2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yup. There was some stumbling early on. I suspect Trump had some NeverTrumpers involved trying to hamstring the response to the election. The mass firings he did seemed to help, as did dragging his entire legal time together and segmenting them out. For example, having Powell off doing her own thing while Trump et all target constitutional challenges, which the originalists are going to appreciate.
Powell is supposed to file a lawsuit today, this allows her to spend her full time on that
And the pardoning of Flynn is interesting as well.

Could be interesting looking back on this a few months later and seeing if the Trump team's strategy emerges in hindsight.

How long have Fox News hosts been chimping out, saying repeatedly, "Where is the evidence? I'm not going to let any discussion of fraud continue without evidence."
Well, here today at this hearing there was an abundance of evidence presented and those motherfucks couldn't even be bothered to air the damn thing.

View attachment 1749124

Toss a Fox 2.0 onto the list of things need to be done whether or not Trump gets his second term or not.
 
And the pardoning of Flynn is interesting as well.

Could be interesting looking back on this a few months later and seeing if the Trump team's strategy emerges in hindsight.
If anything, it seems like the way of getting the press riled about something while Trump plans something else is going in force again.
 
I can see where they're coming from.

The hearing was structured much more as a public forum than a hearing, where you'd make the testifiers give a specific, directed account under oath. Here, they had a schedule of people, but no oath as far as I can tell and it was much more them stating their grievances, legitimacy notwithstanding. The mood of the hearing also doesn't invoke the standard impression of a hearing I myself have.

It was designed in a narrative framing, not a legal framing. Hence the audience being allowed to react and the like. I imagine the audience was hand picked by Trump's team.
 
Screenshot (1152).png
 
You know, it would be a hell of a season ending if American Hispanics wind up being majority driven to the GOP due to the Democrats' inability to not say stupid shit like this.
The latino side of my family hold grudges and don't forget, and I'm sure a number of other latinos are just like them. My family may lean left and my aunts are set in their ways but I'd encourage any latino to look at this shit as definitive proof Democrats think Latinos are pets, not people.
 
The latino side of my family hold grudges and don't forget, and I'm sure a number of other latinos are just like them. My family may lean left and my aunts are set in their ways but I'd encourage any latino to look at this shit as definitive proof Democrats think Latinos are pets, not people.

Don't you mean LatinX?

What, your family doesn't like using LatinX? then they're just a bunch of white mexican neo-nazis, obviously. Only LatinX who support radical lefty politics are real LatinX.

See also: Women, Blacks, Trannys, etc etc. The left colonizes entire identity groups and parasites off of them.

1606341912001.png


The talking point immediately was sent out.

"He pardoned Flynn so now Judge Sullivan (the judge that's trying to force the case to remain in the system forever) can go after TRUMP instead!"

The argument, of course, is ultimately that he's #NOTMYPRESIDENT and thus anything he does is by definition invalid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
See also: Women, Blacks, Trannys, etc etc. The left colonizes entire identity groups and parasites off of them.

There's something fundamentally creepy about the idea of white leftists ballot stuffing in black areas and then, when the GOP tries to get the stuffed ballots thrown out, claiming that black people are being disenfranchised.
 
View attachment 1749144

The talking point immediately was sent out.

"He pardoned Flynn so now Judge Sullivan (the judge that's trying to force the case to remain in the system forever) can go after TRUMP instead!"

The argument, of course, is ultimately that he's #NOTMYPRESIDENT and thus anything he does is by definition invalid.
I guess he could, but what exactly would anybody be able to get from Flynn that would be detrimental to Trump?
 
Rudy recommends a special prosecutor be appointed to investigate the noted irregularities.

I'll be surprised if they do anything, as usual.
Special Prosecutors are like mad dogs. Mueller was one and you saw that, when he couldn't actually produce evidence of Russian collusion, he just resorted to witch hunting members of the Trump team, getting them on whatever bullshit (usually lying to Feds) he could find.

Ken Starr was another one. Liberals hated him
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back