2020-12-03 - FBI inquiry into post threatening political violence

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone should point out @Null hypocrisy for encouraging the ban of SIG while proclaiming this very statement on twitter. Or at least saying he wants to own a gun so he can kill bankers.
There is a very, very big difference between "we should kill the bankers" and "we should eat the rich" versus "I AM GOING TO 1800 BANKER AVENUE NEXT WEEK TO KILL BANKERS".

I'm about to just ban you to get rid of you. You're very clearly an active threat, an unhinged person, and someone who is going to harm my community by continuing to be here. What do I gain from tolerating your violent mindset? Nothing.
 
He should explain why he is not turning himself into the FBI, if he also thinks SIG should not be allowed to speak his mind on a similar topic
Do you really need someone to explain that to you?
I disagree with Null's choice. I don't think you should compromise for feds.
But I'm not a fuckin dumbasss.

1. It's his fuckin website, he gets a say, you don't
2. It makes perfect logical sense
and someone who is going to harm my community by continuing to be here. What do I gain from tolerating your violent mindset? Nothing.
Yeah I can find literally no fault in this reasoning. Self preservation is perfectly rational.
 
There is a very, very big difference between "we should kill the bankers" and "we should eat the rich" versus "I AM GOING TO 1800 BANKER AVENUE NEXT WEEK TO KILL BANKERS".

I'm about to just ban you to get rid of you. You're very clearly an active threat, an unhinged person, and someone who is going to harm my community by continuing to be here. What do I gain from tolerating your violent mindset? Nothing.
>Makes thread about banning glowposts to attract more glowposters to ban.
And they say Trump plays 4D chess.
 
Do you really need someone to explain that to you?
I disagree with Null's choice. I don't think you should compromise for feds.
But I'm not a fuckin dumbasss.

1. It's his fuckin website, he gets a say, you don't
2. It makes perfect logical sense
I am no trying to stage a coup against his website. It is his. I am trying to make him defend his position.
 
@Eris! and @Distant Stare -- you both are unironically going to get the Feds on your backs if you keep it up.
"You really should get in line before big brother harasses you for opposing them on an online gossip forum"

This only proves my point.
I just assume they already are.
Everyone is already a target. The NSA watches all of us. They just pick the tallest person in the crowd to set an example every few months.
 
I am no trying to stage a coup against his website. It is his. I am trying to make him defend his position.
???? There is nothing to defend here. He wants to continue running his website if possible; He already announced free speech is fucked long term. He has, several times, announced that getting the feds on his ass is his "redline" for how far he is willing to go to keep this place running.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back