2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Reisen Storm]

Wha...?

...You know, I'm wondering if this is really signs of Trump "planning something," or if it's just a sign that he just doesn't give a fuck and is letting the craziest motherfuckers he can find run a round and cause havoc in important offices for a month and a half.

Apparently, an American Intelligence Officer is either dead or has gone MIA. Gina Haspel, and it has something to do with the U.S Army raiding Germany

 

[HumanHive]

This method needs only one republican Senator and congressman to do, it's definitely plausible but considering how cucked the GOP is, I doubt this will go well.

Oh, it’s definitely not going to work.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Apparently, an American Intelligence Officer is either dead or has gone MIA. Gina Haspel, and it has something to do with the U.S Army raiding Germany

So it's bullshit

In related 'news' "Dems fell right into Trump's trap, triggering national defense cyber warfare
authority for military tribunals, mass arrests and charges of TREASON"

 

[It's HK-47]

http://www.pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/12.04.20%20Congress%20Election%202020.pdf

Was this brought up anywhere in the thread, yet? 76 Members of the Pennsylvania legislature signed a letter asking that Congress rejects PA's electors. They're citing violations of Article II, Section 1, Cl. 2, and positing that according to 3 U.S.C. §15, Congress has the power to, "reject electoral votes that are not ‘regularly given’ or ‘lawfully certified.’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College."

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

MacGregor has openly criticized the blood sacrifice of thousands of Americans and millions of Iraqis in the Iraq attack, but his appointment at this point is just a sop to try and draw those who were fans of the idea of America having an independent foreign policy back in.

Same sort of deal as the withdrawl of half the occupation troops from Afghanistan- meaningless to do this for 1 1/2 months.

In what world would this be necessary? Look at the CHAZ thing for example. If Trump had actually been intending to do anything about antifa, all it would have taken would be to roll in with engineering vehicles to clear barriers and infantry behind to neutralize anyone who resists, and the job would be done. If problems continued, the police had no trouble arresting a rioter or two. The problem was that they were a) arrested b) let go. So, don't do that.

Ok, but what happens if unarmed civilians are killed in the after math or the cities become a war zone due to commie spergs chimping out? People would have then been more upset that Trump overstepped instead of a "peaceful solution" or trying to take over state representatives potential actions.

In this case, Trump called their bluff and watched as they did nothing even with an open invitation putting the ball in their court as well as the blame.

Besides thost protestors were attacking police, why didn't police you know shoot them? Seems odd unless democrat representatives were telling them not to which would be a direct tie to proving the democrats were terrorist themselves. (IE: Aiding a terrorist makes you a ...)

 

[Reisen Storm]

http://www.pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/12.04.20%20Congress%20Election%202020.pdf

View attachment 1767736

Was this brought up anywhere in the thread, yet? 76 Members of the Pennsylvania legislature signed a letter asking that Congress rejects PA's electors. They're citing violations of Article II, Section 1, Cl. 2, and positing that according to 3 U.S.C. §15, Congress has the power to, "reject electoral votes that are not ‘regularly given’ or ‘lawfully certified.’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College."

I think it was mention here a few times, but since nothing really followed up on it, it was kinda ignored, if I remember correctly.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

I think it was mention here a few times, but since nothing really followed up on it, it was kinda ignored, if I remember correctly.

That and everyone keeps choking themselves on 311's bait, so it takes up 5 pages.

 

[make_it_so]

http://www.pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/12.04.20%20Congress%20Election%202020.pdf

View attachment 1767736

Was this brought up anywhere in the thread, yet? 76 Members of the Pennsylvania legislature signed a letter asking that Congress rejects PA's electors. They're citing violations of Article II, Section 1, Cl. 2, and positing that according to 3 U.S.C. §15, Congress has the power to, "reject electoral votes that are not ‘regularly given’ or ‘lawfully certified.’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College."

The thing is, Pelosi is sure as hell not going to acquiesce to this demand, and I doubt McConnell has the political will or capital to do so when he's probably focused on Georgia.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Ok, but what happens if unarmed civilians are killed in the after math or the cities become a war zone due to commie spergs chimping out? People would have then been more upset that Trump overstepped instead of a "peaceful solution" or trying to take over state representatives potential actions.

In this case, Trump called their bluff and watched as they did nothing even with an open invitation putting the ball in their court as well as the blame.

Besides thost protestors were attacking police, why didn't police you know shoot them? Seems odd unless democrat representatives were telling them not to which would be a direct tie to proving the democrats were terrorist themselves. (IE: Aiding a terrorist makes you a ...)

You're just coping over the fact that Trump watched riots destroy cities and did nothing.

He didn't take the appropriate actions required to suppress them, he didn't even have his FBI go after these people as he did with his supporters when they fought back against antifa. All he did was tweet "LAW AND ORDER" and say that he'd designate Antifa as a terrorist organization (totally meaningless in law, and totally unnecessary to unleash the IRS and FBI to persecute them).

And then the faggot lost to a senile old man, like the stupid fat bitch he is.

 

[LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]]

Is Trump winning yet?

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

You're just coping over the fact that Trump watched riots destroy cities and did nothing.

He didn't take the appropriate actions required to suppress them, he didn't even have his FBI go after these people as he did with his supporters when they fought back against antifa. All he did was tweet "LAW AND ORDER" and say that he'd designate Antifa as a terrorist organization (totally meaningless in law, and totally unnecessary to unleash the IRS and FBI to persecute them).

And then the faggot lost to a senile old man, like the stupid fat bitch he is.

Nah, just watching as Biden encouraged those same rioters destroy cities and then praised them just like Obama. I guess that's appropriate in your eyes, huh?

 

[Reisen Storm]

Is Trump winning yet?

At this point, I don't know. But fucking hell, I honestly think he's going to cross the Rubicon with the recent shit he's been doing.

 

[JambledUpWords]

At this point, I don't know. But fucking hell, I honestly think he's going to cross the Rubicon with the recent shit he's been doing.

One of the first things he did on November 4 was fire top brass from the Pentagon and then order troops back home. At least to me, this seems to have been his plan for a while.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Nah, just watching as Biden encouraged those same rioters destroy cities and then praised them just like Obama. I guess that's appropriate in your eyes, huh?

And yet those riots are going to end in Joe Biden's America, because Joe Biden is tougher on crime than Donald 'Kim and Kanye at the WH' Trump.

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

And yet those riots are going to end in Joe Biden's America, because Joe Biden is tougher on crime than Donald 'Kim and Kanye at the WH' Trump.

Doubt it. That would put him in direct conflict with BLM which within the democrat ranks would open its own can of worms, and in Antifa's case he might not like then but since he likes to cling to Obama's options so hard it's doubtful he'll do anything meaningful to them.. If he did, I'd be awed and humbled and that rarely happens.

 

[It's HK-47]

I think it was mention here a few times, but since nothing really followed up on it, it was kinda ignored, if I remember correctly.

I might be lagging behind a bit in the thread because I've largely tuned it out due to the hysterics, so I'm just sitting on my hands and waiting for everything to make its way up through the courts. People seem to be largely panicking due to the "safe harbour" dates, but even that's all but a formality that's actually been shuffled around before in the past, because the 8th and 14th deadlines in December actually have no Constitutional basis. Current Electoral deadlines are Federal statute, not Constitutional law, and they're somewhat recent, all things considered. The electors meeting and voting--and Congress tabulating their votes--has only been a Federal law since 1948.

The "safe harbour" on December 8th does not apply to states wherein violations of election laws occurred that could throw the vote into question. That letter up there in particular is drawing attention to violations of local election laws for Pennsylvania, and I don't believe that's an accident. Technically speaking, in the process of the election, the only Constitutionally set date that's mandated is the assumption of office on January 20th. Everything else can be shuffled around, because that's happened before in 1789, 1844, 1876, and 1932.

The 1876 election was an odd one, because the electoral vote was tabulated by Congress on the second Wednesday in February, so that one was a bit behind schedule but it was also a bit of a mess. The point more-so is that there's already precedent for changing or delaying the election's deadlines in the event of unclear or questionable results, or other extenuating circumstances.

I don't think his strategy was ever to try and win these fights at the local levels. The more that this goes on and the bigger the mess becomes, I'm starting to wonder if his legal team's goal in all of this is to make such a disasterous clusterfuck out of the whole ordeal that when it all gets thrown into the higher courts, they have to fall back on legal precedents and Constitutional tests, because this still isn't a normal election by any regard.

I know that everyone's resigned to this one way or the other, but I still consider most of this to be up in the air, and there's several reasons why I keep saying that I don't consider it over until someone concedes or someone's inaugurated. Everything else is such a mess and there's so many twists and turns left in the road that trying to pull a definitive out of it is almost ridiculous, especially if Biden decides to play with his dog again and winds up flying out of a damned window.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

The 1876 election was an odd one, because the electoral vote was tabulated by Congress on the second Wednesday in February, so that one was a bit behind schedule but it was also a bit of a mess. The point more-so is that there's already precedent for changing or delaying the election's deadlines in the event of unclear or questionable results, or other extenuating circumstances.

I don't think his strategy was ever to try and win these fights at the local levels. The more that this goes on and the bigger the mess becomes, I'm starting to wonder if his legal team's goal in all of this is to make such a disasterous clusterfuck out of the whole ordeal that when it all gets thrown into the higher courts, they have to fall back on legal precedents and Constitutional tests, because this still isn't a normal election by any regard.

I know that everyone's resigned to this one way or the other, but I still consider most of this to be up in the air, and there's several reasons why I keep saying that I don't consider it over until someone concedes or someone's inaugurated. Everything else is such a mess and there's so many twists and turns left in the road that trying to pull a definitive out of it is almost ridiculous, especially if Biden decides to play with his dog again and winds up flying out of a damned window.

Lol, if it's still 'up in the air', why has it been a full week since Trump's team lost badly at the Third Circuit in their PA federal lolsuit, and they still haven't appealed to the Supreme Court?

Are they waiting to file all their Supreme Court appeals at the same time?

 

[Psychic Espeon]

A moment of silence for the Doomsday thread:

 

[Prester John]

You're just coping over the fact that Trump watched riots destroy cities and did nothing.

He didn't take the appropriate actions required to suppress them, he didn't even have his FBI go after these people as he did with his supporters when they fought back against antifa. All he did was tweet "LAW AND ORDER" and say that he'd designate Antifa as a terrorist organization (totally meaningless in law, and totally unnecessary to unleash the IRS and FBI to persecute them).

And then the faggot lost to a senile old man, like the stupid fat bitch he is.

Why do you hate America?

 

[CrippleThreat]

Why do you hate America?

China and Iran haven't enslaved and/or destroyed us yet.