Dr.Cooley
Sataloff Cricothyroid subluxation and trachea shave12-11-2017
Dr. McGinn labiaplasty, hood repair, scar removal, graph repair and bottom of vagina finished. urethra repositioned. 4-4-2018
Dr. Sataloff Glottoplasty 5-14-2018
Dr. McGinn vaginal in office procedure 10-22-2018
Dr. McGinn vaginal revision 2 4-3-2019 Bottom of vagina closed off, fat injected into the labia and urethra repositioned.
Dr. Thomas FemLar 10/13/2020
All in all, 7 years of "work" will deliver this stunning and brave (but not passing at all) picture.
avatar_24782_1598138657.png
 
I find it funny the the length of the surgery rapsheet does not correlate with passing at all. For example, while reading a prominent member of Susan's place "Depth" article I noticed her TRapsheet:

All in all, 7 years of "work" will deliver this stunning and brave (but not passing at all) picture.
Note the four additional “revision” surgeries (so far) on his dick chop.
 
I find it funny the the length of the surgery rapsheet does not correlate with passing at all. For example, while reading a prominent member of Susan's place "Depth" article I noticed her TRapsheet:

All in all, 7 years of "work" will deliver this stunning and brave (but not passing at all) picture.
Some people get 50 operations to look like a tiger or dye their entire skin green and people generally ridicule it, but this for some reason is more valid and brave because....?
 
Because Kinsey 6 gays loooove to fuck women.
You could get shanked, or at least vomited on, for even uttering the word 'vulva' around a man that gay. I've seen it happen.

"I am biologically male. I have a vagina."
I don't even know how to begin to address that level of mental illness. You cannot reason with them, they are entirely demoored from reality. That is 'lock them up for years in aemtal institution' level of insanity.
 
Last edited:
I find it funny the the length of the surgery rapsheet does not correlate with passing at all. For example, while reading a prominent member of Susan's place "Depth" article I noticed her TRapsheet:

All in all, 7 years of "work" will deliver this stunning and brave (but not passing at all) picture.
I mean...

This DOES look like someone who's a plastic surgery addict. Achievement unlocked?
 
Neither Puberty blockers nor genital multilation can stop masculinization entirely. The reason might be because the adrenal glands continue to produce androgen.
Not a tranny question, but if the body continue to masculinuse based on adrenal gland. Why do people with Androgen Insensitivity (who can't utilise male hormones) tend to look somewhat more 'hairless overgrown boy' than average normal female. Not "manly", and probably indistinguishable from actual female if I see one in the wild without knowing but if they're together there seem to be something off about their faces and proportion. Many of them seem to have really, lanky limbs.

Maybe it's just my bias tricking me into seeing things that aren't there, and it's not that boyish looking fully-female people don't exist. Of course, they do look more like actual female people than troons but.. there's.. something that is different. Anyone please inform me.



Hanne Gaby Odiele
hanne-gaby-odiele_glamour_24jan17_getty_p.jpg

main-qimg-47e6b6f2e54f5de2e36d972e7b54916a.png
 
Last edited:
Latest pic of the dainty pre-everything Alicia.

I'd totally forgotten about Always Alicia and was excited to see what Jack Torrance-esque selfies he has taken lately.

the-shining_1280x720.jpg Screen Shot 2020-11-24 at 8.35.57 PM.png

Unfortunately, I was immediately rendered MOTI upon viewing this shit:

1.png 2.png

TWAW, they just want to snap some photos for the spank bank try on clothes in peace like everyone else!

And big news! Alicia is transitioning because his wife is totally ok with it and just wants him to be happy!

3.png press x to doubt.png 4.png

Based on the gross crap on the floor in his hallway now and the that-totally-happened post above, I say 70% his wife actually left him. Likelihood that she will if she hasn't already? 99% (1% he kills her before she can).

ugh.png ugh 2.png

As a homosexual female person myself, I'd personally consider having a pussy and having sex with someone who also has a pussy to be so......lesbian? But what do I know.
 
I find it funny the the length of the surgery rapsheet does not correlate with passing at all. For example, while reading a prominent member of Susan's place "Depth" article I noticed her TRapsheet:

All in all, 7 years of "work" will deliver this stunning and brave (but not passing at all) picture.
You wanna know how I got these scars?
 
Another update on the u/stupidstories sideshow that has been brewing lately/for a long time.

Despite the fact that it said it wasn't going to post again and that it was taking a break and might not be back- it's back!

Screenshot_3.png


It seems happy and in good spirits, which means that inevitably in a few months it will be posting something like the following again:
Screenshot_4.png


BONUS POINTS: Notice the "Where did you find my before pics?" response to that extremely positive comment!
 
Back