Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[draggs]

most people say bi-cuz
also bi = bee (bad spelling).
very few people say be-cause

Stop soiling the white man's language with your negroid disabilities then projecting them onto everyone else.

 

[Stardust]

most people say bi-cuz
also bi = bee (bad spelling).
very few people say be-cause

Bee the way, stop bi-ing a faggot.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Bee the way, stop bi-ing a faggot.

baɪ ðə weɪ, stɑp ˈbiɪŋ ə ˈfægət

 

[Sped Xing]

PIE was the indigenous language of the PIE. I think Proto Germanic, Proto Slavic, Sanskrit etc. were likely hybrids of PIE + remnants of the indigenous language of the local ethnic group.
Point is replacing words in your language cripples your ability to think.

I think folkkind is better than mankind because there is also womankind.

Are you a young Earth creationist or something, that you think Proto Indo European just appeared fully formed?

If you knew anything about the history of the English language, you'd know that "man" meant "human." "Male human" was "Carl."

 

[Fromtheblackdepths]

So if this site is kill where will our lord and whiteness Boxershorts47 go?

 

[Narc]

Racism isn't real.

You claim to be here to debate, yet you begin your response with a reiteration of the premiss which I have challenged. In fact, you have merely re-summarized the article I had brought up, sandwiching a few descriptive sentences between your claims.

It's a made-up social construct that didn't exist from the beginning of humanity until ~1900.

Denying the validity or utility of a social construct is one thing, but asserting that it has no ontic priority or function whatsoever requires a lot of strongarming existing historical evidence. You can claim that 'culture,' 'borders,' and 'primary characteristics' are all that there are to complaints about race, but then there are also those circumstances in which value judgments on cultures, borders, and phenotypes are themselves determined due to existing preference of one race over another.

When you're taught "racism" by the white liberal k-12 educational system, you learn slavery, kkk, nazi's holocaust, civil rights, and all these terms like bigotry, prejudice, discrimination, etc. and racism is framed as the ultimate evil. it seems to be real and make sense because of the childhood indoctrination but when you stop to think about racism and you start to see it used in context, you realize that racism doesn't make any sense.

You're talking with yourself here, I see no productive argument being made. Ideologically, in education but also in historical and literary narratives across the world, including sci fi and fantasy, racism is not framed as the ultimate evil any more than class, war, or xenophobia.

Whites are "racist" because we don't want to live with blacks vs Hispanics are good guys because their protecting their community from gentrification. What? Once you do all the crunching and analysis, you realize the obvious truth, racism is just anything that offends non-whites.

Boxy's attitude on race:
(i) racism as a concept was invented by anti-racists
(ii) anti-racists are anti-white
(iii) therefore the use of the concept racism is anti-white
You will need a word other than "anti-racist" to describe anyone with an anti-white agenda. You even are describing the white education system as anti-racist, therefore anti-white. Why would whites uniquely hate their own race if they were anti-racist?

Racism is used as a political weapon to force open borders (desegregation) on white people. Obviously the result of that white is genocide. But this is totally contradictory because the entire moral argument of the liberals is they're enacting anti-racism to prevent genocide, yet this concept requires the genocide of whites and then all other races into a brown melting pot. So racism is "fake and gay." It's not real. It's just liberals hating white people because they want a border.

Brown melting pot, fake and gay, got it, you ever-ripening Funyun cruncher. Good luck finding a suitable partner in any case.

Technically, interracial marriage and so on do not qualify as genocide. Genocide involves a population's experimentation, exploitation, and confinement. You seem to think that it requires strong borders in order to be prevented, but history shows equally often that strong borders are a minimum condition for genocide to be effected.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

You claim to be here to debate, yet you begin your response with a reiteration of the premiss which I have challenged. In fact, you have merely re-summarized the article I had brought up, sandwiching a few descriptive sentences between your claims.

Denying the validity or utility of a social construct is one thing, but asserting that it has no ontic priority or function whatsoever requires a lot of strongarming existing historical evidence. You can claim that 'culture,' 'borders,' and 'primary characteristics' are all that there are to complaints about race, but then there are also those circumstances in which value judgments on cultures, borders, and phenotypes are themselves determined due to existing preference of one race over another.

You're talking with yourself here, I see no productive argument being made. Ideologically, in education but also in historical and literary narratives across the world, including sci fi and fantasy, racism is not framed as the ultimate evil any more than class, war, or xenophobia.

Boxy's attitude on race:
(i) racism as a concept was invented by anti-racists
(ii) anti-racists are anti-white
(iii) therefore the use of the concept racism is anti-white
You will need a word other than "anti-racist" to describe anyone with an anti-white agenda. You even are describing the white education system as anti-racist, therefore anti-white. Why would whites uniquely hate their own race if they were anti-racist?

Brown melting pot, fake and gay, got it, you ever-ripening Funyun cruncher. Good luck finding a suitable partner in any case.

Technically, interracial marriage and so on do not qualify as genocide. Genocide involves a population's experimentation, exploitation, and confinement. You seem to think that it requires strong borders in order to be prevented, but history shows equally often that strong borders are a minimum condition for genocide to be effected.

Okay you're an open borders freak (aka anti-racist) and you don't care if the white race goes extinct through race mixing and if all whiteness is destroyed. Got it.

So if this site is kill where will our lord and whiteness Boxershorts47 go?

back to pol.

 

[Narc]

Okay you're an open borders freak (aka anti-racist) and you don't care if the white race goes extinct through race mixing and if all whiteness is destroyed. Got it.

Good luck deducing that from my statements. That's an inference. All races go extinct. I'm not interested in arguments on welfare, just trying to sharpen your skills because you're a penniless k-12er.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Good luck deducing that from my statements. That's an inference. All races go extinct. I'm not interested in arguments on welfare, just trying to sharpen your skills because you're a penniless k-12er.

Do you support the right of white people to have a border? to say, "sorry this space is whites-only."

 

[Narc]

Do you support the right of white people to have a border? to say, "sorry this space is whites-only."

I don't need to, it already exists as a capacity independent of any abstractions about justification, and as a white person, I myself have no interest or reason to be whining about that sort of thing being the missing element that's separating me from what I can do in life.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

So if this site is kill where will our lord and whiteness Boxershorts47 go?

To the nearest playground, to snare himself a tradchildwife, probably.

. . .
2. makes language hard to pronounce. why do english speakers "slur" so many words? because (bicuz) it's very difficult to pronounce
3. ruins the root system of the language which cripples your ability to create new words and understand the meaning of words by context. sense and sensational and sensitivity all have completely different meanings despite having the same root (sense).

Only if you're as dumb as you are, you feckless Slav-mutt. @BallSucker47, if you actually want to know how this works;

Spoiler: It's really simple:

you subhuman baboon. You literal nigger.

How dare you speak, you swarthy jungle monkey. How dare you open your big lipped, rim encrusted, menthol cigarette smelling mouth?

You are human trash, Diego Tyrone LeShawn de Maradona. Universally despised, derided and mocked. Your nationality and skin tone offers no hope to the world that South America can ever prosper. Crawl back in to the Brazilian jungle you came out of, you literal orangutan.

I hope you decide to sail your grandfathers skip to the Falklands and rape some sheep, as is in the negroes nature. It would still be the whitest pussy you ever had. Give Nigel and Robert a chance for some target practice, your sole use to the world. Argentinians obsession with a few windswept islands in the Atlantic is hilarious but sad. Coincidentally its the only worthwhile contribution Argentina has made to the medical field. The MUH LAS MALVINAS sentiment in the average negro Argentinian is both an early warning sign of autism in children, and early on set Alzheimer's in adults.

Take your black hairy fingers off your keyboard, and never talk about the human species again, you mockery of our supposed shared ancestor.. No amount of olive oil and wheat flour slabbed on your face every morning will make you white. It's about as delusional of an idea as your daydreams of European heritage.

You nigger.

You make Bolivia look like a beacon of civilisation.

You are the Baltimore of South America.

Go fertilise the pampas with you and your families corpses, its the best you can hope for in life. For the first time in your life, nigger, you have a job making food for beings vastly superior to yourself. Uruguayan cattle. Coincidentally, it would be the first time an Argentinian "man" provided for a family.

Die, Diego. No one would miss you. Except for Australian Aboriginals, who now would have no one to make them look good.

 

[Just A Butt]

back to pol.

If 230 goes down, what makes you think there will even be a /pol/ to go back to, you idiot.

 

[KittyGremlin]

why is your profile pic so autistic?

 

[BoxerShorts47]

why is your profile pic so autistic?

mods are trolling me.

If 230 goes down, what makes you think there will even be a /pol/ to go back to, you idiot.

then I go IRL.
to be honest, at this point keyboard warrioring isn't helping the movement.
We gotta go IRL even if that means confronting ANTIFA.

 

[Fromtheblackdepths]

why is your profile pic so autistic?

Jannies changed it because he called Sailor Moon a degenerate.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

I don't need to, it already exists as a capacity independent of any abstractions about justification,

Yes or No. Do you support the right of white people to have borders?

and as a white person, I myself have no interest or reason to be whining about that sort of thing being the missing element that's separating me from what I can do in life.

You're not white if you don't speak with a white voice.

 

[Narc]

Yes or No. Do you support the right of white people to have borders?

Requesting power level, only possible reason is @BoxerShorts47's preemptive attempt at an Ad hominem argument, please let me point out the sopping wet holes in your grade-level argumentation without requesting me to speak on behalf of a white nationalist platform or agenda.

 

[draggs]

mods are trolling me.


then I go IRL.
to be honest, at this point keyboard warrioring isn't helping the movement.
We gotta go IRL even if that means confronting ANTIFA.

oh so the only thing stopping you from saving huwhites from genociding commies is...

section 230?

you retarded nignag

 

[Narc]

You're not white if you don't speak with a white voice.

Speaking with a white voice doesn't make you white @BoxerShorts47

When all my intelligent white friends finally get together and establish our paradisic ethnostate, you're not invited

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Requesting power level, only possible reason is @BoxerShorts47's preemptive attempt at an Ad hominem argument, please let me point out the sopping wet holes in your grade-level argumentation without requesting me to speak on behalf of a white nationalist platform or agenda.

ad hominium isn't a fallacy when character matters, when motives matter, when a person has a bias/prejudice or w/e.

Simple question.
Yes or No.
Do you support the right of white people to have a border?

Speaking with a white voice doesn't make you white @BoxerShorts47

When all my intelligent white friends finally get together and establish our paradisic ethnostate, you're not invited

So you support the ethnostate and you believe whites have a right to forcibly deport even the good legal immigrant?