Plagued 4chan - the Internet hate machine

[Jewelsmakerguy]

So /x/ is being more retarded than usual, there's at least a dozen threads about some kind of alien invasion happening December 2nd. Good news is that a decent amount of the posters of those threads seem to either be calling th OPs of those threads fags. Bad news is that no one seems to be reporting them for spam.

 

[Noideawhattopick]

/v/ found old forum posts from other posts.
And what can I say, the discussions are the same since 1989. These pics are not obv from /v/ but they were posted on there and could be posted there.

It's all so tiresome

Coomers in 1997???

What about Todd Howard!?
Oh you bet he was there

Don't worry the next thread will repurpose those decade old discussions.

 

[AnOminous]

And what can I say, the discussions are the same since 1989. These pics are not obv from /v/ but they were posted on there and could be posted there.

I've been seeing that "Mifflin Devin" post for years and years. Imagine saying something so utterly idiotic people haven't stopped mocking you for it in 23 years.

 

[naught sock account 1]

anon has a bad idea...

https://desuarchive.org/q/thread/786290/

 

[thundaga]

/v/ found old forum posts from other posts.
And what can I say, the discussions are the same since 1989. These pics are not obv from /v/ but they were posted on there and could be posted there.

Yeah some things never changed. Even on /a/ sometimes some old usenet posts from the archives were brought up and back then there were already "best girl" discussions, people complaining about the kawaii fad (before moe was a term) and nostalgiafags saying that anime was better years ago.

 

[DungeonMaster]

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

View attachment 1753128

I remember this mongoloid. I still think they crop up on /his/ every once and a while to chimp out over how we should kill all the carnivores and then ourselves.

 

[MooseGump]

Out of everything I've seen on 4chan, I'll never forget this guy's dedication for a whole two weeks before giving up

 

[DungeonMaster]

I remember this mongoloid. I still think they crop up on /his/ every once and a while to chimp out over how we should kill all the carnivores and then ourselves.

I suppose his definition on what "adds" and what "takes" from the environment is based on how many cute herbivorous animals it allows to exist.

 

[AnOminous]

I suppose his definition on what "adds" and what "takes" from the environment is based on how many cute herbivorous animals it allows to exist.

In the lack of predators enough of them would exist to outstrip the food supply rapidly, then most of them would die slowly and miserably.

 

[DungeonMaster]

In the lack of predators enough of them would exist to outstrip the food supply rapidly, then most of them would die slowly and miserably.

In his worldview, the populations of the animals he likes should expand infinitely, because he can't stand the thought of them dying terrified and bleeding to sate the hunger of another creature. In his sad little mind, a planet with only plants and herbivores, the herbivores would keep their own populations in check to ensure that the world remains a Garden of Eden paradise for all eternity.

If predators won't kill them, pathogens will, if not natural disasters or various other factors, but you can bet that that idiot will decide they're evil for evolving that way. I've never seen someone with such an unscientific and self righteous worldview before. He makes John Sakars look sane.

I can't stand people who try to assign a moral stance to nature. Who's the one deciding that predators are parasites, and that parasites are inherently bad? Oh wait, it's him. He's so delusional, so goddamn far up his own ass that he believes nature has its own system of morality that coincidentally aligns with his. I don't like it when people project their own traits into animals, but this just brings it to a whole new level of stupidity.

It's just unreal.

I keep these responses around to restore my faith in humanity:

I remember this mongoloid. I still think they crop up on /his/ every once and a while to chimp out over how we should kill all the carnivores and then ourselves.

Also: Do you have any more of his posts archived?

 

[Pointless Pedant]

In the lack of predators enough of them would exist to outstrip the food supply rapidly, then most of them would die slowly and miserably.

This happened in Yellowstone with elk to the point where they had to reintroduce the wolves that hunters had killed decades earlier. The elk damage was so severe that whole forests were stripped bare and beavers couldn't build their dams.

We did this in A-level biology, so this idiot can't even finish secondary school.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

In his worldview, the populations of the animals he likes should expand infinitely, because he can't stand the thought of them dying terrified and bleeding to sate the hunger of another creature. In his sad little mind, a planet with only plants and herbivores, the herbivores would keep their own populations in check to ensure that the world remains a Garden of Eden paradise for all eternity.

If predators won't kill them, pathogens will, if not natural disasters or various other factors, but you can bet that that idiot will decide they're evil for evolving that way. I've never seen someone with such an unscientific and self righteous worldview before. He makes John Sakars look sane.

I can't stand people who try to assign a moral stance to nature. Who's the one deciding that predators are parasites, and that parasites are inherently bad? Oh wait, it's him. He's so delusional, so goddamn far up his own ass that he believes nature has its own system of morality that coincidentally aligns with his. I don't like it when people project their own traits into animals, but this just brings it to a whole new level of stupidity.

It's just unreal.

I keep these responses around to restore my faith in humanity:

View attachment 1753314
View attachment 1753316
View attachment 1753318
View attachment 1753319
View attachment 1753320


Also: Do you have any more of his posts archived?

Afraid not.

 

[RedStorm]

>tfw I LARP as a spastic pro-Biden shill on /pol/ and things got a little out of hand

 

[AnOminous]

>tfw I LARP as a spastic pro-Biden shill on /pol/ and things got a little out of hand

Wow a 30 day. Impressive.

 

[Postal_Dude]

>Autist 1 has entered the chat

>Autist 2 has entered the chat

>Autist 3 has entered the chat

 

[Pointless Pedant]

>tfw I LARP as a spastic pro-Biden shill on /pol/ and things got a little out of hand
View attachment 1753945

What happened? Did you post CP?

 

[RedStorm]

What happened? Did you post CP?

Part of the LARPing as a Biden shill involved talking about the FBI, that's all I'm gonna say.

President Biden General has been great. It's the first thing in years that's actually made me want to check /pol/ regularly. /pol/ was ruined by the MAGApedes after 2016 so it's pretty cathartic to see them all get dunked on.

I never used /pol/ much but there’s a divide between 2 types of users: Nihilistic oldfag trolls (who’ve been there since Ferguson or before) and self-serious earnestly political newfags (who came from elsewhere during the 2016 election and never really “got” Chan culture). Sometimes people will move between groups (newfags get blackpilled and etc).

It was always like this but Trump’s loss has made the division known (with the newfags seething and coping while the oldfags troll them with Biden memes). Ironically it seems like the nihilistic trolls are better adjusted, because at least they didn’t tie their entire sense of self-worth to Orange Man.
View attachment 1718327

>since Ferguson
>oldfags

wignats who came in around 2014 are not oldfags come the fuck on

also /pbg/ is astroturfed and it's common for divide&conquer shills on /pol/ to try portraying being an anti-Trump white nationalist as the cool oldfag thing to do, but I've been around since 2011 and /pol/ was more diverse back then. The 2016 election did have the effect of /pol/ being swarmed en masse with bots and shills though.

Pic related

P.S. Trump will win in the courts and the so called 'zionist migapedes' will have the last laugh

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Part of the LARPing as a Biden shill involved talking about the FBI, that's all I'm gonna say.






>since Ferguson
>oldfags

wignats who came in around 2014 are not oldfags come the fuck on

also /pbg/ is astroturfed and it's common for divide&conquer shills on /pol/ to try portraying being an anti-Trump white nationalist as the cool oldfag thing to do, but I've been around since 2011 and /pol/ was more diverse back then. The 2016 election did have the effect of /pol/ being swarmed en masse with bots and shills though.

Pic related

P.S. Trump will win in the courts and the so called 'zionist migapedes' will have the last laugh

Troons are troons, whatever site they're on.

 

[AnOminous]

Part of the LARPing as a Biden shill involved talking about the FBI, that's all I'm gonna say.






>since Ferguson
>oldfags

Actual timeline.

Also you never change. I am a newfag. Almost all of nu/pol/ is past even being cancer.