Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
When living an authentic life means lying to everyone around you...
they already have basic human rights. last i checked we all do. there's no clause against anyone in them. It's literally "rights for all humans".
I think in the US, there is a legit cause for them to rally around - as I understand it, you can be fired from your job and denied housing if trans (or gay, for that matter) in a lot of states, but instead of rallying around those obvious injustices, it's all "we want to pee in the laydeeees!".
 
ohno.png


Were his legs hairy tho? the real question. And did he stop constantly to pull them up?
 
Some tranny on 4chans /lgbt/ thought it be a great idea to post pictures of themselves after being stabbed by another tranny, few posts in the one stabbed is exposed as being a massive groomer.
Not really that funny outside of this.

EoXicSeVEAAhy-I.jpg
 
Some tranny on 4chans /lgbt/ thought it be a great idea to post pictures of themselves after being stabbed by another tranny, few posts in the one stabbed is exposed as being a massive groomer.
Not really that funny outside of this.

View attachment 1765918
The video has a perfect summary of events. "A man stabbed another man".
I wonder if they're going to take it down to avoid being labelled transphobic?
 
View attachment 1765915

Were his legs hairy tho? the real question. And did he stop constantly to pull them up?
This reminds me of the saddest troon I've seen in real life. At least I think it was a troon, because how can you tell when they're not even trying?

I think I saw, or at least recognised, my first low effort troon this summer. From the waist up he looked like a regular dude. Gangly teenager, shoulder length fried blonde hair, beard shadow, hoodie. Aaand then there's the black skirt and striped thigh highs. Also boring white sneakers, just to complete the mental image.

It's like he had short brown mens hair, and then like ten inches of fried blonde frizz. Was it just insanely long root growth or was it supposed to be a shitty ombré? Your guess is as good as mine. It was so frizzy more of it was going outwards than downwards. I considered the poor guy might have textured hair and not know how to take care of it, but the brown part was straight and flat. It still looked so distinctly masculine it's unbelievable, like any stereotypical 90s stoner, skater, surfer dude or whatever.

I didn’t get a good look at his face, but I didn't detect any makeup, he just looked like a regular dude. Except for the little black skirt peeking from under the absolutely giant loose hoodie. I nearly gave him a pass for just being a dude that likes rocking skirts like that guy from queer eye, but I just can’t excuse the programmer socks.

Sorry for no picture, but I chose my username for a reason. Laughing at public pictures people willingly post on the internet is different than violating someones privacy while they're just minding their own business. If he had caused a scene in public all bets would be off, but he just ordered his food, sat down staring at his phone and left with his food, no real trooning out action. He just looked sad.
 
Lovingly stolen from a thread on Saidit’s Gendercritical.

According to the website Global Market Insight, the sex reassignment surgery market size will exceed $1.5 Bn by 2026. It’s cold, and perversely clinical reading. Here we go;
"Sex Reassignment Surgery Market size was more than USD 316 million in 2019 and will witness 25.1% CAGR during 2020 to 2026. Increasing awareness related to transgender problems, availability and accessibility to gender reassignment surgical centers are some of the significant factors augmenting the sex reassignment surgery industry growth. Also, inclination of patients towards changing sex as well as increasing number of gender reassignment surgeries are some of the factors driving the market growth."
sex-reassignment-surgery-market.png

shite.png

There’s a lot more data on how to make money off children, and young people on that site;
https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/sex-reassignment-surgery-market

I particularly liked this comment from the GC tread;
“If you look at the details of the report, the big increase in sex reassignment surgeries that's occurring and is predicted to continue at even higher rates is in surgeries that don't involve the genitals. "Sex reassignment surgery" and "gender confirmation surgeries" nowadays is a broad category that for females mainly means double mastectomies, and for males mainly means a host of cosmetic surgeries above the waist, such as facial feminization surgery, chest augmentation with implanted sacs of gel or fluid to mimic the appearance of adult female breasts, tracheal shaves and the like.* Only a minority of these surgeries are on the genitals.

*For males today, "gender affirming medical care" also commonly includes involve facial hair removal, contouring of the upper front teeth to change the shape of the upper lip to make it appear "more feminine," and lip fillers and butt and hip injections. Although some of these procedures are done by practitioners who also perform surgeries, they themselves are not surgeries. But the language is changing: the nomenclature that's becoming increasingly popular is "gender affirming/confirmation/sex change care/treatment/procedures."

The sleight of hand is intentional: the gender cultists want to use terms they know the general public will assume refer to genital surgeries when in reality they are talking about double mastectomies and cosmetic procedures to pretty up men so they can better pose as the opposite sex.”
 
I particularly liked this comment from the GC tread;
“If you look at the details of the report, the big increase in sex reassignment surgeries that's occurring and is predicted to continue at even higher rates is in surgeries that don't involve the genitals. "Sex reassignment surgery" and "gender confirmation surgeries" nowadays is a broad category that for females mainly means double mastectomies, and for males mainly means a host of cosmetic surgeries above the waist, such as facial feminization surgery, chest augmentation with implanted sacs of gel or fluid to mimic the appearance of adult female breasts, tracheal shaves and the like.* Only a minority of these surgeries are on the genitals.

*For males today, "gender affirming medical care" also commonly includes involve facial hair removal, contouring of the upper front teeth to change the shape of the upper lip to make it appear "more feminine," and lip fillers and butt and hip injections. Although some of these procedures are done by practitioners who also perform surgeries, they themselves are not surgeries. But the language is changing: the nomenclature that's becoming increasingly popular is "gender affirming/confirmation/sex change care/treatment/procedures."

The sleight of hand is intentional: the gender cultists want to use terms they know the general public will assume refer to genital surgeries when in reality they are talking about double mastectomies and cosmetic procedures to pretty up men so they can better pose as the opposite sex.”

I used to lurk GC before it was banned from Reddit and I recognise that commenter is a bit of an inflexible and pedantic killjoy, who seems to think that there is only one correct way to view feminism and trans issue. Well, she wasn't wrong, but did she implied that if those stats are dick-chops it would be better for out society or something? I'd just say that the whole radfem community is a cow pasture on its own.

Regardless if most of the surgeries performed aren't genital works, these procedures are a lucrative business and in a certain view, destructive. In fact even if the article was titled differently I wouldn't see troons or GRS doctors in a better or worse light. They're still profiting off duping people into quack medicine regardless.
 
Last edited:
but did she implied that if those stats are dick-chops it would be better for out society or something?

I think what she's getting at is that these surgeries are being marketed as a medical necessity when, at least for the males, these are cosmetic surgeries. And in the context of a national healthcare system, that means normies are paying for someone else's plastic surgery while their own wouldn't be covered.
 
I used to lurk GC before it was banned from Reddit and I recognise that commenter is a bit of an inflexible and pedantic killjoy, who seems to think that there is only one correct way to view feminism and trans issue. Well, she wasn't wrong, but did she implied that if those stats are dick-chops it would be better for out society or something? I'd just say that the whole radfem community is a cow pasture on its own.

Regardless if most of the surgeries performed aren't genital works, these procedures are a lucrative business and in a certain view, destructive. In fact even if the article was titled differently I wouldn't see troons or GRS doctors in a better or worse light. They're still profiting off duping people into quack medicine regardless.
Consistently we've seen that society at large assumes that trannies have gotten the chop and are therefore, even if they aren't actually women, serious enough to make real sacrifices in the name of being seen as women. If you didn't know the truth about troons wouldn't it sound insane for someone to claim that a man had had his genitals surgically removed so that he could prey on women? That's what a lot of people are seeing when they see the bathroom debate, that's the reason that they've been able to make real gains in the culture war. If people realized that most of the time they just get breast implants or other relatively minor cosmetic surgery (or less) then they'd be a lot less sympathetic.
 
Well, she wasn't wrong, but did she implied that if those stats are dick-chops it would be better for out society or something?
Two things:
1. The public by and large still thinks troon == extra gay and "transwoman" == dick chop, therefore "transwomen" are safe and can be allowed into women's restrooms.
2. Normal people don't want to mutilate their dicks or tits any more than healthy people want chemo, and they tend to not question why the money goes where it does. Once they're made aware that troons are getting free boob jobs, hair removals, hair transplants, face beautifications, and genital mutilation isn't actually a requirement, they'll want in on this. Why doesn't an ex-hambeast get free skin removal? Why doesn't a balding man get free hair plugs?
 
What's I don't get do whatsover regarding Trans right is that what is the benefits to our society to give them free pass on everything? In the way other identies in liberal activism don't get to the same extent, not LGB and not racial minorities.

Yeah, the amount of cover that they get for all their shitty behavior is insane. Nobody on the left ever says "well it's okay for black men to leave their children, that's part of their culture."

But if a troon comes out as a true lady as part of a mid-life crisis and abandons his family then people are falling all over themselves to excuse his behavior.
 
Based JKR-
View attachment 1766251View attachment 1766253
https://twitter.com/Emmy_Zje/status/1334303654195687425 (Archive)

>"Also worth noting that JKR isn’t an expert in science, biology, trans healthcare, trans children, or anything related to any of it.".

I wonder if Jimmy would bring this up if JRK agreed with him on troon shit.

LMAO troons & BLM don't deserve a single cent from JK.

Also I love how he thinks JK influenced the court decision.

"Damn you, JK Terfling and your transphobic biological sex propaganda!!11 It's only because of you the court ruled that minors can't consent to harmful drugs & sterilization!1 Traaaaaansphoooobiaaaaaaa!!!!11"
 
Look, if I wanted to fuck something that looks like a pastrami sandwich I’d get drunk and try to cook again. And as for the lesbeings out there, is this in any way different than some dude saying “you just haven’t good dick yet”?
“Boypussy” is not real, “girldick” is not real, and whomever someone is attracted to is between them and whatever god they hold.
Overall, I feel bad for the women who have to put up with this nonsense. At least the gays seem to hold their own well enough. But women, it looks like shits getting weirder and weirder for them.
 
Back