Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
What made him decide to reply to your posts again all of a sudden?
He does it occasionally when people copy and paste a post of mine and tell him it's from me. He likes to pretend that I'm "too stupid" to give a damn about, but he gets upset when I call him out on things; he'll take me off block to reply to a couple posts and then put me back on block.

Edit:
Fuckbot said:
I think there are still some "racist" cops in America who would probably stop blacks from raping, but only in white areas/towns/neighborhoods.
While turning a blind eye to white people raping and only going after black people is an example of racism... I think the bigger issue he's missing is the "rape," and not "cops are racists for stopping rapes."
 
First of all, I told you that Unwin's ideas and rk theory are complimentary. As for studies or books, I said generally, but there are few rare exceptions. Also, 1967 wasn't that far off from 1960. I never said things all changed abruptly on Jan 1, 1960, just that this is when you have to become extremely careful to a point of usually just disregarding it. Also, while the term was coined in 1967 some work backing it up existed before.

It took you three days to respond to this?

Anyway, good going. You moved the goal post again. First it was all studies, now it's only some. First it was about the date of release, now it's about whether or not preexisting studies on the same subject were released. And seriously, read Unwin's book. It supports diddly of the r/K theory unless K-type behavior is somehow connected to Christian values.

Keep making excuses, Holden. They've helped you never, and by the law of balance they'll have to help you amply one day.

Of course. Everything I say was already told by somebody. Those nasty people in your head, I presume.

You lie! Icaria and Watrain only speak to me!

But seriously, thank you for admitting you're not original. Now how about working to correct this problem?
 
It took you three days to respond to this?
I saw it just now, you retard.

Anyway, good going. You moved the goal post again.
Not now or ever.

First it was all studies, now it's only some.
You must learn not to take things 100 percent literally. Devlin's work didn't come out till 2006. Natural History of Rape also after 1960. Doesn't mean that almost everything else is crap.


First it was about the date of release, now it's about whether or not preexisting studies on the same subject were released.
Strawman. I just said that there are some talking about the related subjects before.


It supports diddly of the r/K theory unless K-type behavior is somehow connected to Christian values.
Which they were throughout good portions of the West, especially after the reformation. Also, Unwin didn't get everything right and missed the fourth element, prostitution, instead making a silly claim that sexual frustration is somehow what moved people in those societies.

Keep making excuses, Holden.
You mean "excuses" that a 13 yo boy couldn't have known that he must cut off his classmates head and fuck her in the ass to be attractive? Something idiots that are 40 still can't grasp?
 
You mean "excuses" that a 13 yo boy couldn't have known that he must cut off his classmates head and fuck her in the ass to be attractive? Something idiots that are 40 still can't grasp?
Even for Fuckbot, that made absolutely no sense.
 
You mean "excuses" that a 13 yo boy couldn't have known that he must cut off his classmates head and fuck her in the ass to be attractive? Something idiots that are 40 still can't grasp?
So you're advocating necrophilia? How are men supposed to reproduce if they kill the women they have sex with?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cromit
I saw it just now

Well then perhaps you should read posts more often.

you exceptional individual.

Insults.

Now and forever.

Fixed that for you.

You must learn not to take things 100 percent literally.

No, you must learn to express yourself better.

Devlin's work didn't come out till 2006. Natural History of Rape also after 1960. Doesn't mean that almost everything else is crap.

So only the stuff that you were told agrees with your world view is valid? That would be one hell of a coincidence. Good thing I don't believe in coincidence and now this is just you dismissing all contrary evidence.

Strawman.

It's all you ever do, and yet you see it everywhere? That's either serious stupidity, or delusions of projection.

I just said that there are some talking about the related subjects before

Had you made this distinction before, there would be not a strawman, but the other strategy you're familiar with: cherry picking. Instead, you only brought up this distinction after the fact. That's making excuses, also called moving the goalposts.

Which they were throughout good portions of the West, especially after the reformation.

Really? Because most of the societies he referenced collapsed around the time Christian values got a foothold in them.

Also, Unwin didn't get everything right

Understatement of the century? No. That honor is reserved for the following:

Unwin doesn't preach what you think he does.

and missed the fourth element, prostitution, instead making a silly claim that sexual frustration is somehow what moved people in those societies.

It's done a hell of a job moving you.

You mean "excuses" that a 13 yo boy couldn't have known that he must cut off his classmates head and fuck her in the ass to be attractive? Something idiots that are 40 still can't grasp?

Bucharest and Nara covered this flawlessly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rin
So you're advocating necrophilia? How are men supposed to reproduce if they kill the women they have sex with?
Yeah, I wasn't very clear in that post. I should have said fuck in the ass before kill.

There are three types of men on this board

1. pathetic manginas who don't get anything at all
2. beta guys who feed their wives whoring
3. seducers

None of them know what somebody like me needed to be successful. All of these are living in the past, and 1 and 2 are different from 3 only by the level of success. They don't know that humane treatment no longer works and group 3 also doesn't know that seduction isn't something most men can use.

Well then perhaps you should read posts more often.
Your posts? Why? They're full of retarded attacks and you admitted to be trolling once yourself.

Fixed that for you.
Play those games with a fourth grader, you won't play them with me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are three types of men on this board

1. mostly decent individuals
2. some not so decent individuals
3. Croatian goat fuckers who prove that sometimes abortion IS the answer

ftfy, Croat-Scroat
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Rin
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back