Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon


Panel 1: Everyone is different when it comes to the pleasure aspect of sex. One girl may go absolutely wild when you play with her tits while another may freak the fuck out. Stick to the basics and let people find out what they specifically like outside the classroom with appropriate people (not you Billy!)
Panel 2: I've never had a sex ed class that does that. Stop lying Billy.
Panel 3: Wash your dick Billy. Also keeping teen pregnancy down is a good thing. Teaching about correct protection is probably the primary reason for sex ed.
Panel 4: See my second point for Panel 3. Hardly anyone cares about tranny shit despite what Twatter says.
 
Panel 1: Everyone is different when it comes to the pleasure aspect of sex. One girl may go absolutely wild when you play with her tits while another may freak the fuck out. Stick to the basics and let people find out what they specifically like outside the classroom with appropriate people (not you Billy!)
Panel 2: I've never had a sex ed class that does that. Stop lying Billy.
Panel 3: Wash your dick Billy. Also keeping teen pregnancy down is a good thing. Teaching about correct protection is probably the primary reason for sex ed.
Panel 4: See my second point for Panel 3. Hardly anyone cares about tranny shit despite what Twatter says.

Panel 3: The potential for infections in the private parts is not a laughing matter. So yes, emphasizing the need for cleanliness is absolutely imperative.
 

I'm both confused and horrified at what her ideal sex ed class would be. She wants public schools to use tax dollars to...make children better at sex? Then have the teacher sperg about LGBT stuff? Why? What does that accomplish? The whole point of sex ed is supposed to be to protect them from teen pregnancies (presumably the "heternomative" part since this is more common) and STDS. The argument is that high school kids are going to get involved with that anyway and not teaching them about protection could lead to either and ruin their life. Why would the state need, want, or should even consider teaching children how to perform pleasurable gay sex? Am I entirely misreading the argument? It seems encouraging sexual activity would entirely defeat the point and get more STDS and teen pregnancies.

And why is Ciel moving his fingers like that in Panel 3?
 
Yeah I agree with all these points, why are these bad things Sophie? The aim is to reduce teen pregnancies and teen STDs not encourage them. With how at risk gays are for HIV, having an even younger populous start to get frisky when they’re underaged would just worsen the problem. Casual hookup culture needs to die in a fire
 
1606945365251.png

 
Ok, what the fuck is going on here?
Page comes out as a straight white manlet, and everyone and their dog in the media is going ape to outdo each other congratulating her.
Is this what an astroturf is? I’m confused.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Page pulls a Chase Ross and just self ascribes as ‘queer’ instead of straight
 
Lol by saying in panel 2 that sexual and romantic attraction are different, he's pushing the Split Attraction Model. It's used in some conversion therapy to tell gay people that their homosexuality is actually purely about sex, and they should be happy with a "romantic" (read: platonic) relationship with a best friend of the opposite sex.
Sexual and romantic attraction are the same damn thing, there's just also people's own personalities and boundaries and levels of commitment on top of them that make them more complicated. Best to teach kids that it's normal to have sexual attractions and relationships once they're old enough, but they also have the right to say no to anything and everything, and mustn't pressure anyone else into sexual acts.

I think in panel 3 Sandrat is wagging his finger, to say "nuh-uh-uh, don't do it kids". Which isn't the worst message if they also get the information they need about protection from STD and pregnancy.
 
1: They skip over the fact that sex feels good because kids of the age to be in sex ed have usually already figured out that touching your nono square in particular ways feels good. You're fighting for the attention of teenagers here.

2: Up until your brood crawled into the limelight in the last 10-15 years, that's how sex was viewed by the average world citizen. The main purpose of this was to keep every proto-Attilla the Hun from clubbing rivals over the head and hogging the gene pool. This was also to keep humans from over-breeding but religious doctrine made a loophole for that.

3: How dare they reduce a class aimed at teenagers to just dry information about the consequences of unprotected sex? They don't need to know there are STIs that can rot your junk off slowly, or spread to your brain and boil it in its own juices, or about AIDS (technically HIV), an auto-immune disease a portion of the gay community still actively spreads amongst each other like a badge of honor. The teacher could be a jerk and show off blue waffle infection pics or videos of late term syphilis patients screaming at the walls.

4: Okay, look. I understand the desire to feel special but this argument has always been stupid. You are arguing against not science but biology, against the meat vessel you inhabit. You are a member of house Mammalia. You have either genital set A or B. You can do whatever you want to said genitals after you get them but that does not mean the rest of your body isn't hardwired down to the literal cellular level to have those genitals. The fact that your attention starved brain thinks you're some uwu gender special doesn't not affect your physiology.
With every one of these comics, it becomes more apparent Billie just wants to have a sex workshop with kids rather than actually educate them, which is horrifying at best.
 
Back