Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

[Jack Awful]

It's weird how much they shit on SJWs and Wokeness while also spamming their accounts with Communist symbols and hanging out with hardline socialists. Though, Shoe really isn't politically savvy, or consistent, enough to have a strategy like this. She's clearly just an airhead e-thot trying to get money from the left and the right. That's why she won't just flat out admit to being socialist despite very clearly being one, she doesn't want to scare away the right. Issue is, a lot of right leaning people are not as interested about woke agendas in film, TV and video games as they were in the past (At least from what I've seen) and they're far more critical of leftism in general, not just "wokeness" in media. That market was what Shoe appealed to and it's shrinking.

Shoe has admitted to being a democratic socialist in her Discord, but denied it on Twitter. I'm wondering which one's the truth and which one is a lie meant to appease her simps.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

Shoe has admitted to being a democratic socialist in her Discord, but denied it on Twitter. I'm wondering which one's the truth and which one is a lie meant to appease her simps.

Both. Seriously, I do not think she is genuine.

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

Both. Seriously, I do not think she is genuine.

Plot twist, June just wants to grill.

 

[Ita Mori]

Destiny seems comparatively honest, though, and like he actually has principles, to the point where it almost got him deplatformed.

I don't think he's "honest" more so than he has more shame than Vaush.
While Vaush, similar to other grifters like TJ Kirk or retards like Angry Joe, have no morals and thus no qualms in spouting nonsensical shit ("Kyle Rittenhouse should've submitted to the mob and trust in their judgment instead of defending himself"), it seemed Destiny has a line he won't cross and isn't as devoted to wokeness to make similar statements.
He says stupid shit, but subjectively stupid shit. Not objectively stupid shit like suggesting that yielding to people actively trying to beat you to death is the best plan of action to take rather than sending all who dare strike you to hell one bullet at a time.

 

[Druveer]

@RespectElves posted this on twitter:

Jesus...lol...

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

. Though, Shoe really isn't politically savvy, or consistent, enough to have a strategy like this. She's clearly just an airhead e-thot trying to get money from the left and the right.

Yeah I find it difficult to accept that Shoe has put serious thought into any type of political strategy. Not because she's a grifter (which she is) but because she really doesn't seem very smart. All of her political opinions are surface-level and appeal broadly to (especially younger) people in terms of gibs or emotional grandstanding. I don't think she could engage in a freeform discussion with a collegiate opponent about why she supports healthcare, for instance. She just knows that other countries do it and that socialized healthcare would provide everyone with a "free" service that is critical to their livelihoods.

But there are so many questions that she could address if she seriously wanted to change right wing hearts and minds.

Where is the money funding this huge program coming from? How would this impact our world-class healthcare quality? Would any impact on the financials of medical practitioners discourage students from training in medicine? How would coverage apply to illegal immigrants or alien residents? Is it philosophically valid to put healthcare in the hands of the government (or to expand governmental power at all)? Can the government even really provide (or do we trust them to correctly provide) this type of service? What politicians are proposing healthcare reform that won't just funnel money to corporations and corrupt individuals? Which country has a model which would best adapt to the US? Is there moral justification in forcing taxpayers to pay something like Obamacare's individual mandate? Is it morally justifiable to force doctors to provide services? Will providing an extremely costly healthcare service overly benefit certain states (e.g. California) to the financial detriment of others? Is socialized healthcare a way to retain a permanent underclass of undereducated low-wage workers and illegal immigrants by providing for all their basest needs, rather than encouraging their personal development and career advancement? Would government involvement in preventative medicine and health (reducing obesity, providing vitamins, educating people on how to care for themselves to prevent a situation where they need treatment) actually be more beneficial than a more general form of socialized healthcare?

Not all of these questions have to be answered, but they're all legitimate ones I came up with off the top of my head in 15 minutes after having been awake for two days. The fact that Shoe has never touched upon a single one of these questions despite simping so hard for socialized healthcare demonstrates that her political ideals are shallow and empty. She just isn't intelligent enough to rationally discuss politics—all her policy positions just seem like they derive from lefty memes.

 

[Scarmaiden]

Nah I think she is a grifter, just not necessarily a conscious one. She goes with whatever is popular - in 2016 it was Lauren Southern and co so she orbited them, now it's Vaush and the like so she hangs around with those. Imo she is actually apolitical - at the end of the day she doesn't give a fuck, she'll be fine with either Trump or Biden as president to her it makes 0 difference. She uses politics the same way kids back in the day used subcultures - a shortcut to become a part of the biggest, strongest and coolest group. Tribalism of sorts. Plus, I think she's such a boring and bland person that having some "ceewl" politics is also a subsite for personality in her case.

 

[weaver24]

Nah I think she is a grifter, just not necessarily a conscious one. She goes with whatever is popular - in 2016 it was Lauren Southern and co so she orbited them, now it's Vaush and the like so she hangs around with those. Imo she is actually apolitical - at the end of the day she doesn't give a fuck, she'll be fine with either Trump or Biden as president to her it makes 0 difference. She uses politics the same way kids back in the day used subcultures - a shortcut to become a part of the biggest, strongest and coolest group. Tribalism of sorts. Plus, I think she's such a boring and bland person that having some "ceewl" politics is also a subsite for personality in her case.

I wonder if/when her and Vowsh will have their big falling out.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

I wonder if/when her and Vowsh will have their big falling out.

I give tuem a year at the most.

 

[KateHikes14]

Yeah I find it difficult to accept that Shoe has put serious thought into any type of political strategy. Not because she's a grifter (which she is) but because she really doesn't seem very smart. All of her political opinions are surface-level and appeal broadly to (especially younger) people in terms of gibs or emotional grandstanding. I don't think she could engage in a freeform discussion with a collegiate opponent about why she supports healthcare, for instance. She just knows that other countries do it and that socialized healthcare would provide everyone with a "free" service that is critical to their livelihoods.

But there are so many questions that she could address if she seriously wanted to change right wing hearts and minds.

Where is the money funding this huge program coming from? How would this impact our world-class healthcare quality? Would any impact on the financials of medical practitioners discourage students from training in medicine? How would coverage apply to illegal immigrants or alien residents? Is it philosophically valid to put healthcare in the hands of the government (or to expand governmental power at all)? Can the government even really provide (or do we trust them to correctly provide) this type of service? What politicians are proposing healthcare reform that won't just funnel money to corporations and corrupt individuals? Which country has a model which would best adapt to the US? Is there moral justification in forcing taxpayers to pay something like Obamacare's individual mandate? Is it morally justifiable to force doctors to provide services? Will providing an extremely costly healthcare service overly benefit certain states (e.g. California) to the financial detriment of others? Is socialized healthcare a way to retain a permanent underclass of undereducated low-wage workers and illegal immigrants by providing for all their basest needs, rather than encouraging their personal development and career advancement? Would government involvement in preventative medicine and health (reducing obesity, providing vitamins, educating people on how to care for themselves to prevent a situation where they need treatment) actually be more beneficial than a more general form of socialized healthcare?

Not all of these questions have to be answered, but they're all legitimate ones I came up with off the top of my head in 15 minutes after having been awake for two days. The fact that Shoe has never touched upon a single one of these questions despite simping so hard for socialized healthcare demonstrates that her political ideals are shallow and empty. She just isn't intelligent enough to rationally discuss politics—all her policy positions just seem like they derive from lefty memes.

TBF to shoe that's really a lot more reading about healthcare then most people will do in their lives, shame it's all fluff and no meat.

I think if she was serious about recruitment of right and center-right people she would have a lot of luck talking about more reasonable healthcare reform, some right wing fritters have been pushing that for years.

 

[Illiterate Wanderer]

I think if she was serious about recruitment of right and center-right people she would have a lot of luck talking about more reasonable healthcare reform, some right wing fritters have been pushing that for years.

The problem is from what I've seen Shoe's analysis of government is that it's proper role is to be a gibs dispenser, and most rightwingers want something more (Monarchists and Theocrats for example.) or less, (Libertarians or Ancaps)

 

[KateHikes14]

The problem is from what I've seen Shoe's analysis of government is that it's proper role is to be a gibs dispenser, and most rightwingers want something more (Monarchists and Theocrats for example.) or less, (Libertarians or Ancaps)

Absolutely, if their wasn't disagreements it wouldn't be a distinction, but given the poll numbers on various types of healthcare reform, there's certainly a desire that can be used to try to convert people. Shoe's a Bernie-bro tho, so it's all or nothing to her.

 

[biscuitscilia]

Where is the money funding this huge program coming from? How would this impact our world-class healthcare quality? Would any impact on the financials of medical practitioners discourage students from training in medicine? How would coverage apply to illegal immigrants or alien residents? Is it philosophically valid to put healthcare in the hands of the government (or to expand governmental power at all)? Can the government even really provide (or do we trust them to correctly provide) this type of service? What politicians are proposing healthcare reform that won't just funnel money to corporations and corrupt individuals? Which country has a model which would best adapt to the US? Is there moral justification in forcing taxpayers to pay something like Obamacare's individual mandate? Is it morally justifiable to force doctors to provide services? Will providing an extremely costly healthcare service overly benefit certain states (e.g. California) to the financial detriment of others? Is socialized healthcare a way to retain a permanent underclass of undereducated low-wage workers and illegal immigrants by providing for all their basest needs, rather than encouraging their personal development and career advancement? Would government involvement in preventative medicine and health (reducing obesity, providing vitamins, educating people on how to care for themselves to prevent a situation where they need treatment) actually be more beneficial than a more general form of socialized healthcare?

Unless Vaush has addressed any of these specifically, she doesn't know what they are and they've never crossed her mind before.

I wonder if/when her and Vowsh will have their big falling out.

When she finds a new cock to sit on. (Preferably a BernieBro)

 

[Hotel in Minsk]

 

[msd]

Donated t-cells today, sat in a chair for 4 hours hooked up to a machine. Got bored snd decided to catch up on the reality television show that's June

Its like every few weeks I leave, then when I come back she does something incredibly stupid and has to either backpeddle or erase evidence she supported something.

Either way, it's entertaining to my dumbass.

So god speed you absolute retard June, keep giving me hours to entertainment

note:yeah I'm out of it right now, so apologies if it comes off as mindless rambling

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

The problem is from what I've seen Shoe's analysis of government is that it's proper role is to be a gibs dispenser, and most rightwingers want something more (Monarchists and Theocrats for example.) or less, (Lirtarians or Ancaps

June's analysis of government is that there is no reason for the police to dispense a riot as long as people say it's a protest. She's utterly safe and will never learn.

 

[Jack Awful]

June's analysis of government is that there is no reason for the police to dispense a riot as long as people say it's a protest. She's utterly safe and will never learn.

Also, the police pulled her over for running a stop sign next to her house once but let her go because she was a white girl, and if she was a black man they would have opened fire before she pulled her window down.

 

[Maamtis]

Has Shoe walked back her stance on the wage gap yet? I think that will be the point of no return for her.

 

[babadook]

@RespectElves posted this on twitter:
View attachment 1757508

Jesus...lol...

Chores: maek bideo

 

[Scarmaiden]

Has Shoe walked back her stance on the wage gap yet? I think that will be the point of no return for her.

Nope. She also promised half a year ago on Vaush's stream to do a video where she will apologize for her past transgressions against left. It's safe to say she's not doing either. Because why bother and drag the evidence of her spinelessness out when she has Vaush, his minion Xanderhal and their combined sycophant forces who will whiteknight her to anyone who'll ever mention it. This is precisely what happened with Dusty Smith recently. She started some shit with him on Twitter but when it came to having a debate she sent the Xanderhal manchild to do that. She will never appear anywhere where there's a slight possibility of someone confronting her