Plagued Biden Derangement Syndrome - Blue man bad, KF, /pol/, Twitter and Reddit sperged over the 46th president

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
How did the party that claimed to be the champions of free speech become the hardcore censors? How did they go from being the party of peace and anti-war to being the party of "BLOW DEM UP!!" with their voters largely ignoring overseas violence committed. How did they go from hating the rich and the corporations to being excited over every little piece of product the giant corporations throw their way.

The only thing I can think of to explain it is that the politicians themselves don't really give a shit and will say and do whatever it takes to get elected, which is why they flip flop so much. They go with whatever will get them votes and/or support at the moment. As for the Dem voters, they have probably been successfully programmed into simply wanting their side to win, and as long as a Dem is in the White House, then its all sunshine and rainbows.

Again, I don't have a definitive answer. This is all I got.
It couldn't be that they were lying the whole time now, could it? No it couldn't be that, they just happened to align all of their interests with common criminals, terrorists, nepotistic union thugs, sexual deviants, subversive manipulators, the destruction of the arts. No it couldn't be that, they were super truthful just that once.
 
The democrats were never that peace loving.While its true that pacifists tend to be more common among dems its definitely not true that the democrats were ever peace loving as a whole.Don't forget the list of democrat presidents includes:LBJ,Clinton and Obama.All of whom had no issue with bombings and interventions in other countries.Clinton spent more time intervening in other wars than handling his legal troubles.The only democrat president who was kind of troubled by foreign interventions was Carter who only authorised one foreign intervention during the Iran hostage crisis and that's it.And that was a simple snatch and grab nothing more albeit a complete failure.
Of course if we're being honest republicans tend to lack even a token pacifist among their group.While republicans are not as a rule looking for a fight whenever a war starts they almost never come out against it.
Of course that might be because after all these years no one has been able to criticise a war without getting some kind of accusation of 'not supporting the troops'.So its a lot easier to shut up.Apparently no one in DC knows how you can effectively criticise a war without seeming to be unpatriotic.I gotta admit it presidencies in general have found the perfect solution to drag wars indefinitely.Simply associate the rank and file with the war effort and any criticism of the war needs to spend 10 pages explaining how they're not against the average soldier.By the time they get to the actual substantive criticism everyone forgot what was the big deal to begin with.Its been so effective even wars viewed as failures have seen almost no postwar criticism because no one knows how to do it effectively.
To get back to democrats view it as this the democrats have the token pacifist that does close to nothing while republicans simply accept it whenever the US starts droning someone no questions asked.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Hog On Ice
The democrats were never that peace loving.While its true that pacifists tend to be more common among dems its definitely not true that the democrats were ever peace loving as a whole.Don't forget the list of democrat presidents includes:LBJ,Clinton and Obama.All of whom had no issue with bombings and interventions in other countries.Clinton spent more time intervening in other wars than handling his legal troubles.The only democrat president who was kind of troubled by foreign interventions was Carter who only authorised one foreign intervention during the Iran hostage crisis and that's it.And that was a simple snatch and grab nothing more albeit a complete failure.
Of course if we're being honest republicans tend to lack even a token pacifist among their group.While republicans are not as a rule looking for a fight whenever a war starts they almost never come out against it.
Of course that might be because after all these years no one has been able to criticise a war without getting some kind of accusation of 'not supporting the troops'.So its a lot easier to shut up.Apparently no one in DC knows how you can effectively criticise a war without seeming to be unpatriotic.I gotta admit it presidencies in general have found the perfect solution to drag wars indefinitely.Simply associate the rank and file with the war effort and any criticism of the war needs to spend 10 pages explaining how they're not against the average soldier.By the time they get to the actual substantive criticism everyone forgot what was the big deal to begin with.Its been so effective even wars viewed as failures have seen almost no postwar criticism because no one knows how to do it effectively.
To get back to democrats view it as this the democrats have the token pacifist that does close to nothing while republicans simply accept it whenever the US starts droning someone no questions asked.
Ron Paul was the token pacifist in the GOP. I don't think the parties differ much at all in that respect. It was Polk who conquered a massive chunk of Mexico, after all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hog On Ice
Biden tell a new excuse about his broken foot. Let's wait to see what will be his next excuse? www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/biden_changes_his_broken_foot_story_now_says_he_fell_after_the_shower_pulling_his_dogs_tail.html

Biden changes the story of his broken foot, now says he fell after the shower, pulling his dog's tail​

By Monica Showalter
So now Joe Biden has changed his story about his broken foot, a little-probed story that had a funny smell from the start.
Far from being a tale of injuring himself (touch football, maybe?) and sustaining hairline fractures to his foot while playing with his dog, Biden now says he injured himself stepping out of his shower, tripping over a rug, chasing his dog, and yanking the creature's tail.
Yanking an animal's tail? Like, why? You never yank an animal's tail.
According to the New York Post:
"What happened was I got out of the shower. I got a dog and anybody who's been around my house knows — dropped, little pup dropped a ball in front of me. And for me to grab the ball," Biden told CNN journalist Jake Tapper in his first post-election joint interview with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris.

"And I'm walking through this little alleyway to get to the bedroom. And I grabbed the ball like this and he ran. And I'm joking, running after him and grab his tail. And what happened was that he slid on a throw rug. And I tripped on the rug he slid on. That's what happened. Oh man, not a very exciting story."
Biden owns two German shepherds: the younger Major and the older Champ, who lived with Biden in Washington during his vice presidency.
Senile people sometimes remember things more than one way. It's possible Biden's senile and coming up with a new version, but more likely, he's just lying.
Maybe that's because his grim-faced staff went to such ends to prevent the press from seeing him walking into a doctor's office after this "not very exciting" incident. What was the purpose of that? That Joe could still walk should have been good public relations for the Biden team. But the Bidenites forced the traveling press to stay in its bus and refused to answer questions for them about this supposedly boring incident. It was just like 2011, that time when Joe stuffed a reporter in a closet to keep him from reporting the news. I wrote about that a few days ago here.
What's Biden hidin'?
Here's some other weird stuff: why is Biden always naked? This incident had him stepping out of the shower to go chase balls with his dog. Is there some reason why this guy always has his drawers off? He's famous for skinny-dipping in his pool, disgusting his female Secret Service agents, or giving them the creeps. Now he's got this new shower incident that led to the dog incident, which led to the mysteriously broken foot. Some characters on Twitter point out that a hairline fracture on his foot, supposedly from playing with his dog, is inconsistent with the kind of fall he might have taken, and an arm or wrist injury would be more common. What, again, is Biden hidin'?
 
1607294134189.png

1607294169196.png

1607294225723.png

1607294237742.png

1607294250462.png

1607294265158.png

1607294278878.png

1607294302745.png

We might need to make a Biden thread for the people who are enslavement to his cult of bullshit cause I called it!
 
Holy shit the salt is real, how is it a site dedicated to making fun of whining faggots just became whining faggots when it came to the election.
also give me your delicious dumb(s) and autistic(s) now
It's really nothing, there is a wide range of sperging from all walks of life, thus why this has been such a fun place to browse.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hog On Ice
It couldn't be that they were lying the whole time now, could it? No it couldn't be that, they just happened to align all of their interests with common criminals, terrorists, nepotistic union thugs, sexual deviants, subversive manipulators, the destruction of the arts. No it couldn't be that, they were super truthful just that once.
Simple answer the Left was against censorship because the Right was doing it and the Right's no different now.
 
You probably haven't checked their timelines, have you?
You really don't understand the purpose of this thread, do you?

Back on topic, I found the most amazing Twitter. Among his insane boomer q-anon ramblings are things like

Screenshot_20201206-215803~2.png


And then there's this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Crosspost from TES thread but it's about Biden anyway so it suits here as well

Tl;dr:
1607267158290-png.1770090



There's one subreddit I used to lurk for laughing at the shit over at any political subreddits, but after Biden's victory, they went batshit insane and the subreddit was pretty much slightly inactive, and then there's this:

(Granted it's dumb to say Trump is doing a coup but this is still ridiculous)

https://old.reddit.com/r/ShitPoliti.../hes_not_planning_a_coup_hes_doing_a_coup_if/
https://web.archive.org/web/2020120.../hes_not_planning_a_coup_hes_doing_a_coup_if/

View attachment 1770090View attachment 1770094View attachment 1770095View attachment 1770096View attachment 1770097View attachment 1770098View attachment 1770099
 
Back