Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
If lawsuits over anything connected to electors aren't resolved (by the 8th for states and 14th for federal) the game changes. This will proceed to SCOTUS who will most probably kick the can over to House of Representatives to deal with.
Biden already has 270+ with the 45 states that have certified their elections. There's been 40+ pointless lawsuits and millions spent to uncover absolutely nothing. Biden isn't a great candidate but he's won.

If you're banking on SCOTUS coming to Trump's rescue, you're going to be disappointed. Even a conservative court is not going to throw out millions of votes on a whim because losing makes Trump feel bad.
 
Where did I state that? Nowhere. "This will proceed to SCOTUS who will most probably kick the can over to House of Representatives to deal with."
Biden has ill gotten and unearned votes. Libs want to now say oh it was just a little fraud here and there not to enough to change the election.
How adorable.
 

Attachments

  • 24.jpg
    24.jpg
    926 KB · Views: 61
Anyone else really curious to see how like, 20 years from now they are going to write about Trump's presidency? The tranny camps, stripping gays of marriage, putting mexican kids in cage for fun, being a literal dictator. How confusing is it going to be when they look and see he changed some tax stuff, built some of a barrier wall and really not much else. A very bland average presidency but all the articles and source shit they will read will paint the most insane evil president in US history.
 
Where did I state that? Nowhere. "This will proceed to SCOTUS who will most probably kick the can over to House of Representatives to deal with."
Biden has ill gotten and unearned votes. Libs want to now say oh it was just a little fraud here and there not to enough to change the election.
How adorable.
Didn't vote Trump either time. He has a lot that sucks about him. But Biden is an EVlL cheat who didn't get more than 55 million real votes.
Go back to pol where they agree with your retarded delusions
 
Standard childhood vaccinations like diptheria, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, etc are considered mandatory. Why is the Covid one being added to the list so scary? (Other than it practically being untested.)
"Other than" You're trying to make it sound less bad by... taking out the primary objection to it? Am I misreading your post?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: derpherp2
View attachment 1769630
Everyone has the power to be dumb. Stupidity is universal and applies to anyone at any given time, including people in this thread. If you have an account on Kiwifarms, you’re a fat autistic male sped until proven otherwise.
I like this better:

sheeple.png

Nothing says pretentious faggotry more than being bloviated by a - what I assume I dont read xkcd, pretentious faggot.
 
If lawsuits over anything connected to electors aren't resolved (by the 8th for states and 14th for federal) the game changes. This will proceed to SCOTUS who will most probably kick the can over to House of Representatives to deal with.

This is the Rutherford B. Hayes hail mary strategy, and it's not going to work. When Trump tried to convince the Michigan state legislatures that it was all RIGGED, that's essentially what you need to have this actually happen. Leaf through the election section of the Constitution and some of the related texts - if still having a lawsuit pending by the 8th/14th was enough to throw the election into jeopardy, any salty loser could just file frivalous but not-immediately-suspect claims and scupper it.

If the state election administration bodies feel confident enough to certify the vote and select electors, as it seems like almost every single one has, you would need the state legislatures to step in and suggest that there was uncertainty. None have, and judging by the quality of these lawsuits, none will. Even if we go really off of the wall and think that at least one state will pull the trigger, he needs several states to simultaneously say that their outcomes are unclear to get a Hayes situation going.
 
Go back to pol where they agree with your retarded delusions

Facts don't care about your feelings. Typical liberal. All insults, but failure to address facts presented.

This is the Rutherford B. Hayes hail mary strategy, and it's not going to work. When Trump tried to convince the Michigan state legislatures that it was all RIGGED, that's essentially what you need to have this actually happen. Leaf through the election section of the Constitution and some of the related texts - if still having a lawsuit pending by the 8th/14th was enough to throw the election into jeopardy, any salty loser could just file frivalous but not-immediately-suspect claims and scupper it.

If the state election administration bodies feel confident enough to certify the vote and select electors, as it seems like almost every single one has, you would need the state legislatures to step in and suggest that there was uncertainty. None have, and judging by the quality of these lawsuits, none will. Even if we go really off of the wall and think that at least one state will pull the trigger, he needs several states to simultaneously say that their outcomes are unclear to get a Hayes situation going.

Rutherford B. Hayes predates the 1887 law. Electoral Count Act in 1887. See the codified "Safe Harbor" law in 3 U.S.C. § 5.
 
Rutherford B. Hayes predates the 1887 law. Electoral Count Act in 1887. See the codified "Safe Harbor" law in 3 U.S.C. § 5.

The 'hail mary' strategy is that there's nothing conclusive by the time of the elector vote, triggering a lot of those provisions in 3 U.S.C. Chapter 1, most of which haven't really had their legs exactly stretched, and from which Don Cheetos can try to stretch the bounds of. It wouldn't be exactly like the Hayes deliberations, but it would functionally be trying to agitate a situation in which the vote is contested and he can lean on politicians to try to get his way in.

3 U.S. Code § 5. Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors said:
If any State shall have provided, by laws enacted prior to the day fixed for the appointment of the electors, for its final determination of any controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, by judicial or other methods or procedures, and such determination shall have been made at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, such determination made pursuant to such law so existing on said day, and made at least six days prior to said time of meeting of the electors, shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution, and as hereinafter regulated, so far as the ascertainment of the electors appointed by such State is concerned.

Which basically just says that, yeah, if you can make a legal argument or otherwise convince a state that there's a contest or controversy concerning how the electors should vote (and thus their appointment), however the state governs it shall be conclusive. IE, if you could convince the state that half of its votes are reasonably suspect, you could nominate the electors differently, force a recount, or theoretically even do a special election just so long as you obey:

3 U.S. Code § 2. Failure to make choice on prescribed day said:
Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.

Safe Harbor essentially just refers to that six-days-by-the-point-of-vote thing, having been used in 2000 in Florida to point out that they couldn't get a recount mechanism up and running by the harbor deadline. Trump's efforts to get something through the courts which would invalidate mail-in ballots seems to be his effort at getting a "law" or legal element on the books by the harbor deadline.

...which is to either say that everything the Trump team is doing has been completely frivalous and pointless because they have yet to make any real progress approaching that deadline, or indeed that he's hoping to get a state to un-certify, ID a controversy, and then potentially keep sandbagging the fuck out of the state legislatures until they give him what he wants.

Which, given that the Supreme Court itself is indirectly throwing shade on this effort, doesn't seem like it's around the corner.
 
Biden is more popular than Trump has ever been, according to CNN. Lmfaoooooooo.
View attachment 1770648
I don't doubt it. People hate Trump. I would venture to say far more people hate Trump than love him, and that's what we saw with this election.

Also, post more Hunter Biden please. I wanna see more of that chad. Chad Hunter vs Incel Trump
 
Facts don't care about your feelings. Typical liberal. All insults, but failure to address facts presented.



Rutherford B. Hayes predates the 1887 law. Electoral Count Act in 1887. See the codified "Safe Harbor" law in 3 U.S.C. § 5.

Facts won't care about your feelings when you're watching Joe Biden get sworn in on January 20th.

Edit: I am king of the ring! This is the last post on this thread! Joe Biden wins! Fuck Trump! Fuck Q! Fuck the neo nazis! We won! you lost!
 
Last edited:
I don't doubt it. People hate Trump. I would venture to say far more people hate Trump than love him, and that's what we saw with this election.

Also, post more Hunter Biden please. I wanna see more of that chad. Chad Hunter vs Incel Trump
Why hate Trump, though? I can understand disliking him, but the frothing-at-the-mouth rage he incites in some people is pretty bewildering considering he didn't do much.

Here's the Hunter Biden leaks that actually matter, since you seem to have missed them:
Now Corruption Story Is About Joe, Not Hunter:
https://archive.md/xGBW0

Kamala Harris Listed as Key Contact for Biden Family Business Venture in China:
https://archive.vn/Jp0S4

Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop containing phone numbers for the Clintons, Secret Service officers and most of the Obama cabinet was secured by the password Hunter02
https://archive.md/p5Sxt

Emails Reveal Hunter Biden’s Associates Helped Communist-Aligned Chinese Elites Secure White House Meetings:
https://archive.md/sv60c

Emails reveal Biden Family Lobbied For Nepotistic Presidential Appointments AND Received Them:
https://archive.md/5HwXD

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad:
https://archive.md/2EqDm
https://archive.md/In0sy

Smoking Gun Email shows Joe Biden Did Meet with Son Hunter's Ukraine Partners:
https://archive.vn/98IqB

Hunter Biden also had business dealings in Kazakhstan:
https://archive.md/7Ibp5

Photo shows Joe Biden meeting Hunter's alleged business partner from Kazakhstan:
https://archive.md/gfQba

Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm:
https://archive.md/3tUDo

Hunter Biden's ex-business partner told 'don't mention Joe' in text message:
https://archive.md/0Ynb4

Hunter Biden Cut Deals with Shady Now-Defunct 'House of Cards' Chinese Company
https://archive.md/wip/hBVxn

Biden Whistleblower Emails: Chinese Energy Company Gave $5 Million Non-Secured, Forgivable Loan to Biden Family:
https://archive.md/DyPVK

Hunter biz partner confirms e-mail, details Joe Biden’s push to make millions from China:
https://archive.md/zzlL8

Hunter's ex-partner Tony Bobulinski: Joe Biden's a liar and here's the proof
https://archive.md/eZ3Ds

Tony Bobulinski says he was warned, 'You're just going to bury all of us':
https://archive.md/H7JKB

Jim Biden wrote to Hunter Biden asking if he is interested in deal with Mexican oil company Pemex (involves Carlos Slim, current owner of the NY Times):
https://archive.md/1GAaQ

Report from forensic analysis says that the smoking gun Hunter Biden email is unquestionably legit:
https://archive.md/kflSc

DOJ reportedly agrees Hunter Biden emails are not Russian disinformation:
https://archive.md/RlMmg

Feds had evidence of Joe Biden's Burisma Meeting Since Impeachment Inquiry:
https://archive.vn/Eqmjw

Hunter Biden received $3.5M wire transfer from Russian billionaire: Senate report
https://archive.md/j9VsJ

Senate report links Hunter Biden to 'prostitution or human trafficking ring':
https://archive.md/62hIK

Senate Report Says Joe Biden Allowed Family to Enrich Themselves Abroad While He Was VP
https://archive.md/RPV8H

Three Times the Biden Family Used Joe to Profit in Small American Countries:
https://archive.md/lm8bg

Code Name 'Project Hanson': Insider Documents Reveal How Hunter Biden Associates Helped Chinese Military Contractor Acquire Michigan Dual-Use Manufacturer
https://archive.md/4usfh

Hunter Biden Was on Payroll of Credit Card Company that Benefited from 2005 Bill Pushed by Dad
https://archive.md/wip/AflWe

And here's some cock too since you asked nicely.
HunterBidenPizzaDick.png
 
Last edited:
Why hate Trump, though? I can understand disliking him, but the frothing-at-the-mouth rage he incites in some people is pretty bewildering considering he didn't do much.
People that hate Trump don't generally dislike his policies. It's that they think the US President should be some sort of moral authority. Why that induces them to vote for a pedophile grifter, I have no idea.
 
People that hate Trump don't generally dislike his policies. It's that they think the US President should be some sort of moral authority. Why that induces them to vote for a pedophile grifter, I have no idea.
There's a whole lot of weird psycho-sexual cope.

Many danger hairs exist in a fantasy world were brutish white males straight out of the Handmade's Tale. want nothing more than to ravage their pudgy selves.


They project their hang ups. Feelings of guilt about being turned on by dominant alphas.

Trump actually ran a very modest and unambitious administration. Pretty much what you'd expect from a moderate Civ Nat Republican (which is what Trump is).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back