2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[The High Prophet of Truth]

Biden sucks and like the Drumpfags, I care little about him. However, I must own the Trumpers, until Biden's administration wipes out my forum because of "hate."

Like for the unironic Democrats on this site, I genuinely don't know how they can support the modern party, when the stuff they say here could potentially get them in trouble for hate speech and the entire site burned and salted.

 

[Marissa Moira]

Basically, yes. They don't have to overturn this election. Trump was fucked, had no machine apparatus where he needed it so he won't get really substantial evidence. They need to focus on the very very very very likely scenario that they're going to lose their challenge and be forceful to investigate the irregularities thoroughly to break up the machines that enabled it, shore up legislation and get rid of these corporations that cut corners with their shitty machines.

And politics is a very dirty business. We have a history of political machines and fucking with voters. You need to be prepared for this, which is why you develop machines in the first place.

How can you build a political machine when the media always goes to bat for the other guy and will scrutinize you more?

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

I take it back, this woman is exposing the bogosity of the process. She doesn't need a hat. The GOPe on the panel have said her testimony is 'unbelievably compelling'. The DOJ/FBI ignored her testimony.

 

[Secret Asshole]

I believe they did that because people were trying to break in and there was already observers inside the building

They were locked out of the building.

Like I said back nearer to the election: you know we're fucked when the future of the nation lies in the hands of Filthadelphians.

Here is an accurate representation of people in Philly:

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

How can you build a political machine when the media always goes to bat for the other guy and will scrutinize you more?

I want to say "just ignore them", but at this point that could be genuinely taken as some dictator move and they could try and arrest him for going through on it.

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

Can someone fill me in on what happened with the hearings yesterday? Are we making progress, or not?

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Biden sucks and like the Drumpfags, I care little about him. However, I must own the Trumpers, until Biden's administration wipes out my forum because of "hate."

I think people here are overestimating the extent to which Biden cares at all about the existence of Kiwifarms. Unless we turn into the next thedonald.win or Parler somehow this site won't even register on his perception.

This is like the equivalent of Carl Benjamin expecting Trump to tweet about Gamergate. None of us here really matter.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

I think people here are overestimating the extent to which Biden cares at all about the existence of Kiwifarms. Unless we turn into the next thedonald.win or Parler somehow this site won't even register on his perception.

This is like the equivalent of Carl Benjamin expecting Trump to tweet about Gamergate. None of us here really matter.

What if another NZ shooting situation happens, but in the US? NZ are a bunch of cucks anyway, but I doubt the US government would have any holdbacks on them.

 

[MrJokerRager]

And our usual bet loser. Where are these guys coming from? The shitty Doomsday Thread? I've never seen so many sore winners.


If only Trump were psychic enough to know that TDSers would be so deranged to fraud past 700,000 vote gaps.

They coming here because the real trolls in the doomsday thread are ruthless and don't care who won. So they must bait here because the trolls over there don't care. They just want to have fun. And so many people are falling for the bait.

 

[CrippleThreat]

Nobody likes Joe Biden, not even the people who voted for him.

He's the most popular president ever. Sorry, Minority Leader.

How can you build a political machine when the media always goes to bat for the other guy and will scrutinize you more?

Trump just had to be prepared for literally anything and everything. Come on, man! It's like his outcome with the blacks. He just should've seen past the fallacy of populism, and a catered to the small wignat percentage of his yuge white electorate. Even if he felt confident in his black share, he just should've known they'd vote against what is to their interest. It's like socialism, the right vying for the black vote just doesn't work. Ever. Trump still should've prepared though.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

If Michigan GOP adopted my modest proposal to award electors to the winner of the most counties it would be reliably red and the Democrats could stuff ballots in Wayne County to the hearts' content

Honestly, they wouldn't have to worry about changing rules if they had any kind of game.

 

[DtoDab]

Republican Dominion worker saying some interesting stuff, it seems that the craziest shit happened.

They scanned the same ballots up to 10 times, spent hours working and saw zero ballots for Trump.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

What if another NZ shooting situation happens, but in the US? NZ are a bunch of cucks anyway, but I doubt the US government would have any holdbacks on them.

The result of that was 8chan, not this site, shutting down. Aside from New Zealand, no one cared about us even then, and the site was bigger then than it is now.

Also, another Christchurch shooting did happen in the USA at El Paso, alt-right manifesto and all. We're still around.

 

[Meat Target]

I think people here are overestimating the extent to which Biden cares at all about the existence of Kiwifarms. Unless we turn into the next thedonald.win or Parler somehow this site won't even register on his perception.

This is like the equivalent of Carl Benjamin expecting Trump to tweet about Gamergate. None of us here really matter.

Joe is just malleable enough to put John Walker Flynt or Zoe Quinn in his administration.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

The result of that was 8chan, not this site, shutting down. Aside from New Zealand, no one cared about us even then.

Again though, different governments. And there's so many things they could accuse this site of to shut it down. And I'm sure 8Chan was too small for them at one point too, until it wasn't.

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

The Democrats won't dare try anything next time. After all, it's not like the MI GOP cut some guy off after three minutes when he was talking about being assaulted. Oh, wait. That's exactly what they did.



Sadly, you're probably right, Another witness cut off alleging actual crime by the three-minute buzzer on some GOP cuck's phone.

Why would they dare not try again? They’ve gotten away with it once, the GOP is either complicit or staffed by literal retards, and they can just manufacture another reason to vote by mail?

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

The result of that was 8chan, not this site, shutting down. Aside from New Zealand, no one cared about us even then, and the site was bigger then than it is now.

Also, another Christchurch shooting did happen in the USA at El Paso, alt-right manifesto and all. We're still around.

Yeah, but El Paso's wasn't recorded and posted online like it was there.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Why would they dare not try again? They’ve gotten away with it once, the GOP is either complicit or staffed by literal retards, and they can just manufacture another reason to vote by mail?

Or you know just a new Software (TM) owned by Google (TM) that you can totally trust to do what it supposed to do goy!

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Joe is just malleable enough to put John Walker Flynt or Zoe Quinn in his administration.

to assume that anyone in DNC leadership knows what gamergate was, but that would be a great source of entertainment.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

I think people here are overestimating the extent to which Biden cares at all about the existence of Kiwifarms. Unless we turn into the next thedonald.win or Parler somehow this site won't even register on his perception.

It seems like he wants to carve a hole in 230 so 'misinformation' is exempt. Given how widely the Democrats use that term it sounds absolutely nightmarish. Also, I could see the far left making a hole for 'hate speech', aka 'anything a Democrat hates'.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/17/opinion/joe-biden-nytimes-interview.html
https://archive.vn/wc1ze

Charlie Warzel: Sure. Mr. Vice President, in October, your campaign sent a letter to Facebook regarding an ad that falsely claimed that you blackmailed Ukrainian officials to not investigate your son. I’m curious, did that experience, dealing with Facebook and their power, did that change the way that you see the power of tech platforms right now?

No, I’ve never been a fan of Facebook, as you probably know. I’ve never been a big Zuckerberg fan. I think he’s a real problem. I think ——

CW: Can you elaborate?

No, I can. He knows better. And you know, from my perspective, I’ve been in the view that not only should we be worrying about the concentration of power, we should be worried about the lack of privacy and them being exempt, which you’re not exempt. [The Times] can’t write something you know to be false and be exempt from being sued. But he can. The idea that it’s a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says that online platforms aren’t held liable for things their users post on them, with some exceptions. In July, The Times’s Sarah Jeong weighed in on proposed updates to Section 230, arguing that “we should reopen the debate on C.D.A. 230 only because so much of the internet has changed,” but “the discourse will be improved if we all take a moment to actually read the text of C.D.A. 230.”
CW: That’s a pretty foundational laws of the modern internet.

That’s right. Exactly right. And it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy. You guys still have editors. I’m sitting with them. Not a joke. There is no editorial impact at all on Facebook. None. None whatsoever. It’s irresponsible. It’s totally irresponsible.

CW: If there’s proven harm that Facebook has done, should someone like Mark Zuckerberg be submitted to criminal penalties, perhaps?

He should be submitted to civil liability and his company to civil liability, just like you would be here at The New York Times. Whether he engaged in something and amounted to collusion that in fact caused harm that would in fact be equal to a criminal offense, that’s a different issue. That’s possible. That’s possible it could happen. Zuckerberg finally took down those ads that Russia was running. All those bots about me. They’re no longer being run. He was getting paid a lot of money to put them up. I learned three things. Number one, Putin doesn’t want me to be president. Number two, Kim Jong-un thinks I should be beaten to death like a rabid dog and three, this president of the United States is spending millions of dollars to try to keep me from being the nominee. I wonder why.