Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

Mentioned this to some people and they think it's warranted because Twitter and Facebook will suffer. Hm, call me crazy but repealing 230 just to go after Twitter sounds, I don't know, retarded?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MarineTrainedTard
MarineTrainedTard said:
Literally destroying the internet and free speech to own the libs
Click to expand...
It'll just force the internet to evolve into something even more nebulous for boomers. I'm sure there's already sites only accessible through the onion network. A more sane approach would be to at least threaten to break up twitter, facebook, and google but we talking about a couple hundred propped up corpses who thought "a series of tubes" was an apt description for the internet and probably still don't understand why the phrase continues to be reviled.
Edit: I braced myself and watched the video all the way through: Aww, the dressed-up back alley coke whore interrupted grandpa Guliani's reading time. Seriously, a state court room isn't a really nice Maury show set, you sentient jizz rag; you're there to say yes or no, not give your running commentary.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: B’Elanna and Norman B. Normal
eternal dog mongler said:
It wouldn't affect Big Tech because they actively moderate shit. Calls for violence are already banned on Reddit and Twitter and they actively shut down communities and accounts that might lead to problems. That's basically what you need to do in order to not be found negligent. For example there's a gigantic amount of child porn that gets spammed on large Facebook groups but they never get in trouble for it because they have policies against it and it's removed as soon as they find it.

Parler? KF? Yeah it won't end well.
Click to expand...
Right direction but the wrong degree. Even with 230 protections in place, you're supposed to as an admin work with authorities to remove shit like cp or threats of violence. You've got:
(3) State law
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. No cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.
Click to expand...
and
(5) No effect on sex trafficking law
Nothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit—
(A)
any claim in a civil action brought under section 1595 of title 18, if the conduct underlying the claim constitutes a violation of section 1591 of that title;

(B)
any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 1591 of title 18; or

(C)
any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 2421A of title 18, and promotion or facilitation of prostitution is illegal in the jurisdiction where the defendant’s promotion or facilitation of prostitution was targeted.
Click to expand...
Doesn't mean that they'll always shut you down for infringements, but broadly, you can expect to catch heat if you just host a spot where people engage in explicitly prohibited behavior and your response is "lol i don't curate that shit". As well, there's this:
(2) Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—
(A)
any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected;
Click to expand...
So Facebook and Twitter are at least ostensibly able to argue that their removal of content does not violate that clause of 230.

It isn't just that facebook/twitter have policies to moderate - it's that they have the throughput to moderate targeted barrages, and they have the legal chops to deal with legal challenges from megacorps and crazy individuals with cash to burn sent their way. They've also clearly been buttering up and performing for washington in the hopes of courting the incoming Biden admin, with the hopes of getting to carve out special little exceptions for themselves.

What the Trump team broadly should be doing is clarifying the language of "otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected;" given that this is what Twitter's going to use as an excuse for its nuking of the Post story. Big Tech has to argue not only that "election disinformation" qualifies as "objectionable," but that their particular interpretation of what is and what is not "election disinformation" qualifies as objectionable. They can more than likely do this.

But rather than just defining that particular clause, orange moron wants to... make big tech virtually impossible to oppose as smaller startups fall under litigation for comments sections? He's not good with computers, that one.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛ and AmateurComedicTaxidermist
The Whore of Babylon said:
step aside, libs. trumps Expert legal strike team is unleashing their Kraken to definitively restore REAL democracy and #stopthesteal. The radical left is FINISHED


View attachment 1765248
Click to expand...

Huh, I guess Sweet Dee from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia is "practicing" law (while extremely drunk, of course)

EDIT: Oh, blitzed lady is a witness, not a lawyer and is basically incoherent. You can even see Rudy trying to get her to simmer down fucking LMAO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dead Mime, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and big ups liquid richard
John Titor said:
Mentioned this to some people and they think it's warranted because Twitter and Facebook will suffer. Hm, call me crazy but repealing 230 just to go after Twitter sounds, I don't know, retarded?
Click to expand...

These fucking spergs cheering and hollering like apes over the idea that 230 getting repealed will be sticking it to Twitter and Facebook don’t seem to understand that multi billion dollar tech giants like them will be the only ones left unaffected. All they have to do is invest more in to hyper-censoring everything like they always do, and all their precious little “alt media” sites like Gab and Parler all of a sudden become completely unsustainable without adhering to the exact same overbearing censorship that twitter and Facebook will be doing. Combine that with the lack of net neutrality and now you have a perfect system for complete corporate domination of online information. Anything America based becomes liable for everything it’s users post no matter what it is or who it’s from, anything based outside the US’ jurisdiction and ISPs can be pressured to slow all connections to and from them to a crawl. Trump is a massive fucking retard that has no idea how the internet works, and so is everybody cheering him on with this.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Draza, cheese shaped mouse, Dead Mime and 12 others
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Dead Mime, Pointless Pedant, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 2 others
JaneThough said:
JFC I thought this was some kind of comedy sketch until Rudy popped in. This drunk loon is their smoking gun?
Click to expand...
She's the Kraken. Of course, she slurred her words when she was talking to Rudy and Powell; what she said was "I'll testify for some Kraken (the rum)"
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dead Mime, ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛, big ups liquid richard and 1 other person
The Whore of Babylon said:
step aside, libs. trumps Expert legal strike team is unleashing their Kraken to definitively restore REAL democracy and #stopthesteal. The radical left is FINISHED


View attachment 1765248
Click to expand...
I had to check the source tweet to make sure this wasn't some SNL or some other comedy show sketch. The testimony just sounded like something out of a comedy skit to make fun of the real testimony. But no, this is part of the real testimony.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Dead Mime, Pointless Pedant, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 2 others
Zeke Von Genbu said:
I had to check the source tweet to make sure this wasn't some SNL or some other comedy show sketch. The testimony just sounded like something out of a comedy skit to make fun of the real testimony. But no, this is part of the real testimony.
Click to expand...
I’ve been waiting all day for this to get milked. That chick is %100 white girl drunk. Unless she’s literally fighting through a stroke, there’s no other way to call it. Remember she was much more coherent back when she did Lou dobbs:

this legal strike force they assembled is getting more absurd with every passing week, that the real conspiracy theory the Qs should be running with is “Is Giuliani a Demonrat plant hired by Killery to torpedo Trump from the inside?!?”, because that shit might actually have some legs.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rich Evans Apologist, MarineTrainedTard and AmateurComedicTaxidermist
Hiring a lawyer is totes an admission of guilt.

ducey.png

Insanity certainly isn't filing 30+ lawsuits and losing every one of them.

insanity.png
 
  • DRINK!
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
Reactions: Dead Mime, Borrisokeane, José Mourinho and 1 other person
Mason Verger said:
this legal strike force they assembled is getting more absurd with every passing week, that the real conspiracy theory the Qs should be running with is “Is Giuliani a Demonrat plant hired by Killery to torpedo Trump from the inside?!?”, because that shit might actually have some legs.
Click to expand...

Too bad the reality is much more boring. The Plan is all a grift to bilk gullible right-wingers out of their money. It keeps rolling in, so why stop?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MarineTrainedTard
eternal dog mongler said:
Too bad the reality is much more boring. The Plan is all a grift to bilk gullible right-wingers out of their money. It keeps rolling in, so why stop?
Click to expand...
Cmon now, they can win it back in the new Trump casinos he’ll build with the legal defense funds. It’s honestly impressive. The whole caper has got a Hans Gruber vibe to it that I just can’t help but respect:
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Dead Mime, Borrisokeane, José Mourinho and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back