2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[babadook]

So I refresh the thread and this is what I'm greeted with lol

 

[Reisen Storm]

So, good ol' Obama decided to go after the Hispanic Voters.

https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1331585639666638855

“… There’s a lot of evangelical Hispanics who, the fact that Trump says racist things about Mexicans, or puts undocumented workers in cages, they think that’s less important than the fact that he supports their views on gay marriage or abortion."

They really want Hispanic Voters to be like Black Voters. When will they learn? The comments also refer to the Border Patrol and Cages, and to the surprised of no one, the Left and Democrats are making excuses for Obama and his policies.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

lol I love the replies, some more:
View attachment 1753405View attachment 1753407View attachment 1753408

The International Criminal Court is not in the Constitution.
Also the United States is not party to the Rome Statute.

So, good ol' Obama decided to go after the Hispanic Voters.

https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1331585639666638855

They really want Hispanic Voters to be like Black Voters. When will they learn? The comments also refer to the Border Patrol and Cages, and to the surprised of no one, the Left and Democrats are making excuses for Obama and his policies.

I can't wait to see what racial group is next on Obama's racist shitlist.

 

[GuntPunt]

I can't wait to see what racial group is next on Obama's racist shitlist.

My bet is Asians for swinging right and to fit the new narrative that they aren't PoCs because they actually work hard and are successful despite the Chinese Exclusion Act, the railroads, the internment camps, and otherwise.

 

[MrJokerRager]

So, good ol' Obama decided to go after the Hispanic Voters.

https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1331585639666638855

They really want Hispanic Voters to be like Black Voters. When will they learn? The comments also refer to the Border Patrol and Cages, and to the surprised of no one, the Left and Democrats are making excuses for Obama and his policies.

Obama destroyed the Democratic Party in order to get the Latino vote. And now is angry at how Latinos are not sheep like niggers and embraced Trump. The only major Latino they gained is AOC, who has been a gift for the Republicans.

lol I love the replies, some more:
View attachment 1753405View attachment 1753407View attachment 1753408

I have a feeling all those posters are mostly white rootless cosmopolitans that post on reddit while backpacking in Western Europe. They sound just like those types.

Good they’re continuing this talk. It helps convince the RINOs there will be no return to happy days with the Fonz.

RINOs are traitors in bed with the democrats. It's the milquetoast, cucked and spineless Republicans that need to make a stand. So far Trump has done an excellent job exposing more of them traitors each day.

 

[HumanHive]

My bet is Asians for swinging right and to fit the new narrative that they aren't PoCs because they actually work hard and are successful despite the Chinese Exclusion Act, the railroads, the internment camps, and otherwise.

Lol, no. Asians are conformist and irreligious. They love the “can live anywhere” urban cosmopolitan lifestyle and consider notions of Constitutionalism to be obsolete. Just look at Japan. On the surface they’re conservative, but in reality stuff like the First and Second Amendment disgusts them. Instead they not only expect the state to take care of them, they outright demand it.

 

[babadook]

A different country has a different culture than America? Shocking

 

[Taco]

There was never a fucking audit, all they did was run the papers through the machines again, the same machines, the machines that were already set up the way they needed em. It's plain as day.

They actually did a manual hand recount of every ballot. They didn't just "run them through the machines again."

https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/historic_first_statewide_audit_of_paper_ballots_upholds_result_of_presidential_race

 

[alreadyhome]

I liked the old elections because of the songs that came out of it. Things seemed so simpler then.

Roses are red,
Michael Jackson sang Thriller

 

[Superman93's Bitch]

You guys really are assmad if you can't appreciate a joke that's not even divisive just because it comes from HHH.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

My bet is Asians for swinging right and to fit the new narrative that they aren't PoCs because they actually work hard and are successful despite the Chinese Exclusion Act, the railroads, the internment camps, and otherwise.

To be fair, Asians didn’t have the decades of economic sabotage the black population went through. This is solely because the racial bullshit at the time was laser-focused on darker skin tones something fierce. There were no economic laws specifically introduced to hurt the Asian population.

 

[Oreo Jenkins]

I like this bit where Newsmax goes through the recent Federalist Article.

1. - Biden recieved 80 Million votes, more than Obama, more than Hillary, the most popular Presidential candidate in history.

2. - No incumbent President has gained votes since their last election, and then gone on to lose the subsequent election in 100 years.

3. - Trump won Florida and Ohio bellwether states, and yet lost the election, the first time in 60 years.

4. - Trump won 18 of the 19 bellwether counties, yet went on to lose the election.

5.- The Democrats losing seats in Congress, while Republicans have kept every incumbent seat, and gained every one of the 27 "tossup" seats.

6. - Biden trailed Clinton in performance in every city, except for the cities in the states, where electoral charges are being filed.

Each one by themselves I could say "It's just coincidence", even two or three. But six "coincidences"? Throw in the other stuff about the voting system and sworn eyewitness testimony? Theres only so many co-incidences one can handwave away.

1 and 2 are effectively the same fact, many more people voted in the 2020 election and both candidates benefited. Part of this will be the increased access to mail-in voting, if you make it easier to vote then more people will vote. Part of it will be Trump, it's clear that his style attracted people to vote for him who wouldn't have otherwise bothered to vote and his style attracts people to vote against him who wouldn't have otherwise bothered to vote.

3 and 4 are similar facts, states and counties can have bellwether status for a long time until they don't. South Dakota and Kansas both went for the winning candidate for 10 elections until 1940 when they flipped to Wilkie over FDR, they are both a long way from bellwether status now. It used to be received wisdom that no GOP candidate could win without carrying Illinois until George W Bush did it in 2000, Trump lost it by 17% in 2016 and that wasn't considered unusual.

5. True, but you're comparing to 2018 not 2016. The Democratic Party candidates did better than they did in 2016 but not as well as they did in 2018. If you compare congressional districts to the 2016 winner then the Dems flipped 28 GOP seats at worst (at time of writing 2 races remain uncalled and there's a runoff in LA-5 between two GOP candidates). A net gain of 28 House seats maps well to the improvement in vote share for Biden over Clinton.

6. Just not true. The claim is that Biden underperformed Clinton in every city except for Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelphia and Milwaukee. Firstly in Philadelphia there was a swing from D to R of 3.8%, in the other three, Biden did do better than Clinton. Atlanta +4.0%, Milwaukee +3.0%, Detroit +0.3%. That's not an unusual swing in cities, look at Minneapolis +8.3%, Denver +6.6%, Dallas +5.8%, Portland +5.1%, Phoenix +5.0%, Cincinnati +5.3% all had better Biden performance than any of the 'suspicious four cities'.

 

[Reisen Storm]

To be fair, Asians didn’t have the decades of economic sabotage the black population went through. This is solely because the racial bullshit at the time was laser-focused on darker skin tones something fierce. There were no economic laws specifically introduced to hurt the Asian population.

Actually, a State University research this and found that African migrants and children born from African Migrants are actually wealthier than the native-born "African-Americans." So, nobody fucking knows why American Blacks are fucking poor, other than something systematic in their communities they refuse to divulge because, at this point, that has to be a problem they refuse to address. Also, MSU is the Michigan State University

Among major immigrant groups coming to the U.S., Africans had the fastest growth rate from 2000 to 2013 – increasing 41 percent during that period, according to a Pew Research Center report. By 2015, there were 2.1 million African immigrants in the U.S.

The MSU-led study is one of the first to examine how race and gender shape assimilation for African immigrants. Specific findings include:

• While black African immigrant men saw their earnings increase 79 percent between 1990 and 2010, they made, on average, only $45,343 in 2010 – less than the $49,478 earned by white men born in the U.S. Black men born in the U.S. made an average of just $24,160 in 2010.
• Some 52 percent of black African immigrant men had a college education, compared to 30 percent of white men born in the U.S. and 13 percent of black men born in the U.S.
• The massive earnings growth of black African immigrant women was the big surprise, Nawyn said. Their average earnings jumped from $17,727 in 1990 to $40,699 in 2010. Those earnings in 2010 far outpaced the $27,114 earned by white U.S.-born women and the $21,696 earned by black U.S.-born women.
• Although black African women had a higher rate of college education – 37 percent, compared to 27 percent for white U.S.-born women and 17 percent for black U.S.-born women – their earnings were still higher than expected after controlling for education.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

Actually, a State University research this and found that African migrants and children born from African Migrants are actually wealthier than the native-born "African-Americans." So, nobody fucking knows why American Blacks are fucking poor, other than something systematic in their communities they refuse to divulge because, at this point, that has to be a problem they refuse to address. Also, MSU is the Michigan State University

I am talking about the earlier days when minimum wage laws were introduced along with union deals. I’ll just leave a post I made ages ago about this. Pretty much if you get a demographic on the backfoot And keep them there, the rest will always take care of itself.

Migrants do better because they show up with valuable skills they have already learned and don’t have a home community that will backstab them because reasons. (“Why you acting so white?”, “This is internalized racism.”, etc.)

Black communities did not want nor need all of the free shit at first. That was a carrot after the Democrats enacted laws to make it impossible for them to work normally and get money like any normal American. They were building communities taking advantage of their low cost of living to engage in the market via undercutting the competition in price but producing equal quality of work. Then minimum wage laws and unions shut them out of the market, because you can’t run a tightly budgeted company when suddenly your employment costs spike and unions get deals made to shut you out of their state. Co-existence was and still is possible, but the policies enacted back then did their job of forcefully eroding black communities. It took decades, but when you can control the income of a population, you can control wether or not they can function in society normally. Combine that with the modern day “crabs in a bucket“ mentality in the black community and it doesn’t matter how much freedom a black guy wants, he won’t get any. He has almost zero choice, he either gets in line and follows the program, or his community will kick him into the bottom of the barrel.

 

[Übertroon]

To be fair, Asians didn’t have the decades of economic sabotage the black population went through. This is solely because the racial bullshit at the time was laser-focused on darker skin tones something fierce. There were no economic laws specifically introduced to hurt the Asian population.

That's a joke right?

Chinese Exclusion Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Syaoran Li]

To be fair, Asians didn’t have the decades of economic sabotage the black population went through. This is solely because the racial bullshit at the time was laser-focused on darker skin tones something fierce. There were no economic laws specifically introduced to hurt the Asian population.

Like @Übertroon pointed out, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 proves that wrong, but it could be argued that it was originally supposed to only keep new Chinese immigrants from coming in and theoretically wouldn't effect those already in the country.

There was also the Japanese-American internments during WWII, but that's a little shakier since it was part of wartime paranoia and there were smaller internment efforts directed at German-American and Italian-American communities on the East Coast, but they were far more limited and less sweeping in their scope and scale than the ones targeted at Japanese communities

 

[Übertroon]

Like @Übertroon pointed out, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 proves that wrong, but it could be argued that it was originally supposed to only keep new Chinese immigrants from coming in and theoretically wouldn't effect those already in the country.

There was also the Japanese-American internments during WWII, but that's a little shakier since it was part of wartime paranoia and there were smaller internment efforts directed at German-American and Italian-American communities on the East Coast, but they were far more limited and less sweeping in their scope and scale than the ones targeted at Japanese communities

Main thing the Chinese exclusion act shows is that racial discrimination wasn't something laser focused at the black community as was claimed. Asians didn't arrive in America and get greeted as fellow whites. And while in America they have faced plenty of discrimination, primarily from other non-white groups that view them as a threat. It's the audacity of having someone claim that asians have never faced economic sabotage, when only months ago rioters were burning down asian american owned businesses for having the gall of owning a store in a primarily black neighborhood

 

[CheezzyMach]

We have people in this thread from third world hell holes or friends from third world hell holes heavily convinced this is election fraud.

There is that smug attitude of "it can't happen here" is a cancer that has started the rot. Well now it's here and since they don't teach history as reliable, it happened before in 1824 and 1876. All I am gonna say is that if Trump does not prevail, America will go to hell domestically and internationally.

Well the courts even with handpicked Trump judges disagree there's fraud friend.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

That's a joke right?

Chinese Exclusion Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Like @Übertroon pointed out, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 proves that wrong, but it could be argued that it was originally supposed to only keep new Chinese immigrants from coming in and theoretically wouldn't effect those already in the country.

There was also the Japanese-American internments during WWII, but that's a little shakier since it was part of wartime paranoia and there were smaller internment efforts directed at German-American and Italian-American communities on the East Coast, but they were far more limited and less sweeping in their scope and scale than the ones targeted at Japanese communities

That law is centered around stopping immigration. I am talking about passing legislation to stop the people already in the country from building themselves up. The Exclusion Act didn’t have any legislation that expressly killed Chinese wages. On top of that during WWII the law was repealed.

IIRC Asians had an easier time integrating into society post WWII. Until 1964 segregation made economic competition for blacks extremely difficult since it required building separate everything to people to try to interact with one another. I know there was some bullshit in California involving intermarrying Asians and the like around that time, so I know my explanation isn’t perfect across the board.

Long story short, yes Asian people went through bullshit too, but they didn’t have Congress passing laws specifically to nuke the ways they found to thrive in the US, as opposed to the black population. At least not as far as I know.

Main thing the Chinese exclusion act shows is that racial discrimination wasn't something laser focused at the black community as was claimed. Asians didn't arrive in America and get greeted as fellow whites. And while in America they have faced plenty of discrimination, primarily from other non-white groups that view them as a threat. It's the audacity of having someone claim that asians have never faced economic sabotage, when only months ago rioters were burning down asian american owned businesses for having the gall of owning a store in a primarily black neighborhood

(You guys keep posting when I am responding good lord)
The laser focus comes from what I was mentioning involving unions and the minimum wage laws, where Congress looked at the fact that black communities were growing and smacked them back down. That kind of shit is different from the gov’t saying “Don’t come here anymore“. I didn’t say anything about the recent riots, because I am talking about the past and everyone with the ability to succeed is facing economic sabotage from this particular brand of stupid. African AND Asian-American businesses are being burned down for daring to exist as a symbol of individual success in a black neighborhood.

My point is that due to the continuous hits received over the course of decades, followed by the carrot known as social programs, the black community was pretty much crushed into its current state. Asians took several hits, but not to that degree. Hence why today’s SJWs are trying to toss Asians in the “white” bracket. There wasn’t enough force behind the discrimination they faced in the past, so getting out of the hole was easier.

(Thank you for coming to my TED talk.)

 

[Übertroon]

Well the courts even with handpicked Trump judges disagree there's fraud friend.

The case in Pennsylvania that was dismissed specifically does not allege fraud, but alleges observers and challengers from the Trump campaign were prevented from doing their job. To which the judge points out that Pennsylvania state law doesn't have specific rules for how observers are to be treated as long as they are allowed to be in the same room as the ballot are counted.

Question now is why should anyone accept the results from Pennsylvania when as the courts have stated the rules are vague and the whole process easily exploitable