- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
I'm sorry, but I just can't imagine how anyone could think that taking away women's right to vote could end any way, but badly.
You think gender-relations are bad now?
You think tensions are bad now?
You think the violence is bad now?
You think the country is on the cusp of a civil war now?
Take away half the population's right to vote, and just see what fucking happens.
The country will look like fucking Afghanistan in under two years.
That presumes women do anything other than fucking nag simps into doing shit for them. They don't. Take away women's unwarranted right to vote -- the right to vote is in exchange for your responsibilities for being a citizen, which were NOT extended to women -- and you'll have a bunch of bitching and bellyaching and that's about it. Simps will simp for them, again, but eventually they'll realize they benefit more from keeping that status quo than actually giving women shit.
Edit: Neg rate all you want.
The fact of the matter is, the original theory was men had a vote because when shit hit the fan, men were expected to die for the country. Conscription. They had skin in the game. Women didn't. Simps gave women the vote without giving them the skin in the game men inherently have. So now, if women want men to go die for Israel for them, women can vote on that (despite it inherently not affecting them in the same way) and men have the same vote as they do. That's fucked up.
I don't know the solution to this. Clearly women deserve a say in how things are ran. We're not in the 1700s now. But at the same time, they clearly have different goals, desires, and reasoning than men -- but men are still the ones who suffer for it.
I feel similarly to people voting for property tax levies that don't own land. But what do you do? Make special "male only" voting issues? Or "landowner only?" I don't have a solution, but the situation -- women can decide to send men off to die for them -- is still fucked up.
Don't know if it's been posted here before, but I just read that Cuomo is flagrantly ignoring the Supreme Courts' rules against his coronavirus limits. The Democrats seemed to be emboldened in being defiant towards the Supreme Court.
View attachment 1751302
"It's not valid as long as we don't control it" seems to be their stance on, well, everything.
Last edited: