Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[AnOminous]

And yet even during this allegedly transphobic hate crime, Cox wasn't attacked, the person with him was. So it obviously is safe if you're a transperson. Even transphobes attack the person standing next to you.

I don't really care about the story, just lmao a tranny named Cox. Yeah I know, sorry.

 

[chickenbutt]

I don't really care about the story, just lmao a tranny named Cox. Yeah I know, sorry.

Middle name "Sofonda"

 

[queue-anon]

It doesn't even flow as though asking Cox if he's a guy is the reason the guy attacked. "Do you have the time" is the modern mugger's pick-up line, they ask you to take out your phone to check the time and then they snatch it. I had someone try this on me when I was out walking late at night and I guessed the time within ten minutes or so without stopping, and the guy shouted at me "no but what's the actual time?" from ten feet away as I left him behind. Like buddy... please.

But if Cox stopped and responded with the time, the mugger is just thinking, "well he hasn't taken his phone out yet so I just need to ask some stupid question to keep him from walking off so I can finish the mugging however I can," or even "fuck it's a troon, I'm not sure I can mug a man this tall," and botched the follow-through.

Honestly, it's privilege and ignorance of how normal people live to interpret any violent interaction with a stranger on the street that starts with "what time is it" as anything more than a mugging.

Asking for the time is also sometimes used by men who are trying to pick up women in public. I wonder if the guy saw Cox from a distance or from behind and was interested in the long, blond hair, big bolt-ons, and drag queen sashay, and he then had a nasty surprise when he saw Cox's face. Of course, all this makes Cox uniquely oppressed even when women have been run over by trucks and stabbed to death for spurning a public pick-up attempt.

 

[OttoWest]

I don't really care about the story, just lmao a tranny named Cox. Yeah I know, sorry.

Even funnier his real first name is Rod.

 

[Wanda]

When people tell a story in the present tense it's usually because they're making it up as they go along. If they're describing events that actually happened, they'll almost always use past tense.

I don't think the story is necessarily fake. It probably did happen; hobos asking weird shit, especially if they're high, is very common.

Except the guy punched the friend because he told him to fuck off, not because he cares about Cox's cocks.

 

[Goodbye Horses]

Gender reassignment: High Court rules on puberty blockers for under-16s​

Children under 16 with gender dysphoria are unlikely to be able to give informed consent to undergo treatment with puberty-blocking drugs, three High Court judges have ruled.
The case had been brought against Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust.
One of the claimants, Keira Bell, said the clinic should have challenged her more over her decision to transition to a male as a teenager.
The 23-year-old had been prescribed puberty blockers when she was 16.
Ms Bell, from Cambridge, had been referred to the Tavistock Centre, which runs the UK's only gender-identity development service (GIDS), as a teenager.

She was prescribed puberty blockers, which delay the development of signs of puberty, like periods or facial hair.
The second claimant, known only as Mrs A, is the mother of a 15-year-old girl with autism, who is awaiting treatment at the clinic.
Speaking to the BBC prior to Tuesday's ruling, she said: "My fear is - it's not that she transitions - it's that she gets it wrong."
She said it was "frightening" there was so little exploration of why a child might be feeling they were the wrong sex before puberty blockers were given.
"It is distressing to have to wait and to try and convince someone that your identity warrants medical intervention. However, I think the downside of getting it wrong, the outcomes of getting it wrong, are also catastrophic."

Keira Bell took her case to court as she believed she should have been challenged more over her decision to transition to a man
At a High Court hearing in October, lawyers representing the claimants said there was "a very high likelihood" children who start taking hormone blockers will later begin taking cross-sex hormones, which they say cause "irreversible changes".
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust - as well as University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, to which Tavistock refers children and young people experiencing gender dysphoria - argued taking puberty blockers and later cross-sex hormones were entirely separate stages of treatment.
In a ruling, Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting with Lord Justice Lewis and Mrs Justice Lieven, said: "It is said therefore the child needs only to understand the implications of taking puberty blockers alone... in our view this does not reflect the reality.
"The evidence shows that the vast majority of children who take puberty blockers move on to take cross-sex hormones."

Puberty blockers delay the development of signs of puberty, like periods or facial hair
The court added both treatments were "two stages of one clinical pathway and, once on that pathway, it is extremely rare for a child to get off it".
The judges said their decision was only on the informed consent of a child or a young person, not whether puberty blockers were appropriate themselves.
The ruling said: "The court is not deciding on the benefits or disbenefits of treating children with GD (gender dysphoria) with PBs, whether in the long or short term."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-55144148​

 

[Positron]

At a High Court hearing in October, lawyers representing the claimants said there was "a very high likelihood" children who start taking hormone blockers will later begin taking cross-sex hormones, which they say cause "irreversible changes".

Even blockers cause irreversible changes. Although I agree with the judges' verdict, I'm disappointed they took Tavistock and NHS's lie at face value.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

And friend's sex/gender isn't mentioned. I know why, it's because Cox dates guys who don't want to be seen as dating trannies and Cox doesn't want anyone trying to find out who he was with

Is that why they always dump him because he doesn't pass for shit?!

 

[homewayhalf]

Gender reassignment: High Court rules on puberty blockers for under-16s​

Children under 16 with gender dysphoria are unlikely to be able to give informed consent to undergo treatment with puberty-blocking drugs, three High Court judges have ruled.
The case had been brought against Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust.
One of the claimants, Keira Bell, said the clinic should have challenged her more over her decision to transition to a male as a teenager.
The 23-year-old had been prescribed puberty blockers when she was 16.
Ms Bell, from Cambridge, had been referred to the Tavistock Centre, which runs the UK's only gender-identity development service (GIDS), as a teenager.

She was prescribed puberty blockers, which delay the development of signs of puberty, like periods or facial hair.
The second claimant, known only as Mrs A, is the mother of a 15-year-old girl with autism, who is awaiting treatment at the clinic.
Speaking to the BBC prior to Tuesday's ruling, she said: "My fear is - it's not that she transitions - it's that she gets it wrong."
She said it was "frightening" there was so little exploration of why a child might be feeling they were the wrong sex before puberty blockers were given.
"It is distressing to have to wait and to try and convince someone that your identity warrants medical intervention. However, I think the downside of getting it wrong, the outcomes of getting it wrong, are also catastrophic."

Keira Bell took her case to court as she believed she should have been challenged more over her decision to transition to a man
At a High Court hearing in October, lawyers representing the claimants said there was "a very high likelihood" children who start taking hormone blockers will later begin taking cross-sex hormones, which they say cause "irreversible changes".
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust - as well as University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, to which Tavistock refers children and young people experiencing gender dysphoria - argued taking puberty blockers and later cross-sex hormones were entirely separate stages of treatment.
In a ruling, Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting with Lord Justice Lewis and Mrs Justice Lieven, said: "It is said therefore the child needs only to understand the implications of taking puberty blockers alone... in our view this does not reflect the reality.
"The evidence shows that the vast majority of children who take puberty blockers move on to take cross-sex hormones."

Puberty blockers delay the development of signs of puberty, like periods or facial hair
The court added both treatments were "two stages of one clinical pathway and, once on that pathway, it is extremely rare for a child to get off it".
The judges said their decision was only on the informed consent of a child or a young person, not whether puberty blockers were appropriate themselves.
The ruling said: "The court is not deciding on the benefits or disbenefits of treating children with GD (gender dysphoria) with PBs, whether in the long or short term."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-55144148​

Remember when JK Rowling said that the lawsuits were coming back in July and got called a transphobic bigot?

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

The judgement is out, and it's recommending such stringent requirements for under-16s that there isn't really any way to satisfy them. A win for Keira and a lot of medical malpractice victims.

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-on-the-application-of-quincy-bell-and-a-v-tavistock-and-portman-nhs-trust-and-others/

 

[Return of the Freaker]

The judgement is out, and it's recommending such stringent requirements for under-16s that there isn't really any way to satisfy them. A win for Keira and a lot of medical malpractice victims.

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-on-the-application-of-quincy-bell-and-a-v-tavistock-and-portman-nhs-trust-and-others/

On the one hand this is great news. On the other, how long before we get a bunch of trans suicide news pieces that you aren't allowed to question or examine in order to push for a legislative fix?

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

All it'd take in that case is some journos looking at the numbers. NICE and the NHS procurement should be looking at that anyway, the data coming out of Sweden has shown that puberty blockers increase suicidal ideation in kids, and the "48%" study was a self selecting survey of 2,000 LGBT people, of whom only 27 were trans, and of those 13 had attempted or planned suicide. It's not useful data and the stats for child suicides don't show anything like those numbers.
The problem only arises if they start acting outraged that anyone would dare examine the figures or demand evidence for their claims. Which I fully expect them to do, but it isn't very convincing, and there's more and more detransitioners and clinicians speaking out and countering that narrative.

 

[Drihten]

Gender reassignment: High Court rules on puberty blockers for under-16s​

Children under 16 with gender dysphoria are unlikely to be able to give informed consent to undergo treatment with puberty-blocking drugs, three High Court judges have ruled.
The case had been brought against Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust.
One of the claimants, Keira Bell, said the clinic should have challenged her more over her decision to transition to a male as a teenager.
The 23-year-old had been prescribed puberty blockers when she was 16.
Ms Bell, from Cambridge, had been referred to the Tavistock Centre, which runs the UK's only gender-identity development service (GIDS), as a teenager.

She was prescribed puberty blockers, which delay the development of signs of puberty, like periods or facial hair.
The second claimant, known only as Mrs A, is the mother of a 15-year-old girl with autism, who is awaiting treatment at the clinic.
Speaking to the BBC prior to Tuesday's ruling, she said: "My fear is - it's not that she transitions - it's that she gets it wrong."
She said it was "frightening" there was so little exploration of why a child might be feeling they were the wrong sex before puberty blockers were given.
"It is distressing to have to wait and to try and convince someone that your identity warrants medical intervention. However, I think the downside of getting it wrong, the outcomes of getting it wrong, are also catastrophic."

Keira Bell took her case to court as she believed she should have been challenged more over her decision to transition to a man
At a High Court hearing in October, lawyers representing the claimants said there was "a very high likelihood" children who start taking hormone blockers will later begin taking cross-sex hormones, which they say cause "irreversible changes".
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust - as well as University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, to which Tavistock refers children and young people experiencing gender dysphoria - argued taking puberty blockers and later cross-sex hormones were entirely separate stages of treatment.
In a ruling, Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting with Lord Justice Lewis and Mrs Justice Lieven, said: "It is said therefore the child needs only to understand the implications of taking puberty blockers alone... in our view this does not reflect the reality.
"The evidence shows that the vast majority of children who take puberty blockers move on to take cross-sex hormones."

Puberty blockers delay the development of signs of puberty, like periods or facial hair
The court added both treatments were "two stages of one clinical pathway and, once on that pathway, it is extremely rare for a child to get off it".
The judges said their decision was only on the informed consent of a child or a young person, not whether puberty blockers were appropriate themselves.
The ruling said: "The court is not deciding on the benefits or disbenefits of treating children with GD (gender dysphoria) with PBs, whether in the long or short term."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-55144148​

It's a small step towards sanity, but there's still a long way to go yet. Britain has traditionally been a lot more anti-troon than the US or other European nations, so we'll just have to see if this spreads.

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

The second claimant, known only as Mrs A, is the mother of a 15-year-old girl with autism, who is awaiting treatment at the clinic.

Well, this is one way to sterilize the autists among us.

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

Hilariously, Freddy McConnell "the seahorse dad" best known for being an FtM who had a baby, is angry about this.

For someone whose entire public presence revolves around having had a baby and desperately wanting to be a parent, she's really eager for trans people to be sterilised in childhood.

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

Is being the "Trans and Non-Binary Liberation Officer" a paid position? And if so, how much?

https://archive.is/8WkSJ

More transphobic stickers have been found on Edinburgh Uni campus
The stickers were seen outside 40 George Square and on South College Street

4 DAYS AGO
Sophie Butcher
EDINBURGH

Content warning: transphobia

More transphobic stickers have been spotted on Edinburgh University Campus.

A fourth year Edinburgh student saw the stickers on two lampposts around uni, by 40 George Square and the other two just outside Brewlab on South College Street.

One sticker read “Seahorses ARE horses. Hotdogs ARE dogs. There is no debate. #WarOnWomen.”



The hashtag has been used to refer to attempts by the Republicans in the US to restrict access to abortion. It has since been co-opted by Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) to attack trans women being given the same rights as all other women. This one was found on both lampposts.

“I <3 JK Rowling” stickers have been spotted. Although Edinburgh is known for its links to Harry Potter and therefore could be in reference to that, the author has found herself in hot water recently over a series of late night Twitter rants defending trans-exclusive language and policies. She has also written a book (under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith) with a villain that murders women and gets away with it by crossdressing. Her actions have been condemned by trans activists as well as LGBT+ Harry Potter fans and many cast members of the Harry Potter films.



The stickers were found by Anna, a fourth year Politics and Sociology student earlier this week.

She told The Tab: “I saw them this week, the first few on Monday. They made me feel furious; the fact that people are taking time out of their lives to actively spew hatred against a marginalised group makes me feel sick. What’s even worse is that it’s done under the guise of ‘feminism’ – but there is nothing feminist about excluding trans people.

“I took them down because I couldn’t bear the thought of a trans person having to look at them and feel ashamed of being who they are. I also think hate speech is not free speech so I had every right to take them down.”



When approached for comment, a spokesperson for The University of Edinburgh said to refer to their “Commitment to Freedom of Expression” policy document.

The document says the university policy towards stickers such as these is maintain “both the importance of freedom of expression and of fostering a culture of mutual respect within our University.”

It says: “Freedom of expression is a vital component of an open and democratic society, and the individual freedoms of those who are part of it. It is also fundamental to the University’s purpose: that our graduates, and the knowledge we discover with our partners, will make the world a better place.”



In the past, Vice-Chancellor Peter Mathieson has said he will not tolerate “offensive stickers” or transphobia such as this and promised those responsible for these stickers would be disciplined.

Elliot Byrom, EUSA’s Trans and Non-Binary Liberation Officer, said: “It’s really disappointing and frustrating. However it is not surprising, with the recent goings-on in Parliament and continued hate campaigns in the press.

“Anyone who sees stickers like this should send photos to campus security, so they can be included in ongoing hate crime statistics that are reported to the police. If anyone affected by this wants support, they can always reach out to transnonbinary@eusa.ed.ac.uk.”

This isn’t the first time transphobic stickers have been found on-campus at Edinburgh. In October 2018, stickers saying “Women’s sex based rights aren’t for penises. Get over it.” were found around uni – including in the toilets at Potterrow (a EUSA building). They were quickly removed and replaced with stickers reaffirming “The Students’ Association is a place for all.”

 

[Slimy Time]

The judgement is out, and it's recommending such stringent requirements for under-16s that there isn't really any way to satisfy them. A win for Keira and a lot of medical malpractice victims.

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-on-the-application-of-quincy-bell-and-a-v-tavistock-and-portman-nhs-trust-and-others/

That's some great news.

The legal issue in the case concerned identifying the circumstances in which a child was competent as a matter of law to give valid consent to treatment. The court held that in order for a child to be competent to give valid consent the child would have to understand, retain and weigh the following information: (i) the immediate consequences of the treatment in physical and psychological terms; (ii) the fact that the vast majority of patients taking puberty blocking drugs proceed to taking cross-sex hormones and are, therefore, a pathway to much greater medical interventions; (iii) the relationship between taking cross-sex hormones and subsequent surgery, with the implications of such surgery; (iv) the fact that cross-sex hormones may well lead to a loss of fertility; (v) the impact of cross-sex hormones on sexual function; (vi) the impact that taking this step on this treatment pathway may have on future and life-long relationships; (vii) the unknown physical consequences of taking puberty blocking drugs; and (viii) the fact that the evidence base for this treatment is as yet highly uncertain. The court considered that it was highly unlikely that a child aged 13 or under would be competent to give consent to the administration of puberty blockers. It was also doubtful that a child aged 14 or 15 could understand and weigh the long-term risks and consequences of the administration of puberty blocking drugs. In respect of young persons aged 16 and over, the legal position is that there is a statutory presumption that they have the ability to consent to medical treatment. Given the long-term consequences of the clinical interventions at issue in this case, and given that the treatment is as yet innovative and experimental, the court recognised that clinicians may well regard these as cases where the authorisation of the court should be sought before starting treatment with puberty blocking drugs. The court has granted a declaration to reflect the points on which the application succeeded.

Basically below 16 is no chance as can't consent, 16+ they assume capacity to consent but in these cases it requires court authorisation before starting treatment. Haven't looked up the precise criteria, but seems like it will be a massive pain in the ass to try and go onto blockers before hitting 18.

 

[byuu]

"I love JK Rowling" is now transphobic hate speech. I love this time line.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

I <3 JK Rowling” stickers have been spotted

Oh my god! The horror! I love how they are unsure if it's a HP reference or crimes against troonanity.

 

[Goodbye Horses]

That's some great news.

Basically below 16 is no chance as can't consent, 16+ they assume capacity to consent but in these cases it requires court authorisation before starting treatment. Haven't looked up the precise criteria, but seems like it will be a massive pain in the ass to try and go onto blockers before hitting 18.

As it should be. I'm glad someone has finally stepped up and stopped these nutjobs handing this shit out to kids like it's halloween candy.