Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Wuhan files Leaked documents reveal China's mishandling of the early stages of Covid-19

London — A group of frontline medical workers, likely exhausted, stand huddled together on a video-conference call as China's most powerful man raises his hand in greeting. It is February 10 in Beijing and President Xi Jinping, who for weeks has been absent from public view, is addressing hospital staff in the city of Wuhan as they battle to contain the spread of a still officially unnamed novel coronavirus.
From a secure room about 1,200 kilometers (745 miles) from the epicenter, Xi expressed his condolences to those who have died in the outbreak. He urged greater public communication, as around the world concerns mounted about the potential threat posed by the new disease.
That same day, Chinese authorities reported 2,478 new confirmed cases -- raising the total global number to more than 40,000, with fewer than 400 cases occurring outside of mainland China. Yet CNN can now reveal how official documents circulated internally show that this was only part of the picture.

In a report marked "internal document, please keep confidential," local health authorities in the province of Hubei, where the virus was first detected, list a total of 5,918 newly detected cases on February 10, more than double the official public number of confirmed cases, breaking down the total into a variety of subcategories. This larger figure was never fully revealed at that time, as China's accounting system seemed, in the tumult of the early weeks of the pandemic, to downplay the severity of the outbreak.
The previously undisclosed figure is among a string of revelations contained within 117 pages of leaked documents from the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, shared with and verified by CNN.
Taken together, the documents amount to the most significant leak from inside China since the beginning of the pandemic and provide the first clear window into what local authorities knew internally and when.

The Chinese government has steadfastly rejected accusations made by the United States and other Western governments that it deliberately concealed information relating to the virus, maintaining that it has been upfront since the beginning of the outbreak. However, though the documents provide no evidence of a deliberate attempt to obfuscate findings, they do reveal numerous inconsistencies in what authorities believed to be happening and what was revealed to the public.

The documents, which cover an incomplete period between October 2019 and April this year, reveal what appears to be an inflexible health care system constrained by top-down bureaucracy and rigid procedures that were ill-equipped to deal with the emerging crisis. At several critical moments in the early phase of the pandemic, the documents show evidence of clear missteps and point to a pattern of institutional failings.
One of the more striking data points concerns the slowness with which local Covid-19 patients were diagnosed. Even as authorities in Hubei presented their handling of the initial outbreak to the public as efficient and transparent, the documents show that local health officials were reliant on flawed testing and reporting mechanisms. A report in the documents from early March says the average time between the onset of symptoms to confirmed diagnosis was 23.3 days, which experts have told CNN would have significantly hampered steps to both monitor and combat the disease.
China has staunchly defended its handling of the outbreak. At a news conference on June 7, China's State Council released a White Paper saying the Chinese government had always published information related to the epidemic in a "timely, open and transparent fashion."
"While making an all-out effort to contain the virus, China has also acted with a keen sense of responsibility to humanity, its people, posterity, and the international community. It has provided information on Covid-19 in a thoroughly professional and efficient way. It has released authoritative and detailed information as early as possible on a regular basis, thus effectively responding to public concern and building public consensus," says the White Paper.
CNN has reached out to China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and National Health Commission, as well as Hubei's Health Commission, which oversees the provincial CDC, for comment on the findings disclosed in the documents, but received no response.
Health experts said the documents laid bare why what China knew in the early months mattered.

"It was clear they did make mistakes -- and not just mistakes that happen when you're dealing with a novel virus -- also bureaucratic and politically-motivated errors in how they handled it," said Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, who has written extensively on public health in China. "These had global consequences. You can never guarantee 100% transparency. It's not just about any intentional cover-up, you are also constrained with by technology and other issues with a novel virus. But even if they had been 100% transparent, that would not stop the Trump administration downplaying the seriousness of it. It would probably not have stopped this developing into a pandemic."

China lying back at the start of the pandemic? No way!
I love that little dig at the end at Trump. I remember back in January that the MSM was accusing Trump of being racist for the China travel ban and governors and mayors in places like New York were telling people to go and celebrate Chinese New Year and continue like nothing major was happening. China is still fully to blame for not being honest in the first place, but there’s plenty of blame to go around as far as I’m concerned. The draconian lockdowns to me have been far worse than the virus itself.
 
I got hit with this gem a few days ago.

I was talking to a friend of mine and he said "If the restaurants had just shut down for two weeks, the pandemic would be over".

I considered him a smart guy, but such a statement was so baffling, I was initially stunned into silence. I mean...WHAT?! How do you respond to something to asinine? All I could do was turn to his wife and ask how she was doing, lol.

First of all, how could they be any more shutdown than they already were? We went through pretty strict lockdowns for months, and it didn't go away. What about grocery stores then? Initially, those were the biggest gathering places of people out of necessity. If we shut them down for two weeks, would that have made the bad bug go away?

Or what about, I don't know, ALL THESE FUCKING RIOTS that took up the summer. Those weren't spreader events? At all?

And while we're on the growing number of cases, how many NFL and MLB players have tested positive for Covid? Doesn't matter, because as far as I can tell, none of them died from it. Not fucking one. White House had an outbreak where a ton of people, including the President, First Lady, and Press Secretary, and guess what, no one died from it. I also read the average age of all those that died from Covid was 82 years old and the death rate of 2020 is behind that of 2018.

Call me an optimist, but I think that we can open the world back up at this point, but the media has driven people into being paranoid loons that are afraid of their own shadows over what is essentially a flu.
 
I got hit with this gem a few days ago.

I was talking to a friend of mine and he said "If the restaurants had just shut down for two weeks, the pandemic would be over".

I considered him a smart guy, but such a statement was so baffling, I was initially stunned into silence. I mean...WHAT?! How do you respond to something to asinine? All I could do was turn to his wife and ask how she was doing, lol.

First of all, how could they be any more shutdown than they already were? We went through pretty strict lockdowns for months, and it didn't go away. What about grocery stores then? Initially, those were the biggest gathering places of people out of necessity. If we shut them down for two weeks, would that have made the bad bug go away?

Or what about, I don't know, ALL THESE FUCKING RIOTS that took up the summer. Those weren't spreader events? At all?

And while we're on the growing number of cases, how many NFL and MLB players have tested positive for Covid? Doesn't matter, because as far as I can tell, none of them died from it. Not fucking one. White House had an outbreak where a ton of people, including the President, First Lady, and Press Secretary, and guess what, no one died from it. I also read the average age of all those that died from Covid was 82 years old and the death rate of 2020 is behind that of 2018.

Call me an optimist, but I think that we can open the world back up at this point, but the media has driven people into being paranoid loons that are afraid of their own shadows over what is essentially a flu.
The riots dindu nuffin to spread sheeeiiiittt, get with the programme, fren.


Edited: That being, obviously, the natural end point of the "black people never do noffin wrong ever" mentality.
 
The Wuhan files Leaked documents reveal China's mishandling of the early stages of Covid-19

London — A group of frontline medical workers, likely exhausted, stand huddled together on a video-conference call as China's most powerful man raises his hand in greeting. It is February 10 in Beijing and President Xi Jinping, who for weeks has been absent from public view, is addressing hospital staff in the city of Wuhan as they battle to contain the spread of a still officially unnamed novel coronavirus.
From a secure room about 1,200 kilometers (745 miles) from the epicenter, Xi expressed his condolences to those who have died in the outbreak. He urged greater public communication, as around the world concerns mounted about the potential threat posed by the new disease.
That same day, Chinese authorities reported 2,478 new confirmed cases -- raising the total global number to more than 40,000, with fewer than 400 cases occurring outside of mainland China. Yet CNN can now reveal how official documents circulated internally show that this was only part of the picture.

In a report marked "internal document, please keep confidential," local health authorities in the province of Hubei, where the virus was first detected, list a total of 5,918 newly detected cases on February 10, more than double the official public number of confirmed cases, breaking down the total into a variety of subcategories. This larger figure was never fully revealed at that time, as China's accounting system seemed, in the tumult of the early weeks of the pandemic, to downplay the severity of the outbreak.
The previously undisclosed figure is among a string of revelations contained within 117 pages of leaked documents from the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, shared with and verified by CNN.
Taken together, the documents amount to the most significant leak from inside China since the beginning of the pandemic and provide the first clear window into what local authorities knew internally and when.

The Chinese government has steadfastly rejected accusations made by the United States and other Western governments that it deliberately concealed information relating to the virus, maintaining that it has been upfront since the beginning of the outbreak. However, though the documents provide no evidence of a deliberate attempt to obfuscate findings, they do reveal numerous inconsistencies in what authorities believed to be happening and what was revealed to the public.

The documents, which cover an incomplete period between October 2019 and April this year, reveal what appears to be an inflexible health care system constrained by top-down bureaucracy and rigid procedures that were ill-equipped to deal with the emerging crisis. At several critical moments in the early phase of the pandemic, the documents show evidence of clear missteps and point to a pattern of institutional failings.
One of the more striking data points concerns the slowness with which local Covid-19 patients were diagnosed. Even as authorities in Hubei presented their handling of the initial outbreak to the public as efficient and transparent, the documents show that local health officials were reliant on flawed testing and reporting mechanisms. A report in the documents from early March says the average time between the onset of symptoms to confirmed diagnosis was 23.3 days, which experts have told CNN would have significantly hampered steps to both monitor and combat the disease.
China has staunchly defended its handling of the outbreak. At a news conference on June 7, China's State Council released a White Paper saying the Chinese government had always published information related to the epidemic in a "timely, open and transparent fashion."
"While making an all-out effort to contain the virus, China has also acted with a keen sense of responsibility to humanity, its people, posterity, and the international community. It has provided information on Covid-19 in a thoroughly professional and efficient way. It has released authoritative and detailed information as early as possible on a regular basis, thus effectively responding to public concern and building public consensus," says the White Paper.
CNN has reached out to China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and National Health Commission, as well as Hubei's Health Commission, which oversees the provincial CDC, for comment on the findings disclosed in the documents, but received no response.
Health experts said the documents laid bare why what China knew in the early months mattered.

"It was clear they did make mistakes -- and not just mistakes that happen when you're dealing with a novel virus -- also bureaucratic and politically-motivated errors in how they handled it," said Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, who has written extensively on public health in China. "These had global consequences. You can never guarantee 100% transparency. It's not just about any intentional cover-up, you are also constrained with by technology and other issues with a novel virus. But even if they had been 100% transparent, that would not stop the Trump administration downplaying the seriousness of it. It would probably not have stopped this developing into a pandemic."

China lying back at the start of the pandemic? No way!
China lied, people died. Most of this is what we knew in February and March based on the progress of the disease and modern Chinese political culture. What seems to have happened is that Xi's China is more closed and totalitarian than the China of the early 00s which successfully contained SARS (which actually was pretty dangerous). Although modern China's always been shit, the government was more wary about the messages they were censoring that made them take action on things like a mysterious disease. The system now is far more ossified than it was and Chairman Pooh so totalitarian in his measures that the local authorities basically could not act until it was too late and would not inform Der Chairman to save their own skins (since a novel pandemic originating in your city and province means your career is fucked). Chairman Pooh likely barely knew what was going on because no one told him. When Pooh Xi did know and the lockdowns spread all over Hubei and then elsewhere in China was probably when China decided to export their disease via international flights.

My thought is China erred on the side of caution in believing it was a particularly dangerous disease and decided to "lead the way" in controlling it with their lockdowns and building new hospitals "faster than ever before in history" (i.e. the ones which are basically death camps). They probably did not know whether they could successfully eradicate the disease with their lockdowns, but knew such draconian measures would curtail the spread to low levels. It was a huge gamble since the West might not go ahead with such measures or might do it differently, but if the West did, they'd do it insanely poorly and politicize it since there's all sorts of conflicting politicians and science itself is politicized unlike in totalitarian China. In the end, the CCP gamble succeeded. China "contained" their disease (it almost certainly still spreads but at low levels as in Australia) while the West engaged in economic suicide and convinced half of the political spectrum that economic suicide was necessary, even as the disease is proven to be an order of magnitude less lethal than believed. It created political instability, fanned the flames of the Saint Floyd riots, and demoralized the West like nothing before. It let the China-friendly Democrats win the election in the US via fraud. China has done incredibly well as a result of this, since they entered with a solid plan, carried it out, and sat back and watched the results.

If China ever collapses like the Soviet Union and we get easy access to their internal documents, it will be very fascinating to review the CCP's notes December 2019-April 2020. We'd likely see something similar to what I described above happen, with the biggest variable being the origins of the disease and how long it had been spreading. I don't believe it was deliberately created (outside of "gain of function" research--a specialty of Dr. Fauci's BTW--which isn't a "bioweapon") but I do believe it inadvertently escaped the Wuhan Institute of Virology since pictures of that facility show freezers with faulty seals and insanely poor hygiene practices. Note that the wet market in Wuhan blamed for the outbreak, or IIRC ANY wet market in all of Hubei, didn't even sell bats at the time since bats are very rarely eaten in that part of China as bats are a specialty of the southernmost parts of China.
But even if they had been 100% transparent, that would not stop the Trump administration downplaying the seriousness of it.
Downplayed so seriously, Trump enacted the horribly racist measure of stopping all flights to China and then the equally racist measure (because fuck Catholics) of stopping flights from Italy a few weeks later. IIRC the only mistake Trump made early on was not quarantining/monitering people from infected cruise ships and flights as strictly as should've been done since people without symptoms were getting off those ships and flights with no tests. And that was by no means limited to Trump since it happened in Australia, New Zealand, and European countries too.

The CFR can fuck right off, that's a fucked up organization if there ever was one.
 
Downplayed so seriously, Trump enacted the horribly racist measure of stopping all flights to China and then the equally racist measure (because fuck Catholics) of stopping flights from Italy a few weeks later. IIRC the only mistake Trump made early on was not quarantining/monitering people from infected cruise ships and flights as strictly as should've been done since people without symptoms were getting off those ships and flights with no tests. And that was by no means limited to Trump since it happened in Australia, New Zealand, and European countries too.
Too little too late. The first US case that we knew of at the time was that one in Everett in late Jan. However, the earliest recorded case was in Illinois a week before on the 13th. This was when the WHO was still sticking to the "we don't know if it transmits human to human" line. Then the the Illinois case passed it to her husband on Jan 30th. Then shit got real and the public emergency was declared travel restrictions, etc. That's two weeks wasted. Of uncontrolled unmonitored spread at least. Probably closer to a month.

It all comes back around to Chinese bungling and lack of transparency early on.

Also, what tests? You just gonna lock people up for months at customs in the airport until the testing catches up? You are forgetting how little we knew and our lack of abilities at the time. We didn't know shit about shit.
 
Some local kids were asked how they feel about distance learning. These were their responses.
14014E80-6AA8-4CD7-82C6-9332AB8E6D97.jpeg
85ECFD44-1FAC-4104-91C2-B6CE0DBD4291.jpeg

“Like I’m dead”
(:_(

These are crimes against humanity, there is no other way to describe it.

Washington Exposure Notifications - WA Notify

"Washington Exposure Notifications (also known as WA Notify) is a new tool that works through smartphones, without sharing any personal information, to alert users if they may have been exposed to COVID-19. It is completely private, and doesn’t know or track who you are or where you go."
View attachment 1759563
That doesn’t look secure at all. If it relies on phones sending messages to each other through Bluetooth, then it can be hacked. Bluetooth is known for being easily hacked. Additionally, I just see some totalitarian mayors and governors using this so they know where their subjects are at all times.
People are retarded enough to believe the government saying the apps are super secure and anonymous too.
FB271CB5-02AC-4FAE-93DA-F1413E39BFA2.jpeg
9009FA69-4F04-4A9F-B33E-EA62E3DF4E9C.jpeg

The app does not know anything about you! It just magically alerts you and then tells contact tracers you have been exposed! But anonymously, you can trust us, we are the government.

Minnesota’s IT department sucks so bad at their jobs that they needed millions and millions to “fix” the DMV database after rewriting and fucking it up. People wait literally months for their drivers licenses and car titles in the state because of these retards. There is no way in hell I will ever download a tracking app written by them and anyone else who does is also retarded.
 
The woman in charge of the app in England is a woman called Dido Harding. She was responsible for significant data breaches as head of an ISP, TalkTalk.

I would rather shit in my hands and clap than download anything that useless cunt has been within sniffing distance of.
 
Brace yourselves, I have returned with a longpost.

I really wish my mom would stop reading CNN. She takes literally every Covid doomer article she reads from there as gospel and it’s really frustrating. Like all those “leopards ate my face” tier stories of conspiratards that think covid doesn’t exist dying tragic totally-not-weirdly-karmic deaths that totally don’t read like an attempt to scare dissenters into submission while implying that all skeptics are retarded old people who think 5G is gonna kill everyone and Hillary is secretly a lizard person or something. It’s like fake news exists in her mind as something other people that aren’t the mainstream media do, and it never really occurred to her to think critically about any of it. She‘s not a complete lost cause though, as she abhors anything excessively woke and would be considered just as much of a TERF as I am. It’s just Covid doomerism and American politics from those places that she gets all up in arms about. The politics stuff is fairly harmless because we’re not American so it doesn’t really affect us but hearing her complain about public figure XYZ not wearing a mask when doing a thing because the news told her to is.....disheartening. She seems to believe in masks much more than lockdowns though - I told her about Australia‘s ridiculously overzealous lockdowns and her reaction was “that‘s mental” so there might be hope for her yet.

I found out a few days ago that we aren’t going to be celebrating Christmas with the rest of the family and I am Annoyed. Don’t get me wrong. since I live with my parents and my sister it’s not like its gonna be the worst Christmas ever, but I’m still annoyed that I can’t see my nan. I think the reason why it won’t work out is that we normally go to a restaurant for Christmas dinner since my Nan used to get up early and cook but she has a dodgy knee now so we thought it‘d be best to eat out at Christmas instead to give her the day off from cooking. But obviously there’s no restaurant around that’ll let you have a table for 14, and my mom doesn’t want the stress of cooking for 14 people. So chances are my nan will be celebrating with grandad, my permaNEET failuncle that still lives with them, my aunt that lives across the street from her and my cousin who lives with the aforementioned aunt. I have a second uncle and aunt but I don’t know what they’re doing yet, whether they’ll be going to celebrate with them and we’ll be the odd ones out or if they’ll celebrate on their own too. My mom hates having to rush on Christmas morning to get places, so she seems happy to have a valid excuse to not have to do that this year at least.

Honestly, I’m a NEET shut-in atm anyway so my life in lockdown isn’t that different from The Great Before, but there’s a big difference between being a shut-in by choice and having that imposed upon you by the government. Even as a shut-in my parents would take us out to eat to celebrate a family members’ birthday, and I have a big enough family that it averaged out to about once or twice a month. If I had the money I could get on a plane/train to go and visit my long distance boyfriend or wander around my local shopping center. Hell, I could buy things online without my mom opening the package to disinfect the contents. I at least something vaguely resembling a life (moreso than my permaNEET uncle who has pretty much gone full hikikomori and only leaves his room for Christmas celebrations). I’m kinda optimistic that one day I’ll, like, get a job and not be a slightly dysfunctional hermit but at the same time now I worry that when I do there might not be a society to re-enter due to everything becoming a totalitarian nightmare. Funnily enough, this time last year before I even knew about covid I was filled with crippling social anxiety and remember wishing that the outside world would like, stop being a thing for a while. Now that has kinda come to pass, I wish nothing more than to actually go outside again. I guess the grass is always greener on the other side.

If anyone was wondering about my sister’s friend that was spending Christmas on his own, apparently he has a 16 year old sister who upon learning that their parents weren’t letting him come home for Christmas told them to shove it and is going to go and celebrate with him, so he won‘t be completely alone at least.
 
Some local kids were asked how they feel about distance learning. These were their responses.
View attachment 1759958
View attachment 1759959

“Like I’m dead”
(:_(

These are crimes against humanity, there is no other way to describe it.

I hate to be a "Won't somebody think of the children?!" type of weirdo, but I really feel sorry for them the most in all of this. This overkill to protect the world is having horrible long term effects and kids are the most helpless of the bunch because they have less control over their lives than adults do, and it sucks. I really wouldn't blame this crop of kids if they grew up to be jaded assholes. Between a government that has no idea what its doing, an education system that is failing them, and parents that are paranoid psychos, I don't see how they could turn out to be anything else.

Another story: When I visited my friends this past weekend, one of their kids (6 years old) ran up to me and hugged me the second she saw me. She's a sweet little weirdo and it was both adorable, and normal behavior I'd expect out of her. Her dad then yelled at her "HEY! PANDEMIC! No hugging!". She shrugged her shoulders and walked away from me. BTW, I was wearing a mask and gloves.

I hope that sweetness she has doesn't get ripped out of her because of this nonsense.
 
The woman in charge of the app in England is a woman called Dido Harding. She was responsible for significant data breaches as head of an ISP, TalkTalk.

I would rather shit in my hands and clap than download anything that useless cunt has been within sniffing distance of.
I know someone that tried the app in Michigan. They uninstalled it after a day because it would drain their phone's battery within a couple hours. It wouldn't surprise me if this happened with every other app.
 
Why were you wearing gloves? Unless you're washing your hands and changing the gloves after every single time you touch anything they do no good.

Even the gloves themselves are not sterile and only intended for a very limited range of clinical purposes. Theres no reason beyond histrionics and paranoia and gullibility for members of the public to wear them.

Two reasons:

1) I bought a couple boxes of them at the start of all this and I want to use them up.

2) House rules of this particular friend
 
Honestly, I’m a NEET shut-in atm anyway so my life in lockdown isn’t that different from The Great Before, but there’s a big difference between being a shut-in by choice and having that imposed upon you by the government. Even as a shut-in my parents would take us out to eat to celebrate a family members’ birthday, and I have a big enough family that it averaged out to about once or twice a month. If I had the money I could get on a plane/train to go and visit my long distance boyfriend or wander around my local shopping center. Hell, I could buy things online without my mom opening the package to disinfect the contents. I at least something vaguely resembling a life (moreso than my permaNEET uncle who has pretty much gone full hikikomori and only leaves his room for Christmas celebrations). I’m kinda optimistic that one day I’ll, like, get a job and not be a slightly dysfunctional hermit but at the same time now I worry that when I do there might not be a society to re-enter due to everything becoming a totalitarian nightmare. Funnily enough, this time last year before I even knew about covid I was filled with crippling social anxiety and remember wishing that the outside world would like, stop being a thing for a while. Now that has kinda come to pass, I wish nothing more than to actually go outside again. I guess the grass is always greener on the other side.
If you plan to get a job, then right now might be a good time to start searching.

A lot of businesses are understaffed, and a good chunk of would-be employees have traded working low-end jobs for becoming permanent COVID-shut-ins.
 

If I were a kid
If you plan to get a job, then right now might be a good time to start searching.

A lot of businesses are understaffed, and a good chunk of would-be employees have traded working low-end jobs for becoming permanent COVID-shut-ins.

This is some great advice.

Even though my job search is sucking right now (I work in digital advertising), one thing I like to bring up in interviews is asking what their plans for returning to the office are, which I am gung-ho as fuck for. I also like to bring up how having a 100% remote workforce you lose out a lot on collaboration and socializing.

No matter what the media tries to say whenever I hear about the beauties of working from home all I can think about is some balding 30-something Redditor who only does a third of his work and just spends all afternoon jerking it to internet porn and posting liberal nonsense.
 
We're living in quite the dark comedy where it's so obvious that huge numbers of the "free press" desperately wish they were informants in a totalitarian police state.
Get used to it. When they don't have Trump to crusade against anymore, being simps for the Democratic Party led State will be their new thing.
 
They're all hoping to become taxpayer subsidized, like NPR.
They will be, once Joepedo reinstates Obama's "anti-fake news" bill that gave tens of millions of dollars a year to "authoritative sources" which included HuffPo, Vice, Vox, etc. That stopped being funded when Trump took office and predictably those outlets collapsed. Well guess what, they're soon to be back in business.

The only hope is that the economy is going to be so awful, like 1970s stagflation on steroids, thanks to the national lockdowns, that a bill like that won't even be proposed because the money will be spent on something else like rebuilding all the cities the big city mayors and blue states let the peaceful protestors have lots of peaceful protests in or bailing out bankrupt states that really bought the doomer narrative.
 
They will be, once Joepedo reinstates Obama's "anti-fake news" bill that gave tens of millions of dollars a year to "authoritative sources" which included HuffPo, Vice, Vox, etc. That stopped being funded when Trump took office and predictably those outlets collapsed. Well guess what, they're soon to be back in business.

The only hope is that the economy is going to be so awful, like 1970s stagflation on steroids, thanks to the national lockdowns, that a bill like that won't even be proposed because the money will be spent on something else like rebuilding all the cities the big city mayors and blue states let the peaceful protestors have lots of peaceful protests in or bailing out bankrupt states that really bought the doomer narrative.
Or that Republican congress actually blocks the monstrosity.🌈
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chongqing
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back